CryptoFrontNews

Bitcoin’s on-chain profitability flips negative, signaling market caution and potential bearish sentiment shift.

The $80K–$75K support zone is critical for Bitcoin’s next move, with key implications for market direction.

Bitcoin’s technical indicators remain neutral-to-bearish, suggesting indecision and a waiting market phase.

Bitcoin’s on-chain profitability has recently turned negative, a key indicator that suggests the market is shifting. This marks the first time since 2023 that Bitcoin holders are realizing more losses than profits on-chain. 

This signal usually points to a bearish sentiment shift, as investors who bought at higher levels begin to exit the market. Bitcoin’s price currently hovers around $89.6K, and its next move will depend heavily on whether it holds key support levels.

On-Chain Profitability Flips Negative

On-chain profitability has long been one of the cleanest ways to gauge market sentiment. When it turns negative, it indicates that more Bitcoin is being sold at a loss than at a profit.

This shift typically occurs after momentum breaks, not at the euphoric top of bull markets. The current negative on-chain profitability is a crucial signal of a market that is transitioning from bullish confidence to cautious sentiment.

In early 2022, a similar shift occurred when on-chain profitability dropped sharply despite significant price drops. This was the beginning of a bear market that lasted for months. 

In contrast, when negative realized losses appeared in 2023, they marked a true market bottom, signaling the end of the sell-off and the start of long-term accumulation. Bitcoin may be entering a deeper correction.

https://twitter.com/CryptoPatel/status/2014948278706831464?s=20

The Critical $80K–$75K Zone

Bitcoin is now testing a crucial support zone between $80K and $75K. This price range holds significant historical value, both in terms of on-chain acquisition and psychological support. 

Analysts believe that if Bitcoin holds this range, the market may enter a stabilization phase, where price action slows, and market participants reassess their positions.

If Bitcoin can maintain its position above the $75K level, it could lead to a period of sideways movement, allowing time for sentiment and leverage to reset. While this phase could be boring and uneventful, it may set the stage for future bullish action. 

On the other hand, if Bitcoin decisively loses this support, negative on-chain profitability would likely expand.

Neutral-to-Bearish Momentum

Technical indicators suggest that Bitcoin is currently in a neutral-to-bearish phase. After a sharp sell-off, Bitcoin has entered a consolidation phase around $89.6K.

Source: CryptoRank

The MACD remains below the zero line, signaling that there is no strong bullish momentum yet. Similarly, the RSI, sitting around 48-50, confirms that Bitcoin’s price action lacks clear upward momentum, suggesting that the market is neither oversold nor overbought.

Volume during the current consolidation has tapered off, signaling indecision in the market. Neither bulls nor bears are aggressively pressing, which often follows a distribution phase.

Bitcoin’s price action is now waiting for a clearer direction, either to bounce higher or to test lower support levels.

The post Bitcoin’s Negative On-Chain Profitability Signals Caution in the Market appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Bitcoin and Ethereum are seeing profit-taking as institutional investors rotate capital into assets with clearer growth potential.

Solana and XRP are attracting selective institutional interest, signaling bets on higher risk-reward profiles in crypto.

Capital rotation in crypto ETFs highlights a shift from broad exposure to targeted investments with asymmetric upside.

The latest trends in crypto ETF flows highlight a notable shift in institutional capital. While Bitcoin and Ethereum see significant outflows, Solana and XRP are attracting fresh interest. This rotation signals that institutional investors are no longer broadly buying into crypto; they are now focusing on specific assets with clearer narratives and better growth potential.

Bitcoin ETFs: A Shift from Overcrowded Trade

Bitcoin ETFs have seen consistent outflows, with $103.5 million exiting over five straight days. This is not a sign of panic, but distribution fatigue. Institutional investors are trimming positions as Bitcoin’s dominance reaches its limit. 

Bitcoin had been a go-to hedge for macroeconomic uncertainty, but with its upside looking capped, investors are moving capital elsewhere.

The trend represents a rebalancing of portfolios. Bitcoin is no longer viewed as the only crypto investment option, particularly with increasing alternatives. 

ETF flows show that investors are pivoting away from Bitcoin, recognizing it as a more mature asset within the crypto space. The cooling demand for Bitcoin reflects that its growth story may have already peaked in the short term.

However, this shift doesn’t indicate a loss of faith in Bitcoin. It’s a sign of capital moving toward other assets with clearer narratives and higher potential returns. 

With Bitcoin’s immediate upside perceived as limited, investors are rotating funds into other cryptocurrencies that could offer more explosive growth.

https://twitter.com/coinbureau/status/2014926947701424397?s=20

Ethereum ETFs: Narrative Ambiguity Drives Caution

Ethereum ETFs also saw outflows of $41.7 million over four consecutive days. This trend is primarily driven by narrative uncertainty. Ethereum is struggling to define its identity. 

Is it a decentralized tech platform, a yield-bearing asset, or a competitor to faster Layer 1s? The lack of a clear, cohesive story has left institutional investors uncertain about Ethereum’s future trajectory.

Bitcoin’s simple "digital gold" narrative remains more appealing to conservative investors. In contrast, Ethereum’s multifaceted positioning makes it harder to pitch, especially when compared to other projects that present clearer growth potential. 

As a result, Ethereum is being sidelined by institutional investors looking for clearer stories and stronger upside.

Despite the outflows, Ethereum's position remains relatively stable compared to Bitcoin. Institutions are not abandoning the asset, but they are taking a more cautious approach to it, opting for assets like Solana or XRP instead.

Solana and XRP ETFs: Targeted Bets on Asymmetric Upside

Unlike Bitcoin and Ethereum, both Solana and XRP have seen positive ETF inflows. Solana, for instance, experienced a $1.9 million inflow over four consecutive green days. 

This steady interest signals a bullish outlook for Solana’s performance-driven growth and its potential to outperform in future rallies.

XRP has also seen $3.4 million in inflows over three days, indicating strong institutional interest. XRP's focus on regulatory clarity and its position within the payments infrastructure make it a preferred choice for investors seeking a defensive crypto asset.

 Unlike the retail-driven momentum of other assets, XRP’s flows suggest measured accumulation, driven by long-term strategic positioning. These movements show that institutions are increasingly drawn to assets with clear use cases and higher risk-reward profiles. Solana and XRP are seen as more compelling bets, especially as the broader crypto market matures.

The post Bitcoin, Ethereum Outflows Signal Capital Rotation as Solana, XRP Gain Steam appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Even as crypto prices fell, trading hit record highs, proving investors stayed active during the market shock.

