HNIW30

As of February 1, 2026, the US government has officially entered a partial government shutdown after funding deadlines expired at midnight on January 31. This is not a full shutdown—it primarily affects agencies such as the Department of Defense, State Department, Health and Human Services (HHS), Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and Transportation. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) received a two-week extension for further negotiations on immigration enforcement reforms.

This shutdown stems from political disputes between Democrats and Republicans over ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) operations following recent controversial incidents. It is expected to be short-lived (likely ending Monday or Tuesday once the House votes on the Senate-passed funding package), and its real-world impact is limited since it began over a weekend.

So, how does this shutdown affect Bitcoin and the broader crypto market? Here’s a detailed breakdown based on current market data and historical precedents.

1. Immediate Market Reaction: Short-Term Negative
As shutdown news spread and the deadline approached, Bitcoin dropped about 7% over the past week, falling from recent highs to around $83,000 (some sources report testing support at $81,000–$83,000).Ether (ETH) fell harder, down roughly 9%.Main driver: Increased macro uncertainty → Investors shift to "risk-off" mode, pulling capital from high-risk assets like crypto into USD or government bonds.Reduced liquidity and higher volatility → Crypto markets become more sensitive to sentiment swings, especially if a prolonged shutdown delays key economic data releases (e.g., jobs reports, inflation figures) that influence Fed rate decisions.
Analysts note that if the shutdown drags on longer than expected, BTC could slide toward $60,000 in a worst-case scenario (though probability is low).

2. Historical Impact of Government Shutdowns on Bitcoin
Longest historical shutdown (2018–2019, 35 days): Bitcoin was already in a deep bear market (dropping from $20K to $3K), but the shutdown wasn’t the primary cause—the 2017 bubble burst dominated. Traditional stocks dipped modestly, but crypto showed little direct correlation.Short 2025 healthcare-related shutdown: Impact was very mild; markets recovered quickly once resolved.General pattern: Shutdowns rarely cause lasting economic damage (previous ones cost ~$11 billion, mostly in disrupted public services). Traditional markets (S&P 500, bonds) typically see only minor volatility, while crypto—more sensitive to liquidity—can be more volatile but rebounds fast if the event ends promptly.
3. What Makes This One Different: Why Impact May Be Milder
Partial & brief: Essential services (Social Security, Medicare, military core operations) continue. Most federal offices are closed over the weekend anyway, so public disruption is minimal.Already priced in: Prediction markets and analysts expect a quick resolution (low odds of lasting >4 days). The House is slated to vote early next week to reopen.Bitcoin as a potential safe haven?: Some argue that in political uncertainty, BTC could act as "digital gold"—but current sentiment remains risk-off, partly due to Fed concerns (with a potentially hawkish new chair like Kevin Warsh) reducing expected rate cuts.Biggest risk: If DHS talks fail and the shutdown extends, it could delay crypto-related legislation (e.g., stablecoin rules) or crypto-linked IPOs.
Bottom Line: Not a Disaster, But Watch for Volatility

This shutdown is likely just a minor storm, with primarily short-term negative effects on Bitcoin (price dips and heightened volatility from uncertainty). If the House passes the deal quickly (as forecasted), crypto markets could rebound strongly mid-week and even retest recent highs.For BTC holders:
Short term: Brace for potential further dips; consider buying the dip if resolution comes fast.Long term: Bigger drivers remain the new Fed policy and Trump administration’s crypto stance (potentially pro-crypto).
Things are moving fast—keep an eye on the House vote early next week for updates!
#WhiteHouseDigitalAssetReport #BTC #Binance

Over the past 12 hours, total liquidation of cryptocurrency Futures Contract across the network reached $2.061 billion, primarily driven by Longing positions ($1.958 billion).
Data shows that the sharp price swing wiped out more Longing than Short, with liquidations concentrated heavily in $BTC and ETH within the same timeframe.
MAIN CONTENT
Total liquidation in 12 hours: $2.061 billion.Longing were liquidated for $1.958 billion; Short were liquidated for $103 million.BTC liquidated for $671 million; ETH for $884 million.
Liquidation of Futures Contract surged in 12 hours.
Total liquidation of cryptocurrency Futures Contract across the network reached $2.061 billion in 12 hours, with Longing positions accounting for the majority.
In the liquidation structure, $1.958 billion came from Longing positions and $103 million from Short positions. The large difference between Longing and Short positions reflects the downward pressure/unexpected volatility that forced many leveraged long positions to be closed within the same timeframe.
The figures above are based on CoinAnk data and aggregated across the entire network, focusing on the Futures Contract market over a 12-hour timeframe.
$BTC and $ETH are the focus of liquidation.
In 12 hours, BTC was liquidated for $671 million and ETH for $884 million.
Compared to the total liquidation of $2.061 billion across the entire network, BTC and ETH alone contributed the majority of the liquidation volume. This suggests that volatility in these two market-leading assets may have triggered a domino effect on other leveraged positions.
#BitcoinETFWatch #ETH

