CoinGape Media

Dogecoin price forecasting is also under strain with the price of DOGE trading around a significant demand zone within a broader descending structure. Recent price action indicates structural ineptitude and not the #volatility in the short run. 
This setup coincides with 21Shares launching its spot Dogecoin ETF on NASDAQ, introducing regulated exposure to DOGE. The point is, does this catalyst change the price structure that was there before or does it merely challenge the strength of the structure?
How the 21Shares ETF factors into the Dogecoin price prediction
Dogecoin price prediction gained fresh context after 21Shares announced thelaunch of its spot DOGE ETF, ticker TDOG, providing 1:1 exposure through a regulated exchange-traded structure. The product is aimed at investors who are attracted to the traditional access to the brokerage, there will be fewer needs to use crypto wallets and exchanges. 
This move places Dogecoin among top meme coins receiving institutional-grade access, expanding its market reach without directly forcing spot demand.
The DOGE price action after the announcement was however tame instead of growing thus showing that structure still drives price. The ETF approval was already in circulation even prior to launch and this gave market participants time to position beforehand. 
Accordingly, price did not exhibit impulsive continuation, which supports the idea that only accessibility does not supersede trend dynamics. For Dogecoin price prediction, this confirms the ETF as a structural enhancement rather than an immediate directional trigger, shaping the future DOGE price outlook around confirmation instead of expectation.
Price Action Analysis and Prediction
At the time of press DOGE market value sits at $0.124, just above a well-defined demand zone. #Dogecoin price prediction remains guided by a descending channel that has shaped price action since early September. 
Under this framework, $DOGE price has just stabilized at an average of $0.11734, whereby earlier on the buyers have intervened to slow the fall. Such reaction validates the level as demand demand, but has yet to modify the overall channel structure.
The rebound from this demand zone attempted to extend higher but stalled at the $0.1566 supply zone earlier this month. The #sellers do not act impulsively, that pullback reveals that they are permanent at set overhead resistance. 
DOGE/USDT 1D Chart (Source: TradingView
The price has not yet maintained an acceptance above the 50 EMA at approximately $0.13399, which continues to keep DOGE in the bottom half of the channel and restricts the possibility of following through on upside. This interplay is the reason why the rebounds are fading away and not growing.
For Dogecoin price prediction, the structure presents a clear conditional path. In case DOGE price recovers and holds above the 50 EMA near the price of about $0.13399, the price would be poised to take another attempt to break the key supply zone. 
A decisive move above that zone would allow Dogecoin to reclaim the $0.200 level, last tested in October. If price fails to hold the $0.11734 support level, downside continuation within the channel would remain the prevailing outcome, defining the future DOGE price outlook.
Conclusion
Dogecoin price prediction remains governed by structure rather than narrative expansion. The introduction of the ETF reinforces the long-run position but has not changed the trend control. The prevailing trend #supports consolidation in the descending channel unless DOGE price recovers key dynamic resistance. Failure to hold $0.11734 would reinforce continuation lower, while sustained acceptance above supply would reset the outlook.