Stablecoins surged in 2025 as traders sought safety and liquidity while prices dropped and volatility stayed high.

Institutions kept buying crypto despite the dip, signaling long-term confidence even as Bitcoin lagged stocks and gold.

The crypto market faced a sudden shock in late 2025 as prices fell hard despite rapid growth underneath. CoinGecko Research followed the crypto market’s big drop across exchanges and institutions. 

As per the report, investors everywhere reacted to wild price swings. Heavy events and increased adoption drove the market from policymakers, traders, and large players. Crypto finished 2025 with lower prices but wider use and stronger infrastructure.

Global crypto market capitalization sank precipitously in the fourth quarter of 2025, shedding 23.7% to close at $3.0 trillion. This fall marked crypto's first annual contraction since 2022. Nevertheless, the year started with exuberance.

Market capitalization briefly hit a record $4.4 trillion early in Q4. Then a historic $19 billion liquidation event struck on October 10. The selloff followed the U.S. announcement of 100% tariffs on China. Hence, prices tumbled into late November before stabilizing.

Additionally, trading activity surged despite falling prices. Average daily volume reached a yearly high of $161.8 billion. Volatility from liquidations fueled this spike. However, volumes cooled once prices moved sideways into December.

Stablecoins and Institutions Shape the Market

Besides price pressure, stablecoins delivered one of 2025’s strongest performances. The stablecoin market expanded 48.9% year-on-year. It reached a record $311.0 billion by year-end. This growth reflected rising demand for liquidity during turbulence. However, Ethena’s USDe suffered a rapid collapse. Its supply fell 57.3% after a Binance depeg. Confidence faded in high-yield looping strategies.

Meanwhile, PayPal’s PYUSD climbed into the top five stablecoins. Its supply grew 48.4% to $3.6 billion. Creator payouts on YouTube supported adoption. A roughly 4.25% yield through Spark Savings Vault also attracted users.

Moreover, institutional participation deepened through Digital Asset Treasury Companies. DATCos deployed at least $49.7 billion during 2025. They accumulated over 5% of total Bitcoin and Ethereum supply. However, Q4 buying slowed sharply. Falling crypto prices pushed DATCo valuations below net asset value. Consequently, firms prioritized share buybacks instead of accumulation.

Trading, Prediction Markets, and Asset Divergence

Prediction markets delivered explosive growth during 2025. Volumes jumped 302.7% to $63.5 billion. Kalshi overtook Polymarket in Q4 market share. Additionally, Opinion entered aggressively in November. Its December volume matched Kalshi’s $7 billion.

Perpetual trading also expanded rapidly. Centralized exchanges recorded $86.2 trillion in annual volume. That marked a new historical high. Decentralized perpetual exchanges grew even faster. Their volumes surged 346% year-on-year. Hence, DEXs now command 7.8% of perpetual trading.

However, traditional assets outperformed crypto. Gold surged 62.6% during 2025. U.S. equities also gained strongly. Bitcoin fell 6.4%, lagging most major assets.

The post Crypto Market Slides as Infrastructure Quietly Expands: CoinGecko appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Blockchain signatures aren’t at immediate quantum risk, but encryption on privacy chains could be harvested for future attacks.

Hybrid encryption now protects data today while preparing for future quantum threats without rushing risky upgrades.

Bitcoin and Ethereum must plan post-quantum transitions carefully due to governance, abandoned coins, and high-value addresses.

Quantum computing is stirring big debates in crypto. Venture firm a16z Crypto warns that people are overestimating how soon quantum computers will actually threaten blockchain security.

Such systems, in theory, could compromise classical encryption methods such as signatures, although so far, progress is still short of such abilities. Aside from the hype, they advise that proper planning should be emphasized before rushing into things in panic.

According to a16z Crypto, “Timelines to a cryptographically relevant quantum computer are frequently overstated — leading to calls for urgent, wholesale transitions to post-quantum cryptography.” The firm explains that encryption, unlike digital signatures, faces immediate pressure from harvest-now-decrypt-later (HNDL) attacks. 

Sensitive data encrypted today could remain valuable decades later when quantum computers arrive. However, digital signatures—used by most blockchains for transaction authorization—do not face HNDL threats, making rushed post-quantum migration unnecessary.

Encryption vs. Signatures: Distinct Threats

Hybrid encryption is already seeing adoption. Chrome, Cloudflare, Apple iMessage, and Signal deploy schemes combining classical and post-quantum algorithms. This approach hedges against both future quantum attacks and potential weaknesses in post-quantum cryptography. By contrast, blockchains face different dynamics. 

Bitcoin and Ethereum rely on digital signatures that only become vulnerable once CRQCs exist. Moreover, Bitcoin has additional hurdles: slow governance, abandoned coins, and high-value addresses make careful migration planning essential.

As a result, the issue of increased urgency faces particular chains for privacy, like Monero and Zcash: confidential transaction data would be retroactively decrypted once quantum computers reach cryptographic relevance. In that respect, hybrid or fully post-quantum schemes are things these platforms should be invested in, or redesign systems to avoid storing decryptable secrets on-chain.

Challenges and Recommendations for Developers

Post-quantum cryptography is facing an implementation challenge in the near future. Currently, schemes, such as lattice-based and hash-based signatures, can produce much longer signatures compared with traditional schemes. a16z, a leader in venture capital, warns of bugs, side-channel problems, and poor performance.

Thus, blockchain programming requires a methodical approach that entails moving incrementally from hybrid encrypting now, moving toward signatures later, and focusing on securing complex data structures such as zkSNARKs.

The post Quantum Computing vs Blockchain: Timing the Real Threat appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Trader 7fFCzx’s $PENGUIN bet brings massive gains, but the portfolio remains down overall.

Despite a 700% surge, the trader’s strategy shows a high-risk, low-win-rate profile.

Psychological factors play a key role in whether $PENGUIN remains a lifeline or fades into the noise.

Trader 7fFCzx’s bold bet on $PENGUIN has paid off with a 700% gain, turning an initial $54,000 investment into nearly $793,000. However, despite this windfall, the trader's overall portfolio remains in a significant drawdown, highlighting the risks involved.

$PENGUIN’s Explosive Rise in Trader 7fFCzx’s Portfolio

Trader 7fFCzx’s wallet acquired 15.94 million $PENGUIN tokens for around $54,000, and in just two days.

