Why doesn't Vanar boast anymore? There are hidden secrets behind it. Recently, I've been paying attention to Vanarchain, and its quietness is unusual. In the past, the project team frequently issued announcements, bragging about TPS and cooperation results, but Vanar has changed, no longer hastily pushing new features, instead largely retweeting in-depth insights from independent individuals. This 'speaking through others' strategy stems from the current situation in the AI + Crypto field: projects speaking for themselves are easily seen as 'pump and dump', while authentic external voices are the reliable sources of information. The 'Survival Test' of AI I'm contemplating: if we let an AI Agent run on-chain without supervision, what is it most afraid of? It's not high gas fees or chain congestion, but rather 'losing track'. Traditional blockchain is built for one-time transactions, where people transfer funds and leave without needing the chain to remember. However, an AI Agent needs to be online for an extended period, remembering decision logic and validating data. If the chain lacks 'persistent memory', the AI will crash on the chain. Vanar is currently conducting a survival stress test. Its Neutron (semantic compression) and myNeutron applications are not showcasing technology but proving that in a decentralized environment, an Agent can survive relying on 'on-chain memory'. @Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar