Saad zai 1992

Recently, a new crack has opened in the hermetic case of Jeffrey Epstein. Following the release of documents by the United States Department of Justice last Friday, January 30, public opinion has been perplexed. This is not just about names on a social agenda; this time, emails and financial statements point towards an unexpected sector: #Criptomonedas . What do these newly published files reveal? Let's explore.
One of the most uncomfortable findings of this disclosure is Epstein's indirect approach to #bitcoin , this through investments in Blockstream in 2014. Blockstream is not just any company; it is one of the most important infrastructure entities for the development of Bitcoin.
Image 1 Source: DOJ
Through an investment fund, Epstein injected $500,000 into the initial funding of the company.
Strategic Meetings: Emails reveal in-person meetings between Epstein and figures like Adam Back and Austin Hill.
Protocol War: In private conversations, competitors like #Ripple and #stellar were discussed, labeling them as "negative" for the ecosystem.
This shows that Epstein was not only seeking profitability but was also immersed in strategic discussions, but only as a spectator/investor, not to make decisions.
This ended later when his investment fund decided to sell its stake in the company.
Epstein's influence seemed to extend to the very philosophy of the asset. In July 2014, he exchanged emails with PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel about the definition of Bitcoin. While the world was just waking up to blockchain technology, they were already debating whether Bitcoin was money, property, or a store of value.
Image 2 Source: DOJ
This happened years before the foundations and regulations on Bitcoin were known in the United States.
Years later, in 2016, Epstein tried to take his vision further with the proposal of the "Sharia Coin" to Saudi authorities. His plan was to create a physical fiat currency backed by Bitcoin. In his own words: "I have spoken with some Bitcoin founders." An ambitious project that, fortunately for many, never came to light.

Image 3 Source: DOJ
The disclosure also reveals names that today dominate the headlines.
Michael Saylor: The CEO of MicroStrategy appears on a list of donors from 2010 for a contribution of $25,000 to an event linked to Epstein.
Image 4 Source: DOJ
Kevin Warsh: The former Fed member, recently nominated by Donald Trump to lead the Federal Reserve, appears on a guest list for a festive event in 2010 (although there is no evidence of his attendance).
Image 5 Source: DOJ
 Is Satoshi Nakamoto? The Reality Behind the Myths
Despite the explosive nature of these revelations, it is vital to separate intrigue from technical reality. After analyzing the files, the conclusion is clear:
There is no evidence that Epstein created Bitcoin.
There is no evidence that he was the mysterious Satoshi Nakamoto.
He did not control the development of the Bitcoin protocol.
In fact, in 2017, when the price of Bitcoin began to take off, Epstein gave a resounding "no" to someone who asked him if it was worth buying.
Image 6 Source: DOJ
The Mystery that Remains
To this day, no #crypto wallets directly linked to his illegal activities have been found, nor transactions in the #blockchain that incriminate him in digital financial crimes. Epstein seems to have been an occasional investor and a curious observer who surrounded himself with the brightest minds in the field to understand the future of money.
However, there remains a question in the air that keeps the community on edge: Do you think that at some point the crypto wallets of Epstein will be revealed? Or will we see the specific use of cryptocurrencies in the Epstein case at some point?
👉More crypto updates ...
Share and follow me for more 👈😎
$BTC

The Truth Behind Bitcoin’s Recent Crash
I’ve been watching crypto markets for years now. But this crash feels different somehow. Bitcoin is down four months straight.
That hasn’t happened since 2018. And I finally figured out why. The answer shocked me completely.
The $300 Billion Liquidity Problem
Here’s what’s really happening right now. Arthur Hayes just dropped a bombshell. He explained the core issue perfectly.
About $300 billion in liquidity vanished recently. Most of it went into one place.
The Treasury General Account increased by $200 billion. I checked the data myself. It all lines up perfectly.
Why This Matters for Bitcoin
The government is raising cash balances quickly. They’re preparing for a potential shutdown. When they drain the TGA, Bitcoin rallies.
When they fill it, Bitcoin falls. It’s that simple, really. I’ve seen this pattern before. Middle of last year, they drained it. Bitcoin got some life back then.
Now they’re filling it again. Liquidity is being sucked out fast. And Bitcoin is a liquidity-sensitive asset. It responds to these changes immediately.
Banks Are Starting to Fail
Something else caught my attention recently. Chicago’s Metropolitan Capital Bank just failed. It’s the first US bank failure of 2026.
That tells me something important. There’s a massive liquidity crunch happening globally.
Banks are feeling the pressure now. And when banks struggle, crypto struggles too. The correlation is crystal clear.
The Macro Picture Is Uncertain
Global markets are on edge currently. Uncertainty is driving everything right now. Investors are pulling back from risk.
Bitcoin falls into that risk category. So money flows out quickly. I’ve watched this happen before. But this time feels more intense. The speed is what worries me.
The Government Shutdown Factor
The US government shutdown is happening now. Democrats won’t cave on Homeland Security funding.
ICE isn’t getting funded currently. This creates massive uncertainty in markets. Uncertainty kills crypto prices fast.
Stable Coin Yield Under Attack
There’s another pressure point right now. A new ad campaign just launched. It’s targeting stable coin yield completely.
Community banks are lobbying against crypto. They claim stable coins could drain $6 trillion. That would hurt small businesses supposedly.
The Real Agenda Here
I think this is fear-mongering honestly. Brian Armstrong at Coinbase is under fire. Wall Street Journal called him enemy number one.
His crime? Giving yield to consumers. Banks want to keep their monopoly. They don’t want competition on yields.