The position has ballooned to nearly $793,000—an unrealized gain of approximately $739,000. This surge represents a staggering 14x return on the initial investment, a dream scenario for many traders in the crypto space.

https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/2014968453577531632?s=20

However, this windfall is just one piece of the puzzle. Despite the impressive $PENGUIN gains, 7fFCzx’s total portfolio remains deep in the red, with a net loss of around $598,000. 

This reveals that the $PENGUIN surge, while substantial, has yet to erase the damage caused by prior trades. The large gain, while noteworthy, doesn’t signify a broader recovery, but rather a partial rebound amid ongoing drawdowns.

High-Risk, Low-Win-Rate Strategy in Focus

Trader 7fFCzx’s broader trading approach highlights a high-risk, low-win-rate strategy. The wallet has traded over 1,000 tokens, many of which are low-cap or early-stage assets. 

However, the win rate for these trades is just 14.55%, meaning fewer than one in seven trades result in profit. Such a strategy requires rare, large wins to offset the frequent losses.

In this case, $PENGUIN stands as one of those rare outliers. A significant portion of 7fFCzx’s positions falls within a 0-200% return range, with some resulting in deep losses. 

This suggests the wallet’s overall performance relies heavily on the few massive winners like $PENGUIN to balance out a history of failed bets. The risk of failure remains high without a shift in strategy or more consistent wins.

https://twitter.com/PumpfunEco/status/2015020639531454816?s=20

Psychological Factors and the Fragility of $PENGUIN’s Position

The psychological aspect of trading plays a key role in how Trader 7fFCzx may handle the $PENGUIN surge. Traders who have suffered large losses often face significant pressure when managing large, unrealized gains. 

The temptation to sell early and lock in profits or, conversely, to hold out for even higher returns, can lead to poor decision-making. 7fFCzx’s past behavior suggests a tendency toward short holding durations and frequent selling. 

This raises the risk that the current $PENGUIN gain may slip away if the trader chooses to sell prematurely or fails to manage the position effectively. If the trader can avoid these pitfalls and hold the position strategically, the $PENGUIN trade could provide the breakthrough needed for long-term recovery. 

However, the volatile nature of crypto markets means that the decision made in the coming days will likely determine whether this trade turns into a lasting win or fades back into the noise.

The post Trader 7fFCzx’s $PENGUIN Surge Offers Massive Gains, Yet Portfolio in Red appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Cathie Wood says AI-driven labor slack and weaker wage pressure could let the Fed cut rates without triggering a recession.

Rising youth unemployment and longer jobless durations signal slower turnover, easing inflation and reducing policy tightening needs.

Wood expects stronger U.S. returns, a firmer dollar, and disinflation in 2026, benefiting long-duration, rate-sensitive assets.

Cathie Wood outlined a bullish outlook for 2026 during recent remarks, pointing to shifting labor trends and policy effects. Speaking on U.S. economic conditions, the ARK Invest founder said the outlook centers on stronger domestic returns, easing inflation, and falling interest rates. She linked these expectations to labor data, currency strength, and artificial intelligence adoption.

Labor Data and the Rate Outlook

Wood said labor conditions support a scenario where rates fall without a recession. She highlighted rising unemployment among younger workers. According to her comments, unemployment for people aged 16 to 24 sits near 12%.

Notably, she added that average unemployment duration now stands at roughly 24 months. These figures indicate slower labor turnover. As a result, wage pressure weakens. Wood attributed part of this trend to artificial intelligence adoption. 

She said AI increasingly replaces entry-level roles. Therefore, businesses reduce hiring at the lower end of the workforce. This shift cools inflation. With less wage pressure, price growth slows. Consequently, the Federal Reserve gains room to cut rates without aggressive tightening.

Strong Dollar and Policy Effects

Wood also focused on currency dynamics. She said U.S. return on invested capital should rise compared to global markets. She linked this outlook to current policy direction. As per Wood, U.S. policies resemble those from the Reagan era. 

However, she said some measures operate at greater scale. As returns rise, capital flows into U.S. markets. That inflow, she explained, supports a stronger dollar. A stronger dollar, in turn, eases inflation pressures. 

Therefore, the Federal Reserve may avoid sharp rate increases during economic expansion. Wood said this environment reduces the need for restrictive monetary policy. Instead, she expects rates to trend lower alongside growth.

Growth, Disinflation and Asset Sensitivity

Wood described her base case as growth paired with disinflation. She also expects declining interest rates. Together, these elements form her central 2026 outlook. She said falling inflation could become pronounced. 

At one point, she referenced the possibility of negative inflation rates. However, she tied that view strictly to labor displacement and productivity gains. Wood noted that this combination historically affects asset pricing. Long-duration assets tend to respond strongly to lower rates. 

Her remarks focused on macro conditions rather than specific investments. Throughout her comments, Wood emphasized data trends rather than forecasts alone. She tied each expectation to employment figures, policy direction, and technology-driven labor shifts.

The post Cathie Wood Sees a Very Different 2026 for Markets appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

The “Crypto Sprint” speeds up crypto adoption and makes rules clearer for derivatives and spot trading.

The “Future-Proof” initiative updates rules for emerging markets, attracting startups and big crypto players.

Selig favors minimal regulation that protects markets without slowing innovation, keeping the U.S. competitive globally.

CFTC Chair Mike Selig says the United States is becoming the “crypto capital of the world.” He shared that the government is updating rules to support innovation in digital currencies while keeping markets safe. Selig also highlighted former President Trump’s role in helping crypto gain wider acceptance.

Since Mike Selig became CFTC Chair, the agency has rolled out new steps to make crypto rules clearer and easier to follow. One key effort, called the “Crypto Sprint,” started in 2025 and is designed to speed up crypto adoption while making regulations more straightforward. It focuses on areas like crypto derivatives and spot trading, helping ensure rules are consistent across the board.

Furthermore, the CFTC has recently allowed the trading of spots in official contract markets, which would mean that the digital assets would be included in the regulated and much safer environments. This shows that the US authorities want the country to be the forerunner in the development of cryptocurrency while having the market monitored properly.

Strategic Initiatives and “Future-Proof” Framework

The CFTC also introduced a new program called “Future-Proof” to update rules for fast-growing areas like perpetual futures and prediction markets. This shows the agency understands how quickly digital finance is changing.

Mike Selig aims to achieve a balance between promoting innovation and safeguarding the market. The effort seeks to make the United States more appealing to both established businesses and cryptocurrency startups by updating current regulations. America is therefore shifting from cautiously observing the cryptocurrency field to actively influencing it.

