BRICS Nācijas Ķīna, Indija un Brazīlija izmanto $28,800,000,000 ASV valsts parādos, jo JPMorgan Chase prognozē 'Tīro negatīvu' attiecībā uz ASV dolāru
Trīs Brazīlijas, Krievijas, Indijas, Ķīnas un Dienvidāfrikas (BRICS) ekonomiskā bloka dalībnieki izmeta ASV parādus, kuru vērtība ir miljardiem dolāru, visjaunākajā ziņotajā periodā, saskaņā ar ASV Valsts kases departamentu.
Visjaunākie dati no Valsts kases Starptautiskā kapitāla sistēmas rāda, ka Brazīlija, Ķīna un Indija kopīgi izmeta ASV valsts parādus, kuru vērtība ir $28.8 miljardu oktobrī. #HODL #Binance #Bitcoin❗ #MEME $CC
China reveals its plan to challenge the US dollar for dominance. Could it ever work?
China is seizing an opportunity to challenge American dominance in global finance and exert greater international influence at the expense of the all-powerful US dollar.
Geopolitical uncertainty – driven in large part by President Donald Trump’s often chaotic economic policy – has gripped markets in recent weeks, with the dollar falling to four-year lows. Meanwhile, investors are flocking to safe-haven assets, driving gold prices to record highs of more than $5,500 an ounce. That’s given China an opening to promote its own currency as a viable alternative.
Over the weekend, the flagship ideology journal of China’s Communist Party published remarks from President China that outlined plans to turn the renminbi into a global reserve currency. That’s the role the US dollar currently plays – the go-to currency for the vast majority of foreign transactions, making it one of the world’s safest investments.
No one expects that to change anytime soon. But the steep decline in the dollar’s value since Trump took office again last year has at least opened the door to potential challengers.
According to the journal Qiushi, Xi told government officials that China should aspire to establish “a strong currency widely used in international trade and foreign exchange,” with a “powerful central bank” and the ability to attract investment and influence global pricing.
The Chinese leader’s comments were made privately in 2024. The party publicized them as China is positioning itself as a more reliable economic and political partner than the US – and starting to see results. Here’s what we know.
Market Strategist Warns Bitcoin Meltdown to $40,000 Incoming, Says People Are ‘Tired’ of the Crypto Trade Courtesy by: Rhodilee Jean Dolor $H
The chief equity strategist of Zacks Investment Research says the worst is yet to come as the price of Bitcoin (BTC) falls below $74,000.
In a new interview on CNBC, John Blank says the price of the flagship crypto asset may still plummet to around half of its current value.
“Generally speaking, a Bitcoin winner is 12 to 18 months long and these are well understood technical features so at $76,000 from $125,000, which was the peak, we can get to $40,000.”
He also shares his forecast when Bitcoin could plunge to $40,000.
“When does the force selling and liquidations happen to take us to $40,000? We can get there very quickly or more likely we’re going to get there over the next 6 to 8 months.” $DASH
Blank says that people are getting tired of the crypto trade even with attempts to create demand through crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and stablecoins. He says the trading platform Robinhood is doing better than the crypto exchange Coinbase. $BNB
“The other problem here is how long is that game played? You know, that play gets played for years and there’s also a generational issue. People [are] tired of this whole trade. Tired of it because COVID’s over, tired of it because there’s other screen-based things to do.”
From a technical and macro perspective, Bitcoin may still see downside pressure, with a possible retest of the $60,000 zone before any sustainable recovery.
Liquidity remains cautious, macro uncertainty isn’t fully priced in, and momentum has cooled. Markets don’t move on hope—they move on liquidity and structure.
This doesn’t mean Bitcoin is bearish long-term. It means the market may be resetting before the next major leg.
Bitcoin’s Doomsday Clock sets date when quantum computers will break BTC encryption $BTC A new tool dubbed the Quantum Doomsday Clock has set a timeline for when quantum computers could become capable of breaking Bitcoin’s (BTC) encryption. #bitcoin According to the tool, developed by Colton Dillion and cryptographer Rick Carback, founders of Quip Network, investors have until March 08, 2028, at 11:23 AM to secure their cryptocurrencies. #Binance #BinanceBitcoinSAFUFund $XRP The clock models advances in quantum hardware, error correction, and cryptographic attack efficiency to estimate when elliptic curve cryptography could be compromised by a sufficiently powerful quantum system.
Notably, Bitcoin relies on elliptic curve digital signatures to secure wallets and authorize transactions. $ETH Breaking this cryptography would not alter the blockchain or shut down the network, but it could allow attackers to derive private keys from exposed public keys, enabling unauthorized spending from affected addresses, particularly those that reuse addresses or have already revealed public keys.
