opinion
177,241 views
240 Discussing
Hot
Latest
Sharing the current airdrops I'm participating in: The era of free-riding on the testnet has ended with the maximum anti-RU of Monad, and the project teams have become smarter, wanting to airdrop first by spending money to gain points. I believe that #PERPS has been following the trend of decentralized platform airdrops after the big trend in LMTS, with expectations needing to be lowered for this year; the big trend should be the prediction market.
1. Of course, Binance's prediction platform #opinion currently costs around $100, which is quite expensive, and the limit orders are slow to execute; fortunately, there are Telegram bots to provide reminders. The official founder seems to have mentioned an airdrop before the New Year 🧨, which is quite anticipated 😊.
2. The core members of Binance's early futures team created #StandX , a perpetual contract DEX, where you can deposit #dusd to earn points and interest without loss, and you can also open positions to earn trading points. Currently, the cost is around $200 for over ten thousand points. It is important to note that trading points have the highest weight, and tokens will be distributed in the first quarter after the deadline.
3. #Variational is a derivatives trading protocol built on the ARB chain, supporting community allocation and loss return mechanisms. It’s quite interesting that if you lose money on the contract, there’s a chance you’ll get some back, which is essentially free-riding. The higher the level, the greater the chance of recouping losses. Currently, it’s very tiring, and the official said they won’t distribute tokens until June, which is too long. Let's just casually participate; the cost is $200.
1. Of course, Binance's prediction platform #opinion currently costs around $100, which is quite expensive, and the limit orders are slow to execute; fortunately, there are Telegram bots to provide reminders. The official founder seems to have mentioned an airdrop before the New Year 🧨, which is quite anticipated 😊.
2. The core members of Binance's early futures team created #StandX , a perpetual contract DEX, where you can deposit #dusd to earn points and interest without loss, and you can also open positions to earn trading points. Currently, the cost is around $200 for over ten thousand points. It is important to note that trading points have the highest weight, and tokens will be distributed in the first quarter after the deadline.
3. #Variational is a derivatives trading protocol built on the ARB chain, supporting community allocation and loss return mechanisms. It’s quite interesting that if you lose money on the contract, there’s a chance you’ll get some back, which is essentially free-riding. The higher the level, the greater the chance of recouping losses. Currently, it’s very tiring, and the official said they won’t distribute tokens until June, which is too long. Let's just casually participate; the cost is $200.
From pulling to hitting, analyzing the weight of Opinion scores——the last operation can yield explosive results.
Market Order: 🌟
Newbie traders love to place aggressive market orders, but the weight of market orders should be the lowest.
Trading Volume: 🌟🌟
No trading volume is not workable, but pairing a market order with a large trading volume does not provide extra points. Trading volume is a must, but having too much doesn't yield significant benefits. Opinion tends to favor users with smaller capital.
Profit and Loss: 🌟🌟
From my own testing, whether in loss or profit, the scores are quite similar.
Order Time: 🌟🌟🌟
An order is akin to market-making. Predicting market liquidity is similar to the NFT market, which is relatively poor, so order placements are encouraged.
Limit Order: 🌟🌟🌟
Similar to order time. Opinion encourages users to discover prices in order to provide liquidity to the market.
Probability Neutral: 🌟🌟🌟
A market with a 50% probability is more efficient in scoring than a market with a 90% probability. Therefore, one should engage more in neutral probability markets and avoid mindlessly chasing the tail end.
Niche Market: 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
The characteristics of niche markets are that the trading volume is relatively small, usually below 2 million dollars, and the order wall is only a few hundred dollars, at most one or two thousand dollars. Last time I played in such a market, I reduced the cost to 1 cent per dollar (I mentioned this in my previous article). So, engage more in niche markets; this is a strategy for explosive scoring.
#opinion #空投大毛
Market Order: 🌟
Newbie traders love to place aggressive market orders, but the weight of market orders should be the lowest.