Selig also supports what he calls a “minimum effective dose of regulation,” meaning the rules should protect the market without slowing down innovation. He believes regulations should help the crypto industry grow while keeping it safe.

The CFTC is now embracing blockchain technology and collaborating closely with the cryptocurrency sector, as seen by its new strategy. These actions, however, are part of a larger strategy to maintain American leadership in the rapidly expanding digital economy.

The post U.S. Positions as Global Crypto Hub Under CFTC Oversight appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Las Vegas businesses adopt Bitcoin to avoid 2.5–3.5% card fees, keeping more revenue as operating costs rise.

QR-based Bitcoin payments are fast and simple, helping merchants attract crypto users and boost foot traffic.

Square’s zero-fee Bitcoin rollout and national brands like Steak ’n Shake accelerate local adoption.

Bitcoin payments are spreading across Las Vegas as more local businesses begin accepting the cryptocurrency. According to FOX News, the shift is happening across retail, food, and service industries. Business owners say rising operating costs and high credit card fees pushed the move, while simpler technology made Bitcoin payments easier to manage.

Lower Fees Drive Merchant Adoption

Many Las Vegas merchants cite transaction costs as the main reason for adopting Bitcoin. Credit card processors typically charge businesses between 2.5% and 3.5% per transaction. By comparison, Bitcoin transaction fees remain significantly lower.

Jeremy Quercy, a Bitcoin consultant, told FOX News that merchants want alternatives as expenses rise. He explained that Bitcoin reduces reliance on intermediaries. Therefore, businesses keep more revenue per sale.

Mike Peterson, CEO of Bouncy World Mega Playground & Cafe, confirmed the savings matter. He said Bitcoin fees cost only a fraction of card charges. Since adoption, roughly 20 to 30 customers have paid using Bitcoin. Notably, usage continues to increase steadily.

Simpler Payments Attract New Customers

Beyond cost savings, business owners point to ease of use. Quercy said customers complete payments by scanning a QR code. Payments process instantly using standard Bitcoin apps.

Cane Juice Bar and Cafe, located on Rainbow near Windmill, adopted Bitcoin eight months ago. District manager Tyler Peterson said Bitcoin appeals to everyday customers. He added that callers frequently ask whether the store accepts Bitcoin.

According to Peterson, Bitcoin maps also drive foot traffic. Customers locate nearby businesses that accept digital currency. As a result, the café gained new visitors specifically seeking Bitcoin payment options.

National Chains Join Local Bitcoin Trend

The trend extends beyond small businesses. Steak ‘n Shake introduced limited-edition Bitcoin-themed menu items in Las Vegas. The chain also offers employees a Bitcoin bonus of $0.21 per hour worked. However, payouts follow a two-year vesting schedule.

Meanwhile, Square enabled roughly four million U.S. merchants to accept Bitcoin with zero processing fees through 2026. This change removed a major barrier to adoption. Consequently, Las Vegas merchants gained broader access to Bitcoin payment infrastructure.

FOX News reported that Bitcoin acceptance now spans restaurants, juice bars, medical practices, and children’s play facilities. Together, these developments show how Bitcoin continues integrating into everyday commerce across Las Vegas.

The post Las Vegas Is Going Bitcoin as Local Businesses Adopt BTC appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Big Bitcoin holders are confident, moving $1M+ coins, hinting they’re preparing for future opportunities.

Long-time holders and medium investors are selling, putting pressure on prices despite whale accumulation.

Weak U.S. institutional demand adds caution, creating a mixed market picture for Bitcoin near $89K.

Bitcoin markets are under the spotlight as large holders, or whales, actively adjust their positions. Data from Santiment shows that wallets holding at least 1,000 BTC added 104,340 coins, a 1.5% increase. These whales now control 7.17 million BTC—the most since September 15, 2025.

Despite the market's volatility, large Bitcoin holders are exhibiting confidence, according to Santiment data. Whales are actively transferring their coins, as seen by the two-month high in transfers of more than $1 million. These investors might be getting ready for fresh market possibilities.

Santiment noted that these actions demonstrate that large investors are discreetly purchasing additional Bitcoin rather than selling. This implies that they are optimistic about Bitcoin's prospects for the upcoming months. However, not all market signs are as optimistic. While whales are holding more coins and moving large amounts, other data shows some caution, making the market’s overall picture a bit mixed.

Market Indicators Signal Caution

Even though whales are buying more Bitcoin, crypto analyst EgyHash points out some warning signs. Bitcoin’s demand chart shows that the strong buying seen in mid-2025 has turned into negative demand in January 2026. This means long-time holders are selling their coins faster than new buyers can take them, putting downward pressure on the price.

Also, the chart tracking whales’ year-over-year holdings shows they are starting to reduce their Bitcoin instead of adding more. In the past, this usually meant big investors were stepping back from the market. On top of that, data on medium-to-large investors, called ‘dolphins,’ shows they have moved from buying heavily to taking profits. This suggests that several types of investors are now selling rather than holding.

Moreover, the Coinbase Premium Index sits in deep negative territory, implying weak institutional demand from the U.S. market. “All four indicators are currently showing a bearish convergence,” EgyHash noted, emphasizing that both whales and dolphins are selling, contributing to the current $89.4K price dip.

The post Bitcoin Whales Ramp Up Holdings Amid Market Uncertainty appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Japan plans to reclassify XRP under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, moving it beyond standard crypto rules.

XRP’s new status would impose stricter disclosures, licensing and AML compliance, aligning it with traditional investments.

Regulators aim to match XRP’s legal framework with its growing use in Japan’s banking and tokenized payment systems.

Japan plans to classify XRP as a regulated financial product under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. The change, expected by Q2 2026, would occur in Japan under national regulatory reforms. Regulators aim to shift XRP from a crypto asset category, strengthen investor protections, and align oversight with traditional financial products through updated compliance rules.

Regulatory Shift 

Japan currently regulates most digital assets under the Payment Services Act. However, regulators now plan to bring XRP under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act framework. This move would subject XRP to stricter oversight, including exchange licensing, disclosure standards, and anti-money laundering requirements.

Notably, the proposed change would place XRP alongside conventional investment products. Regulators intend to reduce legal ambiguity for exchanges, institutions, and retail investors. The timeline targets Q2 2026, giving market participants time to adjust compliance systems.