The 2028 estimate is based on recent research suggesting that fewer logical qubits may be required to break elliptic curve cryptography than previously thought, assuming continued improvements in error rates, surface-code error correction, and gate fidelities in line with current industry roadmaps.
Experts on quantum computing and Bitcoin
While the timeline is aggressive, it aligns with warnings from parts of the quantum computing industry. For instance, IonQ CEO Niccolo De Masi has said that cryptographically relevant quantum computers could emerge before the end of the decade, while Bitcoin security engineer Jameson Lopp argues that quantum threats represent a medium-term risk requiring early preparation.
Others are more skeptical with Adam Back, co-founder of Blockstream, contending that quantum computers capable of attacking Bitcoin remain far off due to major engineering, coherence, and scaling challenges.
Bitcoin faces slide to $60,000 if impending US shutdown triggers a statistical blackout
For BTC traders, these rapidly shifting probabilities translate into short-dated hedging demand and sharper moves around incremental legislative updates.
Notably, a partial shutdown tied to unfinished appropriations is the core risk under debate. The Wall Street Journal reports that this includes a contentious fight within the Department of Homeland Security in a broader $1.3 trillion spending package.
Consequently, the transmission to Bitcoin depends on whether the lapse disrupts core economic data releases and whether ETF outflows accelerate as managers cut risk.
Data fog is the headline risk, because rates set the tone for Bitcoin
A shutdown is not a debt-ceiling default event because Treasury interest and principal payments continue. However, the first-order shock of these events is often informational.
If a funding lapse pulls staff from agencies that publish market-moving releases, investors can lose scheduled anchors for inflation, jobs, and spending trends, forcing rate markets to trade with less clarity than they typically get from the macro calendar.
So, the risk is less about the government missing a payment and more about the market losing a timetable.
In prior shutdowns, officials warned that releases, including jobs and CPI, could be delayed, which is a straightforward problem for any market trying to price the path of monetary policy.
In the current market environment, capital rotation is clearly visible.
#Gold is showing strong momentum as global uncertainty, macro pressure, and risk-off sentiment push investors toward traditional safe-haven assets. Central-bank demand and long-term confidence continue to support its upward bias.
#Bitcoin❗ meanwhile, is in a consolidation phase. Price action reflects reduced risk appetite, tighter liquidity, and cautious positioning from traders. Volatility remains, but follow-through strength is limited for now.
Key takeaway: Right now, markets are favoring stability over speculation. Gold is outperforming on relative strength, while Bitcoin is waiting for a clear catalyst to reclaim momentum.
This is not a verdict—just a snapshot. Market cycles rotate, sentiment shifts, and trends evolve. Smart traders adapt to the current regime instead of fighting it.
JPMorgan says bitcoin futures oversold as silver flips overbought, sees $8,500 gold long term
JPMorgan says bitcoin futures oversold as silver flips overbought, sees $8,500 gold long term Courtesy By Yogita Khatri #GoldvsSilvervsBitcoin #JPMorganCryptoWarning $BTC JPMorgan analysts say bitcoin futures appear oversold while gold and silver futures have moved into overbought territory, as investors increasingly favor precious metals over bitcoin across both retail and institutional channels.
Retail investors embraced the so-called “debasement trade” for much of 2025, buying both bitcoin and gold exchange-traded funds, but that trend shifted around August, when cumulative bitcoin ETF flows stagnated and then declined in the fourth quarter, the JPMorgan analysts, led by managing director Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou, said in a Wednesday report.
Over the same period, gold ETF inflows increased sharply and ended the year with close to $60 billion in cumulative inflows, the analysts noted. Most inflows into silver ETFs also occurred in the final quarter of 2025, coinciding with bitcoin ETF outflows, suggesting a rotation by retail investors away from bitcoin toward precious metals, the analysts added.
Institutional behavior has reinforced that shift, according to the analysts. JPMorgan’s proxy for institutional futures positioning — based on changes in CME futures open interest — shows a sharp increase in long positioning in silver during the last quarter of 2025 and into early 2026, driven largely by hedge funds. A similar buildup has been observed in gold futures over most of the past year.
In contrast, the analysts said bitcoin futures positioning has not seen a comparable increase over the past year.
Momentum indicators, which the analysts use as a proxy for positioning by trend-following traders such as commodity trading advisers, show a clear divergence across the three assets. Gold futures are overbought, while silver futures are currently very overbought, and bitcoin futures are oversold, the analysts said. They added that this positioning raises the risk of near-term profit-taking or mean reversion in gold and silver. Indeed, since the report was published, both silver and gold have pulled back from recent highs. #CZAMAonBinanceSquare
Institucionālie investori kopumā pārdeva $1.73 miljardus Bitcoin un kripto aktīvu tikai vienas nedēļas laikā, liecina jaunā atjauninājuma informācija no #Coin shares. $BTC Izplūdes ir vislielākās kopš 2025. gada novembra vidus.