President Donald #Trump is suing JPMorgan Chase and Co. and  CEO Jamie Dimon for at least $5 billion in damages. He is accusing the bank of illegally terminating his accounts because of political reasons.
The complaint was filed on Thursday in Miami-Dade County. It is the most publicized legal splash so far in Trump’s revitalized efforts to stop what he termed politically-motivated attempts by large American #financial institutions to debank him.
Trump Cites Political Reasons For JPMorgan’s Debanking
In a filing cited in a Bloomberg report, Trump asserted that JPMorgan suddenly halted its banking services to him, his companies, and other entities associated with him without prior notice. The claims in the lawsuit include trade libel, breach of the implied covenant of good faith, and violation of Florida’s Deceptive #Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA).
The filing is happening a few days after a Coingape report stated that Trump would sue JPMorgan in weeks for the same reason. The legal team of Trump claimed that the decision would cause major financial and reputational damage.
The court document says JPMorgan shut down Trump-related accounts approximately seven weeks following the January 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol riot.
Trump also claimed that the bank did not do so because of risk exposure, but because it was best not to associate with him at that time due to his political ideology, which was deemed conservative.
The filing also alleged that #JPMorgan blacklisted Trump, the Trump Organization, and his family members. Thus, this denied them wealth management services.
JPMorgan Rejects Claims But Faces Scrutiny
JPMorgan has strongly dismissed the charges. In a quote from the Bloomberg article, the bank stated that it does not shut accounts based on political or religious grounds.
The banking giant claimed that it can sometimes terminate accounts due to legal, regulatory, or compliance risks. However, it asserted that, in many cases, changing regulatory expectations prompt a bank to make such a decision. It is worth noting that JPMorgan has also faced allegations of debanking #crypto stakeholders.
Senator Lummis once called out JPMorgan for allegedly debanking Bitcoin advocate Jack Mallers. Meanwhile, Tyler Winklevoss, Gemini’s co-founder, claimed that JPMorgan Chase halted their onboarding process.
The legal filing that Trump has submitted makes reference to Florida laws. These forbid the termination of any customer account by a financial institution on the basis of political opinions or affiliations.

#Bitcoin (BTC) dropped below the key $90,000 support zone and traded near $89,588 at the time of writing. The decline followed last week’s brief bullish breakout attempt. On the other hand, gold has reached an all-time high of over $4,900 per ounce at the time of writing. This development further underscores the difference between the two assets, which are commonly equated as stores of value. 
Why Bitcoin Isn’t Rallying With Gold
In an X post, analyst Lancaster. $ETH pointed out the difference in the current price action between these two assets. He claimed that both assets can be classified as gold narratives, but only one is setting record Gold prices at all-time highs. He argued about what investors learn in times of macro uncertainty.
Gold, according to the analyst, is well known and accepted. He claimed that many participants are still learning about Bitcoin. The presence of that gap, he contended, is capable of stimulating quicker selling in case of the spread of fear.
Gold has defensive capabilities in uncertain cycles, owing to its multi-century reputation. Bitcoin, on the other hand, has not been around for very long and is deeply narrative-driven. The analyst claimed that the idea is not coming from failure, but from a developing concept.
Comfort and clarity are likely to dominate investor behavior. The analyst stated that people sell what they fear and buy what they know. He said that Bitcoin was in its trust-building phase, which was not structurally invalid.
CoinGape recently reported how gold and silver were rallying under the threat of Trump tariffs on imports from eight European nations. While gold has rallied to new highs, $BTC has erased most of its yearly gains after the tariff threat.
Bonds and Dollar Set the Next BTC Move?
Merlijn The Trader wrote an X post that the old #world still controls the capital flows in this stage. Silver and gold have been on the rise, whereas Bitcoin has lagged.
His opinion implied that the arrangement would be modified once the present macro shock subsides. Bond stress, he said, may impose liquidity relief, yield depression, and currency debasement. Those circumstances were characterized as the standard ground in the following crypto boom. Merlijn remarked that such drivers usually drive market rotations first before they materialize in crypto prices.
However, analyst Jacob King contended in an X post that money is leaving speculative assets and going into metals. King alleged that Bitcoin lacks clear utility in the current climate. He opined that it does not safeguard investors against tariff shocks, currency instability, or broader economic stress. King described the move as capital exiting Bitcoin, not a temporary pause.
The broader macro #environment has also been attributed to gold’s strength. Peter Grant, the vice president and senior metals strategist at Zaner Metals, mentioned geopolitical friction and a weak dollar. Federal Reserve easing expectations for the current year were also cited as a major economic force.
Inflation data are also influencing rate expectations. As CoinGape reported earlier, November U.S. PCE inflation was 2.8% year over year as expected. The month-over-month inflation rate increased 0.2%, in line with predictions.
Core PCE registered comparable results of 2.8% YoY and 0.2% MoM. The consistency of the numbers maintains market focus on when and by how much the Fed will ease. Risk appetite continues to focus on policy expectations of asset classes.

