Sabbir Saadat

Vanar Chain Main Features
Vanar chain offers the community-oriented characteristics of the blockchain and its innovativeness, sustainability, and effective operation. Among the factors that make Vanar qualify as a leader in the market as regards blockchain is discussed below.
Vanar Chain is developed in relation to a very established vision. It desires to simplify blockchain and make it practical and reachable to all people. Numerous blockchain infrastructure are multinomial, costly or hard to sense. Vanar Chain attempts to address these issues not through technology but individuals as the main aspect of concern. I guess, this anthropocentric thinking is the primary feature of Vanar Chain.
Community power is one of the more domineering ideas of Vanar Chain. It is not oriented toward the needs of a very small target market: developers or big companies. It is formulated in such a way that allows its regular users the creators and the constructors of the same to be part and feel owning it. Surveillance of the community is an effective way of community growth in the blockchain. The process of decision-making is less unbalanced and more natural in terms of innovation rather than imposed.
Vanar Chain is also very efficiency-oriented. Numerous blockchains are cheap and slow. Vanar is geared towards ensuring smooth transactions, speed but reliability. This is to imply that the applications can be integrated to the people without necessarily waiting longer or being fearful of the complicated technical procedures. The majority of the successful blockchain exists unnoticed in the background and Vanar can hardly be unaware of that.
Another significant issue of Vanar Chain is sustainability. The blockchain world has not been left out in the fair share of criticism as well, has been accused to consume energy and ruin the environment. Vanar should be more responsible when developing its system to utilize resources in a prudent way. I do not think that this is an option anymore as an individual. Having the future of the planet as its concern will not be a make-believe, and Vanar is not taking this role lightly.
Vanar Chain is not a really noticeable innovative product. It does not utilize the trends, but ingredients and elements that can be applied in the actual world. This simplifies the process of creating the applications by the developers so as to address the actual problems. When innovation is not complicated and has a leading direction, it is more difficult to create and Vanar appears to be a fanatic of this rule.
Accessibility is another condition. Vanar Chain attempts to reduce the barrier of entry that suggests that the new users are not fearful of being educated and using the blockchain technology. The systems are designed so that people develop confidence in them because they are easy to use, follow as well as their simple design. Such is the way into which blockchain will be able to achieve mass adoption in my opinion. When people are going to be comfortable, they will be willing to explore more.
Security is not considered to be back-thought, but back-bone. Vanar Chain is architected in the way that it shields and secures its users, their data, assets without limiting their freedom and creativity. A blockchain should be robust enough, and simultaneously, it should be flexible, and Vanar tries to strike a compromise between the two concepts. The users are assured and trust and the safety generates a long-term usage.
Vanar Chain is also much more Enamored to creativity and web-positioned property. It allows the creators to be freely creative, donate and advance without avoidable restrictions. This would be applicable in a digitalized world where creativity is already emerging to be one of the economic engines. The future of blockchains, which will enable creators to live, is the future in my opinion, and Vanar is heading towards it.
Vanar Chain is a smart and developed blockchain overall. It is not attempting to impress with being high end. Rather it is obsessed with transparency, accountability and society. I believe it provides it with great chances to climb to the top and become a credible institution in the long run. Vanar Chain is moving towards the right way as long as blockchain is expected to be good change in the lives of people.

@Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar

Dusk offers commodity with respect to which one can hardly locate in blockchain as it offers privacy, and receipt transparency. Even sensitive financial information has not come out yet the institutions can still deny the fact that the transactions have been carried out as genuine and in conformity. This appears to be eminent in the world where trust is a priority than privacy. Dusk seems to me the language of persons and corporations, and may be viewed as blockchain that is more realistic and business-like and ready to deploy its decentralized passion into hardcore economic activities.
I believe that this is the equilibrium that the blockchain world has never had. The dairyman appeared to lift his foot sufficiently. On the one hand, there were those ones, who would prefer to have the full privacy, full control and to be unobserved. The cross of the line was objection of institutions, of whose clearness, rules, and evidence should have been safe. Here is a crossroad of these two worlds at the Dusk, known as peaceful.
The privacy has never been that of secrets, which hides evil. In the meantime, transparency does not mean that an individual is obliged to share all the personal facts with other individuals. It is this difference that is presented to Dusk. It encourages secrecy of transactions but verifiable. This does not mean that one blindly trusts but there must be show of demonstration which is palpable and should not be oversteps of the individual.
The fact that such an approach is human was what I have found to be the most significant. In their material existence, the human beings strive to be decently well. They are not prepared to make all in shape of payment, investments and transfers permanent basis. Dusk protects that dignity. In the meantime, it does not forget that the modern finance ought to be in a position to stick by the regulations. The adherence can be manifested and privacy is not infringed in institutions. That is powerful.
This type of construction is an adult stage of thinking in blockchain. It is more than the rebellion in the name of rebellion. It asks a deeper question. And yet what of the actual real laws, actual businesses and actual persons. Dusk gives a very good answer.
The other explanation as to why I believe this would build long term trust is that this style will lead to greater trust. Consumers will feel safe when they know that their information is safe. The institutions feel more confident when they realize that they can get transactions checked. This confidence is accomplished when, the parties feel respected. Duskme could not put itself in a situation of losing to the other side.
The other reason why I prefer Dusk is that it is low profile. It is not grounded on the hype and noise. It is infatuated with a material matter and debate. The outcome of such a concentration is, in most cases, sustainable systems. This is the stability that we are fortunate to live in the fast moving blockchain world.
The decentralization has been lost where it does not exist in the present case. It is refined. Twilight reserves the grand conception, and fashion to it its size. On the one hand, this proves that it might be the fact that, along with decentralization, responsibility goes hand in hand. It is not the sale of values but acquisition of values.
This is one of the solutions, and I think that it will dictate the future of blockchain. Privacy and the respect of trust with the blockchain must be considered by them in the event of the serious financial activity to be followed. Dusk has proven that it is not only possible but it works. It charms an impression of calm down to a scene of violent events.
It is systems by which individuals and institutions gain their reputation that will be eminent in the digital world which is increasingly becoming complex. This is the destiny that Dusk is ready to get. It is eloquent and yet low-pitched. this is, such is what faith demands at times.

@Dusk $DUSK #dusk

The other term applied in the description of the plasma is the XPL which is a blockchain that has a nature as one thought. Money in the internet should be touchable and portable money and understandable. The hypothetical and speculative blockchain is not followed by the footsteps of the number of other hypothetical and speculative blockchain that is based on the price. It has been created because it is anchored on stablecoins. In this paper, the role of the cross chain trading as a component of the equation, its functionality, and the tokenomics format will be discussed. I likewise will give my personal views of the suitability of this concept.

A native blockchain of the stablecoins is called plasma. It means that the solution is not the tokens which will be added to the system in the future but the stablecoins. Trading and settlements are carried out on settled values of assets which are pegged on the stable values. It is developed according to the principle that when the markets run wild namely letting go of the user who is transferring money, buying and selling assets or developing applications, the user has no reason to fret.

Plasma, as a matter of fact, is a one-layered blockchain. To some extent, it has concurrence, XPL validators and currency. The success as an element of the success in contrast to the majority of chains where most weight is provided to the speed or the hype that can be modeled with is conditional with stability and openness that is incorporated by the Plasma. It desires to be boring good. Boring is a shallow form of gagging something easy that is familiar to people and makes them feel devoted and at ease.

Cryptocurrencies Stablecoins are crypto-currencies, and may be fixed-value crypto-currencies, and typically pegged to a fiat currency. The bulk of blockchains is comprised of tokens only, and they are stablecoins. In Plasma, they are given first class treatment. The idea of the stablecoins is assumed within the boundaries of charges, liquidity and large application range. This design will reduce friction to a customer that will wish to conduct business with no concerns of timing in the market.

One of the gravest problems, Plasma tries to brood about, is the psychological weight of the volatility. Most of the chains have a bill of tanks in them, and this will make or lose money to the value of hundreds in a few hours. This makes budgeting, accounting and making of easy payments so stressful. Plasma is attempting to brainstorm something that looks more like a more traditional digital money, an open source and programmable crypto.

XPL token is not aggressive but rather favorable. It is implemented upon the network security, the network governance and what was termed as partial utility. Simultaneously, Plasma is not about forcing other people that XPL should be used everywhere. The service entry is also slightly less problematic and the number of procedures that can be performed on the stablecoins is rather large.

This can be described as a healthy design in my own opinion. Most of the intrusion efforts are directed at the effort to insert its house token in one of the system breaches. And this can bring about artificially high demand and this can pose a danger to the user. To be exposed to a volatile piece of money in such a fashion as all individuals would want to utilize a blockchain would not seem an issue of concern to plasma.

One would also expect the plasma tokenomics to be easy to learn and use. XPL has specified or established distribution of supply model distribution which is to the validators, ecosystem development and long term sustainability. The system already has the stifled incentive already occupied in its system rather than the rampant inflation. The users receive low and consistent payments and the correctors get a reward in defeating the network.

The Grandfather charges will institute the fixed and the low charges charged on the plasma transactions. The less expensive stables are the centrality ones which become more convenient in terms of approximation of fees. The users are presented with an idea of the amount of money they will be spending to-day and to-morrow. This proves very valuable to the managers and entrepreneurs. It helps in scaling and planning.

The XPL holders serve as the ones who associate with the government in the Plasma in the ideology shaping the decisions to the realistic judgments as compared to the ideological clashes. The point is to pre scale parameters, to contribute towards upgrades and put the chain in the course. Government is a thing and not a battle field.

The other fact of vision of the Plasma that can be singled out is the cross chain trading. The cryptosphere is decentralized and the assets sold to multiple chains. Plasma is said to be nondesire nexus where any form of value in numerous or numerous ecosystems can be accumulated and sent about without any trouble. The resources of the other chains can be imported into the Plasma and they may be sold and bought in a stable environment by the users and vice versa they can be exported and reimported as bridges and interoperability tools.

It is more especially pronounced to the case of stablecoins. It has a series of chains made up of hundreds of presence stablecoins, but liquidity is generally dispersed. At some point, the trading attempts to enforce its liquidity on the plasma and, therefore, the trading gets more protracted and with reduced rate of slippage. This can be translated to the improvement of the better performance to the traders. A lay man interprets it to his complete wastefulness.

The fluidity in the cross chain trade at the Plasma is what is expected to occur. The user will not have to be introduced to technical side of bridges and how it transmits communication. Its complexity, as well as the interface which it embodies by its simplicity, make it be captured in the system. It is the most ill-informed consideration of the user of the majority of blockchain and the Plasma is correct in deciding to make the investment in it.

The security is one of the questions which will never be left out whenever the issue of cross chain systems is mentioned. This is achieved in plasma with conservativeness of plasma. It is not anchored on all the new with bridge designs but the old tricks and reservations are given precedence. This has the effect of postponing the growth and does not in the process put it in danger of the catastrophic failures. Personally, I would assume this less risky and conservative adopt a more conservative treatment of the assets that would likely be treated on a constant consideration.

The plasma is a system developer well-known to the background. It is standardized and is typically smart deals and the applications can be transferred to the new ecosystems with ease. The creators do not need to model the world to develop the payment systems, decentralized exchange, lending companies and other financial applications in the real world.

Anyway, the fact that Plasma is very candid regarding its mission is what I like about the firm. It will not be able to bury all the chains to the ground and solve all the issues. It would like it to be a stable business flow and medium of trade. This certainly cannot be the one that is being led in what is being promised undefinedly.

Of course, there are also issues with Plasma. The process of the management of the stablecoins is dynamic and any chain that will be established on the grounds of the stablecoins should capitalize on it and legislations and compliance. The second problem is the liquidity. Nevertheless, only a native chain of stablecoins can be constructed in regards to the presentation of users and money. This is the same with the network effects that are not easily generated even when dealing with the case of an idea.

There would also be questions of enthusiasm. The cryptoculture is a speculative culture that would have a good chance to make profits in the short run. And a chain like that, in which pragmatism is the object, the principle of calm and peaceful and gentle living, can scarcely be attractive to any attentions. Such can be its disguised fineness nature. Infrastructure Infrastructure It does not need gee-whiz to get it across the long term. It needs trust.

In a wider context, it is possible to assume that manicure is a man. It does not identify blockchain as a casino but more than financial plumbing. It can be among the ones that people would transfer salaries, pay bills, run business and even more serious applications as long as it is a success.

In my opinion, Plasma is the required change in the way of thinking on my part. The experimentation, and sound systems of glitter and gloss are not needed in the company. It is a real native Stablecoin, and is not luxurious. Plasma stands a shot at being an unseen and yet meaningful member of the crypto ecosystem provided that it does not go against the very postulates that it represents but uses them in its reasonable manner.

And, lastly, there is Plasma which is interested in choice. It provides the user opportunity to be engaged and never become a victim of blockchain whenever there is a fluctuation. It gives its good underpinning to other applications. And the ecosystem is also made to remember that a design that is simple and straightforward is something to welcome.

The mentioned chains including Plasma will be reminded during the narrations since crypto will be utilized by everyone.

@Plasma #Plasma $XPL

Walrus is built upon an appealing yet simple but intelligent concept. It has to be easily stored, secure on storing as well as the long term cost should be economical. The token of this system is the WAL central and it is the token of payment stored in Walrus protocol. Another interesting fact is that WAL is a token as well and the way how it was built is not uninterested also.

It is neither a dynamical nor random price where an individual is storing information with the help of Walrus. The system is designed in a manner such that constant storage cost will be the case at the real life world even where the value of the WAL token is high in the long run or not. This is because most of end users worry about what the storage will cost them throughout their lifetime and not tokens price charts. Without trust there can not be stability and long term data storage.

Users pay their cash with an objective of storing their information within a given time frame. The WAL is periodically issued to storage nodes and stakers as opposed to all this kind of payment being conferred in one transaction. It means that the very people, who are literally concerned with the safety and availability of the data, will be rewarded at any other moment provided that they are rendering the service. To me it is a sensible and adult process. It encourages the long term thinking and not short term gain.

This is also the format of the protocol which makes it economically viable. Storage node is conscious of the fact that they would eventually be rewarded in the long-term as long as they executed their task effectively. On the contrary, the users will be certain that it is not only their data stored; it is processed. It is an operator-user balance, as one of the most magnificent ones, as far as Walrus design is concerned.

The other positive thing about Walrus is the subsidies (WAL tokens). There is also a specific percentage for the total supply, which is allocated and thus will be available to adopt at an early stage. This will also allow the new users to store at a lower market rate than the current market without compromising the businesses of the storage nodes. Reinforcement of this nature at the initial years of any given protocol can either discontinue the discrepancy in a declining growth or a normal adoption.

As an individual, I suppose that this subsidy process is a sign that Walrus is long-term. It has no emphasis on rushing speedy so that individuals get a chance to experiment with it, get familiar with it, and address them. The storage vendors will not be compelled to operate at a loss in the meantime. Balance is a good resource that is not easily available.

The security is with Walrus pegged on WAL token delegation. This means that, other users who despite not being the runners of the storage nodes are part of the network, are also free to practice network security. They do outsourcing of their tokens. The nodes are struggling to retain possession of this stake and the amount of stake granted to them earns them a fraction of the size of data they receive allocated.

This leads to a de facto but effective duty. Good nodes that offer quality service, will have adequate market share rewarded to them. Non performing nodes fail to receive trust, shares and opportunities. Further harmonization in the system will be done in the future on slashing. This will entail conspicuous financial implication on bad conduct, user and faithful operator security.

The balancing of incentives is the most preferred part of this case that I like most. Walrus users, all operators of Walrus and Walrus token holders are all affiliates of the same system. However, when the network has been reliable and secure, then all of us are winners and when no one, then all of us are losers. Such alignment is required in a distributed infrastructure, which is challenging to design.

Walrus is also an autonomous organization, which applies WAL token to polish herself/ himself. The most interested parties in the success of the system make their adjustments in the system parameters. A vote made by nodes is correlated to the WAL stakes and an important decision is made. This includes, formulation of punitive measures and vengeance of bad performance.

This can be attributed to the fact that the nodes will feel the failure of other nodes in the completion of the task. Those who are most interested in the issue get a chance to participate in the process of solution creation as soon as Walrus grants them the direct voice in the governing process. In my opinion, it makes much more realistic and balanced decision making than the systems of governance, which are too distant to day to day operations running.

Generally, Walrus is a protocol that was not fast. It is not merely a payer and gambler in as far as the application of WAL token is involved. It associates the stability of the prices, just price, time-based support of the adoption, the high quality of the security and reasonable administration. Relaxed human friendly and trustworthy storage system is achieved.

Walrus may be considered as a refreshing product in the world when the flow of information is growing each second and credibility is a vice. It does not promise miracles. Instead it just quietly focuses on making the staples put together and doing them a way that is both to the honor of the user, and those of the operator. Such is what makes it have a real possibility with me.

@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus

XPL will be one of the applications of plasma, and the usage of which will be its largest token. It would also prefer to ensure that the exchange of the stable coins is not just quick, but also is distressing and pain-free as compared to the transfers carried out through the older blockchains. It does not also use plasma since it is digestible by the gurus. It also cooperates with the stable currencies such as the USDT and attempts to resolve the issue of the lack of speed and high costs and complex procedures.
The Plasma laboratories found the concept of the plasma and rely on the success of other famous names in the financial and crypto industry as Peter Thiel and the Bitfinex. This kind of support will make the project be regarded favorably as far as credibility is concerned and create an impression that they cared about the long term. The image of the Plasma is enormous. It is nervous about the process of transferring the large quantities of the real world value to blockchains, and how the digital currency can be swallowed like the message.
Bitcoin in fact is its spin-off, plasma. One can say, that it is integrated with Bitcoin and it has new properties that one can not call the Bitcoin per se. Bitcoin is regarded to be safe and healthy, it is not intended to be fast and steady. Plasma will also aim at making sure that there is power of the Bitcoin and sell it in a dynamic and quick manner. It is giant weigh as it does not involve any utility and security decision making.
Some of the concepts of Plasma that have the greatest value are referred to as Stablecoins. The Stablecoins are electronic currencies but it is not aptly succeeding in setting up a standardized value. Individuals planning to pay and divide them as a western cheque pay them differently as compared to unstable individuals. The fact that most blockchains allow the redemption of the stablecoins is not only horrible in paying but also time wasting. It is these that are perfected in plasma, thus making it a payment scheme, rather than a grove of conjecture.
Plasma network would have smooth flow and use of XPL. This may serve to simplify the job the network has to accomplish and have the bonuses and assistance system safe and operational. XPL will not be a token, but an element of the ecosystem. Plasma is based on the actual practices in its design.
The other alternative that is appropriate is plasma because it can be implemented along with the uses of EVM. It implies that the developers engaged into working upon the project of already popular smart contracts networks are able to re-deploy the tools and applications to Plasma with minimal effort and do not very well require a clean sheet. This causes the network to develop at a higher rate and reduces the adoption cost. This can be interpreted to mean that they can now enjoy the same wallets and the apps that the consumers are using to be applied in order to make the experience of the same enjoyable.
But the most expressive, though, is the mission of Plasma which is not only short, but narrowed out also, according to my own opinion. The majority of the blockchain projects would be the desire and not doing everything simultaneously. One of these issues is selected by plasma and a hole excavated in the issue. It is a mere thought but this indeed might cause the universe to believe in the effort of the sheer fact of their actual implementation with regards to being able to pass on with the feeling of transferring of the stablecoins freely without any hesitation.
It is an infrastructure, I suppose but not a new trend, Plasma. It is not struggling to bring show-biz shine so that it can be likable and admirable. Instead, it will become a presumption that it is the transmitter of remittances, that money and convert the values that are transpiring internationally in the backdrop. People can use it when it is superior irrespective of how much consideration is given to the underlying technology is actually impossible in cases which are literally myriad that are indeed the gauge of the progress being actually.
The XPL is attaining its attention as it is a solution to the increasing demand. The potentiality of the specific networks of the stablecoins is quite large as there are other individuals and institutions that would desire finding a decent digital currency. Plasma would remain in the position of investigations in future in case of the due clipping and realistic design.
Two of such programs are the plasma and the XPL that involve tracking any person exploring the answer to the stablecoins and interface of the traditional finance and the decentralized one. They bet the profitability to all on a cheque on every a complex thing. This is where the second book of crypto ends, as it appeared to me.

