CryptoFrontNews

The “Crypto Sprint” speeds up crypto adoption and makes rules clearer for derivatives and spot trading.

The “Future-Proof” initiative updates rules for emerging markets, attracting startups and big crypto players.

Selig favors minimal regulation that protects markets without slowing innovation, keeping the U.S. competitive globally.

CFTC Chair Mike Selig says the United States is becoming the “crypto capital of the world.” He shared that the government is updating rules to support innovation in digital currencies while keeping markets safe. Selig also highlighted former President Trump’s role in helping crypto gain wider acceptance.

Since Mike Selig became CFTC Chair, the agency has rolled out new steps to make crypto rules clearer and easier to follow. One key effort, called the “Crypto Sprint,” started in 2025 and is designed to speed up crypto adoption while making regulations more straightforward. It focuses on areas like crypto derivatives and spot trading, helping ensure rules are consistent across the board.

Furthermore, the CFTC has recently allowed the trading of spots in official contract markets, which would mean that the digital assets would be included in the regulated and much safer environments. This shows that the US authorities want the country to be the forerunner in the development of cryptocurrency while having the market monitored properly.

Strategic Initiatives and “Future-Proof” Framework

The CFTC also introduced a new program called “Future-Proof” to update rules for fast-growing areas like perpetual futures and prediction markets. This shows the agency understands how quickly digital finance is changing.

Mike Selig aims to achieve a balance between promoting innovation and safeguarding the market. The effort seeks to make the United States more appealing to both established businesses and cryptocurrency startups by updating current regulations. America is therefore shifting from cautiously observing the cryptocurrency field to actively influencing it.

Selig also supports what he calls a “minimum effective dose of regulation,” meaning the rules should protect the market without slowing down innovation. He believes regulations should help the crypto industry grow while keeping it safe.

The CFTC is now embracing blockchain technology and collaborating closely with the cryptocurrency sector, as seen by its new strategy. These actions, however, are part of a larger strategy to maintain American leadership in the rapidly expanding digital economy.

The post U.S. Positions as Global Crypto Hub Under CFTC Oversight appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Las Vegas businesses adopt Bitcoin to avoid 2.5–3.5% card fees, keeping more revenue as operating costs rise.

QR-based Bitcoin payments are fast and simple, helping merchants attract crypto users and boost foot traffic.

Square’s zero-fee Bitcoin rollout and national brands like Steak ’n Shake accelerate local adoption.

Bitcoin payments are spreading across Las Vegas as more local businesses begin accepting the cryptocurrency. According to FOX News, the shift is happening across retail, food, and service industries. Business owners say rising operating costs and high credit card fees pushed the move, while simpler technology made Bitcoin payments easier to manage.

Lower Fees Drive Merchant Adoption

Many Las Vegas merchants cite transaction costs as the main reason for adopting Bitcoin. Credit card processors typically charge businesses between 2.5% and 3.5% per transaction. By comparison, Bitcoin transaction fees remain significantly lower.

Jeremy Quercy, a Bitcoin consultant, told FOX News that merchants want alternatives as expenses rise. He explained that Bitcoin reduces reliance on intermediaries. Therefore, businesses keep more revenue per sale.

Mike Peterson, CEO of Bouncy World Mega Playground & Cafe, confirmed the savings matter. He said Bitcoin fees cost only a fraction of card charges. Since adoption, roughly 20 to 30 customers have paid using Bitcoin. Notably, usage continues to increase steadily.

Simpler Payments Attract New Customers

Beyond cost savings, business owners point to ease of use. Quercy said customers complete payments by scanning a QR code. Payments process instantly using standard Bitcoin apps.

Cane Juice Bar and Cafe, located on Rainbow near Windmill, adopted Bitcoin eight months ago. District manager Tyler Peterson said Bitcoin appeals to everyday customers. He added that callers frequently ask whether the store accepts Bitcoin.

According to Peterson, Bitcoin maps also drive foot traffic. Customers locate nearby businesses that accept digital currency. As a result, the café gained new visitors specifically seeking Bitcoin payment options.

National Chains Join Local Bitcoin Trend

The trend extends beyond small businesses. Steak ‘n Shake introduced limited-edition Bitcoin-themed menu items in Las Vegas. The chain also offers employees a Bitcoin bonus of $0.21 per hour worked. However, payouts follow a two-year vesting schedule.

Meanwhile, Square enabled roughly four million U.S. merchants to accept Bitcoin with zero processing fees through 2026. This change removed a major barrier to adoption. Consequently, Las Vegas merchants gained broader access to Bitcoin payment infrastructure.

FOX News reported that Bitcoin acceptance now spans restaurants, juice bars, medical practices, and children’s play facilities. Together, these developments show how Bitcoin continues integrating into everyday commerce across Las Vegas.

The post Las Vegas Is Going Bitcoin as Local Businesses Adopt BTC appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Big Bitcoin holders are confident, moving $1M+ coins, hinting they’re preparing for future opportunities.

Long-time holders and medium investors are selling, putting pressure on prices despite whale accumulation.

Weak U.S. institutional demand adds caution, creating a mixed market picture for Bitcoin near $89K.

Bitcoin markets are under the spotlight as large holders, or whales, actively adjust their positions. Data from Santiment shows that wallets holding at least 1,000 BTC added 104,340 coins, a 1.5% increase. These whales now control 7.17 million BTC—the most since September 15, 2025.

Despite the market's volatility, large Bitcoin holders are exhibiting confidence, according to Santiment data. Whales are actively transferring their coins, as seen by the two-month high in transfers of more than $1 million. These investors might be getting ready for fresh market possibilities.

Santiment noted that these actions demonstrate that large investors are discreetly purchasing additional Bitcoin rather than selling. This implies that they are optimistic about Bitcoin's prospects for the upcoming months. However, not all market signs are as optimistic. While whales are holding more coins and moving large amounts, other data shows some caution, making the market’s overall picture a bit mixed.

