hashir-awan

Dusk's vision for enterprise-grade blockchain technology that "How can banks, governments, and regulated financial institutions use blockchain technology without breaking the law or leaking sensitive information?"
I've been trying to find the answer of above question, then I looked around the society and I found many cases where Dusk is playing it's role in the magnificent way.

1. Banks Issuing Digital Securities (Avoiding Data Leaks)
A Real-World problem is that banks want to issue bonds or stocks based on blockchain technology but face the following challenges: They cannot disclose the identities of investors. They must comply with procedures such as KYC and AML. Public blockchains would leak all information, which is unacceptable.
But the question arises how does Dusk help solve this problem? Investors verify their identity after completing the KYC process. Their identity information remains confidential on the blockchain. Regulatory bodies can conduct audits if necessary.
Imagine this, A sealed envelope proving your eligibility without revealing your identity. This is exactly what institutions need.

2. Balancing Privacy and Compliance (Both Indispensable):
Most blockchains force users to choose between two options: Privacy → Fails to meet regulatory requirements. Transparency → Fails to meet institutional requirements
Dusk's pragmatic approach is transactions are confidential by default, compliance rules are built into the protocol and regulators can verify compliance, not personal data.
For instance, Retirement funds can invest millions of dollars on the blockchain. Regulators are satisfied, competitors cannot spy on its strategies and user data is protected.

3. Regulated Decentralized Finance (DeFi Usable by Large Financial Institutions)
Reality is that the institutions want to earn DeFi yields, but they lack the following resources: Anonymous wallets, unverified participants and legal ambiguity
Dusk's Advantages:
Interaction is limited to committed and verified participants, automated execution rules for smart contracts. Tokenized assets such as stocks, bonds, and ETFs become available
Dusk transforms unregulated DeFi into professional financial infrastructure.

4. Voting and Confidential Governance: Practical applications includes shareholder voting, governance of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and corporate Decision-Making.
Current Issues includes voting traceability, dynamic exposure of power and manipulation risk.
Dusk solution provides verifiable voting, No one knows the voters' results. Suitable for companies, suitable for institutions, suitable for Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs).

Why do businesses value privacy so much?
Businesses ask some simple questions, IIs this legal? Will we leak customer data? Will regulators stop us?
Dusk answers these three questions by: Built-in compliance, vomprehensive privacy protection and kn-demand auditing
This is why Dusk positions itself as an enterprise-grade solution, not just a marketing tool..
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK
{spot}(DUSKUSDT)

Walrus represents a new direction in decentralized storage, designed specifically for persistent and censorship-resistant online data, rather than public document archiving. Walrus aims for seamless integration with the Sui blockchain, allowing entire websites (including HTML, CSS, JavaScript, images, and metadata) to be stored immutably and accessed via on-chain identities. This makes Walrus ideal for decentralized front-ends, public data, and applications that prioritize usability and security over frequent updates.
In contrast, Filecoin is a large-scale, market-driven decentralized storage network focused on massive data storage and retrieval. Filecoin employs an economic model where storage providers compete to store data for users for a specific period. While Filecoin is well-suited for use cases such as backing up datasets, enterprise storage, and archiving, its data persistence relies on contracts and continuous renewals. One key difference lies in data persistence and user experience. Walrus adheres to the principle of "store once, access forever," reducing the complexity of transaction management. Developers don't need to negotiate storage contracts or worry about renewals; data is continuously available once deployed. While Filecoin is flexible and scalable, it requires effective governance and incentive mechanisms to ensure its long-term availability.

From a performance perspective, Walrus is optimized for rapid global content distribution, making it ideal for web applications, while Filecoin typically relies on additional layers for efficient content distribution. Theoretically, Filecoin is a decentralized storage marketplace, while Walrus is a decentralized deployment layer.
In short, Filecoin excels in decentralized cloud storage, while Walrus stands out as infrastructure for persistent and censorship-resistant networks. They address different challenges within the same ecosystem.

