People keep assuming AI agents will use crypto the same way humans do open a wallet, sign a transaction, wait, repeat. That’s not how agents work. Agents need continuous settlement: tiny payments, automated payouts, recurring fees, and instant routing when a task is completed.
So the question isn’t “does the chain support AI?” The real question is: can an agent earn, spend, and verify value natively without friction? If payments are an afterthought, the whole system collapses into off-chain dependencies and manual approvals.
Vanar’s positioning gets stronger here. When payments are treated as infrastructure tied to workflows, automation, and verifiable outcomes agents can actually operate like services, not like demos. That’s where real adoption hides: games paying creators, brands paying for performance, tools paying for compute, all happening programmatically.
If that’s the direction, $VANRY isn’t a meme on an AI narrative. It’s a token that benefits when agents start doing real economic work on chain.
