Gourav-S
Exploring the crypto world with smart trading, learning,and growing. Focused on building a diversified portfolio.Join me on this exciting digital asset journey!
Öppna handel
Högfrekvent handlare
2.7 år
1.0K+ Följer
29.1K+ Följare
54.4K+ Gilla-markeringar
4.4K+ Delade
Alla
Offerter
Videor
📈 Ledger Plans $4 Billion NYSE IPO in 2026 — A Major Crypto Industry Moment
Ledger, the Paris-based hardware wallet maker and one of the world’s most recognized names in crypto security, is preparing for an initial public offering (IPO) on the New York Stock Exchange with a target valuation of over $4 billion — nearly three times its valuation in 2023. The potential IPO could happen as soon as 2026, marking one of the most significant public market moves in the digital assets sector this year.
According to multiple reports, Ledger is working with major Wall Street investment banks, including Goldman Sachs, Barclays, and Jefferies, as it explores the NYSE listing. The valuation target would reflect dramatic growth from its $1.5 billion private valuation in 2023, underscoring increased investor appetite and the strategic importance of crypto security solutions.
Founded in 2014, Ledger has become a leading provider of hardware wallets used to store cryptocurrencies offline, helping protect private keys from hacks, phishing and online attacks. Its devices are especially in demand as crypto theft and scams surged in 2025, boosting revenue into the hundreds of millions for the company — a strong backdrop for its planned public debut.
This IPO proposal follows the successful NYSE debut of BitGo, another major crypto infrastructure provider, which has encouraged broader interest in crypto firms tapping U.S. capital markets. A Ledger IPO would offer investors a regulated way to gain exposure to the growing self-custody and crypto security market, while reinforcing the narrative that Wall Street remains a key hub for crypto innovation and funding.
In short: Ledger’s potential $4 billion IPO on the NYSE in 2026 would be a landmark event for the crypto industry, spotlighting the rising importance of security infrastructure and institutional investor interest.
Ledger, the Paris-based hardware wallet maker and one of the world’s most recognized names in crypto security, is preparing for an initial public offering (IPO) on the New York Stock Exchange with a target valuation of over $4 billion — nearly three times its valuation in 2023. The potential IPO could happen as soon as 2026, marking one of the most significant public market moves in the digital assets sector this year.
According to multiple reports, Ledger is working with major Wall Street investment banks, including Goldman Sachs, Barclays, and Jefferies, as it explores the NYSE listing. The valuation target would reflect dramatic growth from its $1.5 billion private valuation in 2023, underscoring increased investor appetite and the strategic importance of crypto security solutions.
Founded in 2014, Ledger has become a leading provider of hardware wallets used to store cryptocurrencies offline, helping protect private keys from hacks, phishing and online attacks. Its devices are especially in demand as crypto theft and scams surged in 2025, boosting revenue into the hundreds of millions for the company — a strong backdrop for its planned public debut.
This IPO proposal follows the successful NYSE debut of BitGo, another major crypto infrastructure provider, which has encouraged broader interest in crypto firms tapping U.S. capital markets. A Ledger IPO would offer investors a regulated way to gain exposure to the growing self-custody and crypto security market, while reinforcing the narrative that Wall Street remains a key hub for crypto innovation and funding.
In short: Ledger’s potential $4 billion IPO on the NYSE in 2026 would be a landmark event for the crypto industry, spotlighting the rising importance of security infrastructure and institutional investor interest.
📉 US Government Shutdown Likely Impact Markets — What’s Really Driving Volatility
With U.S. lawmakers struggling to agree on a federal budget, the risk of a U.S. government shutdown is rising sharply, and markets are reacting with heightened uncertainty and risk-off behavior. This political deadlock isn’t just Washington talk — it’s already affecting stocks, bonds, crypto, and investor sentiment globally.
📊 Why Markets Are Nervous
1. Data Vacuum & Policy Blindness
If a shutdown happens, key economic data releases — like jobs, inflation, and GDP reports — could be delayed or suspended, leaving investors and the Federal Reserve “flying blind” when trying to price risk or forecast rate moves. With less guidance on growth and inflation, markets tend to become more volatile.
2. Risk-Off Tilt & Safe-Haven Flows
Uncertainty pushes capital away from risk assets like equities and crypto toward traditional safe havens such as gold, U.S. Treasuries, and defensive stocks. In past shutdowns, assets like gold have surged as traders seek stability amid political dysfunction.
3. Global Spillovers
A pause in U.S. government operations can also disrupt trade approvals, customs, and global supply chains, creating ripple effects in international markets, including pressure on emerging market equities and currencies.
4. Crypto & Regulatory Delays
Shutdowns can sideline regulators like the SEC and CFTC, delaying approvals for ETFs and new market rules — a dynamic that can dampen confidence and short-term liquidity in crypto markets.
📌 Bottom Line
A looming government shutdown elevates uncertainty, volatility and risk-off positioning. While short shutdowns have historically had limited long-term impact, prolonged gridlock could shake risk assets, delay policy clarity, and push markets into a temporary downturn until fiscal normalcy returns.
#USGovernmentShutdown
With U.S. lawmakers struggling to agree on a federal budget, the risk of a U.S. government shutdown is rising sharply, and markets are reacting with heightened uncertainty and risk-off behavior. This political deadlock isn’t just Washington talk — it’s already affecting stocks, bonds, crypto, and investor sentiment globally.
📊 Why Markets Are Nervous
1. Data Vacuum & Policy Blindness
If a shutdown happens, key economic data releases — like jobs, inflation, and GDP reports — could be delayed or suspended, leaving investors and the Federal Reserve “flying blind” when trying to price risk or forecast rate moves. With less guidance on growth and inflation, markets tend to become more volatile.
2. Risk-Off Tilt & Safe-Haven Flows
Uncertainty pushes capital away from risk assets like equities and crypto toward traditional safe havens such as gold, U.S. Treasuries, and defensive stocks. In past shutdowns, assets like gold have surged as traders seek stability amid political dysfunction.
3. Global Spillovers
A pause in U.S. government operations can also disrupt trade approvals, customs, and global supply chains, creating ripple effects in international markets, including pressure on emerging market equities and currencies.
4. Crypto & Regulatory Delays
Shutdowns can sideline regulators like the SEC and CFTC, delaying approvals for ETFs and new market rules — a dynamic that can dampen confidence and short-term liquidity in crypto markets.
📌 Bottom Line
A looming government shutdown elevates uncertainty, volatility and risk-off positioning. While short shutdowns have historically had limited long-term impact, prolonged gridlock could shake risk assets, delay policy clarity, and push markets into a temporary downturn until fiscal normalcy returns.
#USGovernmentShutdown
$ADA
ADAUSDT — Testing Critical Support at Range Low
ADAUSDT is trading near $0.3356, testing the crucial $0.3350-$0.3400 support zone after rejecting from the $0.3550 resistance level. This support area has held multiple times in recent weeks and represents the lower boundary of ADA's current trading range.
