BTC Below 0.75 Supply Quantile, Market Bears Take Control
fell below the price level where 75% of holders bought in, signaling most investors are now at a loss.This creates rising distribution pressure, as more holders may sell to cut losses.Market risk is higher and downside dominant unless $BTC recovers above this key supply level.#bearishmomentum
When Futures Overshadow Spot: How Engineered Moves Trap Retail Traders
Futures Dominance:When futures trading volume exceeds spot volume by 80× or more, the market stops discovering the true price.Engineered Moves:Price is no longer organic—it’s constructed using leverage, volatility injection, and liquidation cycles.Volatility Traps:Repeated liquidations force stop-losses, creating artificial spikes and dips that retail traders often fall victim to.Market Illusion:These engineered moves look like real market action, but they are designed to manipulate price and harvest retail capital.Key Advice:Avoid participating in these extreme futures-driven moves. Focus on spot markets or real volume-backed trends to trade safely.Takeaway:If futures volume is overwhelmingly higher than spot, question the price—it may be a trap, not genuine market demand.
How Funding Rates are used to engineer price moves.
Using $RIVER as an example. This is not an isolated case. Variations of this funding-rate-driven setup have appeared across many tokens over the past two years. Most traders misunderstand funding rates.Funding does not predict direction. It reflects position imbalance — and that imbalance can be intentionally created.Step one is simple: Keep price suppressed while pushing funding deeply negative. This concentrates short positions and builds the belief that “negative funding = inevitable bounce”.At this stage, many traders go long — not because of demand, but because they expecta rebound + funding payments This expectation is the trap.When funding is extremely negative, price doesn’t have to reverse. It only needs a controlled push upward to trigger liquidations,stop losses, and forced short covering.This is why sharp rallies often begin while funding is still negative. The move is not organic demand — it’s leverage being unwound.After shorts are flushed, funding quickly normalizes. Many interpret this as “the market is healthy again”. In reality, it simply means the trap has been reset.This process can repeat multiple times:• manufacture extreme funding attract consensus positioning force liquidation resetIt’s price engineering, not price discovery.Funding rates don’t tell you where price is going. They tell you where traders are crowded — and where liquidation risk is highest. In engineered markets,the safest trade is no trade.
Bitcoin arbitrāžas peļņa samazinās, kad institūcijas maina stratēģijas
Naudas un pārvadājumu (bāzes) tirdzniecības rentabilitāte samazinās: 1 mēneša gada laikā bitcoin bāzes ienesīgums samazinājās no ~17% → ~5% Ar 1 gada ASV valsts obligācijām, kas nodrošina ~3.5%, izplatība vairs nav pievilcīga institūcijām. CME bitcoin nākotnes līgumu atvērtais intereses saruka zem $10B (no >$21B), tagad atpaliek no Binance (~$11B), jo mūžīgie nākotnes līgumi dominē tirdzniecībā.
Institūcijas pāriet no vienkāršas arbitrāžas: Pārvieto kapitālu uz opcijām, hedžēšanu un altcoiniem (ETH, XRP, SOL)Atspoguļo nobriedušāku kripto derivātu tirgu, nevis izeju no kripto.
17,000 BTC Inflow to Exchanges Sparks Sell-Off Concerns
Over 17,000 BTC just moved to exchanges — a level that historically signals rising sell-side pressure. Large inflows often precede increased volatility as traders position for distribution.If follow-through selling emerges, the current BTC pullback could deepen further.Watch exchange net flows, funding rates, and spot demand closely. #bitcoin
🚀 AI sastop blokķēdes finanses: Austrālijas HPC uzņēmums Sharon AI iegūst līdz $500M no USD.AI, lai palielinātu GPU jaudu visā APAC, izceļot pieaugošo pieprasījumu pēc decentralizētas finansēšanas AI infrastruktūrā. #Web3Finance #CryptoNewss
📉 Bitcoin vs Gold: A Growing Divergence The BTC/Gold ratio is now ~18.46, sitting 17% below its 200-week moving average, signaling sustained relative weakness. Since its December 2024 peak, Bitcoin has fallen ~55% against gold, while gold continues to print new all-time highs and is up ~12% YTD. Historically, similar breakdowns lasted over a year, with past cycles seeing 77–84% drawdowns versus gold. If this pattern holds, BTC could remain under pressure relative to gold into 2026, putting the “digital gold” narrative to a real test. $BTC #BTCVSGOLD
$BTC Micro Strategy Signāli nerāda palēnināšanos Bitcoin uzkrāšanā, jo Saylor izsaka mājienu par citu BTC pirkumu zem $90K
~~ Neskatoties uz to, ka BTC konsolidējas ap $89,000 un MSTR akcijas ir samazinājušās par 1.4%, Stratēģija turpina agresīvus Bitcoin pirkumus, pievienojot $3.4B pēdējās divās nedēļās un palielinot kopējo īpašumu virs $60B. #MSTR
$BTC $ETH Bitcoin fell back below $89,000 and ether slid below $3,000 in morning U.S. trading, even as broader equity markets moved higher. #TrumpCancelsEUTariffThreat #BTCVSGOLD
- Showed strong bullish momentum over the last 24 hours - Price action stayed firm near highs, signaling buyers are in control - Volume confirmed the move, suggesting this isn’t just a random spike - Momentum like this often precedes continuation, not exhaustion
If strength holds, $RIVER looks positioned for the next leg up
BTC ir uzrādījis augstākas cenas, kamēr mēneša RSI turpina veidot zemākas augstākas cenas → negaidīta lejupslīde.
🔻 Norāda uz bullish momenta zudumu neskatoties uz cenu paplašināšanos 🔻 Parasti iepriekšējais makro augšgalos, dziļos atgūšanās posmos vai ilgstošās izplatības gadījumos 🔻 Mēneša TF novirze = liela nozīme, lēna norise
⚠️ Tā nav pārdošanas signāls pati par sevi. Nepieciešama apstiprināšana caur struktūras pārtraukumu / mēneša noslēgumu zemā atslēgas EMA atbalsta.