Trading Volume: 🌟🌟
No trading volume is not workable, but pairing a market order with a large trading volume does not provide extra points. Trading volume is a must, but having too much doesn't yield significant benefits. Opinion tends to favor users with smaller capital.
Profit and Loss: 🌟🌟
From my own testing, whether in loss or profit, the scores are quite similar.
Order Time: 🌟🌟🌟
An order is akin to market-making. Predicting market liquidity is similar to the NFT market, which is relatively poor, so order placements are encouraged.
Limit Order: 🌟🌟🌟
Similar to order time. Opinion encourages users to discover prices in order to provide liquidity to the market.
Probability Neutral: 🌟🌟🌟
A market with a 50% probability is more efficient in scoring than a market with a 90% probability. Therefore, one should engage more in neutral probability markets and avoid mindlessly chasing the tail end.
Niche Market: 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
The characteristics of niche markets are that the trading volume is relatively small, usually below 2 million dollars, and the order wall is only a few hundred dollars, at most one or two thousand dollars. Last time I played in such a market, I reduced the cost to 1 cent per dollar (I mentioned this in my previous article). So, engage more in niche markets; this is a strategy for explosive scoring.
#opinion #空投大毛
Is the trading volume of Opinion really important?
I think you can't do without trading volume, but trading volume won't give you extra points.
For example, last week I reduced the cost of a point to 1 dollar through an obscure market. But this account used to have a trading volume of several thousand dollars.
So without trading volume, all the skills are useless. Once you have trading volume, you no longer need to deliberately pursue trading volume.
As for how much trading volume is appropriate? I haven't studied this in detail, but based on my own experience and the previous requirement for the Binance wallet to reach a trading volume of 2000 dollars during the Double Egg event, I think at least 3000 dollars in trading volume is necessary right now.
✳️ Here, I share a market that can accommodate large funds to brush through trading volume with very low costs:
will-the-oklahoma-city-thunder-win-the-2026-nba-finals's Oklahoma City Thunder
Buy the same share of YES at a limit price of 39% on Polymarket, and at a limit price of 59.1% buy the same share of NO on Opinion.
This market can accommodate funds ranging from several thousand to about 10,000 dollars. Moreover, 39% YES + 59.1% NO = less than 100%, indicating that there is arbitrage space in this market.
Feel free to join Opinion through my link and enjoy reduced fees: https://app.opinion.trade/?code=rffOTR
#opinion #空投
I think you can't do without trading volume, but trading volume won't give you extra points.
For example, last week I reduced the cost of a point to 1 dollar through an obscure market. But this account used to have a trading volume of several thousand dollars.
So without trading volume, all the skills are useless. Once you have trading volume, you no longer need to deliberately pursue trading volume.
As for how much trading volume is appropriate? I haven't studied this in detail, but based on my own experience and the previous requirement for the Binance wallet to reach a trading volume of 2000 dollars during the Double Egg event, I think at least 3000 dollars in trading volume is necessary right now.
✳️ Here, I share a market that can accommodate large funds to brush through trading volume with very low costs:
will-the-oklahoma-city-thunder-win-the-2026-nba-finals's Oklahoma City Thunder
Buy the same share of YES at a limit price of 39% on Polymarket, and at a limit price of 59.1% buy the same share of NO on Opinion.
This market can accommodate funds ranging from several thousand to about 10,000 dollars. Moreover, 39% YES + 59.1% NO = less than 100%, indicating that there is arbitrage space in this market.
Feel free to join Opinion through my link and enjoy reduced fees: https://app.opinion.trade/?code=rffOTR
#opinion #空投
Opinion has started distributing points, with a minimum loss of 1 dollar to earn 1 point.
However, the cost of points for most people is still above 20 dollars. I used a method that reduced the cost by 20 times, and it can be replicated. The conclusion is at the end of the text, friends who are short on time can jump directly to the conclusion.
