Naveed_Tanoli
取引を発注
低高頻度トレーダー
1.4年
28 フォロー
406 フォロワー
857 いいね
124 共有
投稿
ポートフォリオ
すべて
引用
ライブ
Crypto Spot ETFs Record Net Outflows on January 29 — BTC, ETH, SOL, and XRP All in Red
Major cryptocurrency spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) experienced broad net outflows on January 29, reflecting a cautious investor sentiment amid ongoing market volatility. Data from asset flow trackers show significant capital withdrawals across Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Solana (SOL), and XRP spot ETF products.
According to flow summaries for the trading session, these ETFs registered the following outflows:
Bitcoin (BTC) spot ETFs: –$817.87 million
Ethereum (ETH) spot ETFs: –$155.61 million
Solana (SOL) spot ETFs: –$2.22 million
XRP spot ETFs: –$92.92 million
The figures indicate a broad pullback from crypto ETF products, with institutional and retail investors reducing exposure through regulated funds. Exact sourcing from flow data comes from aggregated market trackers and SoSoValue reports released on January 29. This day’s movement marks one of the heavier single‐session outflows in recent weeks, particularly in Bitcoin and ETH products, which have seen recurring redemption pressure throughout January.
Market Context: Weak ETF Flows Amid Price Consolidation
The sharp decline in ETF demand coincides with a generally soft performance across major cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin’s price has remained near the mid-$80,000 range, while broader crypto markets have seen a consolidation phase with many top tokens retracing from recent gains. Analysts attribute the outflows to a mix of macro uncertainty, profit-taking, and momentary risk aversion.
One local crypto analyst noted that weak ETF flows can weigh on investor sentiment, even if price movements remain relatively stable. This dynamic has been seen as traders reassess positions following sharp swings earlier in the month.
ETF Flow Tensions: Altcoins vs. Bitcoin
While this particular session showed widespread net outflows across major products, recent weeks had seen intermittent inflows into altcoin-linked ETFs, especially for Solana and XRP products on certain days. Such patterns signal that investors may occasionally rotate capital toward different exposure themes within crypto, though the dominant trend on January 29 was clearly negative across the board.
Why ETF Flows Matter
Spot ETF flows — capital entering or exiting regulated Bitcoin and altcoin funds — are widely watched because they can provide insights into institutional and large retail positioning. Strong inflows are often interpreted as confidence in an asset’s future price trajectory, while sustained outflows suggest hedging, profit-taking, or short-term risk reduction.
Despite the red print on January 29, analysts emphasize that flows are only one piece of the broader crypto market picture, which also includes on-chain data, price momentum, and macroeconomic catalysts like interest-rate outlooks.
Investors and traders will continue to monitor ETF flow trends closely in the coming sessions, as further redemptions or renewed demand could offer clues about where sentiment is headed in early 2026.
$ETH
$SOL
$XRP
According to flow summaries for the trading session, these ETFs registered the following outflows:
Bitcoin (BTC) spot ETFs: –$817.87 million
Ethereum (ETH) spot ETFs: –$155.61 million
Solana (SOL) spot ETFs: –$2.22 million
XRP spot ETFs: –$92.92 million
The figures indicate a broad pullback from crypto ETF products, with institutional and retail investors reducing exposure through regulated funds. Exact sourcing from flow data comes from aggregated market trackers and SoSoValue reports released on January 29. This day’s movement marks one of the heavier single‐session outflows in recent weeks, particularly in Bitcoin and ETH products, which have seen recurring redemption pressure throughout January.
Market Context: Weak ETF Flows Amid Price Consolidation
The sharp decline in ETF demand coincides with a generally soft performance across major cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin’s price has remained near the mid-$80,000 range, while broader crypto markets have seen a consolidation phase with many top tokens retracing from recent gains. Analysts attribute the outflows to a mix of macro uncertainty, profit-taking, and momentary risk aversion.