Market Indicators Signal Caution

Even though whales are buying more Bitcoin, crypto analyst EgyHash points out some warning signs. Bitcoin’s demand chart shows that the strong buying seen in mid-2025 has turned into negative demand in January 2026. This means long-time holders are selling their coins faster than new buyers can take them, putting downward pressure on the price.

Also, the chart tracking whales’ year-over-year holdings shows they are starting to reduce their Bitcoin instead of adding more. In the past, this usually meant big investors were stepping back from the market. On top of that, data on medium-to-large investors, called ‘dolphins,’ shows they have moved from buying heavily to taking profits. This suggests that several types of investors are now selling rather than holding.

Moreover, the Coinbase Premium Index sits in deep negative territory, implying weak institutional demand from the U.S. market. “All four indicators are currently showing a bearish convergence,” EgyHash noted, emphasizing that both whales and dolphins are selling, contributing to the current $89.4K price dip.

The post Bitcoin Whales Ramp Up Holdings Amid Market Uncertainty appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Japan plans to reclassify XRP under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, moving it beyond standard crypto rules.

XRP’s new status would impose stricter disclosures, licensing and AML compliance, aligning it with traditional investments.

Regulators aim to match XRP’s legal framework with its growing use in Japan’s banking and tokenized payment systems.

Japan plans to classify XRP as a regulated financial product under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. The change, expected by Q2 2026, would occur in Japan under national regulatory reforms. Regulators aim to shift XRP from a crypto asset category, strengthen investor protections, and align oversight with traditional financial products through updated compliance rules.

Regulatory Shift 

Japan currently regulates most digital assets under the Payment Services Act. However, regulators now plan to bring XRP under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act framework. This move would subject XRP to stricter oversight, including exchange licensing, disclosure standards, and anti-money laundering requirements.

Notably, the proposed change would place XRP alongside conventional investment products. Regulators intend to reduce legal ambiguity for exchanges, institutions, and retail investors. The timeline targets Q2 2026, giving market participants time to adjust compliance systems.

According to reports, authorities want clearer investor safeguards and more defined operational rules. Therefore, XRP would move beyond its current crypto asset status. The reclassification reflects Japan’s broader effort to refine digital asset regulation through established financial laws.

XRP Ledger Role in Japan’s Tokenized Economy

Alongside regulatory changes, Japan is leveraging the XRP Ledger within its tokenized economy initiatives. The ledger already supports payment and settlement infrastructure across the country. Banks and financial firms continue expanding XRP Ledger use for remittances and related services.

Consequently, the planned classification aligns regulatory treatment with existing institutional usage. XRP already holds a significant share of Japan’s crypto transaction volumes. Regulators appear focused on formalizing frameworks around assets already embedded in financial systems.

This alignment supports regulated participation without altering existing infrastructure. Therefore, oversight would increase while technical adoption continues under established platforms.

Compliance, Tax Structure and Market Context

Japanese regulators are also reviewing simplified tax structures for digital assets. Reports reference discussions around a flat 20% capital gains tax. Such measures aim to standardize reporting and reduce compliance uncertainty for investors.

However, the XRP initiative does not change other crypto classifications immediately. Most digital assets remain regulated under current payment laws. XRP’s case reflects a targeted approach rather than a system-wide overhaul.

Japan continues coordinating with blockchain firms while enforcing consumer protection standards. The XRP classification effort fits within that framework. Regulators seek structured oversight, defined compliance, and controlled institutional participation under existing financial legislation.

The post Japan Plans to Classify XRP as Regulated Financial Asset appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

MegaETH runs on one server, letting it censor, front-run, or even steal user funds. Centralization is a real risk.

L2 fees mostly go to MegaETH, not Ethereum. Users pay $0.003 while ETH sees just 0.2% of value.

Despite risks, MegaETH scales efficiently—but true decentralization still favors L1s like SOL, SUI, and NEAR.

A new wave of concern has emerged in the Ethereum ecosystem as MegaETH, a prominent Layer 2 (L2) solution, faces criticism for extreme centralization risks. According to crypto analyst Justin Bons on X, MegaETH can censor, front-run, and even steal all user funds without delay. 

He warns that its entire network runs on a single centralized server, making its claimed high-speed performance less impressive. Bons emphasizes that less than 0.2% of fees return to Ethereum, labeling the system as “exceptionally parasitic.”

Bons explains that MegaETH’s architecture exposes users to critical admin key risks. Its smart contract, managed via a 4-of-8 multisignature, could be upgraded to send all deposited tokens to a new address. “This is currently the case for all major L2s!” he stated. 

While major exploits have not yet occurred, Bons warns that similar security setups in other contracts have failed, making a large-scale fund loss only a matter of time. Additionally, MegaETH relies on a single permissioned sequencer, giving it the ability to censor transactions or prioritize profits through MEV. Consequently, decentralization claims become misleading.

Centralization vs. Performance

MegaETH’s hardware demands are extreme. Operating one sequencer costs over $100,000 per year, twenty times higher than a Solana validator. Although two backup sequencers exist, Bons argues that the path to true decentralization essentially recreates L1 consensus mechanisms, negating L2 advantages. 

Moreover, the 10ms transaction speed claim ignores latency across global distances, undermining MegaETH’s speed comparisons to L1s like ETH, SOL, SUI, or NEAR. Bons adds, “Having a single centralized server solves many bottlenecks that real cryptocurrencies have to work around.”

Economically, MegaETH contributes very little to Ethereum. Charging $0.003 per transaction while the L2 operation costs just $0.000006 per user operation, MegaETH captures nearly all value for itself. Bons highlights this parasitic relationship, noting that MegaETH settles on EigenDA, not ETH. 

Despite these criticisms, Bons acknowledges MegaETH’s engineering feat: “MegaETH is the most interesting & best L2 from my perspective, as unlike other ETH L2’s, it actually scales!”

The post MegaETH Raises Red Flags for Centralization Risks in Layer 2 Scaling appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

AFP Protección will launch a Bitcoin exposure fund for qualified investors, limiting allocation to support long-term diversification.

Access will be advisory-based, with risk profiling and exclusion of mandatory pension savings from Bitcoin exposure.

The move makes Protección Colombia’s second major pension manager to offer Bitcoin exposure after Skandia.