Trade Plan
Entry (Long): $0.3330 - $0.3380 (Accumulate at range low support)
Target 1: $0.3500 (Range midpoint and immediate resistance)
Target 2: $0.3550 - $0.3600 (Range high and next resistance zone)
Stop Loss: $0.3290 (Below range low and recent swing low)
My View
ADA is in a clear range-bound structure between approximately $0.3350 and $0.3550. This long setup at range low offers a favorable risk-reward for a bounce back toward the range high. A break below $0.3290 would invalidate the range structure and likely lead to a test of lower supports near $0.3200. Given ADA's typical volatility, position sizing should account for potential whipsaw action at this key level.
#ADA
ADAUSDT — Testing Critical Support at Range Low
ADAUSDT is trading near $0.3356, testing the crucial $0.3350-$0.3400 support zone after rejecting from the $0.3550 resistance level. This support area has held multiple times in recent weeks and represents the lower boundary of ADA's current trading range.
Trade Plan
Entry (Long): $0.3330 - $0.3380 (Accumulate at range low support)
Target 1: $0.3500 (Range midpoint and immediate resistance)
Target 2: $0.3550 - $0.3600 (Range high and next resistance zone)
Stop Loss: $0.3290 (Below range low and recent swing low)
My View
ADA is in a clear range-bound structure between approximately $0.3350 and $0.3550. This long setup at range low offers a favorable risk-reward for a bounce back toward the range high. A break below $0.3290 would invalidate the range structure and likely lead to a test of lower supports near $0.3200. Given ADA's typical volatility, position sizing should account for potential whipsaw action at this key level.
#ADA
$ZEC
ZECUSDT — Sharp Correction After Massive Rally
ZECUSDT is trading near $335, experiencing a significant correction (-13.69% weekly, -24.29% monthly) after an enormous long-term rally (+781% over 180 days). Price is now testing the $335-$340 support zone, which aligns with a previous resistance-turned-support level and the 0.382 Fibonacci retracement of the recent up move.
Trade Plan
Entry (Long): $330 - $338 (Scale into the key support and Fib zone)
Target 1: $359 - $370 (Retest of recent breakdown level and swing high)
Target 2: $390 - $400 (Next resistance and measured move target)
Stop Loss: $324 (Clear break below support and recent low)
My View
ZEC is in a healthy pullback after a parabolic rally. The $330-$340 zone represents a high-probability value area for trend continuation. This setup offers a favorable risk-reward for a swing trade back toward recent highs. A break below $324 would signal a deeper correction, potentially to the $300-$310 area. Given the asset's volatile history, position sizing should be conservative.
#zec
ZECUSDT — Sharp Correction After Massive Rally
ZECUSDT is trading near $335, experiencing a significant correction (-13.69% weekly, -24.29% monthly) after an enormous long-term rally (+781% over 180 days). Price is now testing the $335-$340 support zone, which aligns with a previous resistance-turned-support level and the 0.382 Fibonacci retracement of the recent up move.
Trade Plan
Entry (Long): $330 - $338 (Scale into the key support and Fib zone)
Target 1: $359 - $370 (Retest of recent breakdown level and swing high)
Target 2: $390 - $400 (Next resistance and measured move target)
Stop Loss: $324 (Clear break below support and recent low)
My View
ZEC is in a healthy pullback after a parabolic rally. The $330-$340 zone represents a high-probability value area for trend continuation. This setup offers a favorable risk-reward for a swing trade back toward recent highs. A break below $324 would signal a deeper correction, potentially to the $300-$310 area. Given the asset's volatile history, position sizing should be conservative.
#zec
$BTC
BTCUSDT — Consolidating at High-Volume Support Shelf
BTCUSDT is trading near $87,415, consolidating within the $86,800 - $88,200 high-volume support zone after a pullback from the $90,500 resistance area. This zone represents a major accumulation region where the market has previously found strong buying interest, creating a potential base for the next upward move.
Trade Plan
Entry (Long): $86,900 - $87,500 (Accumulate within the high-volume support shelf)
Target 1: $89,300 (Immediate resistance and recent swing high)
Target 2: $90,500 - $91,000 (Breakout target toward all-time highs)
Stop Loss: $86,400 (Clear break below the support shelf and recent low)
My View
BTC is building energy in a critical support zone. A hold above $86,800 suggests underlying strength and sets the stage for a retest of the $90k+ region. This is a high-probability swing long with a well-defined risk point. A break below $86,400 would invalidate the bullish structure and indicate a deeper correction.
#BTC
BTCUSDT — Consolidating at High-Volume Support Shelf
BTCUSDT is trading near $87,415, consolidating within the $86,800 - $88,200 high-volume support zone after a pullback from the $90,500 resistance area. This zone represents a major accumulation region where the market has previously found strong buying interest, creating a potential base for the next upward move.
Trade Plan
Entry (Long): $86,900 - $87,500 (Accumulate within the high-volume support shelf)
Target 1: $89,300 (Immediate resistance and recent swing high)
Target 2: $90,500 - $91,000 (Breakout target toward all-time highs)
Stop Loss: $86,400 (Clear break below the support shelf and recent low)
My View
BTC is building energy in a critical support zone. A hold above $86,800 suggests underlying strength and sets the stage for a retest of the $90k+ region. This is a high-probability swing long with a well-defined risk point. A break below $86,400 would invalidate the bullish structure and indicate a deeper correction.
#BTC
How Dusk’s Strategic Partnerships Are Powering Institutional Adoption & Real-World Finance
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk
In the rapidly evolving world of blockchain technology, partnerships are often what separate theory from real adoption. For many networks, partnerships are marketing announcements — but with Dusk (previously Dusk Network), the collaborations are strategic, compliance-focused, and deeply tied to real financial infrastructure. These alliances aren’t just about logos; they are actively enabling regulated finance, tokenized securities, cross-chain interoperability, and institutional participation that few other chains have achieved.
In this article, I’ll take you through the most important strategic collaborations that are accelerating Dusk’s adoption in traditional finance and blockchain ecosystems, explain why each matters, and give you a clear picture of how they work together to build a future where real-world assets operate natively on-chain.
🏛 NPEX — Turning a Regulated Exchange Into an On-Chain Market
One of Dusk’s most foundational partnerships is with NPEX, a fully regulated Dutch stock exchange licensed as a Multilateral Trading Facility (MTF). This collaboration goes far beyond simple integration — it effectively embeds regulated financial market infrastructure into the Dusk ecosystem.
Here’s why this matters:
Licensed Framework: NPEX holds multiple financial licenses — including MTF, Broker, ECSP, and a forthcoming DLT-TSS — allowing regulated activity like issuance, trading, and settlement of real-world assets on-chain.
Unified Lifecycle: Instead of tokenizing assets off-chain and then trying to map them on-chain, Dusk and NPEX enable native issuance and trading of securities directly on the blockchain.
Regulatory Composability: Assets and applications built under the NPEX framework can interoperate under one legal umbrella, reducing fragmentation and compliance friction.
This partnership is a cornerstone of Dusk’s thesis: blockchains can power actual capital markets — not just experimental tokens — with privacy and compliance built in from the start.
🔗 Chainlink — Interoperability, Oracles & Cross-Chain Reach
To scale beyond a single chain and connect tokenized assets with broader markets, interoperability and reliable data are essential. That’s where Chainlink plays a pivotal role. Dusk has partnered with Chainlink to adopt its Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP), DataLink, and Data Streams — creating a technical and regulatory bridge for financial assets.