One local crypto analyst noted that weak ETF flows can weigh on investor sentiment, even if price movements remain relatively stable. This dynamic has been seen as traders reassess positions following sharp swings earlier in the month.
ETF Flow Tensions: Altcoins vs. Bitcoin
While this particular session showed widespread net outflows across major products, recent weeks had seen intermittent inflows into altcoin-linked ETFs, especially for Solana and XRP products on certain days. Such patterns signal that investors may occasionally rotate capital toward different exposure themes within crypto, though the dominant trend on January 29 was clearly negative across the board.
Why ETF Flows Matter
Spot ETF flows — capital entering or exiting regulated Bitcoin and altcoin funds — are widely watched because they can provide insights into institutional and large retail positioning. Strong inflows are often interpreted as confidence in an asset’s future price trajectory, while sustained outflows suggest hedging, profit-taking, or short-term risk reduction.
Despite the red print on January 29, analysts emphasize that flows are only one piece of the broader crypto market picture, which also includes on-chain data, price momentum, and macroeconomic catalysts like interest-rate outlooks.
Investors and traders will continue to monitor ETF flow trends closely in the coming sessions, as further redemptions or renewed demand could offer clues about where sentiment is headed in early 2026.
$ETH
$SOL
$XRP
イーサリアム共同創設者ヴィタリック・ブテリンが将来のガバナンスのための二層オンチェーンメカニズムデザインを提案
📌 ブテリンが提案していること
イーサリアム共同創設者のヴィタリック・ブテリンは、最近、実行と集団的嗜好形成を分離する二層構造に基づくオンチェーンガバナンスの再編成に関するビジョンを示しました。このデザインは、イーサリアムのようなブロックチェーンでの意思決定が行われる方法において、より良い説明責任、分散化、およびキャプチャに対する抵抗をもたらすことを目指しています。
CryptoRank
🧱 レイヤー 1 — オープンで市場主導の実行
この最初のレイヤーは、参加者が結果に対して財務的賭けを行う予測市場のように機能します。
イーサリアム共同創設者のヴィタリック・ブテリンは、最近、実行と集団的嗜好形成を分離する二層構造に基づくオンチェーンガバナンスの再編成に関するビジョンを示しました。このデザインは、イーサリアムのようなブロックチェーンでの意思決定が行われる方法において、より良い説明責任、分散化、およびキャプチャに対する抵抗をもたらすことを目指しています。
CryptoRank
🧱 レイヤー 1 — オープンで市場主導の実行
この最初のレイヤーは、参加者が結果に対して財務的賭けを行う予測市場のように機能します。
姚乾、中国の元CBDC創設者および規制当局、 alleged Crypto-Bribe に関する調査中
🧑💼 姚乾とは誰か — そして彼はなぜニュースになっているのか？
姚乾は、中国のデジタル人民元（e-CNY）の開発において主要な役割を果たした中国の高級金融官僚であり、中国人民銀行のデジタル通貨研究所の所長を務め、その後、中国証券監督管理委員会（CSRC）で高位の職に就いていました。
彼は最近、中国当局が彼を腐敗で拘束し調査したため、厳しい監視を受けており、中国共産党からの追放と刑事訴追のための送致につながっています。
姚乾は、中国のデジタル人民元（e-CNY）の開発において主要な役割を果たした中国の高級金融官僚であり、中国人民銀行のデジタル通貨研究所の所長を務め、その後、中国証券監督管理委員会（CSRC）で高位の職に就いていました。
彼は最近、中国当局が彼を腐敗で拘束し調査したため、厳しい監視を受けており、中国共産党からの追放と刑事訴追のための送致につながっています。
𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐄 𝐖𝐎𝐃𝐋 𝐀𝐍𝐒𝐖𝐄𝐑
U.S. Lawmakers “Closer Than Ever” to Crypto Market Structure Bill, Says Senator Cynthia Lummis
🧠 What Lummis (and Other Lawmakers) Are Saying
Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) — a leading advocate for clearer U.S. crypto rules and chair of the Senate’s Digital Assets Subcommittee — has repeatedly signaled that a comprehensive crypto market structure bill is closer to passage than ever before, even as procedural delays have slowed progress in Congress.
