Shahab Uddin 777

Part 1
The American Bankers Association (ABA) has elevated the prohibition of interest, yield, or rewards on payment stablecoins to its top policy priority for 2026, reflecting growing tensions between the traditional banking sector and the crypto industry as U.S. lawmakers move toward passing comprehensive crypto market structure legislation.

According to the ABA, its primary concern is that yield-bearing stablecoins could function as substitutes for bank deposits, thereby weakening the deposit base of especially community banks and reducing their capacity to lend. In a policy statement released this week, the association said it aims to “stop payment stablecoins from becoming deposit substitutes that slash community bank lending by prohibiting paying interest, yield or rewards regardless of the platform.”

Stablecoin oversight ranked first among five major priorities identified by the ABA for 2026. Other priorities include combating financial fraud, opposing arbitrary interest rate caps, and addressing issues related to indexing and mission-driven banks. ABA President and CEO Rob Nichols stated that these priorities were shaped by extensive feedback from banks and businesses of varying sizes and operational models across the United Sta$ETH
$BTC
#CZAMAonBinanceSquare
#USPPIJump
#BitcoinETFWatch
#WhoIsNextFedChair

Part 2
The dispute centers on whether yield-bearing stablecoins pose a systemic threat to the traditional banking system. The banking lobby argues that allowing stablecoins to offer returns could siphon deposits away from banks, undermining their role in credit creation and financial intermediation.

This concern has been echoed by senior banking executives. Earlier this month, Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan warned that as much as $6 trillion in deposits could potentially migrate from banks into interest-bearing stablecoins if such products were permitted to operate freely.

Although the GENIUS Act, passed last year, prohibits stablecoin issuers from directly offering interest or yield to holders, the ABA’s Community Bankers Council has raised alarms about what it describes as a loophole in the legislation. In a letter sent to lawmakers in early January, the council argued that stablecoin issuers could still effectively provide yield through third-party arrangements, thereby undercutting traditional banks despite the formal prohibit
$BTC
$ETH
#CZAMAonBinanceSquare
#USPPIJump
#BitcoinETFWatch

$BTC
$ETH
PART 3
As a result, the Community Bankers Council has urged Congress to include stronger provisions in upcoming crypto market structure legislation to close these gaps and prevent stablecoin issuers from offering yield indirectly.

The crypto industry, however, strongly disputes the banking sector’s claims. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire has dismissed concerns that yield-bearing stablecoins could trigger bank runs or destabilize the financial system, calling such fears “totally absurd.” Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Allaire argued that stablecoin yields enhance customer engagement and retention rather than threatening financial stability.

Similarly, Anthony Scaramucci, founder of SkyBridge Capital, has warned that banning yield-bearing stablecoins could place the U.S. dollar at a strategic disadvantage. He argued that such restrictions would weaken the dollar’s competitiveness relative to China’s digital yuan, which is a yield-bearing central bank digital currency.

As Congress accelerates efforts to finalize crypto market structure legislation ahead of the midterm elections, the debate over stablecoin yields has become a central fault line between traditional financial institutions and the digital asset industry. The outcome is likely to shape the future role of stablecoins in the U.S. financial system and determine whether they remain tightly constrained payment instruments or evolve into broader deposit-like financial produ

99...
🚨 99% OF PEOPLE WILL BE SHOCKED BY THIS INFORMATION!!!
🛢️Venezuela Has The Largest Proven Oil Reserves On Earth —
Around 303 Billion Barrels According To Global Energy Data.
This Means Venezuela Holds More Proven Crude Than Any Other Country —
About 17% Of The World’s Total Reserves.
President Trump Has Announced Plans To Rebuild Venezuela’s Oil Sector
And Direct A Portion Of Future Oil Revenue Toward U.S. And Venezuelan Interests.
The U.S. Is Also Allowing Venezuela’s Oil To Be Sold At Fair Market Rates,
Potentially Redirecting Some Exports Away From Prior Trade Flows.
Venezuela’s Oil Exports Have Historically Gone To China And Other Buyers,
But New Policies Could Change Global Energy Supply Lines.
Even With Vast Reserves, Venezuela’s Production Has Been Limited
Due To Sanctions, Investment Issues, And Infrastructure Challenges.
Despite Large Reserves, Daily Output Remains Well Below Past Peaks,
Showing How Complex Energy Control And Production Really Is.
⚠️This Situation Is A Significant Development In Global Energy Markets.
Oil, Currency Flows, And Trade Relationships All React To Long-Term Supply Expectations.
Positioning For Shifts In Energy Policy And Resource Access
Can Influence Market Dynamics Across Commodities And Financial Assets.
#USIranStandoff
#StrategyBTCPurc
#FedWatch
$BTC

The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) has announced that it is developing a platform for tokenized securities trading and on-chain settlement, for which it will seek regulatory approval. The platform intends to support 24/7 trading of U.S. stocks and ETFs, fractional share trading, stablecoin-based fund settlement, and instant delivery, integrating the NYSE’s existing matching engine with a blockchain settlement system. As planned, tokenized stocks will have the same dividend and governance rights as traditional securities. Meanwhile, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the parent company of the NYSE, is collaborating with banks such as BNY Mellon and Citigroup to explore tokenized deposit and clearing infrastructure to support cross-time zone and round-the-clock fund and margin management.
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260119300589/en/The-New-York-Stock-Exchange-Develops-Tokenized-Securities-Platform
$BTC
$ETH
#WhoIsNextFedChair
#MarketCorrection
#PreciousMetalsTurbulence
#USIranStandoff

The US Federal Reserve is announcing its interest rate policy in just a few hours. This decision will almost certainly trigger a massive move for Bitcoin and the entire market.