This partnership enables:
Cross-Chain Movement of Assets: Tokenized securities issued on DuskEVM can move across different blockchains with compliance preserved, expanding liquidity and accessibility.
Real-Time Regulatory Data Feeds: Using Chainlink DataLink and Data Streams, official exchange pricing and trading data from NPEX is published on-chain, which is critical for institutional trading and smart contract logic.
Cross-Chain Token Transfers: DUSK itself can leverage Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Token (CCT) standard to appear on ecosystems like Ethereum and Solana while retaining regulatory attributes.
In essence, Chainlink builds the infrastructure backbone that connects Dusk’s regulated assets to the wider DeFi and institutional ecosystems — a major step toward true composability and global adoption.
🤝 21X — Institutional Market Access With EU Regulatory Credentials
Another key collaborator is 21X, a Frankfurt-based firm that holds the first EU DLT-TSS license — a regulatory credential for tokenized securities markets under European law.
This partnership drives value in several ways:
Market Infrastructure Access: 21X’s DLT-TSS license allows compliant trading and infrastructure services for tokenized assets within EU regulations.
Shared Technology Integration: Plans are underway for 21X to integrate DuskEVM into its platform, further lowering barriers for institutions to use Dusk technology.
RWA Ecosystem Growth: By combining 21X’s regulatory foundation with Dusk’s blockchain architecture, the collaboration expands opportunities for regulated assets like stablecoins and money market funds to operate natively on-chain.
This reinforces Dusk’s reputation as a blockchain platform built for regulated finance, not just another crypto network.
🛡 Cordial Systems — Institutional-Grade Custody and Security
For institutional players, custody and control over digital assets are non-negotiable. That’s where Cordial Systems enters the ecosystem, with custodial solutions that integrate deeply with Dusk’s infrastructure and its NPEX partnership.
Key features of this partnership include:
Self-Hosted Custody: Providers like NPEX can manage assets using Cordial Treasury, avoiding dependency on third-party “SaaS” solutions and ensuring full control.
Institutional Trust: Custody solutions tailored for banks, exchanges, and regulated entities lower the barrier for traditional financial institutions to participate in blockchain markets.
Broad Asset Support: The solution will eventually support custody for cryptocurrencies, tokenized securities, and other digital commodities — making Dusk a one-stop ecosystem for compliant digital finance.
Secure custody is essential for real adoption — without it, institutions simply can’t commit large capital or real assets to on-chain systems.
📌 Why These Partnerships Matter — A Bigger Picture
Taken together, these collaborations paint a clear picture: Dusk isn’t chasing hype — it’s building infrastructure that institutions can actually use. Here’s how these partnerships create a powerful network effect:
1. Regulated Issuance Meets Blockchain Innovation
The NPEX and 21X partnerships embed real financial licenses and market access into the blockchain layer, allowing regulated issuance and trading of assets that historically lived only in legacy systems.
2. Interoperability Unlocks Global Liquidity
Chainlink’s CCIP and oracle capabilities mean that once assets are tokenized on Dusk, they can interact with other ecosystems and markets — a major draw for institutional capital looking for broad accessibility.
3. Trust, Security, and Custody Enable Institutional Confidence
Secure, compliant custody provided by Cordial Systems removes one of the biggest practical blockers for institutional adoption, making Dusk a credible option for real finance entities.
🧠 Final Thoughts
Blockchain adoption in regulated finance isn’t about quick features or flashy marketing — it’s about real partnerships that solve real problems. Dusk’s strategic collaborations with NPEX, Chainlink, 21X, and Cordial Systems demonstrate a focused, long-term strategy to enable scalable, compliant, and institutional-ready financial infrastructure. As more regulated assets come on-chain and interoperability expands globally, the network’s partner ecosystem will likely continue driving meaningful adoption and utility.
In the rapidly evolving world of blockchain technology, partnerships are often what separate theory from real adoption. For many networks, partnerships are marketing announcements — but with Dusk (previously Dusk Network), the collaborations are strategic, compliance-focused, and deeply tied to real financial infrastructure. These alliances aren’t just about logos; they are actively enabling regulated finance, tokenized securities, cross-chain interoperability, and institutional participation that few other chains have achieved.
In this article, I’ll take you through the most important strategic collaborations that are accelerating Dusk’s adoption in traditional finance and blockchain ecosystems, explain why each matters, and give you a clear picture of how they work together to build a future where real-world assets operate natively on-chain.
🏛 NPEX — Turning a Regulated Exchange Into an On-Chain Market
One of Dusk’s most foundational partnerships is with NPEX, a fully regulated Dutch stock exchange licensed as a Multilateral Trading Facility (MTF). This collaboration goes far beyond simple integration — it effectively embeds regulated financial market infrastructure into the Dusk ecosystem.
Here’s why this matters:
Licensed Framework: NPEX holds multiple financial licenses — including MTF, Broker, ECSP, and a forthcoming DLT-TSS — allowing regulated activity like issuance, trading, and settlement of real-world assets on-chain.
Unified Lifecycle: Instead of tokenizing assets off-chain and then trying to map them on-chain, Dusk and NPEX enable native issuance and trading of securities directly on the blockchain.
Regulatory Composability: Assets and applications built under the NPEX framework can interoperate under one legal umbrella, reducing fragmentation and compliance friction.
This partnership is a cornerstone of Dusk’s thesis: blockchains can power actual capital markets — not just experimental tokens — with privacy and compliance built in from the start.
🔗 Chainlink — Interoperability, Oracles & Cross-Chain Reach
To scale beyond a single chain and connect tokenized assets with broader markets, interoperability and reliable data are essential. That’s where Chainlink plays a pivotal role. Dusk has partnered with Chainlink to adopt its Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP), DataLink, and Data Streams — creating a technical and regulatory bridge for financial assets.
This partnership enables:
Cross-Chain Movement of Assets: Tokenized securities issued on DuskEVM can move across different blockchains with compliance preserved, expanding liquidity and accessibility.
Real-Time Regulatory Data Feeds: Using Chainlink DataLink and Data Streams, official exchange pricing and trading data from NPEX is published on-chain, which is critical for institutional trading and smart contract logic.
Cross-Chain Token Transfers: DUSK itself can leverage Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Token (CCT) standard to appear on ecosystems like Ethereum and Solana while retaining regulatory attributes.
In essence, Chainlink builds the infrastructure backbone that connects Dusk’s regulated assets to the wider DeFi and institutional ecosystems — a major step toward true composability and global adoption.
🤝 21X — Institutional Market Access With EU Regulatory Credentials
Another key collaborator is 21X, a Frankfurt-based firm that holds the first EU DLT-TSS license — a regulatory credential for tokenized securities markets under European law.
This partnership drives value in several ways:
Market Infrastructure Access: 21X’s DLT-TSS license allows compliant trading and infrastructure services for tokenized assets within EU regulations.
Shared Technology Integration: Plans are underway for 21X to integrate DuskEVM into its platform, further lowering barriers for institutions to use Dusk technology.
RWA Ecosystem Growth: By combining 21X’s regulatory foundation with Dusk’s blockchain architecture, the collaboration expands opportunities for regulated assets like stablecoins and money market funds to operate natively on-chain.