@Plasma #Plasma $XPL

S+ cisrepresented, Safety of Walrus which is WAL tokens delegation and, within my power, the prettiest ideas, too. It makes the security profession of a select few professionals into the one that would have been made by the entire population. It is non-centralized and quite modern network solution.
The delegated staking vision is the vision that fails to provide a higher-order infrastructure to provide assistance in the process of acquiring the network is having the users. The reason is that the buying of the WAL tokens and the decision to visit it allowed becoming a member of the system that will make Walrus one that is trusting and worthy. This has closed the door and banged open the gate of entrance to better serve out people of more diverse types. This has been discovered to have the most probable problem in the fact that sound networks are made not only due to the strounting strength of technology, but extensive and uniform societies.
It has turned it into its competitive area and it is literally so aggressive and candid.
Delegated Staking Delegated Staking is the other security guarantee on regards to the security of Walrus in case there is a security default of WAL tokens. The users are making hosting obligations on network security that it does not even provide a storage facility. The other characteristic that would dictate the kind of data to be transferred to the nodes would be the rivalry among the nodes as far as who would be winning over the other among the users would be concerned when it comes to winning a stake. These acts are rewarded on the part of the analysts who would sell his/her interests to the nodes and that he/she is a node. These will guarantee the overall convergence of these, child token holders, Walrus users and Walrus operators in the coming years as the slashing will become available in Walrus.
The only interesting thing is that even the incentives are also applied as it is also the task of influencing behavior. This is default policy of the nodes i.e. they should be not left with the nodes. They must make them feel that they have gained attraction of stake and they are expected to proceed performing with a lot of confidence. The citizens who cast their vote in the voting are the same citizens on whom they will cast their blame in the voting nodes of which they are again the persons to whom they will ascribe their responsibility of voting and voting where, at which the users will vote their stake. This leads to an evolutionary trend of the opposite of the nodes, which can be trusted to grow even more and the ones, which would not be destroyed at all.
It was what this reward system is not fond of. The fact that good nodes are good is because good is that the patronizing users of good node are good. The second step that would then follow naturally would be cooperation and not aggressiveness. It makes network more human too since success cannot occur in a vacuum. It resembles the common token holders and the operators.
The second layer that will be embraced is the slashing that should be embraced in future. Bad behavior will have to occur in order to result in the dismissal. I do not believe that it is such an issue as a penalty, but one of clarity. Neither does it lack much trouble in believing in bad practice which incur no profits, when it is known that there exists a guarantee that the latter would be full of losses. The end users holding the token and even the operators would want to have the safe, trustful and the honest network.
A disinterested staking such as the one in the case of Walrus is inherently closer to reflective trade off transparency/ accountability. It does not suppose that one must be technically competent and most importantly does not induce the incentives of good behaviour by emphasizing on it and above all throws the net between the way to long term stability by like incentives. It is a good applicable and decentralization architecture in my opinion. This is a facade and is amalgamated with its preannouncements and otherwise is predisposed to having the opinion that the interdependent dedication is receptive of all security.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus

VANAR: THE AI

INFRASTRUCTURE

FOR WEB3

The internet has not been neutralised. With the existence of the social media and the cloud computing, the age of the boring web pages, every move revolutionized the interactions and development of the patrons. This is already a new age that is referred to as Web3. It is in depth, and it is profound, but cannot be heard on the surface. That property of trust and freedom on the virtual world is disturbing. The new internet must have mighty foundations to fulfill its functionality. One of such foundations is Vanar developed to offer Web3 artificial intelligence.

Most of the population within the modern world lives on a centralized internet. Social networks, streaming services, searching engine and online services are owned by a few companies. Such businesses store the data regarding the users, manipulable algorithms and dictate how to apply artificial intelligence. It is an excellent process that comes at a cost. The customers do not have the data of the customers. Artists rely on platforms. There is no clear image of the process of decision making and the AIs shape lives.

Web3 is trying to remodel the middleware. It is based on the principle of decentralization i.e. decentralization of power and control over the networks and not at one point. With the help of smarth contracts and blockchains, it is possible to have a system that can be controlled by none. This will avail more control and transparency to the users in theory. As it is, the Web3 is a complex beast, which is slow and inaccessible to the majority. Infrastructure role in this case is rather critical.

The infrastructure is the kind of one that is ugly yet it dictates what can occur. Roads decide how cities grow. Electricity dictates to businesses the way they should carry out their operations. On the same note, it is the creators of the internet that are the digital infrastructures. There is no glitzy application and is infrastructure oriented Vanar. The reason is that Web3 will not need more noise. It involves loud systems, which are dependable.

Artificial intelligence takes a different twist into this controversy. AI is entering the daily life. It writes, it makes, prophesies and counsels. The existing internet is more concentrated with the artificially intelligent. The giant models are acquired secrets on how to work with giant data. The outcomes are profitable to users and users lack much control and knowledge. This causes inequality and distrust.

AI is not something that can be introduced to the Web3 easily. The decentralized systems do not provide support to the heavy computing. Data is spread out. Speed matters. Costs matter. The idea of AI infrastructure of Web3 advocated by Vanar suggests the proactive solution to these problems in the first and second levels instead of limiting them in the second place. When AI can work effectively and make sure that it achieves all the tasks without interfering with the principle of decentralization, it will lead to a digital intelligence.

