After a +139% move in 7 days, ENSO is now trading near $1.37, already down ~13% from the $1.58 local high, indicating distribution rather than continuation. The sharp drop came with very high turnover (volume ≈ 10× market cap), which usually signals profit-taking pressure instead of healthy accumulation. Price is losing short-term momentum and failing to hold above the previous breakout zone around $1.45–$1.50. Unless ENSO quickly reclaims that area, the structure favors a pullback toward the $1.28 liquidity zone, with deeper support near $1.15–$1.00 where prior consolidation sits.
Although DUSK is green on the day, it remains down over −21% on the week, signaling only a technical bounce. Price sits around SMA7/30 but stays well below SMA200 near $0.188, keeping the structure bearish. RSI near 49 and a small MACD uptick show stabilization, not strong demand. As long as DUSK fails to reclaim $0.188, rallies are likely to be sold, with risk skewed back toward the $0.136 support.
RESOLV has jumped nearly +30% in 24h with volume ($111M) exceeding its market cap, showing real participation, not a thin spike. Price is holding above SMA7 and SMA200 while MACD stays positive and RSI around 62 supports bullish momentum without extreme overbought risk. The $0.10 zone is the main demand base; as long as it holds, dips are likely to be absorbed. A breakout and hold above $0.14–$0.15 can extend the move higher. This setup stays valid while RESOLV remains above $0.112—losing it signals momentum failure.
@Plasma integrated NEAR Intents in January 2026, solving a problem most chains ignore: executing large stablecoin swaps without getting wrecked by slippage.
Before this, swapping significant volume on-chain meant fragmented liquidity across DEXs, price impact that ate your profits, and routing that felt like duct tape holding together broken pipes. NEAR Intents flips that. Intent-based architecture accesses deep liquidity across 125+ assets spanning 25+ blockchains, delivering pricing that matches centralized exchanges—without the custody risk.
For Plasma builders, this matters immediately. The 1Click Swap API lets developers embed institutional-grade execution into products handling massive stablecoin flows. Think USDT0 transfers, merchant settlement, treasury management. Volume that previously required CEX accounts now executes on-chain with comparable efficiency.
This isn't incremental improvement. Large trades on most chains still suffer catastrophic slippage. Plasma users get optimized routing that treats a $10 million swap like serious business, not an afterthought.
Combined with zero-gas USDT transfers and backing from Tether and Bitfinex, Plasma now handles both retail payments and whale-sized positions without forcing users to choose between chains. Small transfers cost nothing. Large swaps execute at CEX-equivalent rates.
Most blockchains optimize for one user type. Plasma built infrastructure that works for remittances and institutional treasury operations simultaneously. NEAR Intents integration proves the tech can scale across that entire spectrum without breaking. #plasma$XPL
@Plasma ranks second globally by TVL across Aave, Fluid, Pendle, and Ethena trailing only Ethereum mainnet. That's not hype. That's billions in working capital choosing Plasma over Layer 2s and alternative L1s. Maple Finance's syrupUSDT hit $1.1 billion TVL shortly after launching on Plasma, making it one of the world's largest single-chain liquidity pools. Institutions don't park that kind of money somewhere unstable. On Aave V3, Plasma shows the highest stablecoin supply-to-borrow ratio across all deployments. Deep liquidity, competitive rates, minimal risk. That's what a working credit market looks like. Zero-gas USDT transfers drove initial adoption. Backing from Tether, Bitfinex, and Founders Fund gave institutions confidence. Now the chain processes real volume payments, yields, borrowing not just speculation. Most chains compete for memecoins and NFT trading. Plasma went after the stablecoin credit market and won. Second place globally is first place in specialization. @Plasma $XPL #plasma
ETH is trading near $2,910 with RSI around 54 and a positive MACD histogram, showing improving momentum without being overbought. Short-term MAs are stabilizing above the local base, while heavy 24h volume (~$32B) confirms strong liquidity in the $2,800–$3,000 range. As long as price holds the $2,810–$2,830 support zone, pullbacks are likely to be bought. A clean break and hold above $2,980–$3,030 opens room toward $3,050 and potentially $3,200. This LONG setup is invalidated if ETH loses $2,750 with strong selling pressure.
AXS is up +7% in 24h with heavy volume, but RSI7 at 82 and RSI14 near 69 signal overbought conditions. While EMA7 is above EMA30, showing bullish structure, the rally is already extended without a clean consolidation. The $2.65–$2.75 zone is strong resistance, and failure to break it usually leads to mean-reversion toward the $2.22–$2.14 support area. Momentum remains positive, but at these levels risk favors a pullback trade rather than chasing upside unless AXS can close and hold above $2.65 with strong volume.
Price is trading below SMA7 and SMA30, keeping the short-term trend bearish. RSI near 47 shows no strong buying pressure, while MACD histogram remains negative, signaling sellers still control momentum. The $0.142 zone is acting as near resistance, and repeated rejection there increases the probability of a move back toward the $0.125 support. If $0.125 breaks with volume, liquidity is likely to be swept into the $0.11–$0.12 area. Until ZKC can reclaim and hold above $0.154 with strong volume, bounces are more likely to be sold than to start a sustainable upside move.
