Noami Ansari

A technical challenge, such as deploying real financial products (stocks and bonds) on a public blockchain is more than merely a technical challenge. $$$ It must also be legally approved and have a good market structure. Dusk Network is fully aware of this. Dusk also collaborates with regulators and licensed financial companies instead of ignoring regulations....$$$USDC
Numerous cryptocurrency ventures promote decentralization and evade control. Dusk takes another path. It is developing a blockchain with the capability to accommodate regulated assets on a legal basis. It explains the way Dusk is partnering with licensed exchanges, like NPEX and 21X, why it wants to trade and settle via a special license, the way its trading platform STOX connects, and the impact of European regulations on its strategy.
NPEX alliance - acquiring actual financial licenses.
Dusk is collaborating with NPEX, a Dutch licensed exchange in 2025. The collaboration provided Dusk with a number of major financial licenses: trading, brokerage services, crowdfunding, and special blockchain trading and settlement license.
Such licenses allow Dusk to engage in the trade within regulated assets like stocks and bonds in a legal manner. The distinction is that compliance is built in the blockchain. Applications created on Dusk thus do not have to resolve legal problems, the regulations exist at the network level.
The joint venture formed the NPEX dApp, which is a regulated market through which companies can issue tokenized assets, and investors can trade these assets. It is directly linked to the smart-contracts of Dusk and allows the use of assets of NPEX, 21X, and other institutions. Dusk and NPEX are showing that regulated on-chain trading can be conducted in a non-problematic and safe manner by beginning with real-world assets in current markets.
21X collaboration - regulated trading under the DLT Pilot regime.
Dusk collaborates with 21X, a company that was one of the first to obtain permission to implement blockchain-based trading and settlement systems in Europe. The acceptance of that is based on a special European framework that allows testing markets based on blockchain under strict rules.
As opposed to most of the controlled platforms, which are based on a private blockchain, 21X is based on public networks. Dusk is a newcomer to the trading industry and expects to become more integrated in the long run. It aims to utilize the smart-contract layer of Dusk as a supported blockchain to do regulated trading.
The collaboration underlines the management of reserve of stable-coins. The issuers of stable-coins require safe and controlled means of handling huge amounts of money and assets. The privacy aspect that dusk offers facilitates big trades without the exposure of sensitive information but allows regulators to have access to any information when required.
Because the value of real-world assets like stocks and bonds is significant, this collaboration makes Dusk a legitimate platform through which the latter is transferred to the blockchain.
A blockchain stock exchange and Cordial Systems.
The other achievement was when Cordial Systems became part of Dusk and NPEX to create one of the first blockchain-based stock exchanges in Europe. NPEX already has the authorization to operate a regulated trading venue and has Dusk as the blockchain infrastructure to issue and trade assets.
Cordial supplies provide wallet technology that enables institutions to have direct control over their assets without a third-party custodian. This is essential to banks and big investors who need all key control.
With Dusk, NPEX gains privacy, in-built compliance, and DeFi tools without breaking the financial regulations. Technically, it was straight forward to integrate Dusk and the tokenized assets in real life have already been released. This demonstrates the fact that regulated stock trading can be supported by public blockchains, rather than experiments.
STOX the trading platform - own by Dusk.
Besides partnerships, Dusk is also developing its own trading platform, STOX. The idea of the platform is to put regulated assets on-chain, such as, money-market funds, stocks, and bonds, directly to users.
STOX will be installed on the smart-contract of Dusk and will be rolled out in stages. It starts small with few partners and assets, and expands over time. STOX is not a substitute of NPEX but it also works with it. NPEX is licensed as a broker and as such, STOX can legally offer a large array of regulated assets.
As it develops its own platform, Dusk has gained control over the entire process- user-onboarding to the ultimate settlement. STOX is able to combine staking rewards, payments and tokenized assets in a manner that traditional brokers cannot. In the long-term, Dusk aims to introduce users of both conventional and DeFi into a single market.
An important regulatory objective is the DLT -TSS license.
One of the key points of the Dusk strategy is a special license that will allow the blockchain systems to trade and settle securities. It is also time-consuming and requires close cooperation with exchanges, lawyers, and regulators in order to receive this license.
Upon approval, the license will enable assets to be issued on the blockchain without necessarily having traditional custodians. The system should completely adhere to European financial regulations, such as the crypto asset and the financial service provider regulations.