Colombia’s second-largest pension fund manager, AFP Protección, plans to launch a Bitcoin exposure fund for qualified investors. The plan was confirmed in Colombia during a recent interview by company president Juan David Correa. The initiative targets long-term diversification through limited Bitcoin allocation, using personalized advisory, as Protección manages about $55 billion in assets.

Advisory-Based Access Shapes the Fund Structure

Protección SA, a private Colombian financial institution, will offer the Bitcoin exposure through individualized advisory services. According to Juan David Correa, advisers will first evaluate each investor’s risk profile. Only investors meeting defined criteria will gain access to Bitcoin allocation.

Notably, the fund will allow only a small percentage of portfolios to include Bitcoin. The structure limits exposure and emphasizes controlled participation. Correa explained to Valora Analitik that diversification remains the central objective. Bitcoin will complement traditional assets rather than replace them.

This approach applies mainly to voluntary or personalized contributions. Mandatory pension savings plans remain excluded. Protección’s strategy reflects a cautious framework designed to manage volatility within long-term savings portfolios.

Protección’s Scale and Market Position

Protección ranks as Colombia’s second-largest pension fund administrator. The firm serves approximately 8.5 million clients across mandatory pensions, voluntary savings, and severance pay plans. Assets under management exceed 220 trillion Colombian pesos, based on recent company data.

The broader mandatory pension market reached 527.3 trillion pesos in November 2025. Nearly 48.8% of those assets were invested abroad. However, Protección’s Bitcoin fund will not target mass pension allocations. Instead, it focuses on tailored investment strategies for eligible participants.

By size and reach, Protección’s product decisions influence Colombia’s private pension landscape. Therefore, its entry into Bitcoin exposure marks a notable development within voluntary pension offerings.

Bitcoin Exposure Expands Within Colombian Pensions

Protección follows Skandia Administradora de Fondos de Pensiones y Cesantías SA, which already offers Bitcoin exposure. Skandia introduced a similar portfolio. Consequently, Protección becomes the second major pension manager in Colombia to adopt this approach.

However, traditional assets still dominate pension investments nationwide. Fixed income, equities, and international funds remain primary holdings. Protección confirmed that the Bitcoin fund prioritizes diversification and risk management. The initiative broadens options for qualified investors without altering Colombia’s core pension structure.

The post Colombia Pension Giant Protección Plans Bitcoin Exposure Fund appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Creator coins turned friendships into trades—bots and speculators ran the show, not real users.

Complex wallets, gas fees, and chains scared off everyday users used to simple apps.

The tech lives on, but apps fail when money comes before real human connection.

SocialFi, once hailed as the future of social media, faces a dramatic collapse by early 2026. Platforms like Friend.tech, RLY, CYBER, DESO, and DEGEN now struggle or vanish entirely. Tokens linked to these networks have lost between 90% and 99% of their value. 

According to Our Crypto Talk, the collapse stems from speculative capital, bot farming, and short-term trading dominating communities. When incentives dried up, user engagement evaporated almost overnight.

The promise of SocialFi was seductive. It merged Web2 frustrations with crypto’s ownership ethos. Instead of giving attention to advertisers, creators could earn directly. Social graphs would become economic assets, and users would finally control value. 

Venture capital poured in, while crypto Twitter celebrated the idea. However, SocialFi assumed money would improve social behavior—a fatal miscalculation. Vitalik Buterin warned that monetizing social interactions distorts culture and collapses communities.

Speculation Hijacked Social Interactions

SocialFi’s first-generation design monetized individuals, not platforms. Access tokens and creator coins made relationships financial instruments. Users focused on trading and pumping reputations rather than sharing content or forming bonds. 

Early traction appeared strong, with daily volumes hitting eight figures and thousands of daily active users. However, most activity came from bots, speculators, and traders. Genuine community engagement never developed, and once financial incentives slowed, users left.

Moreover, platforms failed to solve usability challenges. Wallets, gas fees, and chain selection created onboarding friction. Users accustomed to effortless Web2 apps like Twitter or Bluesky resisted SocialFi’s complexity. Network effects compounded the problem. People joined apps where their friends already were. Incentives temporarily attracted attention, but SocialFi never captured real social graphs.

Infrastructure Survives While Apps Die

Interestingly, decentralized infrastructure like wallets, identity layers, and social primitives continues to persist. Farcaster’s recent pivot and acquisition illustrate this. Dan Romero emphasized that infrastructure remains functional, while apps built on top fail without proper social design. 

SocialFi conflated infrastructure creation with product adoption, accelerating its decline. Future iterations will likely separate money from social interactions, offering optional monetization and invisible wallets.

SocialFi failed because it treated human connections like financial assets. Vitalik pointed out that crypto should enable social tools, not take over them. Future platforms will focus on social interaction first and financial features second, allowing communities to develop naturally.

The post SocialFi Collapse: Why Creator Coins Failed to Stick appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

The SEC ended the Gemini Earn case with prejudice after Earn users received full in-kind crypto repayments via Genesis bankruptcy.

Investor restitution drove the dismissal, with Genesis returning $2B in assets and Gemini adding up to $40M for customers.

The move fits a broader SEC pullback on crypto enforcement, following similar case closures involving major crypto firms.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ended its long-running case against Gemini Trust Company on January 23, 2026, in New York. Court filings show the regulator dismissed the Gemini Earn lawsuit with prejudice, blocking any future refiling. The decision followed full crypto repayments to Earn users through Genesis Global Capital’s bankruptcy process.

Court Filing Ends Gemini Earn Dispute

According to filings in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the SEC and Gemini submitted a joint stipulation Friday. The filing formally dismissed claims that Gemini Earn involved unregistered securities offerings. A federal judge must still approve the stipulation; however, the filing confirms the dispute’s near conclusion.

The SEC initially sued Gemini Trust Company and Genesis Global Capital in January 2023. The lawsuit focused on the Gemini Earn program, which allowed users to earn interest by lending crypto to Genesis. The agency paused the case in April 2024 while reassessing several crypto enforcement actions.