What is interesting to me about Vanar is the fact that it is user-friendly. The Web3 systems are to some degree, an experiment rather than a tool. They require technical ability and moderation. Reducing complexity Complexity-shifting infrastructure facilitates the developer in achieving a greater experience and the user in fitting in. Whenever adoption occurs technology turns to be natural.

This is an interpretation to cultural side too. Web3 is frequently referred to as making, group and digital rights. People are even able to create worlds, art, games and ideas faster and better than ever before because the creativity can be quickened making it possible to achieve this task. By outsourcing such tools in central servers, even the creators remain reliant. Decentralized infrastructure has the ability to liberate the creators and allow equality should they be supported. Vanar could assist in this eventuality.

Trust is another key theme. People are increasingly finding artificial intelligence and blockchain unrealistic. The deceptions, hype and hollow threats have been blighted. With the assistance of the infrastructure of transparency and long-term thinking and stability, the integrity would assist in restoring the confidence. Vanar is a base layer; it is one of the benefits that can provide it with a chance to define the form of trust into systems.

At the individual level, I do not see the internet to be completely decentralized or centralized. It will be a balance. It is worth noting that it is not only efficient but equally fair. There is limit to power requirement but it should have systems. It is this equilibrium that Vanar appears to chase after, especially in a problematic field of AI and Web3 intersection.

This can be a good thing because Vanar will have no time to familiarize himself/herself with all users. The ideal infrastructure is the one that is nonexistent. People are anxious about what they can do, and not what is running under. This will make smarter applications, more healthy community and more liberal systems in the event Vanar is dominant without being a factor to consider.

Lastly, Vanar is an idea and not a product. The idea that there is no necessity to believe that there is necessity of the having intelligence with fewer hands. Anticipation of Web3 taking off and becoming a possibility. The perception that the veneers are lesser in comparison to the underlay. The next generation internet shall be designed according to the silent engines like Vanar which will work silently in the background, thus making it more human, just and intelligent.

@Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar

Dusk provides a trade off that blockchain Sandwich has never possessed in terms of privacy and transparent receipt. The sensitive financial data is not revealed, however, the banks will be able to demonstrate the fact of existence of the transactions, and their conformity. This is the case in the world where security is a trust. I envision dusk as a people and institutional language that is more practical, respectful and open to take it seriously without the sense of decentralization.

The blockchain is a product of a simple notion. It is anticipated that people are capable of being taught to be grateful of another one and not necessarily trust a mediator. An idea had been shaped up into an idea that was strong, nonetheless, in a tormented way. There are a great number of open source blockchains. One can see transactions made, balances and money flows at any time. This is transparency which comes out of openness but as well creates problems. Being his/her financial life uncovered is something that no one, in this world, would wish to see. Privacy is not concealed of bad behavior. The concept of privacy suggests dignity, freedom and security.

Meanwhile, there is the being of the institutions of the other reality. The rules and regulators and the great organizations must control the banking. They would be under need to demonstrate the availability of money, good faith and law of civil transactions. They are not included in the formula of complete confidentiality. Complete open-heartedness does not augur well with the folks. It has also been escorted with its due share of the load in the reality of the actual implementation of blockchain in a dark-net economy.

There is that Dusk has lost its place.

Privateness and trust dilemma is not brought up in Dusk. It even attempts to own them simultaneously. The transactions may be personal as well as the sensitive may not be disclosed to the society. However, in case of a need when it is possible to offer evidences that there is nothing wrong. The definition can be too anthropomorphic on the other side. It proceeds to mention that you should not share your woes with everyone and be frank and responsible at the same time.

This is already the balance which is restrictively available in conventional finance. The fact displayed in your bank account is not your open information and your bank may still inform you that he/she is all the way to the eye of the regulators. Blockchain has lacked this balance without altering the decentralization. Dusk tries to solve this issue without trying to restore authority in a man. That is interesting.

The other prominent aspect of Dusk is that it is not violative of institutions and institutions are not the ones controlling it. Most blockchain applications lack the addition of the institutions, which should not be done. Both plans lead to extremes. The real world is comprised of institutions. Ignoring them limits impact. It is devitalization of the decentralization purpose to appease them. Dusk already presupposes this tension and concessions.