This reinforces Dusk’s reputation as a blockchain platform built for regulated finance, not just another crypto network.
🛡 Cordial Systems — Institutional-Grade Custody and Security
For institutional players, custody and control over digital assets are non-negotiable. That’s where Cordial Systems enters the ecosystem, with custodial solutions that integrate deeply with Dusk’s infrastructure and its NPEX partnership.
Key features of this partnership include:
Self-Hosted Custody: Providers like NPEX can manage assets using Cordial Treasury, avoiding dependency on third-party “SaaS” solutions and ensuring full control.
Institutional Trust: Custody solutions tailored for banks, exchanges, and regulated entities lower the barrier for traditional financial institutions to participate in blockchain markets.
Broad Asset Support: The solution will eventually support custody for cryptocurrencies, tokenized securities, and other digital commodities — making Dusk a one-stop ecosystem for compliant digital finance.
Secure custody is essential for real adoption — without it, institutions simply can’t commit large capital or real assets to on-chain systems.
📌 Why These Partnerships Matter — A Bigger Picture
Taken together, these collaborations paint a clear picture: Dusk isn’t chasing hype — it’s building infrastructure that institutions can actually use. Here’s how these partnerships create a powerful network effect:
1. Regulated Issuance Meets Blockchain Innovation
The NPEX and 21X partnerships embed real financial licenses and market access into the blockchain layer, allowing regulated issuance and trading of assets that historically lived only in legacy systems.
2. Interoperability Unlocks Global Liquidity
Chainlink’s CCIP and oracle capabilities mean that once assets are tokenized on Dusk, they can interact with other ecosystems and markets — a major draw for institutional capital looking for broad accessibility.
3. Trust, Security, and Custody Enable Institutional Confidence
Secure, compliant custody provided by Cordial Systems removes one of the biggest practical blockers for institutional adoption, making Dusk a credible option for real finance entities.
🧠 Final Thoughts
Blockchain adoption in regulated finance isn’t about quick features or flashy marketing — it’s about real partnerships that solve real problems. Dusk’s strategic collaborations with NPEX, Chainlink, 21X, and Cordial Systems demonstrate a focused, long-term strategy to enable scalable, compliant, and institutional-ready financial infrastructure. As more regulated assets come on-chain and interoperability expands globally, the network’s partner ecosystem will likely continue driving meaningful adoption and utility.
How Storage Pricing Evolves Over Epochs in Walrus — Economics Explained
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus
Decentralized storage is more complex than simply uploading files — it’s an evolving market-driven system where prices adapt over time. In Walrus Protocol, which runs on the Sui blockchain, storage pricing isn’t fixed forever. Instead, it changes at each storage epoch based on node proposals, stake weight, and consensus mechanisms, creating a fair and resistant model that balances supply and demand while rewarding reliable storage providers. Understanding this evolution helps users plan storage costs and builders forecast long-term deployment economics.
1. What Is a Storage Epoch?
Walrus operates in epochs — predefined periods that currently last about two weeks on Mainnet. Each epoch defines a period during which specific storage nodes are responsible for serving data, auditing each other, and sharing economic parameters like pricing and committee membership.
A storage epoch is central to pricing because:
Node prices are proposed and selected at epoch boundaries.
Funds collected for storage are distributed to nodes at the end of an epoch.
Users must buy storage space for one or more epochs in advance.
2. How Nodes Set Prices for an Epoch
Instead of having a static fee or a single authority set storage costs, Walrus uses a market-driven mechanism involving storage node proposals:
1. Before an epoch starts, all participating storage nodes broadcast their proposed prices for storing data in the upcoming epoch — both for per-unit storage and for write operations (registering blobs).
2. These proposals aren’t averaged; they’re sorted by stake weight, giving more influence to nodes with higher delegated stake.
3. Walrus selects the 66.67th percentile price (by stake weight) as the official storage rate for the next epoch. This means two-thirds of stake-weighted proposals suggest a lower price, and one-third suggest a higher price.
4. The final storage price set for that epoch becomes the reference rate users pay when purchasing storage space.
This percentile rule helps make pricing Sybil-resistant and incentive-aligned: a small group of low-stake actors can’t overly manipulate prices, and well-staked, reputable nodes guide more reasonable rates.
3. Buying Storage: What Users See
When a user wants to store a file (a blob), they must first purchase storage space measured in bytes and epochs. The cost is:
Linear in encoded size — larger files cost more WAL to reserve space.
Linear in the number of epochs — longer storage durations cost proportionally more WAL.
Encoded blob size (after erasure coding) is typically about 5× the unencoded file size, meaning pricing factors in redundancy and strong fault tolerance.
Once storage space is bought, users must register the blob and pay a write fee (also determined by node proposals). WAL is paid upfront and split across the epochs for which storage is reserved.
4. Why Pricing Evolves and What It Means
Walrus’s epoch-based pricing has some key implications:
Dynamic Market Response
If many nodes propose higher prices (due to scarcity or higher operational costs), the selected rate rises. Conversely, if many nodes propose competitive lower rates, storage becomes cheaper. This reflects a supply-demand balance of node capacity and user demand for storage each epoch.
Predictability with Flexibility
Users still pay storage upfront for multiple epochs — meaning they lock in the current epoch’s cost for the entire period they pay for. However, future pricing can only be determined after nodes submit their proposals for upcoming epochs. This means:
Users can plan budgets for existing stored data.
New uploads must account for potential cost changes in the next epoch.
Governance Influence
Walrus governance (via $WAL holders) can adjust certain pricing mechanisms over time, such as how write deposits are calculated or how node challenges affect pricing parameters. Thus, pricing evolution isn’t just economic — it’s also protocol-governed when necessary.
5. Practical Example: Planning Storage Costs
Imagine you’re building a decentralized app that stores large JSON files frequently:
You check current costs using the walrus info command, which shows the storage price per encoded unit per epoch and any current write cost.
You decide to reserve storage for 10 epochs (about 20 weeks), paying WAL upfront — the current epoch’s price is applied to all 10 epochs.
Meanwhile, during the next epoch, nodes may propose slightly higher prices due to increased demand, but your reserved costs remain locked for your reserved period.
This model gives long-term storage stability, while still reflecting network conditions when new storage commitments are made.
6. Why Evolving Pricing Matters for Walrus
Walrus-powered applications benefit from this epoch-based pricing evolution for several reasons:
Fairness — Prices reflect actual node costs and decentralized proposals.
Decentralization — No single party sets prices; it’s a democratic selection via stake-weighted node signals.
Predictability — Storage contracts are prepaid, letting developers budget long storage lifetimes without fear of mid-contract price spikes.
Aligns incentives — Nodes that propose reasonable prices are more likely to be selected and earn rewards, encouraging balanced participation.
Conclusion
In Walrus, storage pricing isn’t static — it evolves each epoch based on a stake-weighted proposal mechanism by storage nodes. Users prepay WAL for storage space spanning many epochs, locking in costs for their reserved period while future uploads adjust to new pricing in upcoming epochs. This design makes storage both predictable for long-term use and adaptive to network conditions, reflecting true decentralized economics for durable Web3 data.
