🔥【Vitalik's New Proposal Sparks Controversy: A Creator Token Revolution or 'Utopian Governance'?】
Vitalik has recently taken action again, targeting the creator token ecosystem! He believes the current issue is not about incentivizing creation but about filtering quality content. The solution? — Curatorial DAOs leading + prediction market mechanisms, allowing users to bet on which creators will be 'selected' by the DAO, thereby promoting the rise of truly valuable content.
However, industry bigwigs have had polarized reactions:
✅ RedStone co-founder supports: The prediction market stimulates 'informed discovery', encouraging everyone to focus on quality rather than traffic;
⚠️ Umia's head douses the enthusiasm: There is a lack of off-chain execution mechanisms, making it hard to ensure long-term consistency for creators;
❌ Superset's CEO directly questions: Can DAOs really be good 'creative judges'? Should art be tokenized?
💎 To summarize, Vitalik's vision attempts to reconstruct the creator economy with decentralized governance + market games, but the core challenge still lies in the governance efficiency of DAOs and human dynamics. Whether it can be realized in the future depends on the design of mechanisms and whether the community can form a genuine consensus.
📈 If realized, this could be not only a turning point for the creator economy but also a key experiment in DAO governance models. Do you support this direction? Let's chat in the comments!