And I think this is not one of the imperfections in the middle way. It is maturity. It is connected with the fact that the initial years of blockchain were associated with the creation of a demonstration that something new would be possible. It is happily still there, only now to put it into service, safe and fruitful to the everyday life. Privacy is also not a trade. It is an evolution.

Dusk may as well be correlated to the developers and the users. It does not contain slogans and noises in its idea. It is utilitarian, non-communicative and non-rewarding. It cannot be found in newspapers but it is a-built trust. Another thing is that value systems are not experimental. They are supposed to be secure, delicate, and considerate of the individuals who would be employing them.

The world has never been enlightened like it is today where information is spilled, and surveillance is more than ever before. The latter is the financial crime and fraud, which is present in the meantime. On the one hand, hypocrisy will not be a remedy that will adversely impact it. Dusk does not disregard either of the two realities but does not us them to substantiate the other.

In my opinion, it is a humanizing feature of a blockchain. It is aware of the fact that individuals are complex. We desire to have our freedom, and we desire to feel secure. We desire not to belong to anyone and we should feel confident. Technology that does not provide in terms of these contradictions is doomed to fail. It facilitates the technology which has a chance of survival.

Dusk is not the noisiest one that can be placed in the area, and it is grounded. It seems, this is intended more to come in the future when blockchain has ceased being a professional sector, but a mass media platform. One, in which individuals will be capable of securing their economic survival, and banks will be capable of conducting their business without any misconception and dread.

Finally, one of the factors that affect me is respect. The respect towards the users, the legislation, the privacy and the decentralization. That combination is rare. Its ideas such as Dusk will be useful in case blockchain achieves its potentials and comes into reality. They also show that we need not continue with proceeding on taking side and have to construct bridges between sides to proceed.

@Dusk $DUSK #dusk

DUSK Network is computer (computer nodes) that is owned by none banks or even state and is left to be decentralized across the entire globe. This system of nodes collaborates with them to confirm the transactions and thereby, transforms the system into transparent and flawless of attacks and users and renders the network less resistant.

DUSK Network does not entail a complex concept. This network is not of one individual, but yet it belongs to a host of computers, all of which are in many locations on the earth. This small scintilla of it is retained with the personal computers and would in case they are added render the system operational. It is not as discriminating or secretive network since there is no special group who creates and owns the network. It is something anybody can do, and nobody can bend the rules behind the scenes and play them according to his or her own rules.

And this is the most interesting part of this strategy that comes to my mind because the trust is turned around. The records availed to the banks by the banks, business or the government are safe and honest. The former is an individual, who is a technocrat and has the conception of teamwork and technology at DUSK Network. The nodes guarantee that the labor of the remaining components of the system is verified and, consequently, verification of the work cannot be accomplished rather easily. In case such an individual is planning to attack the system, he/she will not go with the massive wall, but with thousands of small cooperating walls.

Network structure is also good. The system does not fail to make sure that any of the computers goes out or malfunctions. Other nodes continue to work. And this is the natural power, it is almost natural, how nature deals with things. There is no need to have a tree in the forest. As one of them is fell, it is not the cause of death to the forest. And the same thing with DUSK Network.

Freedom of the users is also another factor. This suffices as it is also not the case that it lacks a central control that makes its users not be enticed to join it at its own free will. They are even able to send/ receive value and in actual sense they know that what they are doing is being done in an acceptable manner as well. This causes them to feel that they are proprietors. They are not just customers. They are participants.

It is also mammoth that transparency is taken into account. The net shall validate the will transactions of transactions. This is not a big issue despite the fact its is an open and audit system because of the lack of personal privacy invasion it entails. Not an only only a part of honesty and defense, but must be taken into consideration in the familiarity of the reputation of the long-term trust of credit.

Apparently, the networks such as DUSK symbolize a mute revolution of methods by which digital systems can be made. This is the case since they cannot guarantee that it is the most acceptable rather than they have their acceptable and human choice. It does not have any concentration of power. Sharon does not lack backwardness in sharing the load. Such a network induces a sense of technology availability to the final consumers in a world which seems to be in the darker part of the distended mechanisms.

It could also occur that DUSK Network is not considering transactions and computers as the sole consideration. It is about choice. It further demonstrates that making the systems adaptable to fit the users does not always mean that there is a necessity to be in control of enabling people to react and bring the system strong. So only makes bearkening paying.

@Dusk $DUSK #dusk