White House #crypto adviser under President Donald Trump, Patrick Witt, urged bipartisan backing for a Senate crypto bill released by the #Agriculture Committee today. The committee is preparing for the January 27 markup in Washington. The appeal followed the release of revised text that emerged after extended #bipartisan talks failed.
Patrick Witt Pushes Bipartisan Backing for Crypto Bill
In an X post, the White House crypto adviser encouraged Democrats on the Senate Agriculture Committee to support the crypto legislation. This came as he noted that the Senate Agriculture market structure text closely resembles the House #CLARITY Act.
CoinGape had reported earlier in the day that the Senate Agriculture Committee released its updated crypto market bill. However, as #Chairman John Boozman revealed, they failed to get bipartisan support for the crypto bill ahead of the January 27 markup. Furthermore, no Democrats have publicly supported it yet. This includes Senator Cory Booker, who led Democratic negotiations for months.
Meanwhile, Witt remarked that the crypto bill was over 80% similar to the House version. That House bill previously gained support from 17 Democrats on the Agriculture Committee.
The White House crypto adviser also said several changes reflected concessions requested by Senator Cory Booker. He added those revisions aimed to broaden bipartisan appeal. He also credited Chairman John Boozman for maintaining transparency during negotiations.
According to Witt, the House CLARITY Act earned backing from nearly 40 percent of House Democrats. He specifically named Representatives Nancy Pelosi, Pete Aguilar, and Ted Lieu. 
Commenting on current developments, crypto journalist Eleanor Terrett noted that Booker’s team has told Politico that he will keep working with Boozman. That leaves open the possibility of a potential bipartisan support. 
Reactions To The Legislation
Chief Legal Officer of the top crypto exchange, Coinbase, Paul Grewal, said in an X post that there is still work to be done following the release of the Senate Agriculture Committee’s crypto bill. However, he remarked that there is a strong foundation here for both Republicans and Democrats to build on.
He further thanked Chairman Boozman for taking a constructive step in response to Trump’s call to make the U.S. the crypto capital of the world. Ji Hun Kim of the Crypto Council for Innovation called the release an important step. 
He cited clearer consumer protections and regulatory clarity. Analyst NekoZ noted that granting the CFTC greater authority could reduce confusion and clarify enforcement. Meanwhile, the founder of the Satoshi Radio Podcast, Bart Mol, criticized the bill’s complexity and predicted delays and loopholes.
It remains to be seen if the crypto will gain bipartisan support during the January 27 markup. On the other hand, it is worth noting that the Senate Banking Committee’s CLARITY Act is facing further setbacks, with the markup of the bill unlikely until late next month.
During his Davos speech yesterday, Trump noted that Congress was currently working on the market structure bill and that he hoped to sign it soon. However, there is no clear timeline for when the crypto bill could reach the president’s desk amid these delays.

France’s #trade minister has reacted to Trump’s threat of tariffs on wine exports from France to the U.S. This came even though the U.S. #President scrapped plans to apply the trade policy against certain EU nations amid the dispute over Greenland.
French Minister Rebuffs Trump tariff threats, Warns of retaliation
According to a Bloomberg report, the French trade minister, Nicolas Forissier, criticized the threat by #Donald Trump to impose heavy tariffs on alcohol exports from the nation of France.
He made it clear that Paris would not think twice about retaliatory action should these policies be put into place. Forissier told Davos that the idea to use tariffs on culturally or economically significant items is, to us, unacceptable.
Trump had threatened to impose a 200% levy on French wine and champagne when President #Macron refused to join his “Board of Peace.” It was later shared that the United States is stepping back from the Trump tariffs plans targeting European nations that were against his goal of acquiring Greenland. However, the French authorities are holding their ground.
“It’s not acceptable to have this kind of weapon, taking some sectors which are very symbolic and important for us as hostage, this is not acceptable and if it was done there would be some responses,” Forissier said.
Before Trump’s partial retreat, France was among the European countries pushing a hard collective response. Forissier conceded that consensus within the EU remains difficult to achieve. Member states are divided on how aggressively to respond to the Trump tariff threats.
EU Trade War Cools, But France Threat Remains
Trade wars between the US and #Europe appeared to ease yesterday. Yesterday, the U.S President announced a delay of the implementation of the imposed duties against some European countries. This was meant to take effect beginning February 1.
Trump made the announcement after holding productive talks with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, according to the president. The news also provided a short-term positive effect on the market, and the cryptocurrency market turned green.
The European Union had suspended its trade agreement, which it had reached with the U.S., due to the recent tariff threats made by Trump.
Although currently in freeze mode, a strong indication was given that if this threat of tariffs manifests itself in reality, the response would be quite strong. The Board for Peace, led by President Trump, has been duly established through an agreement with world leaders.