Notably, Genesis already settled with the SEC earlier by agreeing to pay a $21 million penalty. With Genesis resolved, attention shifted to investor recovery outcomes tied to the bankruptcy proceedings.

Investor Repayments Drove the SEC Decision

The SEC linked its dismissal directly to investor restitution achieved during the Genesis bankruptcy. Court documents state Gemini Earn users received a full in-kind return of their crypto holdings by mid-2024. These repayments occurred between May and June 2024.

Additionally, Gemini agreed to contribute up to $40 million to support customer recoveries. The regulator noted that returned assets significantly reduced investor harm. Gemini also resolved related matters with state regulators, including New York authorities.

Genesis returned roughly $2 billion in crypto assets to customers, including about $900 million tied to nearly 340,000 Gemini Earn users. Funds had remained frozen since late 2022 after Genesis suffered losses linked to FTX exposure.

Background and Broader Enforcement Context

Gemini launched Earn in December 2020 through a partnership with Genesis, a Digital Currency Group affiliate. Withdrawals froze in 2022 during market turmoil following FTX’s collapse. That freeze triggered extensive litigation and regulatory scrutiny.

Since January 2025, the SEC has dropped or narrowed several crypto cases. Similar enforcement reversals affected Binance, Kraken, Uniswap, Immutable, and Robinhood. The agency also cited asset recovery when ending other disputes.

Gemini, founded by Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, completed Earn repayments before the dismissal. Gemini Space Station, now publicly listed on Nasdaq as GEMI, closed lower Friday after the filing.

The post SEC Drops Gemini Case for Good After Earn Repayments appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

a16z says no cryptographically relevant quantum computer exists yet, making near-term blockchain breakage unlikely this decade.

Post-quantum encryption needs earlier adoption, but digital signatures and blockchains face far lower immediate quantum risk.

Implementation bugs and side-channel attacks pose greater near-term threats to blockchains than quantum computing advances.

Fears that quantum computers will soon break blockchain cryptography continue to grow, however new analysis urges restraint. According to a16z, claims about imminent quantum threats overstate current capabilities and risk costly, premature security changes. The firm released its assessment this month, focusing on blockchains, encryption, and digital signatures.

Quantum Timelines and Technical Reality

According to a16z, a cryptographically relevant quantum computer does not exist today and remains unlikely this decade. Such a system would require fault-tolerant machines capable of running Shor’s algorithm against RSA-2048 or secp256k1. 

Current platforms lack sufficient qubits, gate fidelity, and sustained error-corrected depth. Notably, some companies cite “quantum advantage” demonstrations, however these focus on narrow, impractical tasks. 

Others reference thousands of qubits, which often describe quantum annealers, not gate-model systems. a16z also highlighted confusion around “logical qubits,” noting true cryptographic attacks would require thousands of fully error-corrected logical qubits.

Scott Aaronson recently acknowledged faster hardware progress, yet later clarified that small-scale Shor demonstrations do not threaten real cryptography. Factoring trivial numbers, such as 15, does not equate to breaking blockchain security.

Encryption Risks Differ From Signatures

a16z stressed that harvest-now-decrypt-later attacks already threaten encrypted data requiring long-term secrecy. As a result, post-quantum encryption demands earlier adoption despite performance costs. 

Chrome, Cloudflare, Apple iMessage, and Signal have deployed hybrid encryption combining classical and post-quantum methods. However, digital signatures face different risks. Signatures do not hide data, so past signatures cannot be retroactively forged. 

Therefore, a16z said immediate migration to post-quantum signatures remains unnecessary. Zero-knowledge proofs, including zkSNARKs, also avoid harvest-now risks because they reveal no confidential information.

Blockchains Face Uneven Exposure

Most blockchains, including Bitcoin and Ethereum, rely on signatures rather than encryption, limiting harvest-now exposure. Privacy-focused chains differ because encrypted transaction data could be later exposed. 

a16z cited Monero and Zcash as examples where design choices affect quantum risk severity. Bitcoin faces separate challenges unrelated to quantum timelines. 

Governance speed, abandoned coins, and exposed public keys complicate migration. Meanwhile, a16z emphasized that implementation bugs and side-channel attacks pose far greater near-term risks than quantum computers.

The post Quantum Threats to Blockchains May Be Overstated, a16z Says appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

India’s FIU bans trading, deposits, and withdrawals of privacy coins to strengthen AML and counter-terrorism measures.

Traders may need to move Monero, Zcash, and Dash to other platforms as exchanges adjust to new rules.

Prices briefly bounced despite the ban, but weekly losses remain steep for all three privacy coins.

India has told crypto exchanges to stop trading privacy coins like Monero, Zcash, and Dash immediately. The Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) says this step is to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing.

Exchanges must immediately stop trading, deposits, and withdrawals for the affected coins. Even as India builds a bigger crypto rulebook, this move shows it’s taking a tougher stance on coins that hide transactions.

The FIU said privacy coins’ extra anonymity makes it harder to monitor money flows. Regulators worry because Monero, Zcash, and Dash use advanced ways to hide transaction history. Exchanges that don’t follow the rules risk fines or even losing their license.

Officials explained that India wants transparency in crypto transactions and aims to track activity within its financial systems. So, the focus is on following the rules rather than banning crypto completely.

Operational and Market Impacts

Exchanges in India must quickly disable affected trading pairs and manage user balances. Traders holding privacy coins may need to transfer assets to other platforms, considering legal constraints. This directive requires immediate operational adjustments, and clear communication with users becomes critical. Additionally, platform developers must ensure AML protocols align with new FIU requirements.

Market prices for these privacy coins shown short-term resiliency in the face of legislative pressure. At $524, Monero was up 3.5% over the previous day. Dash increased 11.6% throughout that time, while Zcash increased 2.2% to $372.

Weekly trends are still negative, though, with losses of about 20% for Dash, 8% for Zcash, and 21% for Monero. As a result, dealers operate in a volatile environment as India strikes a balance between continued participation in the cryptocurrency market and regulatory monitoring.

