AH啊豪

The primary market Chinese MeMe is on fire again‼️
Just entered 2026, Chinese MeMe coins
"I'm here now" have made a large group of people rich overnight
"Binance Life" has also listed on spot trading
Directly baffling foreign friends!

So there are still many opportunities in the primary market now!
But many people still don't take seriously the high fees in the primary market, not knowing that spending just one minute can save hundreds or even thousands of dollars in profits💰
👇👇👇
Now fill in Ahao's wallet invitation to save 30% in fees (the highest proportion allowed within market compliance). Over 300 people have already signed up, and future upgrades will allow me to adjust the ratio in real time for brothers. It's automatically returned by the system, no need for my intervention, completely worry-free about the risk of being scammed‼️
1️⃣ Enter Web3 wallet
2️⃣ Click Invite Friends
3️⃣ Click Participate Now
4️⃣ Enter: AAA111
5️⃣ Confirm Complete✅
Brothers who are bound can come to the homepage to join the group,
And sound the call to launch together on great projects!
#币安上线币安人生 $我踏马来了

How scary is the "liquidation risk" that is often mentioned? Let me give you an analogy: if you use your property title to mortgage and borrow money from the bank to invest in stocks, if the housing price plummets, the bank will worry that you will run away, and will forcefully sell your house to recover the loan. In Lista DAO, the "plummeting housing price" is the significant drop in the value of your collateralized BNB or ETH, and the "bank selling the house" is the smart contract automatically liquidating your collateral.

What extent of this "plummet" will trigger it? It depends on your "collateral ratio." For example, if you deposit BNB worth $1000 and only borrow $300 of USD1, then your collateral ratio is very high, and your safety cushion is thick; BNB needs to drop significantly to be liquidated. However, if you are greedy and borrow $700, then the collateral ratio is very low, and a slight decline in the price may hit the liquidation line.

How to avoid it? First, never borrow up to the limit. The Lista DAO interface will show the maximum borrowable amount, but borrowing around 50%-60% is sufficient. Second, choose assets with relatively low volatility. Blue-chip coins like BTCB, BNB, and ETH are theoretically less risky for plummeting compared to low market cap altcoins. Third, stay vigilant. If you have made a large collateral, during extreme market fluctuations, you need to periodically check on the position status.

Besides market risks, are there other pitfalls? Yes. For example, technical risk: despite audits, there may be unknown vulnerabilities in the protocol. Stablecoin de-pegging risk: can the USD1 you borrow and the USD1 accepted by investment always be reliably exchanged for 1 dollar? If there is a short-term de-pegging, your arbitrage calculations will get messed up. Activity end risk: the 20% high-yield financial products from exchanges are often limited-time activities; after the activity ends, you may not find another place with the same high returns, and the interest margin will disappear.

Therefore, don't just look at that enticing 18% interest margin. Treat it as a strategy that requires meticulous management. Start small, familiarize yourself with all processes and potential friction costs (such as gas fees for cross-chain transfers and possible slippage). Only by truly understanding where the risks lie can you become the one who earns that return, rather than becoming the risk itself.
#usd1理财最佳策略listadao $LISTA @lista_dao

Having discussed the gameplay, we also need to talk about what the Lista DAO protocol itself is all about. What exactly is its background? Just looking at the name with 'DAO', it feels quite decentralized.

According to security firm CertiK, the Lista DAO project has been around for approximately 3 years and 8 months, so it is not a new protocol and has a certain degree of maturity. Its main business is over-collateralized lending and issuing the stablecoin USD1.

It has recently gained quite a bit of attention, with trading volume soaring nearly 360% in a single day, indicating that the number of people paying attention to and using it is indeed increasing. However, from a security perspective, CertiK's audit coverage of its contract code is only 19.23%, which means that a significant portion of the code has not been audited. Additionally, there are some centralized risks, such as the upgradability of contracts and privileged functions. These are objective facts that you need to be aware of before using any DeFi protocol.