In recent weeks she and other lawmakers have described ongoing bipartisan talks with Senate Democrats and industry stakeholders, expressing optimism that agreement on text and regulatory frameworks can soon be reached.
Lummis has said that “lawmakers are closer than ever to delivering the country’s pending crypto market structure bill”, despite some setbacks in markup schedules and opposition on specific provisions from industry players like Coinbase over draft language.
🏛️ Legislative Progress & Challenges
🔸 A key crypto market structure bill has advanced in some committees — including the Senate Agriculture Committee passing a version in a narrow vote — marking the first committee approval of the measure’s framework.
🔸 However, a crucial Senate Banking Committee markup was delayed, and members are negotiating details across party lines, particularly involving how regulators like the SEC and CFTC would oversee digital asset markets.
🔸 Negotiations continue alongside other crypto policy efforts, including the CLARITY Act passed by the House (aimed at defining digital asset classifications and oversight roles) — and lawmakers are working to reconcile House and Senate versions.
🧩 What “Closer Than Ever” Means in Context
When Lummis says lawmakers are closer than ever:
It reflects intent and bipartisan negotiations, not yet final agreement or floor votes.
Key sticking points include developer protections, stablecoin rules, and the balance of regulatory authority, which have slowed formal Senate action.
The Senate is working to align both Republican and Democratic priorities while completing markups and committee votes necessary before a full Senate vote.
Lawmakers had hoped to complete legislative work by late 2025 or early 2026, and Lummis herself has previously set similar goals — though the exact timetable remains fluid as Congress navigates procedural hurdles.
📌 Bottom Line
Sen. Cynthia Lummis’ statement that lawmakers are “closer than ever” to a crypto market structure bill reflects ongoing bipartisan negotiations and incremental legislative progress on a framework meant to clarify U.S. digital asset regulation. Major hurdles remain, but recent committee actions and continued talks signal that tangible progress is happening — even if the final bill is not yet law.
$BTC
Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) — a leading advocate for clearer U.S. crypto rules and chair of the Senate’s Digital Assets Subcommittee — has repeatedly signaled that a comprehensive crypto market structure bill is closer to passage than ever before, even as procedural delays have slowed progress in Congress.
In recent weeks she and other lawmakers have described ongoing bipartisan talks with Senate Democrats and industry stakeholders, expressing optimism that agreement on text and regulatory frameworks can soon be reached.
Lummis has said that “lawmakers are closer than ever to delivering the country’s pending crypto market structure bill”, despite some setbacks in markup schedules and opposition on specific provisions from industry players like Coinbase over draft language.
🏛️ Legislative Progress & Challenges
🔸 A key crypto market structure bill has advanced in some committees — including the Senate Agriculture Committee passing a version in a narrow vote — marking the first committee approval of the measure’s framework.
🔸 However, a crucial Senate Banking Committee markup was delayed, and members are negotiating details across party lines, particularly involving how regulators like the SEC and CFTC would oversee digital asset markets.
🔸 Negotiations continue alongside other crypto policy efforts, including the CLARITY Act passed by the House (aimed at defining digital asset classifications and oversight roles) — and lawmakers are working to reconcile House and Senate versions.
🧩 What “Closer Than Ever” Means in Context
When Lummis says lawmakers are closer than ever:
It reflects intent and bipartisan negotiations, not yet final agreement or floor votes.
Key sticking points include developer protections, stablecoin rules, and the balance of regulatory authority, which have slowed formal Senate action.
The Senate is working to align both Republican and Democratic priorities while completing markups and committee votes necessary before a full Senate vote.
Lawmakers had hoped to complete legislative work by late 2025 or early 2026, and Lummis herself has previously set similar goals — though the exact timetable remains fluid as Congress navigates procedural hurdles.
