CoinGape Media

Dogecoin cenas prognozēšana arī ir zem spiediena, jo DOGE cena tirgojas ap ievērojamu pieprasījuma zonu plašākā dilstošā struktūrā. Neseni cenu kustības norāda uz strukturālu nekompetenci un ne uz #volatility in īstermiņā.
Šis iestatījums sakrīt ar 21Shares savu spot Dogecoin ETF palaišanu NASDAQ, ieviešot regulētu ekspozīciju DOGE. Jautājums ir, vai šis katalizators maina cenu struktūru, kas bija iepriekš, vai tas vienkārši izaicina struktūras stiprumu?

President Donald #Trump is suing JPMorgan Chase and Co. and  CEO Jamie Dimon for at least $5 billion in damages. He is accusing the bank of illegally terminating his accounts because of political reasons.
The complaint was filed on Thursday in Miami-Dade County. It is the most publicized legal splash so far in Trump’s revitalized efforts to stop what he termed politically-motivated attempts by large American #financial institutions to debank him.
Trump Cites Political Reasons For JPMorgan’s Debanking
In a filing cited in a Bloomberg report, Trump asserted that JPMorgan suddenly halted its banking services to him, his companies, and other entities associated with him without prior notice. The claims in the lawsuit include trade libel, breach of the implied covenant of good faith, and violation of Florida’s Deceptive #Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA).
The filing is happening a few days after a Coingape report stated that Trump would sue JPMorgan in weeks for the same reason. The legal team of Trump claimed that the decision would cause major financial and reputational damage.
The court document says JPMorgan shut down Trump-related accounts approximately seven weeks following the January 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol riot.
Trump also claimed that the bank did not do so because of risk exposure, but because it was best not to associate with him at that time due to his political ideology, which was deemed conservative.
The filing also alleged that #JPMorgan blacklisted Trump, the Trump Organization, and his family members. Thus, this denied them wealth management services.
JPMorgan Rejects Claims But Faces Scrutiny
JPMorgan has strongly dismissed the charges. In a quote from the Bloomberg article, the bank stated that it does not shut accounts based on political or religious grounds.
The banking giant claimed that it can sometimes terminate accounts due to legal, regulatory, or compliance risks. However, it asserted that, in many cases, changing regulatory expectations prompt a bank to make such a decision. It is worth noting that JPMorgan has also faced allegations of debanking #crypto stakeholders.
Senator Lummis once called out JPMorgan for allegedly debanking Bitcoin advocate Jack Mallers. Meanwhile, Tyler Winklevoss, Gemini’s co-founder, claimed that JPMorgan Chase halted their onboarding process.
The legal filing that Trump has submitted makes reference to Florida laws. These forbid the termination of any customer account by a financial institution on the basis of political opinions or affiliations.

#Bitcoin (BTC) dropped below the key $90,000 support zone and traded near $89,588 at the time of writing. The decline followed last week’s brief bullish breakout attempt. On the other hand, gold has reached an all-time high of over $4,900 per ounce at the time of writing. This development further underscores the difference between the two assets, which are commonly equated as stores of value. 
Why Bitcoin Isn’t Rallying With Gold
In an X post, analyst Lancaster. $ETH pointed out the difference in the current price action between these two assets. He claimed that both assets can be classified as gold narratives, but only one is setting record Gold prices at all-time highs. He argued about what investors learn in times of macro uncertainty.
Gold, according to the analyst, is well known and accepted. He claimed that many participants are still learning about Bitcoin. The presence of that gap, he contended, is capable of stimulating quicker selling in case of the spread of fear.
Gold has defensive capabilities in uncertain cycles, owing to its multi-century reputation. Bitcoin, on the other hand, has not been around for very long and is deeply narrative-driven. The analyst claimed that the idea is not coming from failure, but from a developing concept.
Comfort and clarity are likely to dominate investor behavior. The analyst stated that people sell what they fear and buy what they know. He said that Bitcoin was in its trust-building phase, which was not structurally invalid.
CoinGape recently reported how gold and silver were rallying under the threat of Trump tariffs on imports from eight European nations. While gold has rallied to new highs, $BTC has erased most of its yearly gains after the tariff threat.
Bonds and Dollar Set the Next BTC Move?
Merlijn The Trader wrote an X post that the old #world still controls the capital flows in this stage. Silver and gold have been on the rise, whereas Bitcoin has lagged.
His opinion implied that the arrangement would be modified once the present macro shock subsides. Bond stress, he said, may impose liquidity relief, yield depression, and currency debasement. Those circumstances were characterized as the standard ground in the following crypto boom. Merlijn remarked that such drivers usually drive market rotations first before they materialize in crypto prices.
However, analyst Jacob King contended in an X post that money is leaving speculative assets and going into metals. King alleged that Bitcoin lacks clear utility in the current climate. He opined that it does not safeguard investors against tariff shocks, currency instability, or broader economic stress. King described the move as capital exiting Bitcoin, not a temporary pause.
The broader macro #environment has also been attributed to gold’s strength. Peter Grant, the vice president and senior metals strategist at Zaner Metals, mentioned geopolitical friction and a weak dollar. Federal Reserve easing expectations for the current year were also cited as a major economic force.
Inflation data are also influencing rate expectations. As CoinGape reported earlier, November U.S. PCE inflation was 2.8% year over year as expected. The month-over-month inflation rate increased 0.2%, in line with predictions.
Core PCE registered comparable results of 2.8% YoY and 0.2% MoM. The consistency of the numbers maintains market focus on when and by how much the Fed will ease. Risk appetite continues to focus on policy expectations of asset classes.

