clarity

Let's start with the timeline, the conception time is the evening of the 29th.
Last night and this morning, Peru experienced a 'late spring chill.'
The Federal Reserve remained still at the policy meeting, and old Powell shattered the market's liquidity fantasy with a cold 'no rate cut,' causing a sharp drop.
Panic spreads, longs are liquidated.
But as an investor, now is definitely not the time to wail.
If you only focus on the Federal Reserve's expression, you will only see the 'past'; the real 'future' is hidden in the Senate on the evening of the 29th and the White House next Monday.
In this 'impossible triangle' composed of central bank tightening, legislative hurdles, and administrative games, how should we find gaps for survival and profit?

The White House is convening executives from the banking and crypto sectors to address key disputes in the stalled CLARITY Act, focusing on stablecoin regulations and yields.

White House intervention: A summit hosted by the administration’s
crypto council is set for February 2 to discuss the delayed market
structure bill. Core dispute: Regulations on stablecoin yields and
rewards, with banks concerned about deposit outflows. Industry hopes:
The meeting could pave the way for compromise and advance bipartisan
legislation. The White House is taking a…

#Clarity
Read more:
cryptopress.site/crypto/white-house-to-host-crypto-and-banking-summit-amid-stalled-market-structure-bill/

According to aggregated data, the 25 largest banks in the US have all researched or prepared products related to Bitcoin, including:

Custody of BTC
Investment / derivatives products
Services for institutional clients
👉 However, the majority has not yet officially implemented.
⏳ Main reason: waiting for the CLARITY Bill
Banks are said to be waiting for the CLARITY Bill to be passed, in order to:
Clarify the legal framework for crypto
Identify the regulatory boundaries between SEC & CFTC

📅 January 26
Just when it seemed the United States was days away from passing the most important law in cryptocurrency regulatory history, bipartisan negotiations in the Senate unexpectedly broke down. Now, racing against the clock and before a crucial hearing this week, Democratic advisors say they are still willing to return to the negotiating table.

📖Since November, the team of Republican Senator John Boozman, chairman of the Agriculture Committee, worked in close coordination with Democratic lawmakers to draft a bill with bipartisan language outlining how regulatory functions would be divided between the SEC and the CFTC, as well as establishing disclosure requirements for the cryptocurrency market.
For weeks, according to the Democratic advisor himself, they met “with every possible stakeholder, from nine to five,” refining a document they considered an example of cooperation in Washington.
But upon returning from the year-end recess, the Democrats were met with a surprise: the Republican team had rewritten the text without them and planned to bring it to a vote on January 15.
This abrupt change shattered the dynamic of trust. Although the Agriculture Committee is seen as more collaborative than the Banking Committee, the new draft was released last week without Democratic support. Some lawmakers introduced amendments, including one related to the Trump family's crypto interests, but the lead Democratic negotiators refused to participate in the process.
Even so, they maintain that an agreement is “very close” and that they only need to return to the previous bipartisan path to finalize it before the vote scheduled for this Thursday.
Meanwhile, pressure is mounting from the White House. Presidential advisors have insisted that the bill must be passed soon to avoid losing the political momentum favoring cryptocurrencies. Analysts in Washington warn that, without this legislation, the US crypto market will continue to operate with a “structural risk premium” due to the lack of regulatory clarity.

Topic Opinion:
The most delicate issue is not that the bill will be delayed, but that trust will be broken among the teams that have been building something historic. This law needs to be bipartisan to have legitimacy and durability. If a vote is forced without consensus, the result could be a fragile, easily challenged, and politically vulnerable law. And that would be worse than having no law at all.
💬 Do you think this crypto bill should pass even if it's not bipartisan?

Leave your comment...
#BTC #CryptoRegulationBattle #Clarity #bitcoin #CryptoNews $BTC

The U.S. Senate is set to vote today on a major crypto market structure bill, advancing long-awaited legislation aimed at clarifying how digital assets are regulated.

What the bill would do:

• Establish clear regulatory roles - grants the Commodity Futures Trading Commission expanded authority over digital commodities and spot crypto markets, reducing uncertainty around jurisdiction.

• Define asset classifications - codifies when a digital asset is a commodity or security, helping eliminate “regulation by enforcement.”

• Increase market oversight - requires exchanges, brokers, and dealers handling digital commodities to register and meet standard trading rules, improving transparency and reducing manipulation risks.

• Split regulatory responsibilities - assigns spot market and commodity oversight primarily to the CFTC while leaving securities enforcement and certain transactional rules under the Securities and Exchange Commission when appropriate.

Why it matters:

This bill - building on the Clarity Act framework passed by the House - aims to provide long-sought legal clarity and stability for crypto markets, potentially boosting investor confidence and reducing manipulation, fragmentation, and enforcement uncertainty that have plagued the industry.

$BTC
$BNB
#Clarity