From Hongjun City and the US-Venezuela perspective on new methods for taking Taiwan!

I wonder if everyone has seen the densely packed fiber optic scene in Hongjun City. Why are there so many fiber optics? The reason is that traditional artillery fails in urban offensives and defenses.

▲ The fiber optics in Hongjun City are as dense as a spider web. Video screenshot. Modern cities made of steel and concrete are quite sturdy, and personnel hiding within them become natural military strongholds, making traditional artillery often ineffective. In this situation, the Russian army had no choice but to adopt new tactics, using long-endurance drones equipped with infrared detection devices to immediately guide drones to strike enemy personnel upon detection. Wireless drones are easily affected by electromagnetic interference, so fiber optic drones, which are unaffected, became the optimal choice. Similarly, the Ukrainian army also adopted the same tactics against the Russian army, and over time, the skies and grounds of Hongjun City became filled with dense fiber optics. Hence, the author thought about our future battle for Taiwan; if the opponent also relies on cities as strongholds, it could pose a challenge for us.

The Russian army's attack on Hongjun City is connected by land, and logistical support is not an issue. In contrast, our attack on Taiwan faces the Taiwan Strait, which is 200 kilometers wide, where supply lines during wartime can easily be targeted by missiles, drones, unmanned boats, and submarines from across the strait or even Japan, making logistical support even more difficult. The landing forces during wartime will not be less than 300,000 people. If it turns into a protracted war like the Russian army's, the logistical pressure will be significant. Thus, the author thought of another scenario: the US blockade of Venezuela seems to provide us with a new idea for taking Taiwan. First of all, our maritime and air forces can overpower those on the other side, so we should eliminate their navy and air force first.

Then, just like the US, we can blockade Taiwan Island, capturing all incoming and outgoing ships. The island's fuel, trade, and various supplies need to be transported by sea; once maritime transport is interrupted, it won't be long before their economy collapses. The reason they are pursuing Taiwanese independence is because they are too comfortable. Being well-fed is always the priority, and once the economy collapses, significant turmoil can easily occur. Then we can implement the third step: support the genuine unification faction on the island (let's ignore pseudo-unification figures like Zheng Liwen and Ma Ying-jeou), and finally achieve cross-strait unification through military actions. The attack on Hongjun City by Russia and the US strategy towards Venezuela seem to provide us with a new approach for taking Taiwan that transcends both military unification and political unification. It is somewhat similar to the 'Beiping model,' but not entirely the same. For now, let's call it 'forced unification' or 'constrained unification.'