Decentralized storage is more complex than simply uploading files — it’s an evolving market-driven system where prices adapt over time. In Walrus Protocol, which runs on the Sui blockchain, storage pricing isn’t fixed forever. Instead, it changes at each storage epoch based on node proposals, stake weight, and consensus mechanisms, creating a fair and resistant model that balances supply and demand while rewarding reliable storage providers. Understanding this evolution helps users plan storage costs and builders forecast long-term deployment economics.
1. What Is a Storage Epoch?
Walrus operates in epochs — predefined periods that currently last about two weeks on Mainnet. Each epoch defines a period during which specific storage nodes are responsible for serving data, auditing each other, and sharing economic parameters like pricing and committee membership.
A storage epoch is central to pricing because:
Node prices are proposed and selected at epoch boundaries.
Funds collected for storage are distributed to nodes at the end of an epoch.
Users must buy storage space for one or more epochs in advance.
2. How Nodes Set Prices for an Epoch
Instead of having a static fee or a single authority set storage costs, Walrus uses a market-driven mechanism involving storage node proposals:
1. Before an epoch starts, all participating storage nodes broadcast their proposed prices for storing data in the upcoming epoch — both for per-unit storage and for write operations (registering blobs).
2. These proposals aren’t averaged; they’re sorted by stake weight, giving more influence to nodes with higher delegated stake.
3. Walrus selects the 66.67th percentile price (by stake weight) as the official storage rate for the next epoch. This means two-thirds of stake-weighted proposals suggest a lower price, and one-third suggest a higher price.
4. The final storage price set for that epoch becomes the reference rate users pay when purchasing storage space.
This percentile rule helps make pricing Sybil-resistant and incentive-aligned: a small group of low-stake actors can’t overly manipulate prices, and well-staked, reputable nodes guide more reasonable rates.
3. Buying Storage: What Users See
When a user wants to store a file (a blob), they must first purchase storage space measured in bytes and epochs. The cost is:
Linear in encoded size — larger files cost more WAL to reserve space.
Linear in the number of epochs — longer storage durations cost proportionally more WAL.
Encoded blob size (after erasure coding) is typically about 5× the unencoded file size, meaning pricing factors in redundancy and strong fault tolerance.
Once storage space is bought, users must register the blob and pay a write fee (also determined by node proposals). WAL is paid upfront and split across the epochs for which storage is reserved.
4. Why Pricing Evolves and What It Means
Walrus’s epoch-based pricing has some key implications:
Dynamic Market Response
If many nodes propose higher prices (due to scarcity or higher operational costs), the selected rate rises. Conversely, if many nodes propose competitive lower rates, storage becomes cheaper. This reflects a supply-demand balance of node capacity and user demand for storage each epoch.
Predictability with Flexibility
Users still pay storage upfront for multiple epochs — meaning they lock in the current epoch’s cost for the entire period they pay for. However, future pricing can only be determined after nodes submit their proposals for upcoming epochs. This means:
Users can plan budgets for existing stored data.
New uploads must account for potential cost changes in the next epoch.
Governance Influence
Walrus governance (via $WAL holders) can adjust certain pricing mechanisms over time, such as how write deposits are calculated or how node challenges affect pricing parameters. Thus, pricing evolution isn’t just economic — it’s also protocol-governed when necessary.
5. Practical Example: Planning Storage Costs
Imagine you’re building a decentralized app that stores large JSON files frequently:
You check current costs using the walrus info command, which shows the storage price per encoded unit per epoch and any current write cost.
You decide to reserve storage for 10 epochs (about 20 weeks), paying WAL upfront — the current epoch’s price is applied to all 10 epochs.
Meanwhile, during the next epoch, nodes may propose slightly higher prices due to increased demand, but your reserved costs remain locked for your reserved period.
This model gives long-term storage stability, while still reflecting network conditions when new storage commitments are made.
6. Why Evolving Pricing Matters for Walrus
Walrus-powered applications benefit from this epoch-based pricing evolution for several reasons:
Fairness — Prices reflect actual node costs and decentralized proposals.
Decentralization — No single party sets prices; it’s a democratic selection via stake-weighted node signals.
Predictability — Storage contracts are prepaid, letting developers budget long storage lifetimes without fear of mid-contract price spikes.
Aligns incentives — Nodes that propose reasonable prices are more likely to be selected and earn rewards, encouraging balanced participation.
Conclusion
In Walrus, storage pricing isn’t static — it evolves each epoch based on a stake-weighted proposal mechanism by storage nodes. Users prepay WAL for storage space spanning many epochs, locking in costs for their reserved period while future uploads adjust to new pricing in upcoming epochs. This design makes storage both predictable for long-term use and adaptive to network conditions, reflecting true decentralized economics for durable Web3 data.
How Rusk Integrates Consensus, Staking & State Management on Dusk
On the Dusk blockchain, Rusk is the core node implementation that ties together consensus, staking, and state management for the entire network. Developed as the reference protocol client, Rusk houses the Succinct Attestation PoS consensus, manages chain state and database logic, and hosts core contracts like Transfer and Stake Genesis. It also provides event APIs and integration points for execution layers like DuskEVM and DuskVM, making settlement, privacy, and execution work in harmony. This unified approach ensures secure consensus, efficient staking participation, and consistent state transitions — a foundation required for regulated finance use cases where stability and correctness are essential.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
On the Dusk blockchain, Rusk is the core node implementation that ties together consensus, staking, and state management for the entire network. Developed as the reference protocol client, Rusk houses the Succinct Attestation PoS consensus, manages chain state and database logic, and hosts core contracts like Transfer and Stake Genesis. It also provides event APIs and integration points for execution layers like DuskEVM and DuskVM, making settlement, privacy, and execution work in harmony. This unified approach ensures secure consensus, efficient staking participation, and consistent state transitions — a foundation required for regulated finance use cases where stability and correctness are essential.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Delegation & Reward Alignment in Walrus ($WAL )
In Walrus Protocol, $WAL holders can delegate their tokens to storage nodes without running infrastructure themselves. By delegating, you help determine which nodes join the active committee and how many data slivers they store, increasing the node’s share of work and fees. Delegators then earn a portion of storage rewards proportional to their stake, aligning incentives between token holders, node operators, and network reliability.
#walrus $WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc
In Walrus Protocol, $WAL holders can delegate their tokens to storage nodes without running infrastructure themselves. By delegating, you help determine which nodes join the active committee and how many data slivers they store, increasing the node’s share of work and fees. Delegators then earn a portion of storage rewards proportional to their stake, aligning incentives between token holders, node operators, and network reliability.
#walrus $WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc
#SouthKoreaSeizedBTCLoss - Prosecutors Lose ~$48M in Seized Bitcoin Amid Phishing Scam
South Korea is investigating a major loss of seized Bitcoin after roughly 70 billion won (about $47.7 million) worth of BTC disappeared from state custody — highlighting a serious vulnerability in how digital assets are managed by law enforcement. Authorities say the loss occurred when officials conducting a routine internal inspection discovered the confiscated Bitcoin was no longer accessible.
