I’m looking at Dusk as infrastructure rather than an app chain. It’s designed around the idea that markets need confidentiality and compliance at the same time. At the base, DuskDS handles consensus and settlement using a proof-of-stake design called SBA, built on a ‘proof of blind bid’ style leader selection that can keep validators less exposed. Smart contracts can run in more than one way: DuskVM executes WASM contracts, while DuskEVM is EVM-equivalent so teams can reuse Ethereum contracts and tooling. In practice, you use DUSK for fees and staking, then interact through wallets and apps that expose only what you need—confidential details for users, and audit views when a regulator or counterparty must verify. Since mainnet went live, they’ve been adding connective pieces like a two-way bridge that moves native DUSK to BEP20 on BSC and back. On the regulated side, they’re building rails with partners: NPEX for an on-chain exchange model and Quantoz Payments to bring EURQ, a MiCA-compliant digital euro (an EMT). The long-term goal is a stack where institutions can issue, trade, clear, and settle RWAs on-chain, with privacy by default but accountability on demand. Their modular stack lets execution layers plug in without changing consensus.
@Dusk_Foundation $DUSK #dusk #Dusk
Dusk is designed around a simple but difficult idea: financial systems need privacy and accountability at the same time. I’m not seeing Dusk as a “privacy chain” in the usual sense. It’s more like a financial ledger that knows when to stay quiet and when to prove something happened correctly.
The network uses different transaction models so users and institutions aren’t locked into one level of transparency. Some activity can be fully visible, while other activity stays confidential, with the option to reveal details to approved parties later. That matters for things like asset issuance, trading, or balance management where public exposure creates real risk.
From a technical side, Dusk separates its base network from execution layers. That lets smart contracts run without overloading the core system, and it keeps the chain adaptable over time. Developers can build familiar contract logic while benefiting from privacy features underneath.
In practice, Dusk is meant for regulated DeFi, tokenized securities, and real-world assets that can’t live on fully transparent chains. They’re building toward long-term adoption by institutions, not short-term speculation. Mainnet is already live, and the goal now seems clear: become infrastructure that real financial systems can actually use.
@Dusk_Foundation $DUSK #dusk #Dusk
Dusk is a blockchain made for situations where transparency alone isn’t enough. I’m talking about finance that needs privacy, structure, and rules. On Dusk, transactions don’t have to expose everything by default, but they’re still provable and auditable when required.
The network separates how value moves from how apps are built. One part secures and settles transactions, while other layers handle smart contracts. That means developers can focus on products instead of rebuilding infrastructure. They’re also not forcing one style of privacy. Some transactions are open, others are shielded, and teams can choose based on the use case.
I see Dusk aiming at compliant DeFi and tokenized assets, especially where institutions are involved. They’re not trying to replace every blockchain. They’re focused on one problem: how to put regulated financial activity on-chain without breaking privacy or trust. Mainnet is already live, so this is no longer theoretical.
@Dusk_Foundation $DUSK #dusk #Dusk
I’m approaching Dusk as infrastructure rather than a typical crypto project. They’re building a Layer 1 blockchain specifically for financial applications where privacy and regulation both matter. Instead of choosing one side, the system is designed to support both.
From a design perspective, Dusk uses Proof of Stake to secure the network and finalize blocks. Participants stake DUSK to help validate transactions, and fees are paid in the same token. What makes it different is how transactions and applications are handled. The protocol supports privacy-preserving transfers while still allowing selective disclosure, which is critical for audits, reporting, and compliance.
This design makes Dusk suitable for things like tokenized real-world assets, securities, and regulated DeFi products. Builders can create applications where sensitive financial data isn’t exposed to the entire public, but accountability is still enforced by the protocol.
The long-term goal is not mass speculation or consumer hype. They’re trying to create a base layer that institutions can realistically use. If blockchains are going to support real financial markets, systems like Dusk are likely part of that future.
@Dusk_Foundation $DUSK #dusk #Dusk
$XMR LONG LIQUIDATION ALERT
🔴 Long Liquidation: $3.1795K at $508.31
Big liquidation on Monero. Longs got flushed at 508.31, which tells us that level was heavily leveraged. When strong coins like XMR see liquidations, volatility usually follows.
This is a serious level now.
Support Zone
495 is immediate support. If that breaks, 470 becomes the next strong demand zone.
Resistance Zone
515 is first resistance. Above that, 535 is major.
Next Target
Reclaim and hold above 515, and 535 becomes the upside objective.
Lose 495 and momentum may drag price toward 470.
XMR moves are powerful when they start. Watch for confirmation before jumping in.
{future}(XMRUSDT)
I’m looking at Dusk as a blockchain designed for financial systems that can’t be fully public. Most chains assume transparency is always good, but in real finance that’s not true. Companies, funds, and institutions need privacy, while regulators still need visibility.
That’s the gap Dusk is trying to fill. They’re building a Layer 1 where transactions can be private by default, but the system still supports auditing and compliance when needed. Instead of forcing everything on-chain in plain view, Dusk uses cryptography to control what is revealed and to whom.
They’re also focused on real use cases like compliant DeFi and tokenized real-world assets, not just speculation. The network runs on Proof of Stake, and the DUSK token is used for staking and transaction fees. Overall, the idea is simple: make blockchain usable for regulated finance without breaking privacy or trust.
@Dusk_Foundation $DUSK #dusk #Dusk
An institution wants to move $1,000,000.
If $XRP = $1
They need 1,000,000 $XRP
If $XRP = $100
They need 10,000 $XRP
If $XRP = $10,000
They need 100 $XRP
If Xrp= $1,000,000
They need 1 $XRP
Same value to move.
Completely different market impact.
Which is easier for a system to utilise?
• One xrp at $1,000,000 ?
• Or one million $1 $XRP?
Vanar Chain is a Layer 1 blockchain designed for products people already use, such as games, virtual worlds, and digital brand platforms. I’m looking at Vanar as a system that puts usability first. Instead of forcing new behavior, they’re building infrastructure that fits existing entertainment and gaming models. The chain is EVM compatible, so developers can reuse Ethereum tools and contracts, which lowers friction. VANRY is the core token used for transaction fees, staking, and network participation. They’re also connecting the chain to real applications like Virtua and VGN, which helps show how the technology is meant to be used, not just described. From their perspective, the goal isn’t only decentralization, but also smooth onboarding and predictable performance. I see Vanar as an attempt to bridge traditional digital products and blockchain ownership in a way that doesn’t overwhelm the end user.
@Vanar $VANRY #vanar #Vanar