Sameer Shah

This theory is the final boss of Bitcoin FUD.

It sounds insane enough to feel believable. But once you slow down and check actual records, it falls apart.

Start with the timeline.

Satoshi released the Bitcoin whitepaper in 2008 and was coding nonstop through 2009 and 2010.

During that same period, Epstein was either in jail or under strict state supervision in Florida. He was not secretly operating as the most disciplined anonymous cryptographer in the world.

Now the MIT funding claim.

Yes, Epstein donated to the MIT Media Lab. Yes, his name was hidden under an alias.

There is zero evidence that any of his money went to Bitcoin development or the Digital Currency Initiative. The DCI was funded later by people like Reid Hoffman and Fred Wilson after the Bitcoin Foundation collapsed.

Epstein was chasing prestige, not building Bitcoin.
Then come the emails.

In 2014 and again in 2018, Epstein was emailing Peter Thiel and Steve Bannon asking basic questions about crypto. Regulation. Taxes. Distribution.

If he were Satoshi, he would not be asking for beginner explanations ten years later. He was trying to understand the technology, not explaining it.

The networking argument also fails.

Yes, Epstein met people like Brock Pierce and Larry Summers. That was his entire pattern. Insert himself into emerging fields once they were already hot.

Meeting early Bitcoin figures in 2014 does not make you the creator. It makes you late.

Others point to contact books and travel logs as proof. Epstein collected names to inflate his importance. Being listed does not equal a secret partnership.

Epstein had no history of C++ coding. No cypherpunk writing. No early work aligned with Bitcoin’s philosophy.

What he did have was a habit of showing up late to powerful ideas, looking for leverage and ways to move money.

Now the part that really blows my mind.
I cannot believe people are selling Bitcoin because they think Epstein was Satoshi.

If that makes you panic sell, you never understood Bitcoin in the first place.

Even if the worst person on earth created Bitcoin, it would not change what Bitcoin is.

Bitcoin is open-source. Decentralized. Permissionless. It does not belong to a founder, a company, or a personality.

It exists to protect people from monetary debasement and to enable free ownership and exchange of value, regardless of identity, borders, or beliefs.

Who created it does not control it.
Who created it cannot change it.
Who created it is irrelevant.

And if an unproven theory about a dead man is enough to make you dump your BTC…

You were never a Bitcoin holder in the first place.$BTC $ETH #WhenWillBTCRebound

L'oro è sceso di quasi il 16% negli ultimi due giorni di trading ed ha cancellato più di 6 trilioni di dollari di valore di mercato.
L'argento è sceso di quasi il 39% in soli due giorni e ha annullato circa 2,6 trilioni di dollari di valore di mercato.
Questo non è un normale ritracciamento e un tale tipo di crollo violento rompe la struttura dei prezzi.
Quando un asset scende così rapidamente, di solito non torna direttamente ai nuovi massimi storici. Spesso ha bisogno di tempo per riprendersi.
Ecco i motivi principali per cui oro e argento potrebbero avere difficoltà a raggiungere nuovi massimi per un po' di tempo.

1) L'incertezza è diminuita