I tested with 4 wallets:
Wallet A placed limit orders for buying and selling, trading in two markets. Each limit order lasted 6-24 hours, with a trading volume of 1250 dollars, resulting in a loss of 6.7 dollars, making the cost per point 11.8 dollars. This should be the normal efficiency of points. Anyone who spends time can keep the cost per point around 10 dollars.
Wallet B only placed orders but had no transactions. So don't just place orders, otherwise you won't earn points. It is recommended that if an order has not been filled after 24 hours, it should be executed at the market price, and then a sell order placed.
Wallet C is similar to Wallet A, but was lucky enough to generate profits, achieving negative costs. However, it can be seen that Wallet C, which made a profit, and Wallet A, which incurred losses, earned points in the same way. This indicates that profit or loss does not particularly enhance point acquisition. It means that whether you lose a lot or earn a lot, the points earned are roughly the same.
Wallet D is the key. Wallet D had a trading volume of only 696 dollars, incurred a loss of 1.7 dollars, but earned 1.48 points. Calculating it out, the cost per point is only 1.1 dollars. This is the wallet with the highest efficiency for points. It can be seen that Wallet D only executed transactions in one market, which is the Super Bowl-Champion-2026 sports market. At that time, the total limit orders for the NO option of Los Angeles R were only a few hundred dollars, and I placed orders that accounted for almost half of that. Therefore, in niche markets with only a few hundred dollars in limit order walls, points can be distributed with a critical hit. This method is friendly for small funds, while large funds actually find it harder to execute orders.
Conclusion:
1️⃣ Limit orders must be executed to earn points, otherwise no points are given.
2️⃣ Participate more in niche markets with only a few hundred dollars in limit order walls; this will lead to critical point distribution.
3️⃣ Combining limit orders with execution is still a good way to acquire points at low cost.
4️⃣ It's best to hold for a few hours after execution, do not sell immediately.
5️⃣ Profit or loss has little impact on the efficiency of point acquisition.
Opinion registration: https://app.opinion.trade/?code=rffOTR, you are welcome to participate in Opinion through my link and enjoy fee reductions.
#opinion #撸毛攻略
However, the cost of points for most people is still above 20 dollars. I used a method that reduced the cost by 20 times, and it can be replicated. The conclusion is at the end of the text, friends who are short on time can jump directly to the conclusion.
I tested with 4 wallets:
Wallet A placed limit orders for buying and selling, trading in two markets. Each limit order lasted 6-24 hours, with a trading volume of 1250 dollars, resulting in a loss of 6.7 dollars, making the cost per point 11.8 dollars. This should be the normal efficiency of points. Anyone who spends time can keep the cost per point around 10 dollars.
Wallet B only placed orders but had no transactions. So don't just place orders, otherwise you won't earn points. It is recommended that if an order has not been filled after 24 hours, it should be executed at the market price, and then a sell order placed.
Wallet C is similar to Wallet A, but was lucky enough to generate profits, achieving negative costs. However, it can be seen that Wallet C, which made a profit, and Wallet A, which incurred losses, earned points in the same way. This indicates that profit or loss does not particularly enhance point acquisition. It means that whether you lose a lot or earn a lot, the points earned are roughly the same.
Wallet D is the key. Wallet D had a trading volume of only 696 dollars, incurred a loss of 1.7 dollars, but earned 1.48 points. Calculating it out, the cost per point is only 1.1 dollars. This is the wallet with the highest efficiency for points. It can be seen that Wallet D only executed transactions in one market, which is the Super Bowl-Champion-2026 sports market. At that time, the total limit orders for the NO option of Los Angeles R were only a few hundred dollars, and I placed orders that accounted for almost half of that. Therefore, in niche markets with only a few hundred dollars in limit order walls, points can be distributed with a critical hit. This method is friendly for small funds, while large funds actually find it harder to execute orders.
Conclusion:
1️⃣ Limit orders must be executed to earn points, otherwise no points are given.