📉 What Happened
The missing Bitcoin was held by the Gwangju District Prosecutors’ Office, stored as evidence from a past criminal investigation. During a standard asset review, staff reportedly connected a storage device containing wallet credentials (such as private keys) and inadvertently accessed a fraudulent or “phishing” website. That interaction is believed to have exposed sensitive access information, allowing malicious actors to drain the funds from the custodial wallet.
Officials from the prosecutors’ office have launched an internal investigation to determine exactly how the breach occurred and whether any of the missing Bitcoin can be recovered, though no precise details have been disclosed publicly. Authorities cited the ongoing nature of the probe as the reason for withholding specifics.
⚠️ Broader Implications
This loss raises urgent questions about security protocols for seized digital assets. Unlike physical evidence, cryptocurrencies require specialized custody practices — including air-gapped wallets, strict access controls, and rigorous phishing safeguards — to prevent unauthorized access. The incident has sparked criticism that law enforcement agencies lack adequate infrastructure and training to secure large amounts of confiscated crypto.
In short: South Korean prosecutors are investigating the disappearance of $48 million) in seized Bitcoin after a suspected phishing compromise, underscoring the vulnerabilities in government custody of digital assets.
South Korea is investigating a major loss of seized Bitcoin after roughly 70 billion won (about $47.7 million) worth of BTC disappeared from state custody — highlighting a serious vulnerability in how digital assets are managed by law enforcement. Authorities say the loss occurred when officials conducting a routine internal inspection discovered the confiscated Bitcoin was no longer accessible.
📉 What Happened
The missing Bitcoin was held by the Gwangju District Prosecutors’ Office, stored as evidence from a past criminal investigation. During a standard asset review, staff reportedly connected a storage device containing wallet credentials (such as private keys) and inadvertently accessed a fraudulent or “phishing” website. That interaction is believed to have exposed sensitive access information, allowing malicious actors to drain the funds from the custodial wallet.
Officials from the prosecutors’ office have launched an internal investigation to determine exactly how the breach occurred and whether any of the missing Bitcoin can be recovered, though no precise details have been disclosed publicly. Authorities cited the ongoing nature of the probe as the reason for withholding specifics.
⚠️ Broader Implications
This loss raises urgent questions about security protocols for seized digital assets. Unlike physical evidence, cryptocurrencies require specialized custody practices — including air-gapped wallets, strict access controls, and rigorous phishing safeguards — to prevent unauthorized access. The incident has sparked criticism that law enforcement agencies lack adequate infrastructure and training to secure large amounts of confiscated crypto.
In short: South Korean prosecutors are investigating the disappearance of $48 million) in seized Bitcoin after a suspected phishing compromise, underscoring the vulnerabilities in government custody of digital assets.
#ScrollCoFounderXAccountHacked - Verified Security Alert for Crypto Community
January 25, 2026 — Crypto Cybersecurity News — The verified X (formerly Twitter) account of Scroll co-founder Kenneth (Ye) Shen (@shenhaichen) was hijacked by attackers in a targeted phishing and social-engineering operation, according to multiple community reports and official alerts. Renowned blockchain security researcher Wu Blockchain and Scroll itself confirmed that the account was compromised and is currently being used to send out phishing messages impersonating X staff and project team members. Users are strongly advised not to click on any links or engage with suspicious direct messages from the account while recovery is underway.
📌 What Happened
The hacker took control of Shen’s verified X account and altered content to mimic official platform communications.
Attackers reportedly sent urgent messages claiming copyright violations and compliance actions, pressuring recipients to interact with malicious links — a known method to harvest credentials or deploy malware.
Scroll’s team acknowledged the breach publicly on X and confirmed they’re actively working to recover the account, urging users to avoid any links or direct messages from that profile in the meantime.
Why This Matters
High-profile social media compromises like this demonstrate how even well-known blockchain leaders and projects are vulnerable to social engineering attacks. Because such accounts have large, trusted followings, fraudsters can amplify phishing campaigns, potentially exposing unsuspecting users to credential theft or financial loss.
In short: The co-founder’s X account was hijacked and used in a phishing scam — do not interact with any communications from the compromised profile until the issue is fully resolved.
January 25, 2026 — Crypto Cybersecurity News — The verified X (formerly Twitter) account of Scroll co-founder Kenneth (Ye) Shen (@shenhaichen) was hijacked by attackers in a targeted phishing and social-engineering operation, according to multiple community reports and official alerts. Renowned blockchain security researcher Wu Blockchain and Scroll itself confirmed that the account was compromised and is currently being used to send out phishing messages impersonating X staff and project team members. Users are strongly advised not to click on any links or engage with suspicious direct messages from the account while recovery is underway.
📌 What Happened
The hacker took control of Shen’s verified X account and altered content to mimic official platform communications.
Attackers reportedly sent urgent messages claiming copyright violations and compliance actions, pressuring recipients to interact with malicious links — a known method to harvest credentials or deploy malware.
Scroll’s team acknowledged the breach publicly on X and confirmed they’re actively working to recover the account, urging users to avoid any links or direct messages from that profile in the meantime.
Why This Matters
High-profile social media compromises like this demonstrate how even well-known blockchain leaders and projects are vulnerable to social engineering attacks. Because such accounts have large, trusted followings, fraudsters can amplify phishing campaigns, potentially exposing unsuspecting users to credential theft or financial loss.
In short: The co-founder’s X account was hijacked and used in a phishing scam — do not interact with any communications from the compromised profile until the issue is fully resolved.
Why modular architecture matters for institutional blockchains like Dusk
The @Dusk ’s move to a modular architecture makes Dusk more practical for regulated finance. Instead of one monolithic chain, Dusk splits into layers — DuskDS for settlement, DuskEVM for EVM execution, and DuskVM for privacy apps — each optimized for specific tasks. This reduces integration costs, speeds up wallet/exchange support, and lets institutions issue and settle assets more efficiently under compliance frameworks.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
The @Dusk ’s move to a modular architecture makes Dusk more practical for regulated finance. Instead of one monolithic chain, Dusk splits into layers — DuskDS for settlement, DuskEVM for EVM execution, and DuskVM for privacy apps — each optimized for specific tasks. This reduces integration costs, speeds up wallet/exchange support, and lets institutions issue and settle assets more efficiently under compliance frameworks.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Why $WAL ’s Prepaid Token Model Matters for Storage Economics
In Walrus Protocol, the native token $WAL isn’t only for speculation — it’s the core unit of economic coordination for decentralized storage. Users pay WAL upfront for a fixed storage duration, and those tokens are gradually distributed to storage nodes and stakers over time. This prepaid model means storage fees stay stable (even if token prices fluctuate), and data remains secured for the paid period. At the same time, prepaid WAL fees create predictable revenue for nodes, encouraging long-term participation and consistent data availability.
#walrus $WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc
In Walrus Protocol, the native token $WAL isn’t only for speculation — it’s the core unit of economic coordination for decentralized storage. Users pay WAL upfront for a fixed storage duration, and those tokens are gradually distributed to storage nodes and stakers over time. This prepaid model means storage fees stay stable (even if token prices fluctuate), and data remains secured for the paid period. At the same time, prepaid WAL fees create predictable revenue for nodes, encouraging long-term participation and consistent data availability.