The post India Bans Privacy Coin Trading on Local Exchanges appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Nexo’s 16,000+ Trustpilot reviews show users aren’t just borrowing—they actively engage with the platform.

The platform hit $30B in stablecoin inflows, proving steady demand for crypto-backed loans worldwide.

Despite $45M in U.S. fines, Nexo keeps expanding internationally and sponsoring major events like the Australian Open.

Nexo has established itself as the most community-connected platform in crypto lending. According to CryptoQuant analyst maartunn, “Trustpilot review volume is a strong proxy for community touchpoints. Nexo’s numbers suggest users aren’t just transacting, they’re talking about the platform.” With over 16,000 reviews and a 4.5-star rating, Nexo shows how having an active, happy community can really boost a platform’s trustworthiness. 

This comes at a time when crypto rules are changing and the market is constantly shifting, which has influenced how Nexo runs its services over the years.

Beyond just lending, Nexo keeps adding new features. Users can take out crypto-backed loans and access other financial tools all in one place. Because of this, Nexo stands out from other lending platforms, attracting users and bigger investors.

Over $2 billion was transferred into stablecoins per month in 2021 and 2022, which indicates an active market. The total quantity of stablecoins in circulation reached $30 billion by January 2026, showing sustained strength of demand for these virtual currencies.

Regulatory Challenges and Compliance

Nexor recently ran into some big regulatory challenges in the U.S. In California. The Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) fined the company for giving loans without a proper license to at least 5,456 residents. The DFPI said Nexo failed to assess borrowers’ ability to repay, existing debt levels or credit history.

On top of that, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission hit Nexo with a $22.5 million penalty in 2023, bringing total U.S. fines to $45 million. As a result, Nexo is expected to move all funds from California residents to a licensed affiliate within 150 days.

A Nexo spokesperson explained, “The matter referenced relates to legacy issues from an earlier phase of the business in 2022 and was resolved through a settlement with the relevant regulatory authority.”

Growth and Market Trajectory

Even with these challenges, Nexo is still growing internationally and running high-profile marketing campaigns with its multi-year sponsorship of the Australian Open. In 2023, the platform took a cautious approach, but user activity and engagement stayed steady.

CryptoQuant analyst Darkfost pointed out that Nexo’s performance reflects shifting investor behavior during growth cycles and market corrections. Further, Nexo’s wide range of services keeps it competitive.

The post Nexo Emerges as the Most Community-Connected Crypto Lender appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Senate postpones votes, pushing crypto market structure markup likely to Tuesday, creating schedule pressure.

New bipartisan amendments, including the Credit Card Competition Act, add complexity to the crypto bill negotiations.

Compressed Senate schedule and partisan disagreements further delay progress on crypto legislation and funding measures.

The U.S. Senate canceled Monday votes due to a severe snowstorm, delaying the Agriculture Committee’s crypto market structure markup. Lawmakers now likely aim for Tuesday afternoon votes, leaving the bill’s fate uncertain. Committee officials offered “nothing to announce yet,” while new amendments, including the bipartisan Credit Card Competition Act, were recently filed.

Amendments Add Complexity

The Credit Card Competition Act, proposed by Senators Roger Marshall, Dick Durbin, and Peter Welch, bars certain credit card networks and issuers from requiring exclusivity. These changes were added to the draft shared Wednesday. 

The Senate Agriculture Committee previously postponed the markup to ensure bipartisan support, with Senator Boozman noting that consensus could not be reached. The amendment filings add another layer to ongoing negotiations. 

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand remains optimistic about progress, while Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott highlighted bipartisan discussions with crypto industry and financial sector leaders. Despite these efforts, the committee has not set a new date for the markup.

Weather Disruptions Compress Senate Schedule

The National Weather Service forecasted heavy snow and ice accumulation in Washington, prompting Senate leaders to shift votes to Tuesday evening. Ryan Wrasse, spokesperson for Senator John Thune, confirmed the delay aimed to account for “impending weather,” while emphasizing the urgency of passing six remaining spending measures before the January 30 government shutdown deadline.

The House has already passed a $1.2 trillion funding package, leaving the Senate with fewer in-person days to negotiate. Dissent among senators complicates approval, including Democratic concerns over ICE funding, federal worker protections, and health insurance guarantees, as raised by Senators Tim Kaine and Chris Coons. Republicans also face pressure from conservative groups led by Senator Rick Scott to remove earmarks.

With the House absent and weather disruptions limiting Senate floor time, lawmakers face a compressed schedule to advance both the crypto market bill and remaining funding measures. The combination of winter storms, legislative amendments, and partisan concerns continues to delay the Senate’s crypto markup process.

The post Senate Postpones Crypto Market Bill Leading to Uncertainty Around Markup on Jan 27 appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

$AXS confirms bullish trend shift after retesting 2.50–2.46 support zone.

Price reaches 2.927, signaling strong buyer conviction and momentum.

Potential pullback toward 2.60–2.50 could offer an ideal entry for new buyers.

$AXS (Axie Infinity) has shifted from recovery mode into trend acceleration, with a decisive break above critical price levels. This shift is marked by a successful retest of key support, signaling a bullish trend continuation. The recent price action suggests more upside potential, with a controlled pullback being the next logical step.

Price Action and Trend Acceleration

The price of $AXS has transitioned from a consolidation phase to a marked uptrend, following the successful retest of the 2.50–2.46 support zone. This level, previously acting as resistance, has now turned into a key demand zone. 

When the price bounced off this area, it solidified the shift in market sentiment, allowing for a confident push higher. The breakout to 2.927, the highest price of 2026, confirms that buyers are willing to chase prices higher. 

This signals confidence in the trend rather than exhaustion. The impulsive nature of the move, along with expanding volume, suggests that the rise is driven by fresh buying interest, not short covering or forced buying.

Given the strength of the breakout, the next logical price targets are around 2.98 and 3.02. Levels that align with both psychological round numbers and local resistance zones. 

However, extending the target range to 3.11 makes sense, as the 3.10–3.11 area marks historical resistance and a potential liquidity trap.

https://twitter.com/0xWhale/status/2014579356798988476?s=20

Momentum and Compression Risk

While $AXS has shown strong momentum, momentum indicators are flashing signs of potential compression. The RSI on the 4-hour chart is currently in overbought territory, signaling that the market is becoming overheated. 