So what is the use of its token LISTA? Holding and staking LISTA tokens currently allows you to share in the protocol's profits. Based on previous community discussions, the annualized rewards can reach as high as 36.75%. This serves as an incentive for loyal users and governors of the protocol.

More importantly, Lista DAO is not standing still. Its roadmap for 2026 is quite ambitious, planning to introduce real-world assets (RWA) such as government bonds as collateral, and even exploring unsecured loans based on on-chain credit. Recently, it has cross-chained to Ethereum, launching more complex 'LP collateralized lending', allowing you to provide liquidity while also borrowing money.

Therefore, my view is that Lista DAO is a protocol that is continuously building and trying to provide richer financial primitives. It is not perfect and has the common risks and centralized compromises found in DeFi protocols. But the low-interest lending tools it offers are very real, especially for users holding mainstream coins who want to improve capital efficiency; it is a choice worth exploring. Use it, but do so with awareness and caution.
#usd1理财最佳策略listadao $LISTA @lista_dao

As a user, I personally experienced a "gas fee fluctuation" event on the WAL chain.

That afternoon, I was conducting a routine liquidity addition operation on a DEX on the WAL chain. The page showed an estimated gas fee of 0.5 WAL, which I thought was acceptable, so I confirmed it. However, the transaction was stuck on "waiting" for almost 5 minutes. I refreshed the page and resubmitted, and at that moment, the estimated fee jumped to 1.8 WAL. I was a bit confused, so I checked the block explorer and found that during those few minutes, the network had suddenly been filled up by a large batch of minting transactions from an NFT project.

This led me to start studying the gas fee mechanism of WAL. It currently adopts a bidding model similar to Ethereum, but lacks the base fee burning mechanism like EIP-1559. This means that during congestion, fees are entirely determined by the market and are all collected by validators. More critically, since the native token of the WAL chain is WAL itself, and the price of WAL is inherently volatile, users bear a "double volatility risk": they have to worry about the level of network congestion as well as the price of WAL.

In the community, there have actually been proposals discussing the introduction of fixed fee units (such as pegging gas fees to a stable value unit) and a fee burning mechanism. However, the implementation has been slow, and some node operators are clearly satisfied with the current model of obtaining all transaction fees. As an ordinary user, my direct feeling is that this fee mechanism is not very user-friendly for low-volume users who engage in high-frequency interactions, as it may inadvertently raise the usage threshold. If the team wants to attract a broader range of regular applications, a more stable and predictable cost structure must be considered.
#walrus $WAL @WalrusProtocol

From my actual experience with Vanar development: The consumption scenarios of VANRY are more than expected!

Recently, I briefly ran Vanar's testnet to see from a developer's perspective how practical the consumption scenarios of VANRY really are.

I found that, in addition to the most basic gas fees, some of its designs are indeed guiding deeper token usage.

For example, the native on-chain AI service calls clearly require payment in VANRY. If an application wants to use the on-chain storage of a 3D model library or dynamic rendering services, it may also involve additional VANRY costs.

From a technical perspective, this design of serviceizing core functionalities allows the value capture of VANRY to be more direct. This is different from purely relying on transaction congestion to drive up gas fees, but rather creates demand by providing valuable on-chain services. However, the premise of all this is that these services (such as AI inference, 3D rendering) can really be more competitive in cost and quality than traditional centralized service providers.

If developers and users feel it is not cost-effective, this closed loop cannot operate.

Therefore, I feel that the value foundation of VANRY largely depends on whether the Vanar team can make these technical facilities both user-friendly and economical.

$VANRY
#vanar
@Vanar

Why is Dusk referred to as the most conscientious project by KOLs in the square? What is the secret behind DUSK's explosive rise?

It is said that price increases are mere speculation, but as a long-time observer, I found that the core of this surge, which reached $DUSK , is actually its seemingly low-key technological upgrade at the beginning of the year, the launch of the DuskEVM mainnet.

