Three Years on Binance Square And Too Many Unanswered Questions @Binance Square Official
I’ve been writing on Binance Square for over three years and built an audience of 320,000 followers.
That doesn’t happen by accident.
But over the last year, serious questions have piled up based not on feelings, but on what I’ve lived through and documented. I’ve raised these issues multiple times with @Karin Veri , @Viane , and @Daniel Zou (DZ) 🔶 , backed with evidence. Either no real solution was found, or I no longer believe the level of expertise matches the responsibility.
Let’s be clear about one thing:
I don’t care who wins article contests or who gets the 10 BNB rewards. That’s your call.
But the unfairness is visible, and pretending otherwise doesn’t make it disappear.
Now, I have two very simple questions about my 320,000 followers:
Are these followers bots?
If they are not bots, then explain this logically:
On any platform without artificial suppression, an account with 320,000 followers should receive at least 1.5%–2% reach, even with a bad post. Quality can increase reach but it should not collapse it.
Three months ago, my articles averaged close to 50,000 views.
Today, with the same writing quality, those numbers have dropped to 3,000.
That kind of decline does not describe a healthy or transparent system.
It describes intervention.
If Binance Square uses a mechanism similar to X, then say it openly. Because with such systems, low visibility despite a large following becomes explainable. Without that explanation, it simply doesn’t add up.
I don’t know if this post will reach the right people.
But nothing I’ve written here is an accusation everything is provable.
Whether these problems get fixed is up to you.
Yes, this may sound harsh.
No, I’m not worried about my account being closed.
An account with this many unresolved issues already has little left to lose.
Sometimes silence is safer.
But clarity is more honest.