Historically, $AXS has not sustained vertical moves without a pullback, and such overbought conditions often lead to a correction or consolidation. A healthy retracement toward the 2.70–2.60 region, or possibly a deeper pullback to the 2.50 support zone, would help reset momentum. 

This would allow the RSI to cool down, providing a more favorable entry for fresh buyers. 

Market Makers and Liquidity Engineering

At current levels, market makers could engineer liquidity, especially as the price reaches the 2.98–3.11 resistance zone. By pushing price into this range, smart money could distribute positions into strength, triggering breakout FOMO and enticing new buyers to chase. 

Once the price reaches these levels, they could walk the price back into demand, optimizing their positions. For retail traders, chasing prices at these levels presents risks. 

Even though the broader trend is bullish, the potential for a pullback increases as the market reaches overbought conditions. This is why a cautious approach, waiting for a correction, may be the best strategy for entering the market at more favorable levels.

The post $AXS Breaks Key Resistance: Bullish Momentum Builds for 2026 appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Bitcoin surged despite PMI below 50, showing manufacturing alone doesn’t drive crypto moves.

Historical BTC tops aligned with PMI above 55, so current readings suggest more upside ahead.

Next key macro signal is the Feb 2 PMI print, likely influencing the cycle’s “blow off” top.

Bitcoin investors will need to stay patient because the bigger bull run hasn’t kicked in yet. U.S. manufacturing activity, measured by the ISM PMI, has stayed below 50 since 2023, which usually signals the economy is shrinking rather than growing. Still, Bitcoin shot up from $16,000 to over $73,000, showing that manufacturing data alone doesn’t predict its price moves.

Ignas | DeFi called this out, saying, “BTC price prediction based on Manufacturing PMI is dumb…” PMI stayed below 50 in 2023 and early 2024, yet BTC pumped from $16k to $73k.” He added, “Claiming Bitcoin is driven by liquidity, institutional adoption (now ETFs), gold, and fiscal dominance makes sense. Manufacturing doesn’t.”

Manufacturing Weakness vs. Bitcoin Momentum

U.S. manufacturing remains subdued, contributing less than 15% to GDP, while services dominate roughly 80%. Satoshi Flipper noted, “The bull market Bitcoin blow off top starts forming when this PMI index starts printing above 50 again, until then .... PATIENCE.” 

The ISM Manufacturing PMI has fluctuated narrowly between 47 and 49 since late 2022, signaling stability without expansion. Recent readings include 48.7 in August 2025, 49.1 in September, and 47.9 by December. Consequently, manufacturing’s lack of momentum fails to trigger strong economic acceleration or sustained dollar strength, factors traditionally tied to market tops.

What This Means for Bitcoin Investors

Historically, Bitcoin cycle tops coincided with PMI peaks above 55. Brain of AskGigabrain explained, “The 2017 top saw PMI at ~60, and the 2021 top hit as PMI hovered near record highs of 61.” With the December print at 47.9 and January forecasts flat, the euphoric phase is delayed. 

Consequently, this cycle may evolve into an extended “supercycle” rather than a standard halving peak. As of writing, Bitcoin trades at $89,493.19, up 0.61% in the last 24 hours, with $32.2 billion in 24-hour trading volume. The next major macro signal arrives with the February 2nd PMI print

The post Bitcoin Cycle Tops: PMI Below 50 Delays Bull Run appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

The board unites quantum and blockchain experts to evaluate post-quantum threats and issue public guidance for crypto security.

Focus areas include elliptic-curve cryptography, post-quantum signature schemes, and secure multiparty computation strategies.

Coinbase’s proactive approach aims to prepare blockchains for quantum risks years ahead, with first position paper in 2027.

Coinbase announced the formation of an Independent Advisory Board on Quantum Computing and Blockchain, aiming to evaluate potential future risks. The board brings together experts from Stanford, Harvard, the University of California, Ethereum Foundation, DeFi protocol EigenLayer, and Coinbase itself. The move addresses concerns that large-scale quantum computers could eventually compromise blockchain cryptography.

World-Class Experts Lead Assessment

The advisory board will operate independently, publishing public analyses and guidance for developers, organizations, and users. Members include Professor Scott Aaronson, a quantum computing pioneer at the University of Texas at Austin, and Professor Dan Boneh, co-director of Stanford’s Center for Blockchain Research. 

Justin Drake from the Ethereum Foundation focuses on Ethereum’s long-term security. Sreeram Kannan, founder of EigenLayer, and Coinbase’s head of cryptography, Yehuda Lindell, also join the board. Professor Dahlia Malkhi, an expert in resilient distributed systems, completes the team.

The board’s responsibilities include issuing position papers assessing quantum computing advancements, providing practical recommendations for safeguarding blockchain systems, and responding quickly to major breakthroughs. According to Coinbase, this structure ensures guidance reaches the broader crypto community, rather than serving internal purposes alone.

Post-Quantum Roadmap and Blockchain Security

Coinbase emphasized that most blockchains, including Bitcoin and Ethereum, rely on elliptic-curve cryptography, which remains secure today. However, large-scale quantum computers could eventually weaken these systems. 

The advisory board forms a key component of Coinbase’s post-quantum security strategy. Current measures include updating Bitcoin address handling and internal key management, while long-term research targets post-quantum signature schemes like ML-DSA within secure multiparty computation systems.

The company noted that proactive planning is critical to prepare for quantum threats years in advance. Experts like Adam Back and Mark Thompson note that quantum risks remain distant, but preparing early allows gradual adaptation to post-quantum standards. 

Coinbase expects the board to release its first position paper in early 2027, providing a baseline risk assessment and recommendations for developers and institutions across the blockchain ecosystem.

The post Coinbase Forms Advisory Board to Tackle Quantum Risks appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

A single entity used 2,418 addresses to corner $RIVER, generating huge profits and dominating the market.

Major withdrawals from Bitget fueled a 15X token surge, putting retail traders at risk of losses.