2️⃣ Participate more in niche markets with only a few hundred dollars in limit order walls; this will lead to critical point distribution.
3️⃣ Combining limit orders with execution is still a good way to acquire points at low cost.
4️⃣ It's best to hold for a few hours after execution, do not sell immediately.
5️⃣ Profit or loss has little impact on the efficiency of point acquisition.
Opinion registration: https://app.opinion.trade/?code=rffOTR, you are welcome to participate in Opinion through my link and enjoy fee reductions.
#opinion #撸毛攻略
Mainstream Giants vs Binance Dark Horses in Prediction Markets, Who is Leading
In the previous article, we introduced the essence of prediction markets, the turning point in 2025, the dual-core structure of Kalshi and Polymarket, and the potential structural changes that may occur in 2026.
This article summarizes several popular platforms with currently high trading volumes and user activity, including mainstream platforms and Binance-related projects. The data comes from Dune Analytics, official platform websites, and public reports, as of January 2026.
If you are interested in the actual operation of these platforms, user experience, or point mechanisms, here is a compilation of relevant information that may provide you with some reference.
Recent news across the internet shows that the prediction market continues to grow at the beginning of 2026. The highest daily trading volume recorded was $701.7 million, with Kalshi contributing $465.9 million, and platforms like Polymarket and Opinion Labs contributing approximately $100 million in total. The weekly trading volume ranged from $500 million to $557 million. Kalshi mentioned an annualized trading volume reaching $10 billion, which is an estimated figure based on recent weekly data; the actual cumulative trading volume for 2025 is approximately $23.8 billion. No public data confirms that daily trading volume reached $10 billion, and this figure is more likely an annualized estimate or a prediction of the total market size.
This article summarizes several popular platforms with currently high trading volumes and user activity, including mainstream platforms and Binance-related projects. The data comes from Dune Analytics, official platform websites, and public reports, as of January 2026.
If you are interested in the actual operation of these platforms, user experience, or point mechanisms, here is a compilation of relevant information that may provide you with some reference.
Recent news across the internet shows that the prediction market continues to grow at the beginning of 2026. The highest daily trading volume recorded was $701.7 million, with Kalshi contributing $465.9 million, and platforms like Polymarket and Opinion Labs contributing approximately $100 million in total. The weekly trading volume ranged from $500 million to $557 million. Kalshi mentioned an annualized trading volume reaching $10 billion, which is an estimated figure based on recent weekly data; the actual cumulative trading volume for 2025 is approximately $23.8 billion. No public data confirms that daily trading volume reached $10 billion, and this figure is more likely an annualized estimate or a prediction of the total market size.
Opinion has started distributing points, with a minimum loss of 1 dollar to earn 1 point.
However, the cost of points for most people is still above 20 dollars. I used a method that reduced the cost by 20 times, and it can be replicated. The conclusion is at the end of the text, friends who are short on time can jump directly to the conclusion.
I tested with 4 wallets:
Wallet A placed limit orders for buying and selling, trading in two markets. Each limit order lasted 6-24 hours, with a trading volume of 1250 dollars, resulting in a loss of 6.7 dollars, making the cost per point 11.8 dollars. This should be the normal efficiency of points. Anyone who spends time can keep the cost per point around 10 dollars.
Wallet B only placed orders but had no transactions. So don't just place orders, otherwise you won't earn points. It is recommended that if an order has not been filled after 24 hours, it should be executed at the market price, and then a sell order placed.
Wallet C is similar to Wallet A, but was lucky enough to generate profits, achieving negative costs. However, it can be seen that Wallet C, which made a profit, and Wallet A, which incurred losses, earned points in the same way. This indicates that profit or loss does not particularly enhance point acquisition. It means that whether you lose a lot or earn a lot, the points earned are roughly the same.