According to reports, authorities want clearer investor safeguards and more defined operational rules. Therefore, XRP would move beyond its current crypto asset status. The reclassification reflects Japan’s broader effort to refine digital asset regulation through established financial laws.

XRP Ledger Role in Japan’s Tokenized Economy

Alongside regulatory changes, Japan is leveraging the XRP Ledger within its tokenized economy initiatives. The ledger already supports payment and settlement infrastructure across the country. Banks and financial firms continue expanding XRP Ledger use for remittances and related services.

Consequently, the planned classification aligns regulatory treatment with existing institutional usage. XRP already holds a significant share of Japan’s crypto transaction volumes. Regulators appear focused on formalizing frameworks around assets already embedded in financial systems.

This alignment supports regulated participation without altering existing infrastructure. Therefore, oversight would increase while technical adoption continues under established platforms.

Compliance, Tax Structure and Market Context

Japanese regulators are also reviewing simplified tax structures for digital assets. Reports reference discussions around a flat 20% capital gains tax. Such measures aim to standardize reporting and reduce compliance uncertainty for investors.

However, the XRP initiative does not change other crypto classifications immediately. Most digital assets remain regulated under current payment laws. XRP’s case reflects a targeted approach rather than a system-wide overhaul.

Japan continues coordinating with blockchain firms while enforcing consumer protection standards. The XRP classification effort fits within that framework. Regulators seek structured oversight, defined compliance, and controlled institutional participation under existing financial legislation.

The post Japan Plans to Classify XRP as Regulated Financial Asset appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

MegaETH runs on one server, letting it censor, front-run, or even steal user funds. Centralization is a real risk.

L2 fees mostly go to MegaETH, not Ethereum. Users pay $0.003 while ETH sees just 0.2% of value.

Despite risks, MegaETH scales efficiently—but true decentralization still favors L1s like SOL, SUI, and NEAR.

A new wave of concern has emerged in the Ethereum ecosystem as MegaETH, a prominent Layer 2 (L2) solution, faces criticism for extreme centralization risks. According to crypto analyst Justin Bons on X, MegaETH can censor, front-run, and even steal all user funds without delay. 

He warns that its entire network runs on a single centralized server, making its claimed high-speed performance less impressive. Bons emphasizes that less than 0.2% of fees return to Ethereum, labeling the system as “exceptionally parasitic.”

Bons explains that MegaETH’s architecture exposes users to critical admin key risks. Its smart contract, managed via a 4-of-8 multisignature, could be upgraded to send all deposited tokens to a new address. “This is currently the case for all major L2s!” he stated. 

While major exploits have not yet occurred, Bons warns that similar security setups in other contracts have failed, making a large-scale fund loss only a matter of time. Additionally, MegaETH relies on a single permissioned sequencer, giving it the ability to censor transactions or prioritize profits through MEV. Consequently, decentralization claims become misleading.

Centralization vs. Performance

MegaETH’s hardware demands are extreme. Operating one sequencer costs over $100,000 per year, twenty times higher than a Solana validator. Although two backup sequencers exist, Bons argues that the path to true decentralization essentially recreates L1 consensus mechanisms, negating L2 advantages. 

Moreover, the 10ms transaction speed claim ignores latency across global distances, undermining MegaETH’s speed comparisons to L1s like ETH, SOL, SUI, or NEAR. Bons adds, “Having a single centralized server solves many bottlenecks that real cryptocurrencies have to work around.”

Economically, MegaETH contributes very little to Ethereum. Charging $0.003 per transaction while the L2 operation costs just $0.000006 per user operation, MegaETH captures nearly all value for itself. Bons highlights this parasitic relationship, noting that MegaETH settles on EigenDA, not ETH. 

Despite these criticisms, Bons acknowledges MegaETH’s engineering feat: “MegaETH is the most interesting & best L2 from my perspective, as unlike other ETH L2’s, it actually scales!”

The post MegaETH Raises Red Flags for Centralization Risks in Layer 2 Scaling appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

AFP Protección will launch a Bitcoin exposure fund for qualified investors, limiting allocation to support long-term diversification.

Access will be advisory-based, with risk profiling and exclusion of mandatory pension savings from Bitcoin exposure.

The move makes Protección Colombia’s second major pension manager to offer Bitcoin exposure after Skandia.

Colombia’s second-largest pension fund manager, AFP Protección, plans to launch a Bitcoin exposure fund for qualified investors. The plan was confirmed in Colombia during a recent interview by company president Juan David Correa. The initiative targets long-term diversification through limited Bitcoin allocation, using personalized advisory, as Protección manages about $55 billion in assets.

Advisory-Based Access Shapes the Fund Structure

Protección SA, a private Colombian financial institution, will offer the Bitcoin exposure through individualized advisory services. According to Juan David Correa, advisers will first evaluate each investor’s risk profile. Only investors meeting defined criteria will gain access to Bitcoin allocation.

Notably, the fund will allow only a small percentage of portfolios to include Bitcoin. The structure limits exposure and emphasizes controlled participation. Correa explained to Valora Analitik that diversification remains the central objective. Bitcoin will complement traditional assets rather than replace them.

This approach applies mainly to voluntary or personalized contributions. Mandatory pension savings plans remain excluded. Protección’s strategy reflects a cautious framework designed to manage volatility within long-term savings portfolios.

Protección’s Scale and Market Position

Protección ranks as Colombia’s second-largest pension fund administrator. The firm serves approximately 8.5 million clients across mandatory pensions, voluntary savings, and severance pay plans. Assets under management exceed 220 trillion Colombian pesos, based on recent company data.

The broader mandatory pension market reached 527.3 trillion pesos in November 2025. Nearly 48.8% of those assets were invested abroad. However, Protección’s Bitcoin fund will not target mass pension allocations. Instead, it focuses on tailored investment strategies for eligible participants.

By size and reach, Protección’s product decisions influence Colombia’s private pension landscape. Therefore, its entry into Bitcoin exposure marks a notable development within voluntary pension offerings.

Bitcoin Exposure Expands Within Colombian Pensions

Protección follows Skandia Administradora de Fondos de Pensiones y Cesantías SA, which already offers Bitcoin exposure. Skandia introduced a similar portfolio. Consequently, Protección becomes the second major pension manager in Colombia to adopt this approach.

However, traditional assets still dominate pension investments nationwide. Fixed income, equities, and international funds remain primary holdings. Protección confirmed that the Bitcoin fund prioritizes diversification and risk management. The initiative broadens options for qualified investors without altering Colombia’s core pension structure.

