uscrypto

$BTC The UK High Court has begun addressing complex procedural issues in a major civil recovery case involving Bitcoin assets linked to convicted fraudster Zhimin Qian, highlighting growing legal challenges in large-scale cryptocurrency restitution cases. The court’s focus has centered on how thousands of victims — most of them based in China — should be represented in proceedings involving one of the largest Bitcoin seizures in UK history.
The case follows Qian’s conviction for money laundering after authorities uncovered that proceeds from a vast investment fraud in China were converted into Bitcoin and later held in the United Kingdom. The fraud, carried out between 2014 and 2017, is believed to have affected more than 100,000 victims. UK law enforcement agencies seized tens of thousands of Bitcoin linked to the scheme, with the value of the assets having risen dramatically since the original crimes were committed.
At a recent procedural hearing, the High Court did not rule on ownership or distribution of the seized Bitcoin. Instead, Judge Turner raised concerns over the increasing number of law firms seeking to represent different groups of victims. The court warned that allowing multiple fragmented legal teams to participate could result in a “proliferation of representation,” complicating proceedings and undermining efficient case management.
The victims’ claims are being pursued under provisions of the Proceeds of Crime Act, which allow individuals to seek civil recovery of property obtained through criminal conduct. While the law provides a route for compensation, the sheer scale of the case — involving thousands of claimants across jurisdictions — presents unprecedented logistical and legal challenges.
Adding further complexity is a parallel bankruptcy process involving Blue Sky Grid Company, an entity linked to the broader fraud. The court acknowledged that outcomes in the bankruptcy proceedings could affect how recovered assets are distributed, raising questions about coordination between different legal processes.
The High Court is expected to use upcoming hearings to determine whether victim representation should be consolidated or coordinated under a smaller number of legal teams. Such a move would aim to streamline proceedings while preserving the rights of victims to be heard fairly and effectively.
Further hearings scheduled for February are anticipated to clarify procedural arrangements and establish a framework for moving toward substantive decisions on asset recovery. Legal observers note that the case could set an important precedent for how courts handle mass-victim cryptocurrency recovery, particularly as digital assets become increasingly central to global financial crime.
As authorities, courts, and victims await the next phase, the proceedings underscore the growing intersection between traditional legal systems and the evolving realities of crypto-related crime — where questions of jurisdiction, representation, and asset valuation remain far from settled.

🔹 Former U.S. President Donald Trump stated at the World Economic Forum (Davos) that his goal is to make America the “Crypto Capital of the World.”
🔹 According to Trump, Congress is working on fast-tracking the crypto & Bitcoin market structure law — and he wants to sign it soon.
⚠ But the drama is not over yet...
🔸 Progress has been made on the bill in the Senate, but:
Coinbase suddenly withdrew support
The Senate Banking Committee postponed the hearing at the last moment
💥 What is the fight about? 👉 Stablecoin rewards