Wallet D is the key. Wallet D had a trading volume of only 696 dollars, incurred a loss of 1.7 dollars, but earned 1.48 points. Calculating it out, the cost per point is only 1.1 dollars. This is the wallet with the highest efficiency for points. It can be seen that Wallet D only executed transactions in one market, which is the Super Bowl-Champion-2026 sports market. At that time, the total limit orders for the NO option of Los Angeles R were only a few hundred dollars, and I placed orders that accounted for almost half of that. Therefore, in niche markets with only a few hundred dollars in limit order walls, points can be distributed with a critical hit. This method is friendly for small funds, while large funds actually find it harder to execute orders.
Conclusion:
1️⃣ Limit orders must be executed to earn points, otherwise no points are given.
2️⃣ Participate more in niche markets with only a few hundred dollars in limit order walls; this will lead to critical point distribution.
3️⃣ Combining limit orders with execution is still a good way to acquire points at low cost.
4️⃣ It's best to hold for a few hours after execution, do not sell immediately.
5️⃣ Profit or loss has little impact on the efficiency of point acquisition.
Opinion registration: https://app.opinion.trade/?code=rffOTR, you are welcome to participate in Opinion through my link and enjoy fee reductions.
#opinion #撸毛攻略
However, the cost of points for most people is still above 20 dollars. I used a method that reduced the cost by 20 times, and it can be replicated. The conclusion is at the end of the text, friends who are short on time can jump directly to the conclusion.
I tested with 4 wallets:
Wallet A placed limit orders for buying and selling, trading in two markets. Each limit order lasted 6-24 hours, with a trading volume of 1250 dollars, resulting in a loss of 6.7 dollars, making the cost per point 11.8 dollars. This should be the normal efficiency of points. Anyone who spends time can keep the cost per point around 10 dollars.
Wallet B only placed orders but had no transactions. So don't just place orders, otherwise you won't earn points. It is recommended that if an order has not been filled after 24 hours, it should be executed at the market price, and then a sell order placed.
Wallet C is similar to Wallet A, but was lucky enough to generate profits, achieving negative costs. However, it can be seen that Wallet C, which made a profit, and Wallet A, which incurred losses, earned points in the same way. This indicates that profit or loss does not particularly enhance point acquisition. It means that whether you lose a lot or earn a lot, the points earned are roughly the same.
Wallet D is the key. Wallet D had a trading volume of only 696 dollars, incurred a loss of 1.7 dollars, but earned 1.48 points. Calculating it out, the cost per point is only 1.1 dollars. This is the wallet with the highest efficiency for points. It can be seen that Wallet D only executed transactions in one market, which is the Super Bowl-Champion-2026 sports market. At that time, the total limit orders for the NO option of Los Angeles R were only a few hundred dollars, and I placed orders that accounted for almost half of that. Therefore, in niche markets with only a few hundred dollars in limit order walls, points can be distributed with a critical hit. This method is friendly for small funds, while large funds actually find it harder to execute orders.
Conclusion:
1️⃣ Limit orders must be executed to earn points, otherwise no points are given.
2️⃣ Participate more in niche markets with only a few hundred dollars in limit order walls; this will lead to critical point distribution.
3️⃣ Combining limit orders with execution is still a good way to acquire points at low cost.
4️⃣ It's best to hold for a few hours after execution, do not sell immediately.
5️⃣ Profit or loss has little impact on the efficiency of point acquisition.
Opinion registration: https://app.opinion.trade/?code=rffOTR, you are welcome to participate in Opinion through my link and enjoy fee reductions.
#opinion #撸毛攻略
$SOL my heart has more and more active users 👀
The network is alive, as seen in the data. The price usually catches up later.
Bullish signal or not? 💬
#SOL #Blockchain #Opinion
The network is alive, as seen in the data. The price usually catches up later.
Bullish signal or not? 💬
#SOL #Blockchain #Opinion
$BTC on the weekly chart looks solid 🔍
The trend is still upward. Emotions are low.
Is this a good moment or a trap? 💬
#BTC #CryptoMarket #Opinion
The trend is still upward. Emotions are low.
