Yesterday i read on @Binance News that Brazil may allow crypto donations in elections.

A judge from Brazil’s Supreme Court is reviewing a rule that bans crypto donations in campaigns. People are giving feedback, and a decision could come soon. On paper, it’s just a legal review. In reality, it’s a sign.

Why this caught my attention?

A few years ago, crypto wasn’t even part of the conversation. Back then, governments asked:

• "Is this legal?"

• "Is this dangerous?"

• "Should we stop it?"

Now the question sounds more like: “How do we deal with it?”

That change matters. To me, it means crypto is no longer something on the outside. It’s slowly being pulled into real systems. This isn’t about supporting or opposing crypto donations

Let me be clear. This post isn’t saying crypto should be used in elections. My point is simpler.

If a country is even considering it, that means:

• Crypto is being taken seriously

• Blockchain is seen as something that can be tracked

• Old rules are being questioned

That’s a big shift. The part many people misunderstand. People often say crypto hides money. But when you really look at it, blockchains are very open. Transactions don’t disappear. They stay there. Anyone can check them. In some ways, crypto can be more transparent than traditional systems.

That’s probably why this discussion is happening at all.

This isn’t just a Brazil only. From my point of view, Brazil is just one example. Everywhere you look in differents countries:

• Rules are getting clearer

• Big institutions are paying attention

• Crypto is now part of serious discussions.

And this we’re seeing is interesting. The same systems that once ignored or resisted crypto are slowly trying to understand it because it’s no longer something they can ignore.

Do you agree with my views?

@Binance Square Official #BlockchainNews #CryptoAdoption