When Regulation Pays the Bills — Why $DUSK Has Structural Demand
Speculation is optional. Compliance is not.
Financial institutions entering blockchain face a strict reality: transparency must coexist with confidentiality. Achieving both requires specialized infrastructure — and infrastructure has a price.
DUSK sits directly at this intersection.
Banks, asset managers, and regulated platforms don’t allocate capital based on hype cycles. They spend when systems are necessary for operation and regulatory alignment.
That distinction matters.
Tokens supported by institutional budgets often behave differently from retail-driven assets. Their relevance grows quietly, anchored in real financial workflows.
The bullish case for DUSK isn’t built on noise — it’s built on necessity.
Ask yourself:
If regulated finance expands on-chain, can it function without privacy-preserving compliance layers?
If not, someone will be paying for DUSK.
And markets tend to notice recurring revenue eventually.