#walrus $WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc
$ETH
ETHUSDT — Testing Critical Support at Major Trendline
ETHUSDT is trading near $2,895, testing the crucial $2,880 - $2,920 support zone after rejecting from the $3,000 resistance. This level aligns with a major ascending trendline and has acted as strong support multiple times in recent weeks. A hold here is critical for maintaining the bullish structure.
Trade Plan
Entry (Long): $2,880 - $2,910 (Accumulate at the trendline and horizontal support confluence)
Target 1: $2,980 (Immediate resistance and recent high)
Target 2: $3,050 - $3,100 (Breakout target above $3,000 resistance)
Stop Loss: $2,850 (Break below the trendline and key support)
My View
ETHUSDT is at a make-or-break level. The confluence of the ascending trendline and horizontal support around $2,880 provides a high-probability long setup for a bounce back toward $3,000+. A decisive break below $2,850 would signal a failure of the bullish structure and likely lead to a deeper correction. Risk is well-defined.
#ETH
ETHUSDT — Testing Critical Support at Major Trendline
ETHUSDT is trading near $2,895, testing the crucial $2,880 - $2,920 support zone after rejecting from the $3,000 resistance. This level aligns with a major ascending trendline and has acted as strong support multiple times in recent weeks. A hold here is critical for maintaining the bullish structure.
Trade Plan
Entry (Long): $2,880 - $2,910 (Accumulate at the trendline and horizontal support confluence)
Target 1: $2,980 (Immediate resistance and recent high)
Target 2: $3,050 - $3,100 (Breakout target above $3,000 resistance)
Stop Loss: $2,850 (Break below the trendline and key support)
My View
ETHUSDT is at a make-or-break level. The confluence of the ascending trendline and horizontal support around $2,880 provides a high-probability long setup for a bounce back toward $3,000+. A decisive break below $2,850 would signal a failure of the bullish structure and likely lead to a deeper correction. Risk is well-defined.
#ETH
$ENSO
ENSOUSDT — Sharp Correction After Parabolic Rally
ENSOUSDT is trading near $1.4426, undergoing a sharp -7.71% correction after a parabolic +117% weekly rally. Price is now testing the key support zone between $1.3985 - $1.5000, which includes a prior swing high and the 0.382-0.5 Fibonacci retracement of the recent explosive move.
Trade Plan
Entry (Long): $1.40 - $1.48 (Scale into the key support and Fib retracement zone)
Target 1: $1.66 (Immediate resistance and recent consolidation high)
Target 2: $1.80 - $1.85 (Next resistance and measured move toward recent highs)
Stop Loss: $1.35 (Clear break below the swing low and support zone)
My View
ENSOUSDT is experiencing a healthy pullback after an extreme momentum move. This support zone offers a high-risk, high-reward long entry for a potential continuation of the uptrend. The stop is tight, respecting the volatile nature of the asset. A break below $1.35 would invalidate the immediate bullish structure.
#ENSO
ENSOUSDT — Sharp Correction After Parabolic Rally
ENSOUSDT is trading near $1.4426, undergoing a sharp -7.71% correction after a parabolic +117% weekly rally. Price is now testing the key support zone between $1.3985 - $1.5000, which includes a prior swing high and the 0.382-0.5 Fibonacci retracement of the recent explosive move.
Trade Plan
Entry (Long): $1.40 - $1.48 (Scale into the key support and Fib retracement zone)
Target 1: $1.66 (Immediate resistance and recent consolidation high)
Target 2: $1.80 - $1.85 (Next resistance and measured move toward recent highs)
Stop Loss: $1.35 (Clear break below the swing low and support zone)
My View
ENSOUSDT is experiencing a healthy pullback after an extreme momentum move. This support zone offers a high-risk, high-reward long entry for a potential continuation of the uptrend. The stop is tight, respecting the volatile nature of the asset. A break below $1.35 would invalidate the immediate bullish structure.
#ENSO
$NOM
NOMUSDT — Pullback to Key Support After Strong Rally
NOMUSDT is trading near $0.01357, pulling back to test the $0.0135 - $0.0140 support zone after a strong +70% monthly rally. This level represents a previous resistance-turned-support and a key Fibonacci retracement area, offering a potential long entry for continuation of the uptrend.
Trade Plan
Entry (Long): $0.01320 - $0.01380 (Accumulate at the key support zone and 0.382-0.5 Fib area)
Target 1: $0.01500 (Immediate resistance and recent high)
Target 2: $0.01670 (Next swing high and measured move target)
Stop Loss: $0.01275 (Below the support zone and recent swing low)
My View
NOMUSDT remains in a strong uptrend on the monthly timeframe. This pullback offers a high-probability long entry for a move back toward recent highs. The stop is placed below key structure, offering a favorable risk-reward. A break below $0.01275 would signal a deeper correction.
#NOM
NOMUSDT — Pullback to Key Support After Strong Rally
NOMUSDT is trading near $0.01357, pulling back to test the $0.0135 - $0.0140 support zone after a strong +70% monthly rally. This level represents a previous resistance-turned-support and a key Fibonacci retracement area, offering a potential long entry for continuation of the uptrend.
Trade Plan
Entry (Long): $0.01320 - $0.01380 (Accumulate at the key support zone and 0.382-0.5 Fib area)
Target 1: $0.01500 (Immediate resistance and recent high)
Target 2: $0.01670 (Next swing high and measured move target)
Stop Loss: $0.01275 (Below the support zone and recent swing low)
My View
NOMUSDT remains in a strong uptrend on the monthly timeframe. This pullback offers a high-probability long entry for a move back toward recent highs. The stop is placed below key structure, offering a favorable risk-reward. A break below $0.01275 would signal a deeper correction.
#NOM
$AUCTION
AUCTIONUSDT — Rejection from Key Resistance, Testing Breakdown Level
AUCTIONUSDT is trading near $6.829, after being rejected from the $7.50 - $8.00 resistance zone and breaking below the $6.87 support. Price is now retesting this broken level from below, which often acts as new resistance, suggesting potential for further downside.
Trade Plan
Entry (Short): $6.85 - $6.95 (On a retest of the broken support, now resistance)
Target 1: $6.25 (Immediate swing low support)
Target 2: $5.80 (Next key support and measured move target)
Stop Loss: $7.15 (Above the resistance zone and recent high)
My View
AUCTIONUSDT shows a clear rejection from higher resistance and has broken its local structure. A retest of the $6.87 breakdown level offers a favorable short entry with a tight stop for a move toward the $6.00 area. A reclaim above $7.15 would negate the bearish setup.
#AUCTION
AUCTIONUSDT — Rejection from Key Resistance, Testing Breakdown Level
AUCTIONUSDT is trading near $6.829, after being rejected from the $7.50 - $8.00 resistance zone and breaking below the $6.87 support. Price is now retesting this broken level from below, which often acts as new resistance, suggesting potential for further downside.
Trade Plan
Entry (Short): $6.85 - $6.95 (On a retest of the broken support, now resistance)
Target 1: $6.25 (Immediate swing low support)
Target 2: $5.80 (Next key support and measured move target)
Stop Loss: $7.15 (Above the resistance zone and recent high)
My View
AUCTIONUSDT shows a clear rejection from higher resistance and has broken its local structure. A retest of the $6.87 breakdown level offers a favorable short entry with a tight stop for a move toward the $6.00 area. A reclaim above $7.15 would negate the bearish setup.