Even after dipping to $6.8, AUCTION is up more than +25% in 24h with reported volume far above its ~$45M market cap, which usually signals liquidity rotation instead of true accumulation. Price moved too fast from the $4.8–$5.6 base and hasn’t built a stable structure above it. With sentiment only mildly bullish, momentum is mainly flow-driven and can fade quickly. If $6.20 breaks, price is likely to seek the prior value zone near $5.60. Unless AUCTION can reclaim and hold above $7.50 with strong volume, bounces are better treated as sell opportunities rather than trend continuation
After a +60% move in 24h, ACU is trading in overextended territory where late buyers usually get trapped. Volume is extremely high relative to market cap, which often signals distribution after hype-driven pumps. Price already showed rejection near the $0.29 top, and momentum at these levels tends to fade once news flow slows. If ACU fails to hold above the $0.24 zone, liquidity is likely to be swept toward $0.20 and potentially the prior breakout base near $0.16. Until ACU can consolidate and hold above $0.30 with strong follow-through, rallies are better treated as short opportunities rather than sustainable trend continuation.
Price is holding above the $8.85 support after a −6.4% drop, suggesting selling pressure is slowing. RSI around 43 is near the lower neutral zone, where relief bounces often start, and MACD is attempting to turn up. A successful reclaim of EMA30 near $9.31 increases the probability of a push toward the $9.60 resistance and possibly the psychological $10 area. This LONG works only while $8.85 holds — a breakdown invalidates the setup and opens downside continuation instead.
From a technical view, the $0.0120 area is a key demand zone where price is attempting to stabilize after a −11% drop. Multiple tests here increase the chance of a reaction bounce if volume starts contracting on sell candles. On the 1h–4h timeframe, momentum is near oversold, which often leads to relief rallies when aggressive selling slows. A successful hold above $0.0118 keeps the structure from fully breaking and opens a path back toward the prior supply zone at $0.0140–$0.0150. This LONG only works as a support-defense play — if $0.0120 fails with strong volume, the setup is invalid and downside continuation toward $0.0105 becomes likely instead.
🔥 $SPACE just flushed into support and is showing early signs of a relief bounce.
🚀 SPACE Futures LONG Entry: 0.0166 – 0.0169 Stop: 0.0154 TP1: 0.0176 TP2: 0.0189 TP3: 0.0205
✅ Why long $SPACE
SPACE already pulled back -8.5% and is now testing the $0.0158 support zone with RSI ≈ 37, close to oversold. This is where sellers usually slow down and bounces start forming.
The key signal is flow: $15.3M taker buy volume hit the market while price was dropping — a classic sign of whales absorbing panic sells, not chasing highs. At the same time, open interest dropped 17%, meaning weak longs are flushed and downside pressure is getting exhausted.
With Binance Futures listing live and DePIN narrative still hot, SPACE has liquidity + catalyst. As long as $0.0158 holds, price has room to mean-revert toward $0.0176 → $0.019 → $0.020+ quickly.
ZEC is down -25% in 30 days and still trades below SMA30 ($350) and SMA200 ($366), meaning the medium-term structure stays bearish. The recent hold above SMA7 is only a technical pause, not a trend reversal.
RSI14 sits near 44, showing weak demand, while price keeps getting rejected under the $350–$370 supply zone. Each bounce is being sold, not accumulated.
If $343 fails, liquidity is thin toward $330 → $315 → $300, which can accelerate fast as stops trigger. Risk is clean: above $372 the bias flips, but below resistance sellers stay in control.
ENSO pumped over +140% in 7 days, then failed at $1.78 and dumped nearly -30% in 24h classic blow-off top behavior.
The key signal is liquidity: $784M volume vs $29M market cap. That’s extreme turnover, usually seen when whales distribute into FOMO. After the top, price can’t reclaim highs and momentum flips from expansion to profit-taking.
Once $1.40 breaks, structure is thin until $1.30 → $1.12 → $0.90, so downside can accelerate fast. Risk is clean: above $1.66 the short is invalid, but below support sellers gain control.
$RIVER is losing steam after a vertical expansion and is now sitting at a key rejection area.
📌 RIVER Futures — SHORT Entry: 72.8 – 74 Stop: 78 TP1: 71.2 TP2: 69.0 TP3: 65.9
🔻 Why this short makes sense
RIVER already pumped +170% in 7 days, then failed to hold the breakout above $78.9 and rotated back into $73–74. That’s a classic exhaustion + distribution pattern.
RSI is cooling from overbought, and volume after the top is shrinking — meaning buyers are no longer aggressive while late longs are still stuck. Once $73 is lost, there’s very little structure until $71 → $69 → $66, so price can slide fast.
This is a tight-risk fade trade: invalidation is clear above $77.2, but downside opens wide if sellers press. Secure profit early and trail the rest.
SOL crashed into RSI 15 (extreme oversold) and immediately attracted buyers around $117–118, then pushed back to $120. That tells us sellers are getting exhausted and liquidity is flipping back to the buy side. Even with whales distributing, ETF inflows + ecosystem liquidity growth are supporting demand. As long as price holds above $119, SOL has room for a momentum squeeze toward $125–130 before any larger correction.
The New Powerhouse of Stablecoin DeFi @Plasma has solidified its position as a "stablecoin king", now ranking #2 in TVL across major protocols like Aave, Fluid, Pendle, and Ethena—surpassed only by Ethereum mainnet.
With over $2.68B on Aave and $1B+ on Pendle, Plasma’s total TVL has surged into the billions. It currently boasts the highest stablecoin supply/borrow ratio across all Aave V3 deployments. This deep liquidity, driven by assets like USD₮0 and Ethena’s sUSDe, creates a "global credit layer" offering lenders steady yields and borrowers low-cost capital.
By combining zero-gas payments with deep integration across DeFi’s top yield engines, Plasma is no longer just a fast chain it is the primary hub for stablecoin lending and farming in 2026. #plasma$XPL
Inicia sesión para explorar más contenidos
Conoce las noticias más recientes del sector
⚡️ Participa en los últimos debates del mundo cripto