Bitcoin vadīja izplūdi ar $1.09 miljardiem. Ethereum sekoja, zaudējot $630 miljonus, savukārt XRP redzēja, ka izplūda $18.2 miljoni. #Binance Savukārt, Solana piesaistīja $17.1 miljonus ieplūdē. Mazie ieguvumi skāra BNB ar $4.6 miljoniem un Chainlink ar $3.8 miljoniem. Īsie Bitcoin produkti piesaistīja mazu $0.5 miljonu.
Reģionāli, ASV dominēja izplūdēs ar gandrīz $1.8 miljardiem. Zviedrija un Nīderlande zaudēja attiecīgi $11.1 miljonu un $4.4 miljonus. #MEME Pretēji tendencei, Šveice pievienoja $32.5 miljonus, Kanāda $33.5 miljonus un Vācija $19.1 miljonus.
Coin shares saka, ka šie soļi ir saistīti ar tirgus kritumiem, izplūstošām cerībām uz procentu likmju samazinājumiem un negatīvu cenu dinamiku.
$RESOLV is quietly cooking 🔥 Price sitting around $0.1312, up 31%+, and the vibes are loud — 87% bullish sentiment with strong spot buying and real liquidity behind the move. Social chatter is rising, volume is healthy, and price is respecting key support like it actually means business.
This isn’t blind hype mode — yes, there are some trust questions floating around, but the market is clearly voting with money right now. When volatility hits, assets with liquidity + attention + trend strength tend to move first.
AUCTION is the native token of the Bounce Finance ecosystem — a decentralized auction protocol. It’s designed to support different types of auctions such as:
Token sales
NFT auctions
Fixed-price and sealed-bid auctions
Liquidity bootstrapping events
The goal is to offer fair, transparent, and decentralized price discovery.
📊 Market Sentiment (Last 24H)
Bullish: 82.2%
Bearish: 17.8%
Total Posts: 793
KOL (Influencer) Posts: 98
Search Volume: 540
This suggests strong attention + positive crowd psychology, often seen during momentum phases.
🧱 Key Technical Insights
Major Support: ~$5.00
This is a psychological support level and price is holding well above it.
Buyer Control: Strong — buyers are dominating price action.
Liquidity: Healthy, meaning trades can be executed without extreme slippage.
📈 Why It’s Pumping
High trading interest and social buzz
Strong breakout above key levels
Speculation on ecosystem growth and broader market momentum
⚠️ Risks to Watch
After a +76% move, short-term pullbacks are common
Resistance zones above current price may slow upside
Sentiment can flip quickly if volume drops
🧠 Bottom Line
AUCTION is currently in a high-momentum bullish phase, supported by strong sentiment, liquidity, and technical structure. It’s attracting both traders and speculators, but volatility is high — risk management matters.
#TopGainers While the market is acting like it drank five cups of chaos, NOM is doing something rare: holding its ground above resistance. That’s not luck, that’s intent.
At around $0.0177, NOM has already printed a +124% move, and the crowd isn’t asleep. We’re seeing 85% bullish sentiment, nearly 1,000 bullish posts, and 161 KOL mentions. Translation: smart money chatter is heating up, not retail panic noise.
So what is Nomina? Nomina is positioned around utility and infrastructure rather than meme hype. The project focuses on building sustainable on-chain solutions instead of short-term fireworks. Coins like this usually move quietly, then suddenly everyone asks, “Why didn’t I buy earlier?”
Why does NOM matter in a volatile market? Volatile markets punish weak hands and reward structure. NOM is consolidating above resistance, which tells a classic story from old-school market wisdom: strong buyers are absorbing sell pressure. That’s accumulation behavior, not exit liquidity.
When fear spikes, capital rotates into projects with:
Clear narrative
Active community
Strong technical structure
NOM currently checks those boxes.
Why people are buying now (not later): Because volatility is where positions are built, not chased. Buying strength after confirmation beats gambling on dead charts. NOM showing buyer control during uncertainty is exactly the kind of asymmetry traders look for.
No fairy tales here. Resistance still exists, macro pressure still exists. But coins that refuse to break during fear often lead when confidence returns.
In simple terms: The market is loud. NOM is calm. And calm strength usually speaks last.
Pakistānas zīmols Maria B ienāk Bangladešā kā pirmais starptautiskais sieviešu zīmols
Pakistānas zīmols Maria B ienāk Bangladešā kā pirmais starptautiskais sieviešu zīmols #MariaB #Bangladeshi🇧🇩 Maria Butt, Pakistānas modes nama Maria B dibinātāja, runā ar medijiem zīmola pirmā veikala atklāšanas laikā Daka, Bangladešā, 2026. gada 20. janvārī. (Maria B) Globālie zīmoli ražo apģērbus Bangladešā, bet tiem nav oficiālu veikalu Pirms Maria B Junaid Jamshed ģimenes modes zīmols atvēra veikalu Daka #BinanceSquareTalks DHAKA: Pakistānas zīmols Maria B, kas šonedēļ atvēra savu pirmo filiāli Daka, ir kļuvis par pirmo starptautisko sieviešu apģērbu zīmolu, kas izveidojis klātbūtni Bangladešā, valstī, kas ražo daudzus pasaules apģērbus, bet trūkst ārzemju mazumtirgotāju.