Centralized exchanges like Bitget and Binance face scrutiny for enabling market manipulation schemes.

A single entity reportedly cornered most of the $RIVER token supply, generating over $300 million in profits. According to Wazz, a crypto researcher, this operation involved 2,418 addresses orchestrated through Bitget, one of the major crypto exchanges. 

The scheme allegedly began with a wallet funded by 8 BNB from OKX. From there, the operator used a distribution contract called Multicall3 to send BNB to 362 addresses. This clever strategy hid incoming transactions on most blockchain explorers, making the initial accumulation nearly invisible.

Moreover, Wazz highlighted that these recipients formed a nine-hop chain, totaling 2,418 addresses. The chain funneled $RIVER tokens into specific wallets. Significant withdrawals occurred on December 5 and December 29, with two million and one million tokens taken from Bitget respectively. 

At an average price of $4.12 per token, these moves represented $22 million initially. However, at $RIVER’s peak, the accumulated tokens would have yielded an approximate $350 million profit. Consequently, nearly half of the circulating supply ended up controlled by this single entity.

Market Impact and Risks for Traders

Brain, another analyst, called the operation “a sophisticated industrial-scale wash trading or supply cornering operation.” He emphasized that controlling 2,418 addresses gives a single party enormous market influence. “If they controlled the float during the pump from sub-cent levels to recent peaks, a $300M profit is entirely possible on paper,” he said. Additionally, RIVER has faced continuous negative funding rates, suggesting heavy short liquidations fueled the price surge.

Retail traders face significant risks as a result. When one entity dominates supply, they effectively become the market. Brain warned, “Unless you were in during the accumulation phase below $0.01, you're just providing the exit liquidity for that $300M.” The recent 37% drop in RIVER’s price reflects the entity beginning to unload its holdings. Consequently, the remaining addresses are expected to continue unwinding, potentially causing further downside.

Wazz and Brain both criticized Bitget for facilitating or ignoring these manipulative practices. Wazz added, “Binance and co are also comfortable taking in fee money for perps and liquidating their users gambling on this.” Hence, the RIVER incident underscores growing concerns about centralized exchanges enabling market manipulation. 

The post RIVER Token Hit by $300M Supply Cornering Scheme appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Institutions influence crypto via KYC, stablecoins, and staking, but aren’t outright adversaries to decentralization.

Ethereum supports censorship-resistant, self-sovereign participation while enabling institutional cooperation where beneficial.

Cypherpunks and developers must balance privacy, compliance, and ecosystem growth to preserve user autonomy and security.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin outlined the growing relationship between cypherpunks, corporations, and governments on social media. His remarks, made in early 2026, emphasized the need for self-sovereignty while recognizing institutional influence. Buterin warned that institutions often seek control over operations while resisting external intrusion, but this does not make them outright adversaries.

Institutions’ Complex Role in Crypto

Buterin cited several examples illustrating institutional behavior. He noted the European Union’s support for open-source projects, while some EU officials push for mandatory encryption backdoors via Chat Control. 

He also referenced the U.S. Patriot Act, which remains largely unchanged, alongside the U.S. government’s use of Signal. Buterin emphasized that institutions are staffed by sophisticated personnel capable of strategic decisions, and many already enforce strict data protection internally.

He further explained that this dual behavior affects stablecoins, governance, and blockchain systems. EU-based stablecoin issuers prefer non-U.S.-dominated chains, while U.S.-based issuers favor domestic control. 

Institutions will increasingly adopt KYC measures while privacy tools improve, including developments in zero-knowledge proofs. Buterin projects non-KYC assets will coexist with regulated solutions, reflecting ongoing ideological and technical debates.

Ethereum’s Role in User Self-Sovereignty

Buterin reaffirmed Ethereum’s position as a censorship-resistant world computer. He stressed that users do not need approval for all activities and highlighted the importance of building strong decentralized systems atop Ethereum. 

Institutions may control staking and wallets, which can benefit network decentralization, but cypherpunks must ensure regular users retain self-sovereign wallet access. He also discussed stablecoins as a central area of institutional control versus user privacy. 

Arbitrage strategies between decentralized and centralized stablecoins could reduce spreads, while institutional participants may use these assets for hedging. Buterin emphasized cooperation where mutually beneficial, while defending cypherpunk principles, financial autonomy, and identity protection.

Balancing Compliance, Privacy, and Ecosystem Growth

Buterin outlined the ongoing tension between KYC enforcement and privacy innovation. He noted the growing sophistication of institutions, which will pursue both compliance and secure operations. 

Ethereum developers and cypherpunks are tasked with providing tools for secure, self-sovereign participation. Buterin emphasized that the community’s focus should remain on constructing a robust ecosystem that competes with centralized alternatives while preserving user independence.

The post Vitalik Buterin Explains Cypherpunks’ Role with Institutions appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Developer sold $RALPH tokens to “de-risk,” triggering a massive 80% price drop and panicking traders.

70% of traders sold fast, while 30% held on, collectively losing around $2M in hours.

The incident shows memecoins tied to small developers carry huge risk and need transparency for trust.

The $RALPH memecoin plummeted nearly 97% after the developer sold a significant portion of tokens, shaking investor confidence. The community reacted swiftly, with 70% of traders exiting and 30% holding on, collectively losing around $2 million. 

The sale, valued at $300,000, triggered an immediate -80% price candle, illustrating the volatility of small-cap, community-driven coins. Besides shaking traders, the incident has raised questions about developer control and project sustainability.

The coin, inspired by Ralph Wiggum prompting techniques in AI, distributes 99% of token royalties to developer Geoffrey Huntley on a vesting schedule. However, Huntley confirmed the sale from his wallet, part of a 2% cluster, calling it a necessary “de-risking.” 

He tweeted, “moments like this will test the paperhands from the diamondhands. I still hold Ralph btw. I could have waited 12 hours until the next vesting schedule before selling but I didn’t.” This statement highlights the delicate balance developers face between personal risk management and community expectations.

