Apresentador do Cozinha OnChain, onde cripto e gastronomia se encontram.
Entrevistas com grandes nomes do mercado enquanto preparamos pratos de verdade.
Why is US$ 100k a dangerous level for those who are short in $BTC Above US$ 100k there are US$ 9.5B in short positions. This is not technical resistance. It's concentrated risk. What happens if the price rises? When the $BTC rises: the short's loss increases the margin decreases the broker forces the closure Closing shorts = buying $BTC at market. This pushes the price even higher. That's why we call it a short squeeze It's not euphoria. It's mathematics. The price rises → shorts break → forced buying → price accelerates.
Ethereum and Wyckoff: what the chart is really saying
Ethereum is not 'stopped'. It is in accumulation. According to the Wyckoff model, this type of structure is built in phases, and each has a clear function: 🔹 Phase A – Interrupts the downtrend 🔹 Phase B – Time + lateralization to absorb supply 🔹 Phase C – Spring: last liquidity cleanup 🔹 Phase D – Character change (LPS / SOS) 🔹 Phase E – Trend establishes What seems like boredom is, in fact, market engineering. 📉 Price moves sideways to:
📊 Analysis — BTC x Global Liquidity (Fair Value Model)
The chart shows three key things: • Green line (Fair Value) → "fair" price of BTC based on global liquidity • Orange line (BTC Price) → market price • Shaded area → acceptable statistical zone (±1 deviation)
What this says today: • The price of $BTC is below or very close to the Fair Value, even with: • Global liquidity expanding • Less restrictive monetary policy on the horizon • Structural entry of institutional capital (ETFs, custody, derivatives)
📌 In previous cycles, when $BTC was below Fair Value, it did not last long; the adjustment came through the price, not through liquidity.
👉 In other words: it is not that $BTC is weak, it is the liquidity that has not yet been fully priced in.
🧠 Simple translation
The market has not yet reflected all the liquidity available in the global system. When this happens, historically, Bitcoin catches up.
The chart compares the Fully Diluted Market Cap (FDV) of Ethereum with the total TVL of the ecosystem. Historically, this relationship acts as a thermometer for structural undervaluation. 🔍 What the red circles show In the last two times the FDV of $ETH fell below or touched the TVL: 2020 2022 👉 Both marked macro bottom zones and asymmetric buying opportunities before significant upward movements. Today, the chart shows again: 📉 Compression between FDV and TVL
The $BTC lost the 50-week Moving Average (MA50) on the weekly chart. This signals short-term weakness, not the end of the cycle. Bull markets undergo corrections — this is structural. Historically, the loss of the MA50 in bull cycles: • Indicates corrective phase • Reduces leverage • Reprices risk ❌ Does not confirm trend reversal by itself. The price is now testing the 'Make or Break' zone, with the MA50 acting as dynamic resistance. This behavior is typical of intermediate corrections before the next directional leg.
The debate is not 'has altseason died or not'.
It's relative structure.
ETH/BTC has remained in compression for ~1100 days within the same range that marked the breakout of the previous cycle. ALTS/BTC show defense of historical support after multiple years of underperformance. This characterizes a transition zone, not a defined trend. Prolonged compressions alter asymmetry. The risk is not only of continued decline, but also of violent directional movement when: • dominance of $BTC stabilizes • risk spreads begin to close • marginal flow seeks beta
It is waiting for too many people to get it wrong.
The heatmap shows everything. The market hunts for liquidity, not opinions.
What can be read clearly: • 🟡 Intense yellow bands = large liquidation pools • Above and below the current price → the market is surrounded • 📍 Region ~80k–85k: giant liquidity below • 📍 Region ~100k–120k: even greater liquidity above
🧠 Simple translation: • It's not about "breaking resistance" • It's about going where there's more money to be liquidated
Will Bank was placed into extrajudicial liquidation by the Central Bank. This doesn't happen out of nowhere; it's the final point when the bank can no longer sustain itself financially. Liquidation ≠ random punishment. The Central Bank monitors, demands adjustments, and seeks solutions beforehand. When there is no viable recovery, it closes to protect clients and the system. Banks fail, almost always, due to the same combination: ❌ Lack of capital (solvency) ❌ Poor risk management ❌ Dependency on a controller in crisis
No, the White House did not announce in Davos that "banks will invest everything in cryptocurrencies".
👉 What really happened: • Banks and authorities spoke about conditional interest • Everything depends on clear regulation • Adoption is gradual, not an "all-in"
⚠️ Inflated headline ≠ fact.
Honest question: do you prefer hype or data before investing? 👀📊