tornadocash

In a shocking turn of events in the crypto world, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) has just announced the dissolution of the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team (NCET) and has suspended criminal prosecutions against crypto services such as exchanges, coin mixing tools, and cold wallets, unless related to clear crimes such as fraud, rug pulls, or hacks.

This information was disclosed in an internal memo sent to DOJ employees on Monday evening, signed by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. On Tuesday morning, Amanda Tuminelli, the executive director of the DeFi Education Fund advocacy group, publicly announced this memo on social media X.

In a significant turn of events, a federal court in Texas has ruled that the U.S. Treasury exceeded its authority in imposing sanctions on Tornado Cash, a decentralized encryption protocol. This is the second time the Treasury has failed to regulate immutable smart contracts.

What Does the Court Say?

The ruling confirms that the immutable smart contracts of #TornadoCash cannot be considered "property" under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). According to the court:

Yesterday, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas lifted sanctions against Tornado Cash, a protocol for mixing cryptocurrencies that were imposed by the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). This decision has become an important event for the crypto industry and raises many questions about the future of privacy technologies.
The history of sanctions
In August 2022, Tornado Cash was included in the OFAC sanctions list due to allegations of facilitating illegal transactions worth more than $455 million related to the North Korean Lazarus Group. These actions caused a wide response: developers, including Alexey Pertsev, were arrested, and the crypto community began to talk about where the line between innovation and compliance with the law lies.
Why is the decision important?
The court ruled that OFAC's actions may have exceeded their authority. The plaintiffs, consisting of Tornado Cash users, argued that immutable smart contracts are not "proprietary" in accordance with the law, and their blocking is contrary to the law.
In addition, they emphasized that blockchain is transparent by nature, and tools such as Tornado Cash perform legitimate functions to protect user privacy.
The Future of Privacy in Cryptocurrencies
This victory raises the question of how to regulate privacy-preserving technologies. Some, like Matthew Niemerg of Aleph Zero, believe that innovation and privacy must go hand in hand with meeting legal requirements. However, there are still many unresolved issues: for example, the responsibility of developers for using their technologies.
Alexey Pertsev is still in custody, despite the fact that Tornado Cash is a decentralized protocol that he did not directly manage. This case raises the question of how much personal responsibility can be applied to the creators of such technologies.
What does this mean for the cryptocurrency industry?
The court ruling could set a precedent that points the way to a more balanced regulation where innovation is protected and abuse is prevented. But while the industry is waiting for further development of the Pertsev case and clarification of legislation, the question remains open.:
How do you think it is possible to achieve a balance between privacy protection and security in the crypto industry?
#TornadoCash #cryptocurrency #crypto