jpmorgan

The silver $XAG market didn't just experience a "bad day" on January 30, 2026; it witnessed a financial "crime scene." A 35% vertical drop is the largest crash in 40 years, and while the mainstream media pointed to a surging USD and a hawkish Fed, the underlying data suggests a much more calculated maneuver—a massive liquidity flush orchestrated by the "Big Shorts."
Here is an analysis of why this crash looks less like an organic market reaction and more like a textbook manipulation.
1. The Narrative vs. The Mechanics
On the surface, the story was simple: Kevin Warsh’s nomination fueled the Dollar, making non-yielding assets like Silver $XAG less attractive. However, macro factors rarely cause a 35% plunge in a single session unless a "liquidity trap" is triggered.
The real goal? To "flush out" the overcrowded Long positions. By creating a sudden, violent move, institutional players forced retail traders into a corner, triggering a domino effect of margin calls and liquidations.
2. The "Smoking Gun": 633 Contracts
The most damning evidence of manipulation lies in the transaction data from JP Morgan during the crash:
The Precision Exit: JP Morgan closed exactly 633 Short contracts (equivalent to 3.17 million ounces) at the absolute bottom of the crash: $78.29.Physical Monopoly: On that specific day, JP Morgan was the primary issuer of these contracts. In simpler terms, they were the ones "supplying" the physical silver to the market.The Conflict of Interest: By flooding the market with "paper silver" (short contracts) during a low-liquidity window, they manufactured an artificial supply shock. This drove prices down to their desired "buy-back" zone.
3. Anatomy of the "Flush" Strategy
How does a titan like JP Morgan move a multibillion-dollar market? They follow a three-step cycle:
The Spark: Use a bearish headline (like the Warsh nomination) to start a heavy selling streak.The Stop-Loss Domino: As the price falls, it hits the "Stop-Loss" orders of retail traders. This triggers automatic sell orders, which pushes the price even lower without any extra effort from the manipulator.The Great Buy-Back: Once the price hits the "liquidation floor" ($78.29), where most Long positions are wiped out, JP Morgan enters as the buyer. They close their shorts at a massive profit and scoop up cheap silver from the very people they just forced out of the market.
The Bottom Line
JP Morgan has a long, documented history of paying "operating costs" (often labeled as fines by the CFTC) for precious metals manipulation. This 35% crash serves as a brutal reminder: In the world of silver $XAG , the price isn't always set by supply and demand, but by who controls the exit door.

🔔Insight. Signal. Alpha. Get it all by hitting the follow button.

All posts are for informational purposes only | Personal insights, not financial advice | DYOR
#Silver #JPMorgan #GoldSilverRebound

