A logical question, but let's be realistic without exaggeration 👇
Can AI currencies reach these levels?
The short answer: some are theoretically possible, but not all and not with the same ease.
Let's break it down step by step:
---
🔹 $TAO → 1,000$
A very ambitious goal.
It can only reach this if:
There has been a huge actual reliance on the network
A very large liquidity flow
Real demand preceded speculation
Maybe in the very long term, but currently high optimism.
---
🔹 $ICP → 1,000$
True, it reached high levels before, but:
The market has changed.
The competition is stronger.
Needs real usage growth, not just a return to the past.
It's difficult, but not impossible if the scene changes completely.
---
🔹 $RENDER → 15$
This is one of the closest goals to logic:
A project with actual use (GPU + AI + Rendering)
Demand might increase with the expansion of artificial intelligence.
It remains a possible goal but needs momentum and continuity.
---
🔹 $NEAR → 12$
A strong project with excellent infrastructure:
Application expansion
Increase in users
Liquidity flow into L1
A goal that can be achieved if the overall market supports it.
---
🔹 $FET → 5$
Among the projects with a clear AI story:
AI Agents
Potential uses outside of crypto
Possible, provided there is real reliance, not just a wave.
---
🧠 Summary
Not every AI coin = automatic success.
The true value > the hype
The higher the price grows, the more liquidity and reliance I need.
Some goals are relatively realistic.
And some are overly ambitious for the moment.
💬 My personal opinion: closest to logic: RENDER – NEAR – FET
The hardest: TAO – ICP
What do you think? Which target seems reasonable and which one is exaggerated? 🤔📊#TrumpCancelsEUTariffThreat #WEFDavos2026 #GoldSilverAtRecordHighs #FOMCWatch #BinanceHODLerMorpho