Will Powell be hawkish, potentially sending BTC below its $85k support? Or will a dovish tone ignite the next big pump?

My view is an urgent pre-announcement breakdown:
✅ The Bull Case vs. The Bear Case.
✅ My analysis of the most likely outcome.
✅ Other bullish factors for crypto on the horizon.
✅ A look at a cool "Play Money" tool to test your skills.

Get prepared for the volatility.

Link to Tria:
https://app.tria.so?accessCode=2MNV3ZN1Z3

Binance: https://cf-workers-proxy-exu.pages.dev/join?ref=VV2WMAX4

$BTC
#FederalReserve #InterestRates #Bitcoin #MarketAnalysis #FOMC #FederalReserve #InterestRates #Bitcoin #MarketAnalysis #FOMC #Volatility
$ETH

The New York Stock Exchange’s announcement that it is developing a platform for tokenized securities trading and on-chain settlement marks a potentially historic inflection point in global financial infrastructure. While tokenization has long been discussed within fintech and crypto circles, the NYSE’s entry into this space—subject to regulatory approval—signals that the concept is no longer experimental or peripheral. Instead, it is moving toward the core of regulated capital markets.$BTC
At the heart of the initiative is the creation of a blockchain-based settlement layer that would integrate with the NYSE’s existing matching engine. This distinction is crucial. The NYSE is not proposing to replace its price discovery mechanism with a decentralized alternative; rather, it aims to modernize post-trade settlement while preserving the institutional robustness of its current trading architecture. If implemented as described, the platform would support 24/7 trading of U.S. equities and ETFs, fractional ownership, stablecoin-based fund settlement, and near-instant delivery of securities.
Such a system directly challenges one of the most entrenched inefficiencies in modern finance: the time lag between trade execution and settlement. Traditional equity markets still rely largely on T+1 settlement (and until recently T+2), tying up capital, increasing counterparty risk, and complicating cross-border fund management. On-chain settlement, by contrast, promises atomic delivery-versus-payment, where cash and securities move simultaneously, potentially reducing systemic risk rather than increasing it.
Importantly, the NYSE has emphasized that tokenized stocks under this framework would retain the same dividend rights, voting privileges, and governance entitlements as traditional securities. This is not a cosmetic detail. One of the persistent criticisms of tokenized assets has been their ambiguous legal status—whether they represent true ownership or merely synthetic exposure. By anchoring tokenized shares within existing securities law frameworks, the NYSE appears to be positioning tokenization as a format change, not a rights change.
However, this initiative does not exist in isolation. Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the parent company of the NYSE, is simultaneously collaborating with major financial institutions such as BNY Mellon and Citigroup to explore tokenized deposits and clearing infrastructure. The goal is to enable round-the-clock liquidity management, margin optimization, and cross-time-zone fund mobility. Taken together, these developments suggest a coordinated attempt to rebuild the plumbing of global finance for a world that no longer operates on a 9-to-5, New York-centric schedule.
The implications of 24/7 equity trading are profound. Markets have historically been constrained by human working hours, national holidays, and settlement cycles designed for a pre-digital era. Crypto markets demonstrated—sometimes painfully—that continuous trading alters volatility dynamics, liquidity distribution, and investor behavior. If U.S. equities move in the same direction, regulators and institutions will need to rethink circuit breakers, market surveillance, and risk controls in an always-on environment.
Fractional share trading is another subtle but important element of the NYSE’s plan. While already available through brokers, embedding fractional ownership directly into the settlement layer could further democratize access to high-priced securities and ETFs. More importantly, it allows for finer capital efficiency, particularly when combined with tokenized collateral and real-time margining.
Stablecoin-based settlement deserves careful scrutiny. While stablecoins can dramatically reduce settlement friction, their use within regulated equity markets raises non-trivial questions: Which stablecoins qualify? Are they bank-issued tokenized deposits, central bank-backed instruments, or privately issued dollar proxies? ICE’s parallel work with global banks suggests a preference for regulated, bank-linked digital money rather than open-market stablecoins, a choice that would reduce regulatory friction but may limit interoperability.
Critically, none of this is guaranteed to succeed. Regulatory approval is not a formality. Securities regulators will need to be convinced that on-chain settlement does not introduce new systemic risks, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, or investor protection gaps. Custody models, smart contract failure modes, and governance of the underlying blockchain infrastructure all remain unresolved issues. The NYSE’s credibility helps, but it does not eliminate these concerns.
What makes this development genuinely significant is not the novelty of tokenization itself, but who is pursuing it and how. Unlike startups attempting to disrupt finance from the outside, the NYSE and ICE are attempting internal evolution. This approach favors gradual adoption, legal continuity, and institutional trust over ideological disruption.
From a macro perspective, tokenized securities and deposits could reshape capital flows, particularly across time zones. Global investors may gain faster access to U.S. markets, while U.S. institutions could manage liquidity more dynamically across Asia, Europe, and the Americas. Over time, this could reduce the dominance of specific trading hours and shift how global risk is priced.
In summary, the NYSE’s planned tokenized securities platform represents a serious, infrastructure-level attempt to modernize equity markets. It is neither a crypto marketing gimmick nor a wholesale abandonment of traditional finance. Instead, it reflects a recognition that settlement technology, not asset ownership itself, is overdue for reinvention. Whether this initiative becomes a quiet revolution or a constrained pilot will depend on regulatory outcomes, technical execution, and institutional adoption—but its strategic intent is unmistakable.
The future of capital markets may not be decentralized in ideology, but it is increasingly likely to be on-chain in function.

$BTC
$ETH
#VIRBNB
#TokenizedSilverSurge
#USIranStandoff
#USIranStandoff
#StrategyBTCPurchase