Balto namu #crypto padomnieks bijušā prezidenta Donalda Trampa laikā, Patriks Vits, aicināja uz divpusēju atbalstu Senāta kriptovalūtu likumam, ko šodien izlaida #Agriculture komiteja. Komiteja gatavojas 27. janvāra atzīmēšanai Vašingtonā. Aicinājums sekoja pēc pārskatītā teksta izdošanas, kas parādījās pēc ilgstošām #bipartisan sarunām, kas neizdevās.
Patriks Vits aicina uz divpusēju atbalstu kriptovalūtu likumam
X ierakstā Balto namu kriptovalūtu padomnieks aicināja demokrātus Senāta Lauksaimniecības komitejā atbalstīt kriptovalūtu likumdošanu. Tas notika, kad viņš norādīja, ka Senāta Lauksaimniecības tirgus struktūras teksts cieši līdzinās Pārstāvju palātas #CLARITY aktam.

Francijas #trade ministrs ir reaģējis uz Trampa muitas draudiem attiecībā uz vīna eksportu no Francijas uz ASV. Tas notika pat tad, kad ASV #President atsauca plānus piemērot tirdzniecības politiku pret noteiktām ES valstīm strīda dēļ par Grenlandi.
Francijas ministrs noraida Trampa muitas draudus, brīdina par atbildes pasākumiem
Saskaņā ar Bloomberg ziņojumu Francijas tirdzniecības ministrs Nikolā Forisjērs kritizēja Trampa draudus uzlikt smagas muitas nodevas alkoholisko dzērienu eksportam no Francijas.

The price of #bitcoin remains sideways as the uncertainty over US crypto regulation lingers. $BTC price is currently in the range of $90,000, unable to achieve follow-through following recent surges that saw its price peak at stagnation. This is compelled by the recent postponement of the #CLARITY Act by the US Senate, which made traders anxious instead of responsive. For now, the structure of the Bitcoin price indicates balance rather than fear.
Regulatory Delays Keep Bitcoin Price Structure Constrained
The latest delay to the CLARITY Act reinforces an already fragile regulatory backdrop, which continues shaping Bitcoin price behavior through hesitation rather than outright #selling . The market structure bill has once again been delayed by lawmakers, who have switched their attention to housing policy and election issues. The move prolongs uncertainty that has prevailed since January, making it impossible to provide regulatory guidance to #crypto markets.
As a result, institutional participants remain cautious, which keeps Bitcoin price locked in range-bound behavior instead of directional expansion. Regulatory delays reduce incentive for aggressive positioning, therefore limiting follow-through on both rallies and breakdowns. This is a place that promotes liquidity based movement instead of trend development.
In turn, BTC price reflects this delay through repeated tests of range boundaries without structural resolution. The #buyers intervene around the areas of established demand, and the sellers support the overhead resistance in a consistent way. Bitcoin price action will mostly follow structure rather than the narrative-driven catalysts unless lawmakers can provide a clear picture.
Liquidity Wicks Highlight Analyst’s Bearish Tactical Bias
Market analyst Lennart Snyder points to the ongoing conformity of Bitcoin price to bearish structural indicators despite short-lived stability. He observes the continuing lower highs and a significant H4 wick, indicating active liquidity attraction, as opposed to trend reversal. Historically, mean reversion is frequently preceded by large wicks particularly in down-trending structures..
This behavior makes the expert lean slightly bearish, with BTC price continuously attracting liquidity to areas of resistance above $90,600. He points out this level as a possible stop-hunt region and not sustainable breakout region. On the contrary, downside liquidity is close to the imbalance of the $86,200, which is consistent with previous reaction zones.
Although a bullish market is not ruled out, it will demand a robust H4 reclaim above $91,200 on active sessions.. Nonetheless, this situation is less probable because of counter-trend positioning. Therefore, Bitcoin price currently reflects tactical caution rather than directional confidence.

BTC/USDT 4H Chart (Source: TradingView)
Bitcoin Price Structure Reinforces Range Control
Bitcoin price has remained locked in a clearly defined range since mid-November, following the sharp breakdown from the prior macro uptrend. This is a consolidation of approximately between the support of the price of $84,700 and the resistance of the price at $97,100 and the price moves in circles between these levels rather than making directional movements. 
At the time of press, BTC market value sits near $89,900, placing price back toward the lower-middle portion of the range, which reflects balance rather than strength.
This range bound structure is supported by parabolic SAR behavior. The indicator keeps oscillating and going above and below price indicating that it is not under sustained trend control. 
Every SAR flip coincides with the temporary directional efforts that do not last long and ensure that Bitcoin price movement remains on rotational, as opposed to trend following. This recurrent failure to push through proves that neither sellers nor buyers have created structural dominance.
Besides, RSI also adds clarity to the recent price action. After topping out near 70, it turned lower as Bitcoin price slipped back under the $90,000 mark, dragging RSI down to 39. That drop matched price settling deeper into its range, not breaking away from it.
Since then, the RSI has stabilized and is gradually rising again, currently hovering around 44. This rebound keeps the long-term BTC price forecast firmly in range mode, indicating that it is regaining equilibrium rather than preparing for a new trend.
BTC/USD 1D Chart (Source: TradingView)
Summary 
Bitcoin price remains governed by structure, not sentiment, as regulatory delays extend uncertainty. The prevailing result is the furtherance of range behavior as long as the policymakers are passive. From a technical perspective, BTC price stability depends on holding established demand zones, which hence preserve consolidation. 
A breakdown below support would nullify this bias and put control in the hands of sellers. Until then, Bitcoin price reflects disciplined balance but not directional intent. This situation keeps the  BTC price outlook neutral and structurally driven.