King_crypto_Pakistani

#NEAR🚀🚀🚀 #HEDERA🌿
Short term: $NEAR aiming for $3 to $5, $HBAR $0.40 to $0.80 if alts heat up 🔥

Long term (3–5 yrs): NEAR $8 to $15+, HBAR $1 to $2+ as adoption grows.

Full analysis: 👉 Bullish macro + fundamentals take on NEAR and HBAR. Both are trading at prices that reflect market fatigue, not protocol failure, which is where long term asymmetric opportunities usually form. NEAR is hovering around the $1 area after a deep drawdown from prior cycle highs, while HBAR sits near $0.09 despite continued enterprise traction. Price action looks quiet, but fundamentals are moving. NEAR is one of the few L1s that has continued to ship aggressively through the bear. Developer activity remains strong, the chain is fast, cheap, and increasingly focused on real usability rather than hype. NEAR’s push into chain abstraction and intents is a genuine attempt to simplify how users interact with crypto, and the AI narrative around NEAR is backed by tooling, infrastructure, and research integrations positioning it as a backend chain for complex applications rather than just another DeFi venue.

From a price perspective, NEAR around $1 is historically compressed relative to its tech and adoption. In the short term, if broader crypto sentiment flips risk on, NEAR has room to mean revert, with a move toward the $2 to $3 range reasonable on momentum alone. Over a 3 to 5 year horizon, assuming continued developer growth and at least one strong alt cycle, NEAR reaching the $8 to $15 range is a realistic bullish scenario, driven by higher on chain activity and renewed demand for scalable L1s that actually get used. HBAR is a very different asset. It is not built for hype cycles but for enterprises, institutions, and real world use cases that move slowly but compound. The Hedera council model is unattractive to speculators and appealing to corporations, with tokenization, identity, and regulated finance as core lanes.

At roughly $0.09, HBAR is priced as if none of that matters. Short term, compression after volatility often precedes sharp moves, and a relief rally into the $0.12 to $0.20 zone is achievable if markets stabilize. Long term is where the thesis plays out. If even a fraction of enterprise pilots convert into sustained usage, network value follows. Over a 3 to 5 year window, a $0.50 to $1+ HBAR is a believable bullish outcome in a strong cycle. The takeaway is simple. NEAR is a high growth bet on developers and abstraction, HBAR is a slower burn bet on enterprise adoption. Short term both look underpriced, long term both have clear paths higher if crypto continues to mature.

#HYPE #ASTR.每日智能策略
Short term: $HYPE $60–$90+, $ASTER $5–$10

Long term (3–5 yrs): HYPE $150–$300+, ASTER $15–$40+

Full Analysis: 👉 Bullish fundamentals + price take on Hyperliquid & Aster. Hyperliquid ($HYPE) is trading around ~$32 today, down from its all-time high near $59 but still commanding a multi-billion dollar market cap and robust on-chain activity on its Layer 1 perpetuals engine, with sub-second execution and deep liquidity across major pairs. Recent data highlights that Hyperliquid supports hundreds of perpetual markets and spot pairs with significant cumulative volume, and although market share has shifted in the wake of new competition, it still holds impressive open interest levels and long-term liquidity depth that many analysts consider a core advantage. Meanwhile, Aster ($ASTER ) trading around ~$0.55 has carved out lightning-fast growth since its token generation event, with TVL over $1 billion and explosive initial price performance fueled by multi-chain perp features, high leverage, and early backing from the Binance founder’s ecosystem that sparked both audience and capital flows. Hyperliquid’s audited, non-custodial perpetual engine with deep order-book mechanics and established revenue streams contrasts with Aster’s high-leverage, high-volume growth model, and these different fundamentals shape how traders and investors are valuing each token.

Short-term price dynamics are setting up a compelling narrative for both tokens as crypto market conditions evolve. Hyperliquid’s present price action near $30–$35 suggests a consolidating base with room to reclaim higher value structure if broader risk assets stabilize and perp DEX volumes ramp back up; a short-term move toward the $60–$90+ zone becomes a reasonable target if bullish sentiment returns, driven by renewed protocol usage, fee growth, and market share expansion. Meanwhile, Aster’s current price near $0.55 belies its past all-time highs above $2.40, pointing to latent upside if traders rotate back into high-beta perp infrastructure tokens and multi-chain perpetuals regain momentum; in hype cycles, Aster’s unique leverage options and multi-chain design could propel it transiently into $5–$10+ levels in the near term as speculative capital and network activity align.

Over a 3 to 5 year horizon, both tokens have credible bullish paths anchored in real adoption narratives rather than pure speculation. Hyperliquid’s deeper liquidity, cumulative fee capture, and evolving ecosystem of tools including expanded utility for staking, fee discounts, and network growth via integrated apps provide core drivers for sustainable appreciation, with long-term targets in the $150–$300+ range in strong market cycles as decentralized perpetuals take increasing market share from centralized venues. Aster’s blistering early growth and multi-chain strategic positioning, if it sustains real usage beyond incentives and consolidates its user base into stable volume, could see its price trend toward $15–$40+ by capturing broad perp and margin trading demand across networks. Both narratives assume continued maturation of DeFi perp markets, innovation in trading primitives, and favorable macro liquidity that supports risk asset inflows. Hyperliquid’s build-for-depth approach and Aster’s build-for-growth strategy together make them standouts in the perp DEX sector, and in bullish cycles this kind of real fundamental momentum often precedes major price discovery phases.