Sometimes I catch myself relaxing when a project sounds “trust-minimizing.” Payments make me do the opposite: I look for the quiet human levers.

When something goes wrong, who actually has the “final say” in this system?

With Plasma, trust seems to sit in a few places at once: the validators who include transactions, the operators behind sponsored flows, and whatever governance can change rules fast. An ordinary user won’t debate consensus; they’ll just ask why a transfer failed and who can fix it. Under pressure—a hack, a legal demand, a chain halt—someone must act quickly, and someone must be able to say no. If trust is merely relocated, what proof would show it’s accountable and not hiding behind infrastructure today?@Plasma #plasma $XPL

XPL

0.0936

-2.80%