Is this a good moment or a trap? 💬
#BTC #CryptoMarket #Opinion
Defending personal #opinion against #criticism 🤪😅
Source: Binance News / #BitDegree / Coinmarketcap
"Place a trade with us via this post mentioned coin's & do support to reach maximum audience by follow, like, comment, share, repost, more such informative content ahead"
#MEME #Justforfun
Source: Binance News / #BitDegree / Coinmarketcap
"Place a trade with us via this post mentioned coin's & do support to reach maximum audience by follow, like, comment, share, repost, more such informative content ahead"
#MEME #Justforfun
Today I was devastated in opinion, be careful when choosing markets with too large a spread
Pay attention, in the Yes bids column, 7 goes to 5, and 5 goes to 3—this cliff-like spread is the real killer
I have a lot of Yes shares, but unfortunately, I can't sell them. Only at 3 is there over 6,000 dollars in settlement funds.
It's like I took over at the mountain top, and those at the bottom said, no problem, just jump down—your health drops by half
#opinion
Pay attention, in the Yes bids column, 7 goes to 5, and 5 goes to 3—this cliff-like spread is the real killer
I have a lot of Yes shares, but unfortunately, I can't sell them. Only at 3 is there over 6,000 dollars in settlement funds.
It's like I took over at the mountain top, and those at the bottom said, no problem, just jump down—your health drops by half
#opinion
🏆🏆🏆
#onchain #opinion
🚀 CryptoQuant: “The second half of the bull market is ahead!”
- "Capital inflows from small whales and retail investors began to grow."
₿If you find this information helpful, consider supporting me through the Binance Tipping feature. Your generosity helps me provide quality content.🙏🏾$BTC $ETH $BNB
#onchain #opinion
🚀 CryptoQuant: “The second half of the bull market is ahead!”
- "Capital inflows from small whales and retail investors began to grow."
₿If you find this information helpful, consider supporting me through the Binance Tipping feature. Your generosity helps me provide quality content.🙏🏾$BTC $ETH $BNB
Are you buying the dip or waiting for lower prices?
Comment your #strategy below 👇⬇️
#downtrend #MarketSentimentToday #opinion #CryptoCharts101
$FLM $TUT $HMSTR
Comment your #strategy below 👇⬇️
#downtrend #MarketSentimentToday #opinion #CryptoCharts101
$FLM $TUT $HMSTR
So I'm little bit confused ,I see a lot of people say
"you can get money and it easy,so you can start on binance without money" did you think that correct and if it réel how to have🤣 I wanna Start but I'm broke irl 🤧,I think I'm not the only one could be interested here😏
#opinion #makemoney $ #helpmeplease T~T
"you can get money and it easy,so you can start on binance without money" did you think that correct and if it réel how to have🤣 I wanna Start but I'm broke irl 🤧,I think I'm not the only one could be interested here😏
#opinion #makemoney $ #helpmeplease T~T
$BEAMX #juegosnft #opinion
The success of the Beamx game development team, in my opinion, is the game Rumble Arcade. It is fun and addictive, its development is going very well and they have been adding languages to expand their potential player base. The gameplay is good and quite intuitive, plus the complexity as you progress is interesting because it makes you think of new strategies to defeat your opponents. The rewards and contests are kept at a good level. Overall, it is a good game and it helps me as an investor and holder of $BEAMX to feel safe and calm for having made a good investment in this project. In short, let's have some fun for a while 😚
The success of the Beamx game development team, in my opinion, is the game Rumble Arcade. It is fun and addictive, its development is going very well and they have been adding languages to expand their potential player base. The gameplay is good and quite intuitive, plus the complexity as you progress is interesting because it makes you think of new strategies to defeat your opponents. The rewards and contests are kept at a good level. Overall, it is a good game and it helps me as an investor and holder of $BEAMX to feel safe and calm for having made a good investment in this project. In short, let's have some fun for a while 😚
Login to explore more contents