青蛙也会飞
关注我的今年就会暴富，想省手续费的可以填写我的邀请码: QW6666, 平台规则下给到你最高。
Open Trade
PEPE Holder
High-Frequency Trader
1.2 Years
88 Following
2.5K+ Followers
15.5K+ Liked
213 Shared
All
Quotes
PINNED
$BNB 点我抽1BNB
PINNED
$BTC 币安红包，点我领取。
$WAL is a typical case of "definitely misjudging with short-line logic".
It lacks frequent stimulus points and is not good at generating emotional peaks. It is difficult to gain instant feedback from it, but it will not easily show you a complete collapse.
This is a common problem with infrastructure projects, but it is also their advantage.
The market is reluctant to pay a premium for "things that have not fully manifested value" in the early stages, but when the system begins to rely on it, the pricing will undergo a qualitative change.
The stage that WAL is currently in is more like waiting for this structural change rather than waiting for an emotional explosion.
#walrus $WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc
It lacks frequent stimulus points and is not good at generating emotional peaks. It is difficult to gain instant feedback from it, but it will not easily show you a complete collapse.
This is a common problem with infrastructure projects, but it is also their advantage.
The market is reluctant to pay a premium for "things that have not fully manifested value" in the early stages, but when the system begins to rely on it, the pricing will undergo a qualitative change.
The stage that WAL is currently in is more like waiting for this structural change rather than waiting for an emotional explosion.
#walrus $WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc
Many people research #walrus and focus their attention on technical parameters, but what truly determines its long-term value is the degree of "embedding".
Once Walrus is chosen as the storage solution at the architectural level, the subsequent migration costs will be very high. This binding relationship is more valuable than mere user growth.
Because users can change, but the underlying architecture rarely does.
This means that Walrus's growth path does not rely on attracting retail investors, but on gradually embedding into the ecosystem. The deeper the embedding, the more stable the demand for WAL will be.
This value often takes time to reflect in price, but once it forms, it is difficult to reverse.
#walrus $WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc
Once Walrus is chosen as the storage solution at the architectural level, the subsequent migration costs will be very high. This binding relationship is more valuable than mere user growth.
Because users can change, but the underlying architecture rarely does.
This means that Walrus's growth path does not rely on attracting retail investors, but on gradually embedding into the ecosystem. The deeper the embedding, the more stable the demand for WAL will be.
This value often takes time to reflect in price, but once it forms, it is difficult to reverse.
#walrus $WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc
$BTC You are too afraid to build a position now; you will always be a poor loser.
The value of many tokens comes from 'Will someone else take over?'.
And the value of $WAL comes from 'Does the system need it?'.
These are two completely different logics.
The storage of #walrus is not a luxury, but a necessity after the application scales. Once the data volume increases, the risks and costs of centralized storage will be magnified, while the advantages of decentralized storage will become apparent.
WAL plays the role of resource allocation and network incentives in this process. This role determines that its source of value is long-term, rather than explosive.
You may not like this pace, but it's hard to deny its stability.
If a project's existence does not rely on whether the market pays attention, but on whether the system operates, then its survival probability will be higher.
#walrus $WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc
And the value of $WAL comes from 'Does the system need it?'.
These are two completely different logics.
The storage of #walrus is not a luxury, but a necessity after the application scales. Once the data volume increases, the risks and costs of centralized storage will be magnified, while the advantages of decentralized storage will become apparent.
WAL plays the role of resource allocation and network incentives in this process. This role determines that its source of value is long-term, rather than explosive.
You may not like this pace, but it's hard to deny its stability.
If a project's existence does not rely on whether the market pays attention, but on whether the system operates, then its survival probability will be higher.
#walrus $WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc
If you look at Walrus within the entire Sui ecosystem, you will find that its position is very special.
Sui is responsible for execution, and #walrus is responsible for storage.
One is responsible for "running logic," and the other is responsible for "storing data."
As long as the complexity of applications on Sui increases, the volume of data will certainly rise, and this data ultimately needs a scalable, low-cost, decentralized storage layer to accommodate it.
Walrus is designed for this stage.
This means that the demand for $WAL does not exist independently, but is driven by the overall usage of the Sui ecosystem. The higher the activity of Sui, the more stable the call frequency of Walrus.