📌 Bottom Line
Sen. Cynthia Lummis’ statement that lawmakers are “closer than ever” to a crypto market structure bill reflects ongoing bipartisan negotiations and incremental legislative progress on a framework meant to clarify U.S. digital asset regulation. Major hurdles remain, but recent committee actions and continued talks signal that tangible progress is happening — even if the final bill is not yet law.
$BTC
プリンスグループ創設者チェン・ジー、カンボジアで逮捕され、中国に送還されるビリオンダラー・ビットコインの中で
👤 チェン・ジーとは誰ですか？
チェン・ジー（ビンセント・チェンとも呼ばれる）は、中国生まれの実業家で、プリンス・ホールディング・グループの創設者兼会長です。このグループはカンボジアに拠点を置く複合企業で、不動産、ギャンブル、金融サービスなど、アジア全体でさまざまな事業を展開しています。彼は長年にわたりカンボジアで影響力を持ち、エリートの称号「オクニャ」を保持し、政治家との密接な関係を築いてきました。
🚨 カンボジアでの逮捕と中国への引き渡し
カンボジアの当局は、彼の帝国に関連するオンライン詐欺およびサイバー犯罪の操作についての長期にわたる調査の後、2026年1月6日にチェン・ジーを逮捕しました。
チェン・ジー（ビンセント・チェンとも呼ばれる）は、中国生まれの実業家で、プリンス・ホールディング・グループの創設者兼会長です。このグループはカンボジアに拠点を置く複合企業で、不動産、ギャンブル、金融サービスなど、アジア全体でさまざまな事業を展開しています。彼は長年にわたりカンボジアで影響力を持ち、エリートの称号「オクニャ」を保持し、政治家との密接な関係を築いてきました。
🚨 カンボジアでの逮捕と中国への引き渡し
カンボジアの当局は、彼の帝国に関連するオンライン詐欺およびサイバー犯罪の操作についての長期にわたる調査の後、2026年1月6日にチェン・ジーを逮捕しました。
Industry Expert Warns Crypto Must Cement Its Role Before Political Backlash Hits
🧠 Context: Crypto Faces Increasing Political Scrutiny
Experts and key figures in the crypto world have repeatedly cautioned that now — while digital assets are gaining traction — is a critical window to define their role in the broader economy and influence how regulators perceive them.
🔹 U.S. regulatory push imminent:
Industry voices, including influential figures tied to market structure advocacy, stress that waiting for “perfect” crypto regulation risks letting future political shifts lead to harsher, more punitive rules. They argue the industry needs to engage now to help shape legislation before it’s framed under crisis conditions when political pressure is high — similar to past financial rulemaking after market turmoil.
💡 Key point: Acting early can help avoid reactive regulation that might stifle innovation or impose heavy constraints.
⚠️ Political Backlash Risks Highlighted by Experts
Several trends and warnings underline why this matters:
Political environment shifting around crypto: With evolving government stances — from regulatory rollback under certain administrations to possible future counter-movements — crypto’s trajectory could swing quickly depending on which party or lawmakers gain influence.
For example, changes in U.S. Congressional control could delay or block crypto-friendly laws, triggering stricter frameworks later.
Market volatility + regulatory gaps = flashpoints: Experts note that without clearer economic roles and regulatory alignment, crypto assets are easier targets for backlash when prices swing sharply or when political narratives turn against perceived risk assets. (While the exact quote isn’t cited here, this theme is widely reflected in ongoing industry discourse around regulation and political risk.)
Internal industry engagement matters: Voices within the sector — including executives, lobbyists, and legal strategists — are pushing for constructive engagement with policymakers now to cement crypto’s legitimacy and functional value rather than letting reactionary politics shape outcomes later.
📌 Bottom Line
Industry experts warn that crypto must clearly define and communicate its economic, technological, and societal roles now — before political narratives harden against it. The concern is that if crypto waits too long to solidify legitimacy and value, a backlash driven by political cycles or regulatory fear-mongering could result in more restrictive environments that hamper innovation and adoption.