Before launching its products, Dusk works hand in hand with regulators to meet these requirements through its blockchain and applications. It is also a pre-emptive measure that will avoid future legal challenges and it shows that Dusk is, in fact, dedicated to regulation.
The institution readiness and compliance to miCA.
The European crypto regulations distinguish between digital assets namely payment tokens, asset-backed tokens, and utility tokens. The technology of Dusk is designed to serve all these types correctly.
Dusk implements legal regulations in its smart contracts and network structure instead of making companies develop their own compliance tools. This eases regulated product issuance by regulators and assures the regulators that the system promotes investor protection and market regulations.
This preparedness is important to institutions that are incapable of bearing legal risks. The looming of dusk reduces the obstacles of using blockchain infrastructure by traditional organizations.
Forced transfers, identity and security lifecycle.
The administration of on-chain securities does not only involve transferring tokens. Dusk includes features that deal with real-life situations.
Forced transfer is a mechanism that allows authorized individuals to transfer assets in case an investor loses access to it or a court decides to reverse it. It also gives the investors protection and makes it easy to settle dispute although it is somewhat centralizing the control.
Dusk also enables on-chain voting in case of token owners. Shareholder votes can be conducted by companies with a set time to vote and power is considered to be in terms of the number of tokens.
There is a requirement of identity checks. The trading of regulated assets should verify the investors and only the qualified people should possess such tokens, and the system remains not violating the financial laws.
Dusk as a depository securities depository.
Dusk has been moving towards the operation as a central securities depository, which would handle electronic ownership records and settlements on-chain.
This will save expenditures as opposed to old systems that are based on costly charges and brokers. Settlement are nearly immediate, and compliance is an inbuilt part of the process. The model of Dusk will provide a sustainable solution to the digital securities as the sandboxes of the temporary regulations are abandoned.
This is a major achievement towards becoming a blockchain-based securities depository. It positions Dusk on the same level as the traditional providers of financial infrastructure and indicates that it is highly trusted by regulators.
Chainlink connection and cross-chain access.
Dusk is linked to other blockchains through cross-chain system, which enables the transfer of assets and tokens in Dusk, Ethereum, and Solana without any risk.
Chainlink is also a provider of reliable market information, which is necessary to the regulated trading. This integration allows to regulate assets of Dusk to interact with the rest of the blockchain ecosystem and maintain privacy and compliance.
In this arrangement, the assets of Dusk are not limited to one chain, but can be deployed in many systems without affected legal safeguards.
Stablecoins and momentum of real-world assets.
One of the initial applications of the regulated infrastructure of Dusk can be stablecoin reserves. Issuers of stablecoins require safe methods of purchasing and selling regulated assets that support their tokens.
This can be done through the partnerships of Dusk under European regulations and the network is also compatible with payment-centered firms, not just securities but real-life finance.
Dusk is set to be the blockchain layer that provides the opportunity to issue, trade, and settle tokenized funds and stablecoins as legitimate assets as institutions move towards greater adoption of these technologies.
Conclusion
Dusk Network is acting in a very bold and disciplined manner. It is constructing an official blockchain uniquely to regulated finance, in conjunction with licensed exchanges, creating its own buying and selling platform, pursuing key licenses, and embedding closely with European regulations. This provides a legal basis that is not trying to be covered by many crypto projects.
Simultaneously, it provides more current blockchain functions, including privacy, rapid settlement, staking and cross-chain access. The identity checks, forced transfers, and on-chain voting are just some of the tools that solve the real operational dilemmas.
The real test is next. Provided that the platforms of Dusk draw real companies, investors, and trading activity, it might be fundamental infrastructure of tokenized finance. The success would demonstrate that public blockchains and financial regulation can work instead of confront one another and drive the future of markets.
#Dusk
$DUSK @Dusk $XRP

Unlike others that focus on transactional anonymity (like Monero), Dusk prioritizes programmability and confidentiality for complex financial instruments . Think private smart contracts, selective disclosure, and Zedger's financial instrument modeling
Here's the breakdown:
🔹 Transactional Anonymity vs Financial Programmability: Dusk focuses on the latter, enabling complex financial behavior with confidentiality.
🔹 Selective Disclosure: Unlike Zcash's shielded transactions, Dusk's approach scales better for applications with multiple dependent outcomes.