From an investment perspective, this is a type of "passively bound demand," rather than demand driven by promotion. The characteristic of this type of demand is slow, but has extremely strong stickiness.
This is also why WAL finds it difficult to escape the curve of wild fluctuations, but it is also not easy to be completely abandoned.
#walrus $WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc
Sui is responsible for execution, and #walrus is responsible for storage.
One is responsible for "running logic," and the other is responsible for "storing data."
As long as the complexity of applications on Sui increases, the volume of data will certainly rise, and this data ultimately needs a scalable, low-cost, decentralized storage layer to accommodate it.
Walrus is designed for this stage.
This means that the demand for $WAL does not exist independently, but is driven by the overall usage of the Sui ecosystem. The higher the activity of Sui, the more stable the call frequency of Walrus.
From an investment perspective, this is a type of "passively bound demand," rather than demand driven by promotion. The characteristic of this type of demand is slow, but has extremely strong stickiness.
This is also why WAL finds it difficult to escape the curve of wild fluctuations, but it is also not easy to be completely abandoned.
#walrus $WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc
Many people see WAL and their first reaction is: Why isn't it rising?
But this question itself is actually asking in the wrong direction.
$WAL is not a token that relies on market sentiment to maintain demand; it is more like a 'pricing unit within the system.' As long as the Walrus network is in use, WAL will definitely be consumed, rather than relying on trading activity to support its presence.
Walrus's storage model determines that it serves real on-chain applications, rather than short-term speculation. Once an application is launched, it will continuously generate data; as long as the data is growing, the storage demand is ongoing. This demand will not disappear due to market fluctuations.
This is also why WAL's price performance seems relatively 'dull.' Because it does not need to rely on price manipulation to create a sense of presence, it truly depends on usage frequency.
From this perspective, WAL's price is not waiting for sentiment, but for usage. This kind of token may not be popular in the early stages, but it is very difficult to be completely marginalized in the long term.
#walrus $WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc
But this question itself is actually asking in the wrong direction.
$WAL is not a token that relies on market sentiment to maintain demand; it is more like a 'pricing unit within the system.' As long as the Walrus network is in use, WAL will definitely be consumed, rather than relying on trading activity to support its presence.
Walrus's storage model determines that it serves real on-chain applications, rather than short-term speculation. Once an application is launched, it will continuously generate data; as long as the data is growing, the storage demand is ongoing. This demand will not disappear due to market fluctuations.
This is also why WAL's price performance seems relatively 'dull.' Because it does not need to rely on price manipulation to create a sense of presence, it truly depends on usage frequency.
From this perspective, WAL's price is not waiting for sentiment, but for usage. This kind of token may not be popular in the early stages, but it is very difficult to be completely marginalized in the long term.
#walrus $WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc
Walrus's true competitor is not other projects, but traditional cloud storage.
If you simply understand the competitors of #walrus as 'other decentralized storage protocols', you are actually underestimating its ambition.
What Walrus truly wants to replace is the position of traditional cloud storage in certain scenarios.
This point is crucial.
Because once you realize that Walrus's target users are not entirely within the cryptocurrency circle, but rather applications and organizations that need decentralized, censorship-resistant, and verifiable storage, you will understand that the valuation logic of WAL should not be viewed through the lens of 'speculative cryptocurrency standards'.
Traditional cloud storage solved efficiency issues but sacrificed control. Decentralized storage addresses the control issue but often sacrifices cost and experience.
What Walrus truly wants to replace is the position of traditional cloud storage in certain scenarios.
This point is crucial.
Because once you realize that Walrus's target users are not entirely within the cryptocurrency circle, but rather applications and organizations that need decentralized, censorship-resistant, and verifiable storage, you will understand that the valuation logic of WAL should not be viewed through the lens of 'speculative cryptocurrency standards'.
Traditional cloud storage solved efficiency issues but sacrificed control. Decentralized storage addresses the control issue but often sacrifices cost and experience.
Why is the price of WAL so 'bothersome'? Because it is essentially not an emotional coin.
Many people's dissatisfaction with
actually centers on one point:
—— it's not stimulating enough.
There is no continuous rise, no emotional premium, and none of that feeling of 'as long as you don't chase, you'll miss out'. In today's cryptocurrency environment, this is almost a 'sin'.
But the problem is: WAL was never meant to be about emotions.