@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus $WAL
{spot}(WALUSDT)

分散型ウェブサイトホスティングの常に進化する分野において、Walrus SitesとArweaveは革新的なソリューションを提供していますが、やや異なるニーズに対応しています。Arweaveは、その「永続ネットワーク」によって永続的なストレージを開拓し、ファイル、ウェブサイト、アプリケーションが永久に不変であることを保証します。その包括的なストレージプランは、一度の前払いに基づいており、コンテンツを無期限に保存できるようにします。このモデルは、アーカイブ、歴史的記録、メタデータ（NFT）に最適で、比類のない永続性とセキュリティを提供します。

In decentralized network environments, both Walrus Sites and IPFS aim to reduce reliance on centralized servers, but their implementations and user experiences differ significantly. IPFS (InterPlanetary File System) is a peer-to-peer network designed for distributed storage and content addressing. Files are divided into blocks, encrypted, and distributed across nodes, ensuring redundancy and resilience. Users retrieve content using a unique cryptographic hash value, which persists as long as the content is hosted on a node. IPFS is highly effective for decentralized file sharing, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and decentralized applications (dApps), but it heavily relies on active nodes and installation services for availability.
In contrast, Walrus Sites focuses on hosting fully decentralized websites and front-ends, giving them a native blockchain identity. Each website (including code, images, and metadata) is linked to a blockchain address (e.g., Sui), ensuring censorship resistance and ownership verification. Unlike IPFS, Walrus Sites offers developers and users a smoother experience, enabling dynamic updates, near-instant access, and integration with Web3 applications without external installation or node maintenance. It combines the advantages of decentralized storage and instant interactive web hosting, making it ideal for decentralized applications, marketplaces, and social media platforms.

IPFS, as a distributed storage network, ensures data integrity and resilience; while Walrus Sites, as a fully decentralized interactive web layer, prioritizes ease of use and continuous content availability. Both systems free developers from centralized control, but Walrus Sites offers a more comprehensive web hosting solution. For developers looking to deploy censorship-resistant interactive websites without sacrificing speed or accessibility, Walrus Sites represents the next step beyond IPFS in the Web3 environment by 2026.

@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus $WAL
{spot}(WALUSDT)

In decentralized storage, data protection methods are just as important as data storage locations. Walrus explores this issue through two distinct concepts: Full copy and Erasure coding.
• Full copy refers to completely replicating each piece of data across multiple nodes. This method is simple, robust, and easy to verify. Even if multiple nodes fail, the data remains immediately available. This method offers the highest reliability and minimal reconstruction complexity, but at the cost of requiring larger storage space and higher redundancy.
• On the other hand, erasure coding divides data into blocks and distributes them across the network using mathematical security mechanisms. The original data can be reconstructed using only a subset of these blocks. This significantly reduces storage costs and improves scalability, but increases the complexity of recovery and repair.

✓ Walrus favors full copy for persistent, high-quality data. Why?

Because Walrus prioritizes:
✓ High availability guarantees, convenient data access and verification and long-term durability, eliminating the risk of data reconstruction. While erasure coding excels in cost-effective large-scale storage, Walrus prioritizes trust, permanence, and censorship resistance, with full data backup being particularly outstanding in these areas.
In short: Erasure Coding → Complex yet efficient storage recovery
Walrus→ Higher cost, but higher security
When data integrity is paramount, Walrus chooses security.

• Significance of Full Replication (Traditional Storage)
The entire file is copied multiple times and stored on different nodes. Now the question arises how it works?
If the replication factor is 3, the same complete file will be stored on 3 different nodes. For instance, Suppose you upload a 1GB research PDF file.
Node A → Stores the complete 1GB file
Node B → Stores the complete 1GB file
Node C → Stores the complete 1GB file
✓ Availability: High
✓ Storage Cost: Very expensive (1GB of data requires 3GB of storage space)
✓ Scalability: Poor performance after scaling
If one node fails, other nodes can still access the file.
Now look at Erasure Coding (Algorithm used by Walrus)
The file is divided into multiple parts + a parity check part; only one part is needed to recover the complete data. Here the question arises also that how it Works?
The file is divided into 'k' data parts.
An additional 'm' parity parts are added.
Only k parts are needed to rebuild the file.
Example Format: 10 data parts + 4 parity parts = 14 parts
For instance, Suppose you have a 1GB research PDF file. It is divided into 10 parts (100MB each). 4 parity parts are added. It is distributed across 14 different nodes.
Now:
Even if 4 nodes fail,
the entire file can still be rebuilt. 🎯
✓ Availability: Very High
✓ Storage Cost: Approximately 1.4GB instead of 3GB
✓ Fault Tolerance: Strong
✓ Scalability for Large Data
• Why Choose Walrus Erasure Coding?
Walrus is designed for long-term, highly reliable decentralized storage. Suitable for:
✓ Data must remain intact even if the contract fails.
✓ Scaling costs must be kept low.
✓ Availability must be guaranteed through encryption.
✓ Erasure encryption provides a level of security comparable to duplication, but at a lower cost.

So, the efficiency of Walrus Protocol is practically proved.
@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus $WAL
{spot}(WALUSDT)