$BTC
Experts and key figures in the crypto world have repeatedly cautioned that now — while digital assets are gaining traction — is a critical window to define their role in the broader economy and influence how regulators perceive them.
🔹 U.S. regulatory push imminent:
Industry voices, including influential figures tied to market structure advocacy, stress that waiting for “perfect” crypto regulation risks letting future political shifts lead to harsher, more punitive rules. They argue the industry needs to engage now to help shape legislation before it’s framed under crisis conditions when political pressure is high — similar to past financial rulemaking after market turmoil.
💡 Key point: Acting early can help avoid reactive regulation that might stifle innovation or impose heavy constraints.
⚠️ Political Backlash Risks Highlighted by Experts
Several trends and warnings underline why this matters:
Political environment shifting around crypto: With evolving government stances — from regulatory rollback under certain administrations to possible future counter-movements — crypto’s trajectory could swing quickly depending on which party or lawmakers gain influence.
For example, changes in U.S. Congressional control could delay or block crypto-friendly laws, triggering stricter frameworks later.
Market volatility + regulatory gaps = flashpoints: Experts note that without clearer economic roles and regulatory alignment, crypto assets are easier targets for backlash when prices swing sharply or when political narratives turn against perceived risk assets. (While the exact quote isn’t cited here, this theme is widely reflected in ongoing industry discourse around regulation and political risk.)
Internal industry engagement matters: Voices within the sector — including executives, lobbyists, and legal strategists — are pushing for constructive engagement with policymakers now to cement crypto’s legitimacy and functional value rather than letting reactionary politics shape outcomes later.
📌 Bottom Line
Industry experts warn that crypto must clearly define and communicate its economic, technological, and societal roles now — before political narratives harden against it. The concern is that if crypto waits too long to solidify legitimacy and value, a backlash driven by political cycles or regulatory fear-mongering could result in more restrictive environments that hamper innovation and adoption.
$BTC
ピーター・シュiffが戦略のビットコイン優先アプローチを株式のパフォーマンス低下として批判
📉 戦略の株式のビットコインに対するパフォーマンスの低下
シュiffは、戦略がビットコインを主要な企業資産として重視していることに公に疑問を呈しました。特に、同社の株はビットコイン自体やより広い市場に対して遅れを取っているためです。彼は、戦略の株価が著しく下落しており、しばしば純資産価値を下回って取引されていることを強調しました。これは、市場が会社を保有するビットコインの総価値よりも低く評価していることを意味します。
💬 ビットコインは「偽の資産」
シュiffは、ビットコインが金のような伝統的な資産に比べて内在的な価値を欠いているという長年の見解を繰り返しました。彼は、ビットコインのナスダックや金に対する急激な下落は、単なる市場の「リスクオフ」取引ではなく、「偽の資産から本物の資産への」回転を反映していると主張しています。
シュiffは、戦略がビットコインを主要な企業資産として重視していることに公に疑問を呈しました。特に、同社の株はビットコイン自体やより広い市場に対して遅れを取っているためです。彼は、戦略の株価が著しく下落しており、しばしば純資産価値を下回って取引されていることを強調しました。これは、市場が会社を保有するビットコインの総価値よりも低く評価していることを意味します。
💬 ビットコインは「偽の資産」
シュiffは、ビットコインが金のような伝統的な資産に比べて内在的な価値を欠いているという長年の見解を繰り返しました。彼は、ビットコインのナスダックや金に対する急激な下落は、単なる市場の「リスクオフ」取引ではなく、「偽の資産から本物の資産への」回転を反映していると主張しています。
Jihan Wu Says Maintaining Bitcoin Mining Provides a Hedge Against an AI Bubble
🧠 Who Is Jihan Wu?
Jihan Wu is a Chinese-Singaporean entrepreneur, co-founder of Bitmain and current CEO of Bitdeer — one of the largest publicly traded Bitcoin mining companies.