Developer Response Sparks Debate

Huntley insisted he never launched or controlled the coin, stating, “I never launched this coin. I never had control of it. I never consented to this.” Moreover, he emphasized that he lacks admin access to the community, which someone else manages. 

Despite his claims, community members criticized him sharply. One member, Mir Auqib, stated, “shut up. you made 250k from the fees then decided to dump your supply. you ruined a good project.” Hence, tension between developer intentions and trader perception remains high.

Implications for Memecoin Investors

Consequently, the $RALPH incident underlines the risks inherent in memecoins tied to single developers or small clusters. Additionally, the episode demonstrates how quickly trading momentum can reverse in speculative markets. Moreover, it highlights the importance of transparency and clear communication to maintain trust. Investors now face the challenge of navigating volatile markets while monitoring developer actions.

Furthermore, Huntley defended his decision, claiming the sale avoided restrictive or risky grant contracts. He added, “it’s been a fun two weeks where folks have made millions trading this coin backwards and forwards. Fees have been lovely but I too also needed to derisk my investments.” This underscores a critical lesson: even short-term gains can be overshadowed by sudden liquidity moves.

The post RALPH Crash Sparks Investor Outcry After Developer Sale appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Hacker John flaunted $23M in crypto linked to U.S. government seizures after being provoked online.

Wallets hold Ethereum, altcoins, and stablecoins, showing both risky bets and safer holdings worth over $1M.

Blockchain tracking exposes thefts, giving investigators a clear path to trace stolen funds and catch criminals.

A dramatic crypto showdown happened online, exposing $23 million in stolen funds connected to U.S. government seizures. The incident involved a hacker named John, who’s reportedly linked to over $90 million in thefts, and got tricked into showing off his wallets.

According to blockchain investigator ZachXBT, John engaged in a “band for band” flex with another actor, Dritan Kapplani Jr., which led to public exposure of his holdings. The wallets displayed significant transfers, connecting them to prior high-profile thefts, including funds tied to the 2024 Bitfinex U.S. government seizure.

The wallets also holds a variety of other cryptocurrencies and stablecoins, showing a mix of risky and safer bets. In the past 24 hours, huge movements took place. For example, 2.65 million FTM tokens (about $210K), 1,011 ETH (nearly $3 million), and 328,472 NEXO tokens (around $306K) were transferred. Smaller but still significant moves included 744,213 KNC tokens ($158K) and some BUSD stablecoins. This shows the wallet’s owner actively manages a wide range of digital assets.

Tracing the Wallets and Their Origins

ZachXBT’s investigation traced John’s wallet address, 0x89..0Bec, holding over $1.08 million in mixed assets. The largest portions are NEXO (~$307,790) and Fantom (~$261,400), followed by FTX Token (~$247,870) and KNC (~$157,930). 

The portfolio also includes minor allocations in tokenized gold and REPV2, balancing risk and stability. Moreover, on-chain analysis shows that John controlled multiple addresses, consolidating roughly $23 million in one wallet post-flex.

ZachXBT also traced the wallets back to past U.S. government seizures. One address, 0xc7a2, received $24.9 million from the Bitfinex-related seizure in March 2024. John then moved large sums between his wallets, 0x8924 and 0xd8bc, with over $63 million coming from suspected victims in late 2025. Just today, he also received 4,170 ETH (about $12.4 million) from MEXC, showing that funds are still actively moving across platforms.

Consequently, the public exposure provides a roadmap for potential law enforcement action. ZachXBT emphasized that “the proof of ownership for these wallets makes it an easy future case for law enforcement.” Furthermore, John’s quick removal of NFT usernames and Telegram screen name changes highlights attempts to obscure identity post-exposure.

The post Crypto Heist Exposed: $23M Wallet Linked to U.S. Seizures appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.

Circle’s Arc lets developers deploy ERC-20 tokens without writing Solidity, using pre-audited templates and EVM-compatible tools.

Arc deployments use dev-controlled wallets funded with testnet USDC to handle contract admin, minting, and transactions.

Circle webhooks enable real-time monitoring of mints and transfers, supporting dashboards and production tokenization workflows.

Circle Developer noted that deploying tokenized assets on Arc does not require writing Solidity from scratch. The guide, authored by Elton Tay, demonstrates how developers can deploy an ERC-20 contract on Arc Testnet. It includes steps using Circle Contracts, Templates, and Wallets, funding with testnet USDC, and monitoring contract activity in real time.

Setting Up Wallets and Funding for Arc Deployment

Developers first need a dev-controlled wallet on Arc Testnet. Wallets belong to a wallet set, so users must create a set, then a wallet within it. The wallet acts as the administrator for ERC-20 contracts and submits all transactions.

Testnet USDC is required for transaction fees. Developers can fund wallets via Circle Console Faucet or Circle Faucet. Once funded, the wallet can deploy contracts, mint tokens, and execute contract calls, establishing the operational base for tokenized assets.

Deploying and Minting ERC-20 Contracts

Using Circle Templates, developers can deploy pre-audited ERC-20 contracts without writing Solidity. The templates remain fully compatible with EVM tooling and expose the contract ABI for interaction. After setting deployment parameters, the Contracts SDK deploys the ERC-20 contract to Arc Testnet.

Once deployed, the contract begins with zero token supply. Completed mint transactions update wallet balances and record Transfer events, showing token creation and recipient addresses.

Monitoring Contract Activity with Webhooks

Circle offers real-time event monitoring through webhooks. Developers can track mints, transfers, and other contract events automatically, without polling or maintaining indexers. Event monitors watch for specific signatures, sending webhook payloads with transaction hash, block height, block hash, and decoded event data.

This monitoring enables dashboards, downstream workflows, or off-chain records for production tokenization systems. By combining Templates, Wallets, and webhook monitoring, Arc provides developers predictable infrastructure, stable execution costs with USDC, and integration with Circle-issued assets like USDC, EURC, and USYC.

Developers can explore Arc further using reference documentation, step-by-step tutorials, or by joining the Arc Community Hub, Arc Discord, or Circle Discord for guidance and collaboration.

The post Circle Offers Guide for Developers to Deploy ERC-20 on Arc appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.