$BTC $SOL $DOGE 🚨The biggest variable for the Federal Reserve: Will Waller really take the position, and will there be a rate cut in June? The market is about to get excited! 专注于MEME行情，马年就玩马斯克概念的小奶🐶狗🐶P U P P I E S
It's here! Just saw the latest update, and there's a new script for this big drama at the Federal Reserve📜
If Waller, strongly backed by Trump, really can sit in the chairman's position in May, the situation might be completely different! Why? This person has publicly criticized high interest rates before, and the market thinks he is 'both reliable and market-friendly'.
Now the key point comes: the market has already started to bet!
According to CME's FedWatch tool, the probability of a direct 25 basis point rate cut at the June FOMC meeting (which will be Waller's first after taking office) has risen to 46%! It's almost a coin flip situation.
In other words, the next two meetings (in March and May) will likely keep the interest rates unchanged, and everything will wait until June to see the real picture. If Waller takes office, he might quickly start the easing cycle.
What does this mean for our crypto circle? Those who understand, understand 🫢 The shift in liquidity expectations has always been one of the core engines of the market.
Let's take a look at the reactions of some hot coins right now (data fluctuates in real-time, for reference only):
· $CYBER: +3%, showing some momentum.
· $SUI: -1.9%, short-term consolidation.
· $XLM: -0.9%, relatively stable.
A key figure could change the direction of the entire market in the second half of the year. Right now, all eyes are focused on that tough nomination battle (yes, the one previously mentioned, still stuck in the Senate!).
If Waller gets through, will June become the starting point for a new round of market activity? If he doesn't, does the plan have to be completely rewritten?
(What do you all think? Waller taking office is the start of a June rate cut celebration, or just another chapter of 'The Wolf is Coming'? Share your judgment in the comments! 👇)

One Epstein rumor was enough to make people dump Bitcoin. $BTC
That should scare you more than the rumor itself.
Not because the claim is credible, but because of how quickly conviction disappeared. A decentralized system that has survived bans, crashes, wars, and coordinated attacks was suddenly questioned because of gossip about one person.
The “Epstein was Satoshi” theory falls apart the moment you look at reality.
Bitcoin launched in 2008, with the most intense development happening in 2009 and 2010. During that exact period, Epstein was either incarcerated or under strict state supervision in Florida. Building Bitcoin required obsessive, uninterrupted work. That was not the life he was living.
Years later, after Bitcoin was already global, Epstein was still trying to understand it. In 2014 and again in 2018, he emailed people like Peter Thiel and Steve Bannon asking basic questions about crypto. Regulation, taxes, distribution. Creators do not ask for beginner explanations of systems they designed.
Then there is the MIT narrative people keep recycling. Yes, Epstein donated to the MIT Media Lab. No, there is no evidence that his money funded Bitcoin development or the Digital Currency Initiative. The DCI was funded later by established tech investors after the Bitcoin Foundation collapsed. Epstein was buying proximity to influence, not maintaining an open-source protocol.
The rest of the theory is just pattern-matching. He met early Bitcoin figures. He appeared in contact books. He showed up near powerful names. Presence is not authorship.
Here is the part that actually matters.
Even if Bitcoin had been created by the worst person imaginable, nothing about the system would change. Bitcoin is open-source, decentralized, and permissionless. It does not care about identity, borders, politics, or morality. No individual controls it. No founder defines it.
Bitcoin exists to protect people from monetary debasement and to allow free ownership and exchange of value.
So if an Epstein rumor was enough to make 2014someone sell their BTC, they were never holding Bitcoin.
They were holding a story.
And stories do not survive pressure.
What are your Theories about that?? Tell us in the comments and make sure to like ❤️ that