The post Colombia Pension Giant Protección Plans Bitcoin Exposure Fund appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Creator coins turned friendships into trades—bots and speculators ran the show, not real users.

Complex wallets, gas fees, and chains scared off everyday users used to simple apps.

The tech lives on, but apps fail when money comes before real human connection.

SocialFi, once hailed as the future of social media, faces a dramatic collapse by early 2026. Platforms like Friend.tech, RLY, CYBER, DESO, and DEGEN now struggle or vanish entirely. Tokens linked to these networks have lost between 90% and 99% of their value. 

According to Our Crypto Talk, the collapse stems from speculative capital, bot farming, and short-term trading dominating communities. When incentives dried up, user engagement evaporated almost overnight.

The promise of SocialFi was seductive. It merged Web2 frustrations with crypto’s ownership ethos. Instead of giving attention to advertisers, creators could earn directly. Social graphs would become economic assets, and users would finally control value. 

Venture capital poured in, while crypto Twitter celebrated the idea. However, SocialFi assumed money would improve social behavior—a fatal miscalculation. Vitalik Buterin warned that monetizing social interactions distorts culture and collapses communities.

Speculation Hijacked Social Interactions

SocialFi’s first-generation design monetized individuals, not platforms. Access tokens and creator coins made relationships financial instruments. Users focused on trading and pumping reputations rather than sharing content or forming bonds. 

Early traction appeared strong, with daily volumes hitting eight figures and thousands of daily active users. However, most activity came from bots, speculators, and traders. Genuine community engagement never developed, and once financial incentives slowed, users left.

Moreover, platforms failed to solve usability challenges. Wallets, gas fees, and chain selection created onboarding friction. Users accustomed to effortless Web2 apps like Twitter or Bluesky resisted SocialFi’s complexity. Network effects compounded the problem. People joined apps where their friends already were. Incentives temporarily attracted attention, but SocialFi never captured real social graphs.

Infrastructure Survives While Apps Die

Interestingly, decentralized infrastructure like wallets, identity layers, and social primitives continues to persist. Farcaster’s recent pivot and acquisition illustrate this. Dan Romero emphasized that infrastructure remains functional, while apps built on top fail without proper social design. 

SocialFi conflated infrastructure creation with product adoption, accelerating its decline. Future iterations will likely separate money from social interactions, offering optional monetization and invisible wallets.

SocialFi failed because it treated human connections like financial assets. Vitalik pointed out that crypto should enable social tools, not take over them. Future platforms will focus on social interaction first and financial features second, allowing communities to develop naturally.

The post SocialFi Collapse: Why Creator Coins Failed to Stick appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

The SEC ended the Gemini Earn case with prejudice after Earn users received full in-kind crypto repayments via Genesis bankruptcy.

Investor restitution drove the dismissal, with Genesis returning $2B in assets and Gemini adding up to $40M for customers.

The move fits a broader SEC pullback on crypto enforcement, following similar case closures involving major crypto firms.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ended its long-running case against Gemini Trust Company on January 23, 2026, in New York. Court filings show the regulator dismissed the Gemini Earn lawsuit with prejudice, blocking any future refiling. The decision followed full crypto repayments to Earn users through Genesis Global Capital’s bankruptcy process.

Court Filing Ends Gemini Earn Dispute

According to filings in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the SEC and Gemini submitted a joint stipulation Friday. The filing formally dismissed claims that Gemini Earn involved unregistered securities offerings. A federal judge must still approve the stipulation; however, the filing confirms the dispute’s near conclusion.

The SEC initially sued Gemini Trust Company and Genesis Global Capital in January 2023. The lawsuit focused on the Gemini Earn program, which allowed users to earn interest by lending crypto to Genesis. The agency paused the case in April 2024 while reassessing several crypto enforcement actions.

Notably, Genesis already settled with the SEC earlier by agreeing to pay a $21 million penalty. With Genesis resolved, attention shifted to investor recovery outcomes tied to the bankruptcy proceedings.

Investor Repayments Drove the SEC Decision

The SEC linked its dismissal directly to investor restitution achieved during the Genesis bankruptcy. Court documents state Gemini Earn users received a full in-kind return of their crypto holdings by mid-2024. These repayments occurred between May and June 2024.

Additionally, Gemini agreed to contribute up to $40 million to support customer recoveries. The regulator noted that returned assets significantly reduced investor harm. Gemini also resolved related matters with state regulators, including New York authorities.

Genesis returned roughly $2 billion in crypto assets to customers, including about $900 million tied to nearly 340,000 Gemini Earn users. Funds had remained frozen since late 2022 after Genesis suffered losses linked to FTX exposure.

Background and Broader Enforcement Context

Gemini launched Earn in December 2020 through a partnership with Genesis, a Digital Currency Group affiliate. Withdrawals froze in 2022 during market turmoil following FTX’s collapse. That freeze triggered extensive litigation and regulatory scrutiny.

Since January 2025, the SEC has dropped or narrowed several crypto cases. Similar enforcement reversals affected Binance, Kraken, Uniswap, Immutable, and Robinhood. The agency also cited asset recovery when ending other disputes.

Gemini, founded by Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, completed Earn repayments before the dismissal. Gemini Space Station, now publicly listed on Nasdaq as GEMI, closed lower Friday after the filing.

The post SEC Drops Gemini Case for Good After Earn Repayments appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

a16z says no cryptographically relevant quantum computer exists yet, making near-term blockchain breakage unlikely this decade.

Post-quantum encryption needs earlier adoption, but digital signatures and blockchains face far lower immediate quantum risk.

Implementation bugs and side-channel attacks pose greater near-term threats to blockchains than quantum computing advances.

Fears that quantum computers will soon break blockchain cryptography continue to grow, however new analysis urges restraint. According to a16z, claims about imminent quantum threats overstate current capabilities and risk costly, premature security changes. The firm released its assessment this month, focusing on blockchains, encryption, and digital signatures.

Quantum Timelines and Technical Reality

According to a16z, a cryptographically relevant quantum computer does not exist today and remains unlikely this decade. Such a system would require fault-tolerant machines capable of running Shor’s algorithm against RSA-2048 or secp256k1. 

Current platforms lack sufficient qubits, gate fidelity, and sustained error-corrected depth. Notably, some companies cite “quantum advantage” demonstrations, however these focus on narrow, impractical tasks. 

Others reference thousands of qubits, which often describe quantum annealers, not gate-model systems. a16z also highlighted confusion around “logical qubits,” noting true cryptographic attacks would require thousands of fully error-corrected logical qubits.