If you dismantle Walrus from the original design intention, you'll find that almost every key decision is deliberately avoiding short-term games and instead serves long-term use.
First, let's clarify one thing: #walrus is not about 'telling storage stories', but is truly about building storage infrastructure. Erasure coding is not a marketing term, but a clear engineering solution. Blob storage is also not a concept, but a structural choice serving large-scale data scenarios.
actually centers on one point:
—— it's not stimulating enough.
There is no continuous rise, no emotional premium, and none of that feeling of 'as long as you don't chase, you'll miss out'. In today's cryptocurrency environment, this is almost a 'sin'.
But the problem is: WAL was never meant to be about emotions.
If you dismantle Walrus from the original design intention, you'll find that almost every key decision is deliberately avoiding short-term games and instead serves long-term use.
First, let's clarify one thing: #walrus is not about 'telling storage stories', but is truly about building storage infrastructure. Erasure coding is not a marketing term, but a clear engineering solution. Blob storage is also not a concept, but a structural choice serving large-scale data scenarios.
$BTC Bitcoin is about to experience an epic surge, hold on tight.
Looking at WAL from the price structure of coins, why is it taking a 'counter-crypto circle' path?
If you compare the price structure of WAL with most new coins today, you will find a very obvious difference: it has not tried to complete all emotional releases in a short time.
This is actually a very unusual thing in the crypto circle.
Most projects in the early stages will desperately create emotions, putting all narratives out at once to form consensus quickly through price fluctuations. But #walrus has not done this; it is more like 'waiting for the ecosystem' rather than 'grabbing attention'.
This rhythm is essentially determined by the attributes of the project.
Walrus is not a protocol designed for trading, but an infrastructure designed for use. It addresses the data issues that arise after the scaling of on-chain applications: how to store large volumes of data at low cost, how to decentralize distribution, and how to ensure recoverability and security.
This is actually a very unusual thing in the crypto circle.
Most projects in the early stages will desperately create emotions, putting all narratives out at once to form consensus quickly through price fluctuations. But #walrus has not done this; it is more like 'waiting for the ecosystem' rather than 'grabbing attention'.
This rhythm is essentially determined by the attributes of the project.
Walrus is not a protocol designed for trading, but an infrastructure designed for use. It addresses the data issues that arise after the scaling of on-chain applications: how to store large volumes of data at low cost, how to decentralize distribution, and how to ensure recoverability and security.
$BTC Buy on dips, keep buying, is it that hard? Are you so eager to get rich? Slow is fast, fast is slow.
Why DUSK is not a product of the bull market narrative, but rather the foundational layer of the migration of financial order.
In the cryptocurrency market, the fate of most projects depends on one question: Is it suitable enough to be hyped? However, from its inception, DUSK has clearly not prioritized this question. It chose a path that is not the easiest for the market to understand, but rather the one closest to real financial logic.
This path has only three key words: Compliance, Privacy, Auditability.
In the traditional financial system, privacy and compliance have never been opposites. Banks do not make your transaction records public, but regulators can access them when necessary. This model is not decentralized, but it is extremely stable. The problem lies in the traditional system's low efficiency, high costs, and difficulties in cross-border transactions.
This path has only three key words: Compliance, Privacy, Auditability.
In the traditional financial system, privacy and compliance have never been opposites. Banks do not make your transaction records public, but regulators can access them when necessary. This model is not decentralized, but it is extremely stable. The problem lies in the traditional system's low efficiency, high costs, and difficulties in cross-border transactions.
When tokens are no longer priced through speculation, where does the real demand for DUSK come from?
In most crypto projects, the core role of a token is singular: it is meant to be traded. Regardless of how the project wraps its narrative, the ultimate measure of success remains price performance and market enthusiasm. This structure determines the fate of the vast majority of tokens; they must continually create new stories to attract new funds, or they will quickly lose attention.
However, $DUSK from the very beginning, it was not designed along this path.
If you carefully analyze the architecture and positioning of DUSK, you will find that its understanding of tokens is closer to systemic assets in traditional finance rather than traffic assets in the internet sense. It does not rely on explosive user numbers, nor does it depend on emotions to drive valuation; instead, it attempts to embed tokens into the essential processes of financial activities.
However, $DUSK from the very beginning, it was not designed along this path.
