Don't let 'trust' become an accomplice to hackers! 3 million USDT evaporated overnight, these life-saving rules you must understand
Friends, today I want to share a true story. A buddy of mine in the circle lost 3,000,000 USDT within half an hour— the reason was that when he asked his wife to help with a transfer, he sent a screenshot of the mnemonic phrase via WeChat. What's even more heartbreaking is that the browser plug-in on that old Android phone had long been implanted with malicious code by hackers, specifically targeting the clipboard to steal the mnemonic phrase. By the time he reported it to the police, the hacker's server had cleared the records after 72 hours, leaving no clues for investigation. This kind of tragedy is not an isolated case. For example, in February 2025, the exchange Bybit was hacked due to a cold wallet vulnerability, resulting in the theft of $1.5 billion worth of Ethereum, which instantly triggered panic selling in the market; meanwhile, a seasoned player from Wenzhou named Zhuo, fell for a 'high exchange rate' scam and downloaded counterfeit wallet software, losing hundreds of thousands of assets within half an hour. The bloody cases tell us: in the crypto world, overly trusting others or tools is like handing a knife to hackers.
The Trillion-Dollar Capital Game Behind London's Luxury Homes: How Musk Propelled xAI's Astonishing Valuation with a Dream of Space
The £57 million penthouse is not just a real estate transaction; it is a key move in Musk's capital chess game. When Musk announced that SpaceX would acquire xAI at a valuation of $1.25 trillion, the market was in an uproar. Even more astonishing, Igor Babuschkin, a co-founder who had just left xAI, immediately purchased a penthouse apartment in London's Hyde Park for £57 million, setting a record for the most expensive residential transaction in the UK in over a year. The timing of this luxury property transaction is no coincidence—just days before the merger announcement, Babuschkin decisively liquidated his stake in xAI. As a seasoned crypto analyst, I believe this is not just personal wealth management, but a clever maneuver in Musk's capital chess game.
If the United States cuts the line, will China lose internet access? Don't panic, the truth is not what you think!
Root servers are not the master switch of the internet; the distributed network and China's independent layout have long built a firewall that is difficult for the United States to overcome. "There are 13 root servers globally, 10 of which are in the United States, and China doesn't have a single one!" This statement indeed sounds frightening, as if the United States could disconnect us at any moment. But as an analyst who deals with network architecture and encryption protocols all day, I can clearly tell you: the technical details and real interests are far more complex than the superficial numbers. If the United States really takes action, the first problem it faces is: the internet is a distributed network, not a centralized system that can be cut off by a single line. Let me elaborate on this.