At ET@Davos 2026, David Rubenstein says India has the potential to become the world’s biggest economy in the coming decades. With its massive population, growing middle class, tech boom, and global influence, the spotlight is clearly on India’s long-term rise. #WEFDavos2026 The question now isn’t if—it’s how fast. 🚀🇮🇳
Saudi Arabia says it has $2.5 trillion in mineral reserves. That could make it a key player in the race for rare earths
Courtesy By Tom Page CNN #BinanceSquareTalks President Donald Trump announcing on Wednesday that he’d reached an agreement on a possible deal on Greenland that would include rights to rare earth minerals. #TrumpCancelsEUTariffThreat Critical and rare earth minerals underpin technologies propelling the clean energy transition, AI and advanced military hardware, among others, and their production is dominated by China. It controls over 90% of the world’s output of refined rare earths and over 60% of rare earth mining production, according to the International Energy Agency. #BTCVSGOLD Speaking to CNN last week at the Future Minerals Forum in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Abigail Hunter, executive director of the Minerals Center at SAFE (Securing America’s Future Energy), a nongovernment organization, described China as “light years ahead” of the US, “through decades of strategic investments, state-backed projects and coordination with the private sector, and investing internationally.” #usa #SaudiArabia
Europeans have trillions of dollars worth of leverage on the U.S. economy. They're not likely to use
Europeans have trillions of dollars worth of leverage on the U.S. economy. They're not likely to use it.#WEFDavos2026 $2Z $SENT A selloff of Treasurys would hurt the U.S. economy. But it would hurt the Eurozone, too. courtesy by: Greenlandby Sabri Ben-Achour At the World Economic Forum annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, President Trump switched gears Wednesday and said he doesn't want to use force to acquire Greenland. But he left a lot of questions unanswered, too. Europe has been thinking about a whole bunch of ways that it might be able to retaliate against American aggression, including, potentially, selling off some of the trillions of dollars worth of U.S. Treasurys held by Europe's central banks and its private sector. Europeans own at least $8 trillion worth of U.S. Treasurys. Selling them off would make it harder and more expensive for the U.S. to borrow money to fund all its spending. There is, however, a problem. “These assets are not help predominately by European governments, they’re held by private investors,” said Josh Lipsky, international economics chair at the Atlantic Council. He said European governments don’t have a quick way of forcing private investors to sell their Treasurys. Then, there’s another, minor issue. “It would not be in Europe’s own economic interest to do something like this,” said Daniel McDowell, a political science and international affairs professor at Syracuse University. #TrumpCancelsEUTariffThreat U.S. Treasurys back a lot of financial instruments around the world. “Any mass sale of Treasurys like that would likely cause severe disruptions that not only impact the U.S., it would also impact European banks and the entire global economy,” McDowell said. #usa And, on top of that, a lot of Europeans would lose a lot of money because it’d basically be a mega-flash sale of U.S. Treasurys. “When everybody is going through the exit door at the same time, it’s impossible to get out and you’re gonna have to lose a lot in value if you’re trying to all sell at the same time,” said Luis Alvarado, global fixed income strategist at the Wells Fargo Investment Institute. #economy Plus, this would mess with currency markets — make the Euro appreciate and European goods more expensive. But on the other hand, money isn’t everything. “I think we’re well past the point where considerations have to be only a financial and economic nature without consideration of national security,” said Nicolas Veron, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. So let’s say Europe did decide to burn it all down and force a sell off of Treasurys. Where would it put all that money? There isn’t an alternative, said McDowell at Syracuse. “There’s no other market capable of absorbing that much capital in a short time without major disruptions,” he said. And if European investors, like all investors, want to be where the money is? That leads right back to the U.S. “The U.S. is the center of AI, we have superior growth track, superior productivity,” said John Canally, chief portfolio strategist at TIAA Wealth Management. There are lots of other pain points Europe could hit before selling off Treasurys — tariffs, going after U.S. tech companies. So an official move to unload U.S. debt looks unlikely. What we might see though, said the Atlantic Council’s Josh Lipsky, is an unofficial, gradual, organic backing away from that debt. “There is a move out there and I think it was already underway before what happened in the past week, to find alternatives to diversify your portfolio,” he said. Not a wave or a catastrophe, just a gradual waning of U.S. financial importance.