If you carefully analyze the architecture and positioning of DUSK, you will find that its understanding of tokens is closer to systemic assets in traditional finance rather than traffic assets in the internet sense. It does not rely on explosive user numbers, nor does it depend on emotions to drive valuation; instead, it attempts to embed tokens into the essential processes of financial activities.
When the crypto industry enters the institutional phase, where is DUSK?
If we extend the crypto industry to a ten-year scale, we will discover a repeatedly overlooked fact: what truly determines the life and death of a project is never a certain market cycle, but whether it can adapt to the changes in the industry phase. Many projects perform brilliantly in the early stages, but once the environment changes, they quickly lose significance. There are also some projects that appear dull in the early stages but gradually reveal their value later.
$DUSK obviously belongs to the latter.
The current market still tends to evaluate all public chains using the standards of the speculative phase, such as trading activity, narrative popularity, and price volatility. However, this evaluation method itself carries a strong limitation of the phase. It only applies under the premise that the crypto world is in a state of barbaric growth for a long time.
$DUSK obviously belongs to the latter.
The current market still tends to evaluate all public chains using the standards of the speculative phase, such as trading activity, narrative popularity, and price volatility. However, this evaluation method itself carries a strong limitation of the phase. It only applies under the premise that the crypto world is in a state of barbaric growth for a long time.
Many people's hesitation towards DUSK actually stems from a misconception; they believe that all public chains must prove themselves through activity and popularity. However, in the financial world, truly important systems are often those that are hardly discussed daily yet have never been replaced.
The token logic of DUSK essentially does not serve high-frequency traders but rather supports stable operation. As long as compliant financial activities continue to take place on the chain, the demand for DUSK is not a matter of choice but a necessity. This demand will not disappear due to declining market sentiment, nor will it drop to zero because of a cooling market.
This is also why the value of $DUSK relies more on time rather than nodes. It is difficult to judge its upper limit based on one or two months of price performance, but you can determine its qualifications for long-term existence based on whether it continues to be used.
In the crypto market, short-term volatility determines sentiment, while long-term usage determines fate. DUSK clearly bets on the latter.
#dusk $DUSK
The token logic of DUSK essentially does not serve high-frequency traders but rather supports stable operation. As long as compliant financial activities continue to take place on the chain, the demand for DUSK is not a matter of choice but a necessity. This demand will not disappear due to declining market sentiment, nor will it drop to zero because of a cooling market.
This is also why the value of $DUSK relies more on time rather than nodes. It is difficult to judge its upper limit based on one or two months of price performance, but you can determine its qualifications for long-term existence based on whether it continues to be used.
In the crypto market, short-term volatility determines sentiment, while long-term usage determines fate. DUSK clearly bets on the latter.
#dusk $DUSK
If we look at DUSK within the entire cycle of the cryptocurrency industry, it resembles an asset prepared for the next phase rather than a target serving the current phase.
The current market phase is more inclined towards narrative-driven and sentiment pricing, while institutional finance requires stability, predictability, and interpretability. The design direction of DUSK corresponds precisely to the latter.
This means that it is difficult for DUSK to become a market center in the early stages, but once the industry begins to value compliance and risk control, its value will be reassessed. The role of the token here is not to stimulate transactions but to maintain system operation.
This type of token does not create surprises every day, but its demand base is more solid. It does not rely on newcomers entering the market but on whether the system continues to exist.
From this perspective, the valuation of DUSK is not a matter of sentiment but a matter of time
#dusk $DUSK $DUSK
The current market phase is more inclined towards narrative-driven and sentiment pricing, while institutional finance requires stability, predictability, and interpretability. The design direction of DUSK corresponds precisely to the latter.
This means that it is difficult for DUSK to become a market center in the early stages, but once the industry begins to value compliance and risk control, its value will be reassessed. The role of the token here is not to stimulate transactions but to maintain system operation.
This type of token does not create surprises every day, but its demand base is more solid. It does not rely on newcomers entering the market but on whether the system continues to exist.
From this perspective, the valuation of DUSK is not a matter of sentiment but a matter of time
#dusk $DUSK $DUSK
$PENGUIN Will the penguin impact 1 billion or even 10 billion to recreate the Trump coin miracle? This penguin is truly a top narrative, with the president leading the way, capital following, and Musk adding fuel to the fire at the end. Next, let's see how we respond here. I suggest pulling down the Binance life.
Login to explore more contents