The company Anthropic and the US Department of Defense have encountered serious disagreements regarding a contract worth up to $200 million for the use of the AI model Claude for military purposes. Negotiations have stalled due to fundamental differences in approaches to the application of artificial intelligence (AI).
Anthropic insists on strict restrictions that prohibit using their AI for autonomous targeting of weapons and internal surveillance of American citizens. The company demands mandatory human oversight over all operations and involvement of its specialists in model tuning.
Pentagon Position
The Department of Defense opposes additional corporate restrictions, believing that the use of AI should be regulated exclusively by federal legislation in the U.S. In the military's opinion, independent restrictions from technology companies could seriously hinder the work of government agencies.
Particular concern for the Pentagon is caused by potential obstacles for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Anthropic's restrictions could significantly complicate the operations of these agencies in the area of national security.
Corporate Ethics vs. Government Interests
Anthropic justifies its position with concerns about potential abuses of artificial intelligence technology. The company insists that human oversight must remain an integral part of any military application of their developments.
This approach reflects a broader discussion in the technology industry about the balance between innovation and ethical principles. Many companies working with AI face the dilemma of how to cooperate with government structures without violating their own moral standards.
History of the Agreement
The contract between Anthropic and the Pentagon was first announced in July 2025. The two-year agreement for $200 million provided for prototyping and cooperation in the field of national security.
However, since the announcement, the company has not provided updates on the progress of the negotiations. The current conflict has become the first public information about problems in implementing the agreements.
Disagreements between Anthropic and the Pentagon reflect fundamental contradictions between corporate ethics and government security needs. The outcome of these negotiations could set a precedent for future agreements between technology companies and military agencies.
AI Opinion
From the perspective of machine data analysis, the conflict between Anthropic and the Pentagon could become a catalyst for the emergence of new players in the military AI market. History shows that the strict ethical positions of large tech companies often open opportunities for less scrupulous startups — just remember how Google withdrew from the Maven project, and other contractors took its place.
The situation demonstrates a fundamental contradiction in the modern AI industry: companies want to be 'ethical', but at the same time are not ready to completely give up profitable contracts. $200 million is a serious amount even for Anthropic, and the company is likely to seek a compromise that formally preserves its reputation but allows it to make money. The only question is how creatively lawyers can interpret the concept of 'ethical restrictions.'
#AI #AImodel #Anthropic #Write2Earn