#AUCTION
EEE
Good Evening 🧧
Market Sentiment Tonight: The Crypto Fear & Greed Index is still in the Fear zone (~34), showing traders are cautious as the market stays range-bound and volatility persists. Fear dominates over greed, reflecting uncertainty and risk-off behavior today.
BTC and altcoins are steady but lack strong directional moves — patience and discipline remain key as we head into the next session.
Stay sharp, trade wisely, and enjoy your evening!
Market Sentiment Tonight: The Crypto Fear & Greed Index is still in the Fear zone (~34), showing traders are cautious as the market stays range-bound and volatility persists. Fear dominates over greed, reflecting uncertainty and risk-off behavior today.
BTC and altcoins are steady but lack strong directional moves — patience and discipline remain key as we head into the next session.
Stay sharp, trade wisely, and enjoy your evening!
📊 Crypto ETFs With Staking Features Offer Yield Potential but Pose Real Risks
A notable evolution in the crypto exchange-traded fund (ETF) landscape is underway: fund issuers are now integrating staking rewards into ETF structures, giving investors a way to earn passive yield in addition to price exposure. While this innovation could reshape how mainstream money views digital assets, it brings with it regulatory, operational, and liquidity risks that investors must carefully understand.
📈 Yield Potential: A Key Attraction
Traditionally, crypto ETFs simply tracked price. That’s changing: Grayscale has become the first U.S. issuer to distribute staking rewards through its Ethereum ETF (ETHE), paying out actual staking income to shareholders — a landmark move in regulated crypto investing.
Meanwhile, major institutions like BlackRock and Fidelity have filed to add staking functionality to their Ethereum ETF products — aiming to capture Ethereum’s Proof-of-Stake yield (~3–4% APR) inside a regulated vehicle.
⚠️ But There Are Real Risks
Regulatory Uncertainty: The SEC’s stance on staking inside ETFs remains cautious. Some filings have seen delayed reviews, and legal frameworks continue evolving, leaving the outcome unclear.
Operational Complexity: Staking requires trusted custodians and validator services. Technical failures, mismanagement, or slashing penalties could hurt returns.
Liquidity & Redemption Mismatch: Staked assets may be locked on-chain, which can complicate immediate ETF redemptions and affect pricing dynamics.
📌 Bottom Line
Staking-enabled crypto ETFs represent a major next frontier in digital asset investing, offering income potential not seen in traditional price-only products. But yield isn’t free — it’s paired with regulatory hurdles, technical challenges, and liquidity considerations that make these products more complex than classic ETFs.
A notable evolution in the crypto exchange-traded fund (ETF) landscape is underway: fund issuers are now integrating staking rewards into ETF structures, giving investors a way to earn passive yield in addition to price exposure. While this innovation could reshape how mainstream money views digital assets, it brings with it regulatory, operational, and liquidity risks that investors must carefully understand.
📈 Yield Potential: A Key Attraction
Traditionally, crypto ETFs simply tracked price. That’s changing: Grayscale has become the first U.S. issuer to distribute staking rewards through its Ethereum ETF (ETHE), paying out actual staking income to shareholders — a landmark move in regulated crypto investing.
Meanwhile, major institutions like BlackRock and Fidelity have filed to add staking functionality to their Ethereum ETF products — aiming to capture Ethereum’s Proof-of-Stake yield (~3–4% APR) inside a regulated vehicle.
⚠️ But There Are Real Risks
Regulatory Uncertainty: The SEC’s stance on staking inside ETFs remains cautious. Some filings have seen delayed reviews, and legal frameworks continue evolving, leaving the outcome unclear.
Operational Complexity: Staking requires trusted custodians and validator services. Technical failures, mismanagement, or slashing penalties could hurt returns.
Liquidity & Redemption Mismatch: Staked assets may be locked on-chain, which can complicate immediate ETF redemptions and affect pricing dynamics.
📌 Bottom Line
Staking-enabled crypto ETFs represent a major next frontier in digital asset investing, offering income potential not seen in traditional price-only products. But yield isn’t free — it’s paired with regulatory hurdles, technical challenges, and liquidity considerations that make these products more complex than classic ETFs.
🛡️ Solana’s Agave Upgrade Tackles Network Vulnerabilities and Boosts Security
Solana’s core developers and ecosystem teams have been actively responding to technical and security challenges in the network’s Agave validator client, an essential component that runs many of the blockchain’s nodes. Recent efforts focus on patching vulnerabilities, improving stability, and strengthening validator software — a key move for one of the fastest and most active Layer-1 blockchains in crypto.
🔧 Why This Matters
Solana has long been praised for high throughput and low fees, but that performance has brought operational complexity and occasional software risks — especially when validator clients lag on critical updates. In early January, Solana maintainers issued the v3.0.14 Agave patch with urgency, highlighting two potential issues: one involving the gossip protocol (which validators use to share network messages) and another in vote message verification that could disrupt consensus under certain conditions.
A broad rollout of Agave v3.0.14 is aimed at neutralizing these attack vectors before they can be exploited. However, validator adoption of the new release has been slower than ideal — with a significant portion still on older clients — leaving a short window of elevated exposure until the upgrade is widely applied.
🔍 Broader Improvement Context
Alongside Agave patches, Solana developers are also testing upgrades to address network congestion and reliability issues, with testnet validators trialing congestion fixes that will later help mainnet performance.
📌 Bottom Line
The Agave upgrade reflects active defensive work by Solana’s developer community to tackle real network vulnerabilities and operational risks. It underscores a deeper truth: maintaining speed and decentralization in high-performance blockchains requires ongoing security vigilance, coordinated upgrades, and rapid validator adoption — not just raw throughput.
Solana’s core developers and ecosystem teams have been actively responding to technical and security challenges in the network’s Agave validator client, an essential component that runs many of the blockchain’s nodes. Recent efforts focus on patching vulnerabilities, improving stability, and strengthening validator software — a key move for one of the fastest and most active Layer-1 blockchains in crypto.
🔧 Why This Matters
Solana has long been praised for high throughput and low fees, but that performance has brought operational complexity and occasional software risks — especially when validator clients lag on critical updates. In early January, Solana maintainers issued the v3.0.14 Agave patch with urgency, highlighting two potential issues: one involving the gossip protocol (which validators use to share network messages) and another in vote message verification that could disrupt consensus under certain conditions.
A broad rollout of Agave v3.0.14 is aimed at neutralizing these attack vectors before they can be exploited. However, validator adoption of the new release has been slower than ideal — with a significant portion still on older clients — leaving a short window of elevated exposure until the upgrade is widely applied.
🔍 Broader Improvement Context
Alongside Agave patches, Solana developers are also testing upgrades to address network congestion and reliability issues, with testnet validators trialing congestion fixes that will later help mainnet performance.
📌 Bottom Line
The Agave upgrade reflects active defensive work by Solana’s developer community to tackle real network vulnerabilities and operational risks. It underscores a deeper truth: maintaining speed and decentralization in high-performance blockchains requires ongoing security vigilance, coordinated upgrades, and rapid validator adoption — not just raw throughput.
Logga in för att utforska mer innehåll