I tell you, this is like putting a 'rocket engine' on the ecosystem.
In the past, developers had to learn a whole new set of skills to build here, which had a very high threshold.
What does full compatibility with Ethereum's EVM mean?
It means that the vast number of mature applications and the army of developers on Ethereum can be almost costlessly migrated over.
With the threshold for development reduced to zero, the ecosystem can take off.

What I see is that as applications increase, users and transaction volumes will follow.
And everything done on this network, whether it's issuing a private placement bond or completing a privacy settlement, has to burn @Dusk as fuel.
This creates a continuously sustained consumption scenario for DUSK based on real demand.
Especially with the DuskTrade they are doing with the Dutch exchange, there are really hundreds of millions of euros worth of assets queued to go on-chain.
Just think, what will the consumption scale be when these physical assets start circulating at high frequency, like #dusk ?
So, this technological upgrade has transformed DUSK from 'fuel' into 'premium gasoline' that will be frantically sought after by massive engines.
The value logic has completely changed.
What is even more precious is that it actually issued rewards for creator tasks in advance, with those getting more receiving around $1600, and even the least getting $800. No wonder it has been so sought after, raising the coin price and rewarding creators can be said to be very conscientious!
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation

Recently I've been quite idle, so I specifically tested the XPL network's testing environment for a cross-chain exchange to see if their claims of "optimal routing" are reliable.

The operation is very simple; it's just converting a small amount of ETH from the Ethereum testnet into AVAX on the Avalanche testnet through their aggregator. The interface is quite clean, and you can initiate it with a single click without any hassle.

However, I was a bit surprised by the backend routing—I found that my transaction was split into three steps: first, exchanging ETH for XPL's bridging assets on Ethereum, then going through their dedicated cross-chain channel for transmission, and finally converting to AVAX on Avalanche.

The entire process took about 4 minutes, which is almost twice as slow as the mainstream cross-chain bridges I usually use. To be honest, my patience was running thin.

But the advantages are also quite obvious: the final amount of AVAX received was about 2.3% more than if I had directly exchanged the equivalent value of ETH on the target chain's DEX.

Now I understand the core logic of XPL—it doesn't pursue absolute speed; instead, it relies on algorithms to real-time scrape the best prices across multiple chains and DEXs.

In simple terms, it trades time for profit, which is indeed appealing for large and non-urgent transactions.

However, it also has noticeable shortcomings: its efficiency entirely depends on the data update speed of the "liquidity oracle" and the congestion situation of various chains.

During my testing, I encountered a situation where a chain suddenly got congested, resulting in the transaction price of one step becoming invalid, requiring the entire routing to be recalculated, causing unnecessary waiting time.

Therefore, whether XPL can succeed really depends on whether its routing algorithm is intelligent enough and whether the connected liquidity depth is sufficient.
#plasma $XPL @Plasma

Practical Details: No One Will Tell You About Slippage and Gas Fees

Having watched a lot of tutorials calculating attractive theoretical arbitrage, you'll find two frustrating issues once you start operating: slippage and gas fees. These two can seriously eat into your profits.

For example, if you want to immediately exchange the borrowed USD1 for other assets to mine, when making a large exchange on a decentralized exchange (DEX), if the liquidity pool isn't deep enough, slippage will occur. It might show as 1 dollar to exchange for 1 coin, but the actual transaction turns out to be 0.995 coins. This 0.5% seems small, but over time it adds up painfully. My clumsy solution is: try to break it into smaller orders, operate in time slots, or choose the trading pairs with the best depth.

Even more tedious are gas fees. From collateral, borrowing, cross-chain transfers (if you need to move assets to different chains) to finally depositing in wealth management, each step burns gas. Although BNB Chain is cheap, if the operation chain is long, especially when the network is busy, it can accumulate to a significant amount. Once I calculated, and found that nearly 30% of my profits were eaten up by gas fees, a painful lesson. So now, I only operate when the arbitrage is large enough and the planned holding period is longer, and I never engage in frequent trading for small profits.
#usd1理财最佳策略listadao $LISTA @lista_dao