The gold market is also going through one of the most interesting cycles in several years. Price of precious metal The precious metal experienced a 11 percentage point correction after reaching an all-time high during the period January to about 4 894 on 1 February 2026. However, instead of reflecting on the sign of weakness, analysts interpret this pull-back as a precursor to a long term action towards the 8000 mark by 2028. The foundation of the bullish thesis is that combining these three factors, namely healthy technicals, structural demand catalysts, and the macro environment is pro-real assets in comparison to nominal securities.
Market Overview and Price Movement.
In the short-term, the pull-back was an expression of hawkish change in the U.S. Federal Reserve rhetoric. Markets responded to the intimations that quantitative tightening would be sustained and that policy may be tighter than thought. Despite the fix, the technical picture of gold is positive: it is above its 100-day exponential moving average of about $4 275, meaning that it entrenches the positive trend. Bollinger Bands are broadening and this can indicate that a volatility can grow over the coming weeks- A usual prelude to directional breakouts. Noticeable support is close to $4 980 but more noteworthy is the support at 100-day EMA. It is observed to be resisting at $5 109 and a medium term target is approximated at 5 600. This kind of trend suggests that traders can get a possibility of adding on dips as opposed to trying to pursue strength.
Projections and Long-Run predictions.
The recent correction failed to discourage the raising of price targets by the institutions. Indeed, entity, company, JPMorgan, investment bank, just updated its year-end projection to $6 300/oz in 2026, and forecasts an average price of approximately $5 055 in the fourth quarter of 2026. They project a price of approximately $5 400 by 2027, and have it trending to an 8000 situation by 2028. This trajectory suggests an annualised growth rate that will outrun inflation making gold a possible supercycle asset like in the early 2000s. The bullish case crucially relies on increased participation by investors: currently, the percentage of gold in the portfolio of private funds is about 3, it is reasonable to assume that it will grow to 4.6 per cent, as JPMorgan believes. Such a small increment might release approximately 1.2 trillion of incremental demand, and supply would be overwhelmed, which would support higher prices over years.
Structural Demand Drivers
One of the most important components of the outlook is central bank behaviour. Central banks are predicted to increase their purchases to 800 tonnes in 2026 following purchases of more than 1 000 tonnes in the past three years. This perpetuated build up information covets a structural dedollarisation trend whereby countries are diversifying reserves beyond the U.S. treasuries. It also decreases the supply of gold to the private market intensifying price impacts in case of increases in investor demand.
In the meantime, in 2025, the global gold demand was highest at 5 002 tonnes. Contributions were made by over-the-counter transactions, exchange-traded funds inflows and maintained retail purchase. A shift towards physical gold as a store of value by households is taking place in emerging markets and replacing long-dated bonds. The geopolitical tensions and the possibility of currency realignments are also persistent, which serves as an additional reason to desire the tangible assets. The fact that gold does not yield at all, therefore, the appeal in a high-rate environment would be counter-intuitive, yet the safety and liquidity it provides are increasingly attractive as bond prices are put under a downward pressure by tightening.
Technical Context and Psychology of the markets.
Technically, the present consolidation above the 100-day EMA is indicative of the market digesting its gains as opposed to turning the market back. Momentum indicators have shifted out of overbought levels and the bulls have room to thrust upwards without being inhibited by close-term extremes. The expanding Bollinger Bands show that expansion of volatility may help in a break out when a new trigger comes into play. With the gold trading at 4 980 to 5 109, traders can either look at the gold breaking out of its resistance and embarking on a run towards 5 600 or the gold breaking down and getting to the 100-day EMA and have a chance to buy.
The feeling has also changed, though temporarily. Gold is becoming a macro hedge against financial repression, geopolitical turmoil and fiscal risk, and a hawkish Federal Reserve opened near-term headwinds, but the underlying story is the same: gold is being viewed as a macro hedge. Consolidation phases, as opposed to long-term trend changing, are, therefore, likely to be regarded as corrections. The demand on records in 2025 shows that any lows are a plus to the buyers. Simply speaking, volatility amounts to the cost of long-term engagement.
Trading Strategy and Investment.
To investors the long-term bullish thesis would dictate holding long-term positions tactically taking them in and out around the major support lines. The pull-backs suggested by analysts are around $4 980 or at the case of more weakness, 100-day EMA around 4 275 which would serve as accumulation points. However, stop-loss order might be set now at less than $4 800 to guard against undue dollar strength or still stronger Fed tightening. The first upside is at 5 600, but the true bargain is to hold to the 2026-2028 cycle where the valuations can be dramatically re-priced with the price-supply imbalance being overstretched.
Risk management is crucial. Even such healthy trend can suffer steep declines--the recent 11 percent downslope of gold is a lesson. Position sizing is also a disciplined method to be able to stay invested with volatility without necessarily being pushed out. Physical bullion and the few mining stocks can also be used by long-term investors to diversify by exposing themselves to the supply chain by having gold-backed ETFs, physical bullion, and select mining equities. To traders, incremental weakness buying, and strength selling can get in-between swings without losing the core exposure.
Greater Implications and Macro Drivers.
As the trend to move towards $8 000, the trend also indicates a more fundamental change in the market perception of money. The trend of dedollarisation can be expected to pick up because the emerging markets are seeking to hedge reserves against geopolitical risk. Both households and institutions are re-considering their bonds is due to ten years of ultra-low yields and a swift rate shock. Gold is a good replacement of anchor portfolios with bond volatility being high. The case is also supported by inflation uncertainty and the issue of fiscal sustainability.
Geopolitical context should not be left out. The conflict between the leading powers, the reposition of the supply chains and the shift toward multipolarity all speak in favor of assets without national borders. Gold has traditionally worked well in times when there is no confidence in fiat systems.

