I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately: in AI markets, intelligence is not the rare thing anymore. Trust is.
Anyone can demo a smart agent. Very few can explain what it did, why it did it, and whether that decision can be verified later.
That’s why Vanar’s direction stands out to me. It doesn’t try to sell “smarter AI.” It keeps pushing toward something less exciting but more important: memory, verification, and continuity at the protocol level.
This doesn’t create instant hype. It creates accountability.
And if AI is going to touch money, identity, or real assets, accountability will matter more than raw intelligence.
That’s the lens I’m using to watch Vanar right now.
