In the previous BSC wave, too many opportunities were given at the bottom, allowing too many people to get on board, making it impossible to wash out the holdings later. As a result, every upward move became a massive handover. The root cause was that too many paper hands held too many bottom-level positions, leading to a supply glut.

These past few days, it's obvious that this BSC2.0 bottom won't give you much time, the rally won't offer much space, and you won't have much time to react. But it ensures that the early followers or late joiners are mostly smart money or diamond hands, with relatively high cost basis and healthy distribution—this is what healthy holding structure looks like, enabling stability in the long run.

Take SOL's previous Goat wave as an example—it was the same. The longer the bottom phase lasted, the cheaper the entry, which easily created a false consensus and misleading illusion.

Low-cost holdings + strong narrative = more buying pressure as price rises.

High-cost holdings + strong narrative = increasing reluctance to sell as price rises.