#GOLD
#JPMorgan
#InstitutionalAdoption
#PreciousMetalsTurbulence
#volatility
$BTC
$XAU
$ZIL

We just saw the biggest single-day crash in silver since 1980. The price dropped 32% in two days. That’s a $2.5 trillion wipeout. Now, a lot of people are pointing fingers at JPMorgan, saying they’re behind the crash.

This isn’t coming out of nowhere. The same bank got hit with a $920 million fine from the Department of Justice and the CFTC for rigging gold and silver prices between 2008 and 2016. That’s not a rumor—it’s on the record. They used fake orders to push prices around, then canceled those orders once they got the move they wanted. Some of their traders actually went to jail. So, this isn’t just conspiracy talk.

Let’s talk about how the silver market actually works now.

Most silver trading doesn’t touch real, physical silver. It’s all about futures contracts—basically bets on silver prices. For every actual ounce of silver sitting in a vault, there are hundreds of paper contracts linked to it.

JPMorgan is a giant here. They’re one of the biggest bullion banks on COMEX and hold a mountain of both registered and “eligible” physical silver. That means they have power on both sides: the paper market and the physical market.

Here’s what most people miss: Who wins when the price drops fast in a leveraged market? It’s not the small guys. Not even the hedge funds that borrowed money to go long. The real winners are the ones who can survive the panic, ride out the margin calls, and buy when everyone else has to dump.

That’s JPMorgan.

Right before the crash, silver was on a tear. Traders were piling in, using borrowed money. When prices started to fall, they didn’t sell because they wanted to—they got forced out. Exchanges demanded more cash for margin. Then, just to make things worse, the exchanges hiked margin requirements even more. Suddenly, all these traders needed way more money to keep their bets alive. Most couldn’t do it. Their positions got closed out automatically.

That’s where the forced selling came from. And that’s when JPMorgan steps in.

When prices are falling apart and everyone else is scrambling, JPMorgan can play three angles at once:

First, they can buy back silver futures at bargain prices, after selling them higher earlier—locking in profits.

Second, they can actually take delivery of physical silver while prices are in the gutter. The COMEX delivery reports show big banks, including JPMorgan, taking delivery right when prices were weakest.

Third, their huge balance sheet means those margin hikes don’t force them to bail. In fact, margin hikes just wipe out smaller players and leave JPMorgan with less competition.

That’s why people are calling out JPMorgan for this crash.

The numbers back it up. COMEX data shows JPMorgan issued 633 February silver contracts during the crash. “Issued” means they were short. The claim is simple: JPMorgan went short near the $120 top, then closed those shorts around $78 during delivery. They made money while everyone else got crushed.

Zoom out and look at the global scene.

In the US, silver’s paper price tanked. But in Shanghai, physical silver is still selling for much higher prices. Real buyers are still paying up. Only the paper price fell apart.

So, this wasn’t about a flood of real silver hitting the market. It was paper selling—plain and simple.

This is exactly the kind of setup where JPMorgan has cashed in before: a market heavy on paper trades, margin calls, forced selling, and the weakest hands getting tossed out.

You don’t have to prove JPMorgan planned it. The way the market is built just lets the big players win big when things get wild.

And when a bank with a history like JPMorgan’s is right at the center, you can’t blame people for asking tough questions.#JPMorgan