🗣️ What He Said About Bitcoin Mining & the AI Bubble
At the Bloomberg New Economy Forum in Singapore (Nov 21, 2025), Wu explained his strategic thinking as technology markets evolve:
🔹 Bitcoin mining provides stable revenue
Wu highlighted that continuing efficient Bitcoin mining ensures a steady cash flow, even as some mining firms pivot their infrastructure toward AI computing.
🔹 Hedge against uncertainty in AI demand
He noted there’s uncertainty around how quickly and sustainably AI demand will grow, and that mining can supply predictable income while the AI market develops.
🔹 Helps support infrastructure and power partners
Keeping mining operations running gives energy suppliers and power infrastructure partners confidence — useful if and when those facilities transition to AI megacenters.
🔹 Strategic flexibility
Wu suggested that rather than fully abandoning mining, companies like Bitdeer may continue mining first and convert facilities to AI compute as AI contracts and long-term demand are secured.
🧩 Why This Matters
Wu’s comments reflect a broader tech and capital strategy:
The AI sector has drawn massive investment, with some observers talking about possible “AI bubbles” (debate exists over whether the trend is a bubble or structural growth).
Maintaining Bitcoin mining gives a real business anchor — generating revenue and cash flow independent of AI market dynamics. This can be seen as a hedge (a risk-management tool) against over-valuation or slow AI adoption.
📌 Bottom Line
Jihan Wu argues Bitcoin mining isn’t just about cryptocurrency profits — it’s a financial and infrastructure hedge in an era of heavy AI speculation. He believes steady mining revenue and operational flexibility provide a buffer against potential AI market volatility and support long-term shifts into AI data infrastructure.
$BTC
Jihan Wu is a Chinese-Singaporean entrepreneur, co-founder of Bitmain and current CEO of Bitdeer — one of the largest publicly traded Bitcoin mining companies.
🗣️ What He Said About Bitcoin Mining & the AI Bubble
At the Bloomberg New Economy Forum in Singapore (Nov 21, 2025), Wu explained his strategic thinking as technology markets evolve:
🔹 Bitcoin mining provides stable revenue
Wu highlighted that continuing efficient Bitcoin mining ensures a steady cash flow, even as some mining firms pivot their infrastructure toward AI computing.
🔹 Hedge against uncertainty in AI demand
He noted there’s uncertainty around how quickly and sustainably AI demand will grow, and that mining can supply predictable income while the AI market develops.
🔹 Helps support infrastructure and power partners
Keeping mining operations running gives energy suppliers and power infrastructure partners confidence — useful if and when those facilities transition to AI megacenters.
🔹 Strategic flexibility
Wu suggested that rather than fully abandoning mining, companies like Bitdeer may continue mining first and convert facilities to AI compute as AI contracts and long-term demand are secured.
🧩 Why This Matters
Wu’s comments reflect a broader tech and capital strategy:
The AI sector has drawn massive investment, with some observers talking about possible “AI bubbles” (debate exists over whether the trend is a bubble or structural growth).
Maintaining Bitcoin mining gives a real business anchor — generating revenue and cash flow independent of AI market dynamics. This can be seen as a hedge (a risk-management tool) against over-valuation or slow AI adoption.
📌 Bottom Line
Jihan Wu argues Bitcoin mining isn’t just about cryptocurrency profits — it’s a financial and infrastructure hedge in an era of heavy AI speculation. He believes steady mining revenue and operational flexibility provide a buffer against potential AI market volatility and support long-term shifts into AI data infrastructure.
$BTC
𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐄 𝐖𝐎𝐃𝐋 𝐀𝐍𝐒𝐖𝐄𝐑
𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐄 𝐖𝐈𝐃𝐋 𝐀𝐍𝐒𝐖𝐄𝐑
𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐄 𝐖𝐎𝐃𝐋 𝐀𝐍𝐒𝐖𝐄𝐑
𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐄 𝐖𝐎𝐃𝐋 𝐀𝐍𝐒𝐖𝐄𝐑
モルドバは2026年までに暗号を合法化し規制する計画で、EUのMiCA枠組みに合わせています
モルドバは2026年までに暗号を合法化し規制する予定
• 新しい包括的な暗号法：モルドバは2026年末までに全国的な暗号通貨法を採用する計画であり、これは欧州連合の暗号資産に関する規制枠組み（MiCA）と一致させるものです。
• 暗号資産の法的地位：提案された立法は、国内での暗号通貨の保有と取引を規制された条件下で法的に認めるものです。
• 支払いと法定通貨：所有権と取引の合法化にもかかわらず、暗号通貨は商品やサービスの支払い手段としては許可されず、モルドバ・レウは公式な法定通貨として残ります。
• 新しい包括的な暗号法：モルドバは2026年末までに全国的な暗号通貨法を採用する計画であり、これは欧州連合の暗号資産に関する規制枠組み（MiCA）と一致させるものです。
• 暗号資産の法的地位：提案された立法は、国内での暗号通貨の保有と取引を規制された条件下で法的に認めるものです。
• 支払いと法定通貨：所有権と取引の合法化にもかかわらず、暗号通貨は商品やサービスの支払い手段としては許可されず、モルドバ・レウは公式な法定通貨として残ります。
ビザ、BVNKと提携してステーブルコインインフラを強化し、企業がステーブルコインの支払を資金提供し送信できるようにします。
ビザ、BVNKと提携してステーブルコインインフラを強化し、企業がステーブルコインの支払をウォレットに資金提供し送信できるようにします。
グローバルな決済大手ビザ株式会社は、ステーブルコインインフラの主要プロバイダーであるBVNKとの戦略的パートナーシップを発表し、ビザの決済エコシステム内でのステーブルコインの機能を強化します。このコラボレーションは、企業がステーブルコインベースの支払いをデジタルウォレットに直接資金提供し送信できるように設計されており、商業決済やリアルタイムのビジネス配分におけるデジタル資産の採用を加速する可能性があります。
グローバルな決済大手ビザ株式会社は、ステーブルコインインフラの主要プロバイダーであるBVNKとの戦略的パートナーシップを発表し、ビザの決済エコシステム内でのステーブルコインの機能を強化します。このコラボレーションは、企業がステーブルコインベースの支払いをデジタルウォレットに直接資金提供し送信できるように設計されており、商業決済やリアルタイムのビジネス配分におけるデジタル資産の採用を加速する可能性があります。
𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐄 𝐖𝐎𝐃𝐋 𝐀𝐍𝐒𝐖𝐄𝐑
𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐄 𝐖𝐎𝐃𝐋 𝐀𝐍𝐒𝐖𝐄𝐑
トークン化された資産が未来を支配する、コインベースCEOが発言
ブライアン・アームストロング、コインベースのCEOは、トークン化された資産—トークン化された株式、実世界の資産（RWA）、デジタル証券を含む—がより早く到来し、金融市場の未来を形作ると最近強調しました。
アームストロングは、トークン化された株式や他の伝統的な資産のデジタル表現がグローバル市場を変革し、24時間年中無休の取引、部分的所有権、より迅速な決済などの利点を提供すると特に強調しています。
世界金融市場レビュー
彼はトークン化を、ブロックチェーンが仲介者を減らし、市場へのアクセスを広げ、地理や収入に関係なく投資家のために「金融の競技場を平等にする」より広範な進化の一部として位置づけています。
アームストロングは、トークン化された株式や他の伝統的な資産のデジタル表現がグローバル市場を変革し、24時間年中無休の取引、部分的所有権、より迅速な決済などの利点を提供すると特に強調しています。
世界金融市場レビュー
彼はトークン化を、ブロックチェーンが仲介者を減らし、市場へのアクセスを広げ、地理や収入に関係なく投資家のために「金融の競技場を平等にする」より広範な進化の一部として位置づけています。
さらにコンテンツを探すには、ログインしてください