Amir Thapa chhetri

Following Donald Trump's triumphant return to the White House in November 2024, America was filled with whispers of a Fed overhaul fueled by the president's longstanding grudge against incumbent FED chair "Jerome Powell", whom he tagged a "disaster" on several occasions for resisting aggressive rate cuts during his first term as President.
On January 30, 2026, President Donald Trump took the bold move announcing his nomination of Kevin Warsh to serve as the next Chair of the Federal Reserve, succeeding Jerome Powell whose term as chair concludes in May.
Who is Kevin Warsh?
Kevin Maxwell Warsh is an American financier, former central banker, and economist. He was born on April 13th, 1970, in Albany, New York and currently 55 years old. Kevin is best known for serving as a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors from 2006 to 2011, appointed by President George W. Bush.
He played a major role as the Fed's primary liaison to Wall Street, helped navigate crisis response efforts and served as the Fed's representative to the G20. Before the Fed work, Kevin worked in mergers and acquisitions at Morgan Stanley (1995-2002), rising to vice president and executive director.
Briefly after leaving FED in 2011, he had also served in different notable capacities like:
1. Shepard Family Distinguished Visiting Fellow in Economics at Stanford University's Hoover Institution.
2. Lecturer and Dean’s Visiting Scholar at the Stanford Graduate School of Business.
3. Partner at Duquesne Family Office (associated with investor Stanley Druckenmiller).
4. Board member of companies like UPS and Coupang (a major Korean e-commerce firm).
5. Member of the Group of Thirty (G30) and the Congressional Budget Office's Panel of Economic Advisers.
Kevin's credentials are somewhat referred as unimpeachable as an expert on monetary policy, banking, international finance, and has been a frequent speaker and commentator on economic issues.
What do you think about this nomination?
#WhoIsNextFedChair $SOL
$TRUMP

Introduction: Reputation is the Missing Layer in the Creator Economy
As a creator in Web3, I’ve noticed something strange: we can tokenize almost everything art, access, communities but reputation itself is still mostly invisible. Likes, views and follows are platform owned signals, not creator owned assets. When creators move platforms or collaborate across ecosystems, much of their hard earned credibility gets reset or ignored.
This is where Walrus begins to matter in a deeper way. Beyond tokens or incentives, Walrus opens the door to creator reputation graphs on chain records of contribution, participation and impact that persist over time. Instead of reputation being a fragile social signal, it becomes verifiable, portable, and composable, something creators truly own.
The Problem With Platform-Based Reputation
In today’s creator economy, reputation is fragmented. A creator might be respected in one community but invisible in another. Contributions are locked inside platforms, and collaboration history is rarely preserved in a way that others can verify.
This creates three major problems that I’ve encountered personally:
Loss of context: New collaborators can’t easily see a creator’s full history.
Reputation resets: Moving platforms often means starting from zero.
Unequal recognition: Silent contributors and behind-the-scenes creators are often overlooked.
Walrus as a Reputation Layer for Creators
Walrus approaches this problem from a data first perspective. Instead of treating creator activity as disposable events, Walrus allows creator actions to be recorded as structured, on chain data forming the basis of a reputation graph that persists across time and use cases. In simple terms, this means:
Contributions can be logged and verified
Collaboration history persists across projects
Engagement is measured by depth, not just likes
Over time, these records form a living reputation profile—not controlled by a single platform, but shaped by real participation.
From my perspective, this changes how value is perceived. You’re no longer just someone who “posted something once.” You’re someone with a track record.
Why Reputation Graphs Matter for Creators
Reputation graphs unlock practical benefits that go far beyond impressions:
Better collaboration: Teams can evaluate contributors based on real history.
Fairer rewards: Recognition and incentives align with actual effort.
Trust without gatekeepers: Reputation becomes verifiable without centralized moderation.
For creators who work in collectives, DAOs, or open communities, where contribution matters more than follower counts, this is especially powerful.
Real-World Use Cases in Practice
Here’s how creator reputation graphs on Walrus could play out in real life:
Collaborative media projects: Writers, designers, and editors build shared histories that future teams can easily verify.
Open creator communities: Active contributors gain reputation-based access without manual vetting.
Long-term creator brands: Reputation becomes part of a creator’s identity, not tied to a single app or trend.
In each scenario, Walrus enables creators to carry their credibility with them, wherever they build next.
Trading Data Anchors the Discussion
This is where today’s trading data helps anchor the discussion and show real market context. As of the current market snapshot:
(Walrus) is trading around $0.14–$0.15 USD per token.
The 24-hour trading volume is roughly $11.3 million USD, reflecting active participation and liquidity in the market.
$WAL
0.1065
+0.09%
Its market capitalization sits around $218 million USD, with a circulating supply of about 1.54 billion WAL out of a 5 billion max supply.
Coin Market Cap
While price alone doesn’t define the utility of a project, these figures show that there is real economic activity and interest around the Walrus token. For a platform that aims to support creator reputation and on-chain history, liquidity and market participation help ensure that reputation assets have real visibility and potential economic value not just symbolic significance.
From Visibility to Verifiability
The biggest shift Walrus introduces is moving creators away from chasing visibility toward building verifiable value. Visibility fades, algorithms change, and platforms disappear but a reputation graph, if designed well, endures as an immutable record of contribution.
This reframes how creators think about growth. Instead of optimizing only for reach, they can optimize for meaningful contribution, knowing that their effort will remain part of their on-chain story.
Final Thoughts: Reputation That Compounds
In my view, Walrus isn’t just about tokens or decentralized data; it’s about memory. It gives the creator economy a way to remember who contributed, how they contributed, and why it mattered.
For creators who want their work, effort, and collaboration to compound over time, reputation graphs may be one of the most underrated building blocks in Web3. Walrus positions itself right at the center of that shift quietly turning contribution into something permanent rather than ephemeral.
$WAL

Bb

Tomorrow will be the worst day of 2026 for markets.
If you think a shutdown is “just politics,” remember what happened in 2025:
→ GDP crashed 2.8%
→ Trillions wiped out across the stock market
This is how “politics” turns into market destruction:
Political tensions have escalated and Democrats are using it to slow the DHS funding bill on the Senate floor.
That explains it all.
DHS funding is the fuse.
If the DHS bill stalls, a partial shutdown clock starts ticking straight into the deadline.
And a shutdown isn’t just “everybody stays home.”
→ Paychecks get postponed
→ Government contracts stall
→ Approvals grind to a halt
→ Key data releases get delayed
Uncertainty slows the whole economy.
And then the markets do exactly the same thing every time:
1⃣ Bonds sell off first
2⃣ Stocks dump second
3⃣ Crypto and commodities dump ever harder
Already we’re seeing markets break lower:
→ Gold is down ~9%
→ Silver has dumped ~14%
→ S&P 500 fell ~2%
→ Bitcoin crashed ~7%
And that’s just the beginning.
Right now most people are ignoring this risk.
Markets think it won’t matter.
But that complacency always ends before the headline.
I’ve been studying markets for a decade and called every major top, including the October BTC ATH.
Follow and turn on notifications if you want to survive in this market.
I’ll post the real warning before it hits the headlines.
$ENSO

$BULLA
$SOMI