🔹 Privacy Smart Contracts: Dusk vs Secret Network's TEE reliance – Dusk minimizes trust dependencies.
🔹 Layer-2 Solutions: Aztec (L2) vs Dusk (L1) – trade-offs between liquidity and execution predictability.
Dusk's strengths:
✅ Confidentiality + programmability + settlement finality as co-equal design constraints
✅ Zedger models financial instruments, not just tokens
✅ Steady development, high staking participation, low validator churn
The catch? Thinner liquidity and market structure 📉.
Is Dusk's trade-off worth it? Prioritizing credibility over speculative liquidity might pay off in the long run. What's your take on Dusk's approach? $DUSK #Dusk #Blockchain @Dusk_Foundation

- Treating tension as a product: Dusk acknowledges the need for both public verification and confidentiality in finance, and is building a settlement layer that balances these competing demands.
- Institutional-grade focus: The project's language and partnerships suggest it's targeting regulated markets and institutional players, prioritizing confidentiality and compliance.
- Privacy with discipline: Dusk's approach to privacy is nuanced, allowing for controlled disclosure when needed, rather than forcing a single worldview on every transaction.
- Phoenix mechanism: This enables confidential value transfer without revealing sensitive info, a crucial feature for serious financial usage.
- Balancing transparency and confidentiality: Dusk acknowledges the need for transparency in regulated environments, offering a more transparent lane alongside confidential transactions.
- Architecture: The project's separation of settlement and execution layers, combined with an EVM-oriented approach, suggests a focus on stability and flexibility.
- Confidential logic: Dusk's work on smart contract environment privacy aims to enable regulated finance applications, handling sensitive information carefully.
- Prioritizing safety: The project's tendency to pause services when risks appear and communicate transparently suggests a focus on infrastructure security.
Overall, Dusk seems to be building a settlement rail that mirrors real-world finance, prioritizing confidentiality, auditability, and institutional-grade infrastructure. Its success will depend on real-world adoption and usage. #Dusk #Blockchain #Finance $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation

After using Dusk for a while, I found that my understanding of blockchain experienced an intelligent change. It's not that I technically understand more, but rather that I began to reconsideration something I had never seriously considered before: how much responsibility should a chain take for its users?
On most public chains, this answer is almost the default the chain is only responsible for performance, not for judgment. You sign, broadcast, and go on-chain, and the result is irrevocable. As for whether you have permission, whether the operation is reasonable, or whether there are hidden dangers, that's your concern. The system never mediates and does not provide reminders.
This design has no issues when live, and even feels very free. But when I start dealing with things that must be treated rigorously on-chain, this mode of complete letting go becomes a burden.
I first clearly felt this after multiple repetitive operations. Each step requires me to frequently confirm the rules, check the status, and worry about missing conditions. It is not because I do not understand, but because once an error occurs, the chain will not catch me. That emotional pressure has always existed.
Later, I travelled part of my operations to Dusk, and the feeling was very direct. Dusk does not entirely shift the 'responsibility' onto the user, but actively takes on part of it. The system does not assume that you are fully aware of all the rules; instead, it writes the rules into the protocol, making non-compliant behavior impossible.
At first, I was not accustomed to this way and even felt it was limiting me. But the longer I used it, the more I realized a fact: true freedom is often built on certain boundaries. If the boundaries are unclear, all freedom becomes risk.
On Dusk, assets are not a string of values that can be freely circulated, but objects with clear states and transfer conditions. Each change is a passage of the state machine, rather than a simple 'send - confirm - end'. This design allows many potential issues to be addressed before the operation.
What I particularly feel this difference in is when handling continuous operations. On other chains, each operation is isolated, and you need to ensure the logical consistency yourself. But on Dusk, the system actively verifies the relationships between states before and after; as long as the logic is not closed, the operation cannot proceed. This experience made me feel for the first time that a chain is not just a 'tool', but is assisting me in getting things right.
The privacy design is also where I truly appreciate the value after long-term use. Dusk does not simply hide data; it has very clear divisions on 'who should see what'. For me, this means I do not need to repeatedly weigh compliance against exposure. The system has already made reasonable choices for me.
The longer I use it, the more I understand why Dusk does not seem lively. Because it does not pursue frequent user operations, but hopes that each operation has a clear purpose. This design is inherently inappropriate for users seeking excitement and a sense of participation but is very suitable for those wishing to reduce long-term risks.