Scott Aaronson recently acknowledged faster hardware progress, yet later clarified that small-scale Shor demonstrations do not threaten real cryptography. Factoring trivial numbers, such as 15, does not equate to breaking blockchain security.

Encryption Risks Differ From Signatures

a16z stressed that harvest-now-decrypt-later attacks already threaten encrypted data requiring long-term secrecy. As a result, post-quantum encryption demands earlier adoption despite performance costs. 

Chrome, Cloudflare, Apple iMessage, and Signal have deployed hybrid encryption combining classical and post-quantum methods. However, digital signatures face different risks. Signatures do not hide data, so past signatures cannot be retroactively forged. 

Therefore, a16z said immediate migration to post-quantum signatures remains unnecessary. Zero-knowledge proofs, including zkSNARKs, also avoid harvest-now risks because they reveal no confidential information.

Blockchains Face Uneven Exposure

Most blockchains, including Bitcoin and Ethereum, rely on signatures rather than encryption, limiting harvest-now exposure. Privacy-focused chains differ because encrypted transaction data could be later exposed. 

a16z cited Monero and Zcash as examples where design choices affect quantum risk severity. Bitcoin faces separate challenges unrelated to quantum timelines. 

Governance speed, abandoned coins, and exposed public keys complicate migration. Meanwhile, a16z emphasized that implementation bugs and side-channel attacks pose far greater near-term risks than quantum computers.

The post Quantum Threats to Blockchains May Be Overstated, a16z Says appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

India’s FIU bans trading, deposits, and withdrawals of privacy coins to strengthen AML and counter-terrorism measures.

Traders may need to move Monero, Zcash, and Dash to other platforms as exchanges adjust to new rules.

Prices briefly bounced despite the ban, but weekly losses remain steep for all three privacy coins.

India has told crypto exchanges to stop trading privacy coins like Monero, Zcash, and Dash immediately. The Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) says this step is to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing.

Exchanges must immediately stop trading, deposits, and withdrawals for the affected coins. Even as India builds a bigger crypto rulebook, this move shows it’s taking a tougher stance on coins that hide transactions.

The FIU said privacy coins’ extra anonymity makes it harder to monitor money flows. Regulators worry because Monero, Zcash, and Dash use advanced ways to hide transaction history. Exchanges that don’t follow the rules risk fines or even losing their license.

Officials explained that India wants transparency in crypto transactions and aims to track activity within its financial systems. So, the focus is on following the rules rather than banning crypto completely.

Operational and Market Impacts

Exchanges in India must quickly disable affected trading pairs and manage user balances. Traders holding privacy coins may need to transfer assets to other platforms, considering legal constraints. This directive requires immediate operational adjustments, and clear communication with users becomes critical. Additionally, platform developers must ensure AML protocols align with new FIU requirements.

Market prices for these privacy coins shown short-term resiliency in the face of legislative pressure. At $524, Monero was up 3.5% over the previous day. Dash increased 11.6% throughout that time, while Zcash increased 2.2% to $372.

Weekly trends are still negative, though, with losses of about 20% for Dash, 8% for Zcash, and 21% for Monero. As a result, dealers operate in a volatile environment as India strikes a balance between continued participation in the cryptocurrency market and regulatory monitoring.

The post India Bans Privacy Coin Trading on Local Exchanges appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Nexo’s 16,000+ Trustpilot reviews show users aren’t just borrowing—they actively engage with the platform.

The platform hit $30B in stablecoin inflows, proving steady demand for crypto-backed loans worldwide.

Despite $45M in U.S. fines, Nexo keeps expanding internationally and sponsoring major events like the Australian Open.

Nexo has established itself as the most community-connected platform in crypto lending. According to CryptoQuant analyst maartunn, “Trustpilot review volume is a strong proxy for community touchpoints. Nexo’s numbers suggest users aren’t just transacting, they’re talking about the platform.” With over 16,000 reviews and a 4.5-star rating, Nexo shows how having an active, happy community can really boost a platform’s trustworthiness. 

This comes at a time when crypto rules are changing and the market is constantly shifting, which has influenced how Nexo runs its services over the years.

Beyond just lending, Nexo keeps adding new features. Users can take out crypto-backed loans and access other financial tools all in one place. Because of this, Nexo stands out from other lending platforms, attracting users and bigger investors.

Over $2 billion was transferred into stablecoins per month in 2021 and 2022, which indicates an active market. The total quantity of stablecoins in circulation reached $30 billion by January 2026, showing sustained strength of demand for these virtual currencies.

Regulatory Challenges and Compliance

Nexor recently ran into some big regulatory challenges in the U.S. In California. The Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) fined the company for giving loans without a proper license to at least 5,456 residents. The DFPI said Nexo failed to assess borrowers’ ability to repay, existing debt levels or credit history.

On top of that, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission hit Nexo with a $22.5 million penalty in 2023, bringing total U.S. fines to $45 million. As a result, Nexo is expected to move all funds from California residents to a licensed affiliate within 150 days.

A Nexo spokesperson explained, “The matter referenced relates to legacy issues from an earlier phase of the business in 2022 and was resolved through a settlement with the relevant regulatory authority.”

Growth and Market Trajectory

Even with these challenges, Nexo is still growing internationally and running high-profile marketing campaigns with its multi-year sponsorship of the Australian Open. In 2023, the platform took a cautious approach, but user activity and engagement stayed steady.

CryptoQuant analyst Darkfost pointed out that Nexo’s performance reflects shifting investor behavior during growth cycles and market corrections. Further, Nexo’s wide range of services keeps it competitive.

The post Nexo Emerges as the Most Community-Connected Crypto Lender appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Senate postpones votes, pushing crypto market structure markup likely to Tuesday, creating schedule pressure.

New bipartisan amendments, including the Credit Card Competition Act, add complexity to the crypto bill negotiations.

Compressed Senate schedule and partisan disagreements further delay progress on crypto legislation and funding measures.

The U.S. Senate canceled Monday votes due to a severe snowstorm, delaying the Agriculture Committee’s crypto market structure markup. Lawmakers now likely aim for Tuesday afternoon votes, leaving the bill’s fate uncertain. Committee officials offered “nothing to announce yet,” while new amendments, including the bipartisan Credit Card Competition Act, were recently filed.

Amendments Add Complexity

The Credit Card Competition Act, proposed by Senators Roger Marshall, Dick Durbin, and Peter Welch, bars certain credit card networks and issuers from requiring exclusivity. These changes were added to the draft shared Wednesday. 