Over the past year, I’ve spent a lot of time observing how different blockchain projects evolve, especially during periods when the market shifts its focus every few weeks. Some projects explode with attention and then disappear just as quickly. Others move more slowly, sometimes so quietly that most people miss what is actually happening. From my point of view, @Plasma belongs to the second group.
What initially caught my attention about Plasma wasn’t a viral announcement or aggressive marketing. It was the way the project consistently framed its purpose around infrastructure rather than short-term excitement. In a space where many networks try to position themselves as “the next big thing,” Plasma seems more interested in building something that can actually support long-term on-chain activity.
One thing that stands out is how Plasma approaches scalability and reliability. These topics are often mentioned across crypto, but they’re rarely treated as core design principles. Plasma, however, appears to treat them as non-negotiable foundations. That mindset matters because real usage tends to expose weaknesses very quickly. Systems that look fine under light traffic often struggle once demand increases, and fixing those problems later is usually far more difficult.
From an ecosystem perspective, Plasma feels designed for builders who care about stability. Developers don’t just need speed; they need predictability. They need to know how a network behaves under stress, how it handles execution, and whether it can support complex interactions without constant workarounds. Plasma’s direction suggests an awareness of these needs, even if the progress doesn’t always come with loud announcements.
The role of the native token, $XPL , also deserves attention. In many projects, the token exists primarily as a market instrument, disconnected from actual usage. With Plasma, $XPL seems more closely tied to how the network functions and how participants interact with it. This kind of integration doesn’t always generate immediate hype, but it often creates more sustainable incentive structures over time.
Another aspect I find interesting is how Plasma fits into the broader evolution of blockchain infrastructure. As the industry matures, the focus naturally shifts away from experiments and toward systems that can operate continuously and reliably. Plasma appears to be positioning itself for that phase, where fundamentals matter more than narratives and long-term usability becomes the real differentiator.
Of course, no project develops in isolation. Plasma is building within a competitive and fast-moving environment. But instead of reacting to every trend, it seems to be following a clearer internal logic. That consistency is easy to overlook, yet it’s often what separates networks that survive multiple cycles from those that fade after their initial moment.
In my view, Plasma’s progress may not always be obvious on the surface, but that doesn’t make it insignificant. Sometimes, the most important work happens quietly, away from constant attention. For those who value infrastructure, execution, and long-term thinking, Plasma is a project worth continuing to watch closely.
#Plasma

10 days ago I wrote the first lines on Binance Square, at that time the views were very few and I was also very discouraged but I tried to keep writing and gradually the views increased and I felt happier. And then!!

Today I officially received 1 BNB from the creator reward program of 200 BNB from Binance Square – a very meaningful reward for my content creation efforts over the past time. This is not just money, but also a great motivation for me to continue sharing knowledge more seriously. I started participating in Binance Square as a trader wanting to learn and exchange. But gradually, I realized this is not just a forum, but a real ecosystem helping crypto creators build sustainable income.

Today is a truly special day for me. When I just woke up, as usual, I picked up my phone to check notifications, I saw a lot of notifications and messages mentioning me. I was very anxious and worried (because of Long

and Short

) I tried to reassure myself that it would be fine, then saw my name on the list of those selected to receive rewards from the 200

Creator Rewards program of Binance Square, and I couldn't hold back my tears. Not because of the value of the reward (even 1 BNB is already very precious!), but because of the feeling of being recognized, of the community accepting what I have tried to share.

Important information: The price drop to 1011 is not due to a system failure at Binance; the platform has done everything possible to compensate for the losses.

Early in the morning on January 31, the founder of Binance,
, held an English-language online Q&A on Binance Square to address recent rumors (FUD - Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt) from the community about Binance. Below is a record of the main statements made by CZ from BlockBeats:

One thing I’ve noticed while watching @Plasma over time is that the project doesn’t try to define itself through loud promises. Instead, Plasma seems to focus on how blockchain infrastructure should actually behave when it’s pushed beyond early experimentation.
A lot of networks look impressive during low usage, but the real test comes when activity increases and systems are forced to operate under pressure. Plasma appears to be designed with that reality in mind. The emphasis is not only on speed, but also on stability and predictable behavior, which are often overlooked until problems start to appear elsewhere.
From a user and observer standpoint, this approach makes sense. Sustainable ecosystems are usually built by solving practical issues first, not by chasing every trending narrative. Plasma’s development direction feels more aligned with long-term usability than with short-term attention.
The utility of $XPL fits naturally into this picture. Rather than being treated as a separate speculative layer, the token is part of how the network functions and aligns incentives across participants. Over time, that kind of structure tends to support healthier growth, especially as more real use cases emerge.
Plasma may not dominate headlines every day, but steady progress is often what matters most in this space. For those paying attention to fundamentals, Plasma is a project worth continuing to watch closely.
#Plasma

For developers and studios building consumer-facing applications, choosing the right blockchain has become less about buzzwords and more about reliability. Vanar Chain is increasingly interesting from this angle. Instead of marketing itself as a universal solution, @Vanarchain focuses on being a stable and performant environment for applications that demand consistency, especially in gaming and interactive digital experiences.
From a builder’s perspective, predictability matters. Networks that suffer from congestion, unstable fees, or constant architectural changes make long-term planning difficult. Vanar’s positioning suggests an emphasis on providing a dependable base layer where teams can focus on product development rather than constantly adjusting to infrastructure limitations.
As more developers look for chains that support real production workloads, the relevance of $VANRY becomes more closely linked to ecosystem usage and participation. Vanar Chain’s approach aligns with a broader industry trend: developers gravitating toward blockchains that prioritize execution quality over short-term attention. #vanar