Regarding the DUSK token, my viewpoint has gradually become realistic. It is not meant to create short-term demand but plays the role of incentivizing network security and rule execution. Nodes need it to maintain consensus, and the system requires it to ensure rules are continuously executed. This value is not easily intensified by emotions, but once missing, the entire system loses its foundation.
Of course, I would not represent Dusk as a problem-free project. It has high requirements for user understanding, which is unfriendly to beginners; the pace is slow, making it hard to gain attention in the short term; many values can only be appreciated through real use. These are genuine shortcomings.
But it is precisely these 'unappealing' traits that make me increasingly certain of one thing: Dusk is not designed for everyone, but exists for a very specific need. That need is not loud but persists over time, and once neglected, the cost will be very high.
Now, I naturally regard Dusk as a 'responsibility-based system'. When things are important, have long-term impacts, and cannot go wrong, I will choose it; when things are trivial, I still use other lighter tools.
This distinction is not because I have become traditional, but because I finally realized: a truly mature chain should think one step further for the user at critical moments.
And Dusk is precisely taking on this step.
@Dusk $DUSK #Dusk

$DUSK Network's approach to blockchain is a breath of fresh air in an industry often dominated by ideological rhetoric. Unlike many of its peers, Dusk doesn't peddle in absolutism no "total transparency" or "code is law" maximalism here. Instead, it feels like the project was designed by people who've actually seen how financial institutions operate behind the scenes, where privacy is normal, audits are routine, and neither side thinks the other is optional.
Imagine a professional office building. Inside, doors are closed, conversations are private, and documents aren't taped to the windows. But at the same time, there are logs, access controls, compliance officers, and paper trails when they're legitimately required. That's the balance Dusk is chasing on-chain – not hiding everything, not exposing everything, but making disclosure something that happens with purpose, not by default.
A Tale of Two Environments: Phoenix and Moonlight
Dusk's approach to privacy is nuanced. The project doesn't declare that one model should rule the entire network. Instead, it treats privacy like lighting in a building – some rooms need bright lights, some need the blinds down. The split between Phoenix and Moonlight becomes meaningful in this context, allowing users to move between environments without leaving the system or breaking its rules.
For institutions, who live in a world of NDAs, restricted information, and regulatory oversight, this flexibility isn't philosophical – it's operational.
From Project to Infrastructure
What's made Dusk feel less like an idea and more like infrastructure is the quiet progress under the hood. The Rusk core node software began fully enabling third-party smart contracts, marking a turning point that didn't come with fireworks. It simply meant: other people can now build serious things here. That's when a chain stops being a project and starts being a place.
Dusk's modular structure also feels less like trend-chasing and more like practical design. With DuskDS anchoring consensus and finality, DuskEVM welcoming Solidity developers, and DuskVM pushing deeper into privacy-preserving logic, Dusk resembles financial market plumbing more than a typical monolithic chain.
A Token with a Purpose
The DUSK token makes more sense when you stop thinking like a trader and start thinking like an operator. Staking isn't just yield farming with a different logo – it's closer to a reliability bond, a financial commitment that says, "I'm serious about running this infrastructure correctly." The introduction of soft-slashing mechanics reinforces this tone, treating validators like service providers with performance expectations.
Transparency without Opacity
Despite building privacy tech, Dusk is straightforward about its monetary state. The live supply tracker at supply.dusk.network shows roughly 566 million DUSK in circulation. This clarity about system-level numbers, while protecting individual transactional privacy, shows the project understands the difference between confidentiality and opacity.
Ecosystem Developments
On the ecosystem side, developments like EURQ on Dusk are interesting because they provide a bridge between on-chain logic and real-world accounting. Institutions get a unit of value that feels familiar, auditable, and legally legible – a crucial building block for sophisticated financial products.
Custody and interoperability efforts involving groups like Cordial Systems, NPEX, and standards from Chainlink are also noteworthy. These aren't flashy developments, but they're the support beams of a system meant to carry regulated assets.
A Future that Works
Dusk Network's approach to blockchain is pragmatic, nuanced, and focused on building a system that can live inside the real world, not rebel against it. It's a harder path, slower and less viral, but ultimately more promising for serious financial infrastructure.
As @Dusk continues to build, it's clear that $DUSK is more than just a token – it's a key to a more private, secure, and compliant financial future #Dusk