The Senate Agriculture Committee previously postponed the markup to ensure bipartisan support, with Senator Boozman noting that consensus could not be reached. The amendment filings add another layer to ongoing negotiations. 

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand remains optimistic about progress, while Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott highlighted bipartisan discussions with crypto industry and financial sector leaders. Despite these efforts, the committee has not set a new date for the markup.

Weather Disruptions Compress Senate Schedule

The National Weather Service forecasted heavy snow and ice accumulation in Washington, prompting Senate leaders to shift votes to Tuesday evening. Ryan Wrasse, spokesperson for Senator John Thune, confirmed the delay aimed to account for “impending weather,” while emphasizing the urgency of passing six remaining spending measures before the January 30 government shutdown deadline.

The House has already passed a $1.2 trillion funding package, leaving the Senate with fewer in-person days to negotiate. Dissent among senators complicates approval, including Democratic concerns over ICE funding, federal worker protections, and health insurance guarantees, as raised by Senators Tim Kaine and Chris Coons. Republicans also face pressure from conservative groups led by Senator Rick Scott to remove earmarks.

With the House absent and weather disruptions limiting Senate floor time, lawmakers face a compressed schedule to advance both the crypto market bill and remaining funding measures. The combination of winter storms, legislative amendments, and partisan concerns continues to delay the Senate’s crypto markup process.

The post Senate Postpones Crypto Market Bill Leading to Uncertainty Around Markup on Jan 27 appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

$AXS confirms bullish trend shift after retesting 2.50–2.46 support zone.

Price reaches 2.927, signaling strong buyer conviction and momentum.

Potential pullback toward 2.60–2.50 could offer an ideal entry for new buyers.

$AXS (Axie Infinity) has shifted from recovery mode into trend acceleration, with a decisive break above critical price levels. This shift is marked by a successful retest of key support, signaling a bullish trend continuation. The recent price action suggests more upside potential, with a controlled pullback being the next logical step.

Price Action and Trend Acceleration

The price of $AXS has transitioned from a consolidation phase to a marked uptrend, following the successful retest of the 2.50–2.46 support zone. This level, previously acting as resistance, has now turned into a key demand zone. 

When the price bounced off this area, it solidified the shift in market sentiment, allowing for a confident push higher. The breakout to 2.927, the highest price of 2026, confirms that buyers are willing to chase prices higher. 

This signals confidence in the trend rather than exhaustion. The impulsive nature of the move, along with expanding volume, suggests that the rise is driven by fresh buying interest, not short covering or forced buying.

Given the strength of the breakout, the next logical price targets are around 2.98 and 3.02. Levels that align with both psychological round numbers and local resistance zones. 

However, extending the target range to 3.11 makes sense, as the 3.10–3.11 area marks historical resistance and a potential liquidity trap.

https://twitter.com/0xWhale/status/2014579356798988476?s=20

Momentum and Compression Risk

While $AXS has shown strong momentum, momentum indicators are flashing signs of potential compression. The RSI on the 4-hour chart is currently in overbought territory, signaling that the market is becoming overheated. 

Historically, $AXS has not sustained vertical moves without a pullback, and such overbought conditions often lead to a correction or consolidation. A healthy retracement toward the 2.70–2.60 region, or possibly a deeper pullback to the 2.50 support zone, would help reset momentum. 

This would allow the RSI to cool down, providing a more favorable entry for fresh buyers. 

Market Makers and Liquidity Engineering

At current levels, market makers could engineer liquidity, especially as the price reaches the 2.98–3.11 resistance zone. By pushing price into this range, smart money could distribute positions into strength, triggering breakout FOMO and enticing new buyers to chase. 

Once the price reaches these levels, they could walk the price back into demand, optimizing their positions. For retail traders, chasing prices at these levels presents risks. 

Even though the broader trend is bullish, the potential for a pullback increases as the market reaches overbought conditions. This is why a cautious approach, waiting for a correction, may be the best strategy for entering the market at more favorable levels.

The post $AXS Breaks Key Resistance: Bullish Momentum Builds for 2026 appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Bitcoin surged despite PMI below 50, showing manufacturing alone doesn’t drive crypto moves.

Historical BTC tops aligned with PMI above 55, so current readings suggest more upside ahead.

Next key macro signal is the Feb 2 PMI print, likely influencing the cycle’s “blow off” top.

Bitcoin investors will need to stay patient because the bigger bull run hasn’t kicked in yet. U.S. manufacturing activity, measured by the ISM PMI, has stayed below 50 since 2023, which usually signals the economy is shrinking rather than growing. Still, Bitcoin shot up from $16,000 to over $73,000, showing that manufacturing data alone doesn’t predict its price moves.

Ignas | DeFi called this out, saying, “BTC price prediction based on Manufacturing PMI is dumb…” PMI stayed below 50 in 2023 and early 2024, yet BTC pumped from $16k to $73k.” He added, “Claiming Bitcoin is driven by liquidity, institutional adoption (now ETFs), gold, and fiscal dominance makes sense. Manufacturing doesn’t.”

Manufacturing Weakness vs. Bitcoin Momentum

U.S. manufacturing remains subdued, contributing less than 15% to GDP, while services dominate roughly 80%. Satoshi Flipper noted, “The bull market Bitcoin blow off top starts forming when this PMI index starts printing above 50 again, until then .... PATIENCE.” 

The ISM Manufacturing PMI has fluctuated narrowly between 47 and 49 since late 2022, signaling stability without expansion. Recent readings include 48.7 in August 2025, 49.1 in September, and 47.9 by December. Consequently, manufacturing’s lack of momentum fails to trigger strong economic acceleration or sustained dollar strength, factors traditionally tied to market tops.

What This Means for Bitcoin Investors

Historically, Bitcoin cycle tops coincided with PMI peaks above 55. Brain of AskGigabrain explained, “The 2017 top saw PMI at ~60, and the 2021 top hit as PMI hovered near record highs of 61.” With the December print at 47.9 and January forecasts flat, the euphoric phase is delayed. 

Consequently, this cycle may evolve into an extended “supercycle” rather than a standard halving peak. As of writing, Bitcoin trades at $89,493.19, up 0.61% in the last 24 hours, with $32.2 billion in 24-hour trading volume. The next major macro signal arrives with the February 2nd PMI print

The post Bitcoin Cycle Tops: PMI Below 50 Delays Bull Run appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.