When discussing DUSK, I am more concerned with two things: first, whether the token economics are designed for long-term operation, and second, whether the on-chain costs and security budget have formed a positive feedback loop. The token structure of duskfoundation is inherently long-term oriented, with a maximum supply of one billion tokens, and a long release span, which essentially allocates a budget for long-term network security and ecological operation. Looking at the fee mechanism, it does not just end with collecting a transaction fee; rather, it binds the fees to block rewards and the earnings of network participants. This is crucial for a network that aims to carry compliant assets because you need a stable security budget to encourage institutions to engage in more serious settlement and asset activities. Not to mention the productization possibilities brought by super staking; once staking becomes service-oriented and productized, the participant structure will be more decentralized and stable, and the locking and usage logic of DUSK will resemble that of infrastructure. No one can guarantee how the short-term market will behave, but structurally speaking, the more duskfoundation resembles a long-term network, the more DUSK needs to rely on actual usage for pricing, rather than on a temporary surge in interest.
DUSK
0.1022
+0.69%