The price of #bitcoin remains sideways as the uncertainty over US crypto regulation lingers. $BTC price is currently in the range of $90,000, unable to achieve follow-through following recent surges that saw its price peak at stagnation. This is compelled by the recent postponement of the #CLARITY Act by the US Senate, which made traders anxious instead of responsive. For now, the structure of the Bitcoin price indicates balance rather than fear.
Regulatory Delays Keep Bitcoin Price Structure Constrained
The latest delay to the CLARITY Act reinforces an already fragile regulatory backdrop, which continues shaping Bitcoin price behavior through hesitation rather than outright #selling . The market structure bill has once again been delayed by lawmakers, who have switched their attention to housing policy and election issues. The move prolongs uncertainty that has prevailed since January, making it impossible to provide regulatory guidance to #crypto markets.
As a result, institutional participants remain cautious, which keeps Bitcoin price locked in range-bound behavior instead of directional expansion. Regulatory delays reduce incentive for aggressive positioning, therefore limiting follow-through on both rallies and breakdowns. This is a place that promotes liquidity based movement instead of trend development.
In turn, BTC price reflects this delay through repeated tests of range boundaries without structural resolution. The #buyers intervene around the areas of established demand, and the sellers support the overhead resistance in a consistent way. Bitcoin price action will mostly follow structure rather than the narrative-driven catalysts unless lawmakers can provide a clear picture.
Liquidity Wicks Highlight Analyst’s Bearish Tactical Bias
Market analyst Lennart Snyder points to the ongoing conformity of Bitcoin price to bearish structural indicators despite short-lived stability. He observes the continuing lower highs and a significant H4 wick, indicating active liquidity attraction, as opposed to trend reversal. Historically, mean reversion is frequently preceded by large wicks particularly in down-trending structures..
This behavior makes the expert lean slightly bearish, with BTC price continuously attracting liquidity to areas of resistance above $90,600. He points out this level as a possible stop-hunt region and not sustainable breakout region. On the contrary, downside liquidity is close to the imbalance of the $86,200, which is consistent with previous reaction zones.
Although a bullish market is not ruled out, it will demand a robust H4 reclaim above $91,200 on active sessions.. Nonetheless, this situation is less probable because of counter-trend positioning. Therefore, Bitcoin price currently reflects tactical caution rather than directional confidence.

BTC/USDT 4H Chart (Source: TradingView)
Bitcoin Price Structure Reinforces Range Control
Bitcoin price has remained locked in a clearly defined range since mid-November, following the sharp breakdown from the prior macro uptrend. This is a consolidation of approximately between the support of the price of $84,700 and the resistance of the price at $97,100 and the price moves in circles between these levels rather than making directional movements. 
At the time of press, BTC market value sits near $89,900, placing price back toward the lower-middle portion of the range, which reflects balance rather than strength.
This range bound structure is supported by parabolic SAR behavior. The indicator keeps oscillating and going above and below price indicating that it is not under sustained trend control. 
Every SAR flip coincides with the temporary directional efforts that do not last long and ensure that Bitcoin price movement remains on rotational, as opposed to trend following. This recurrent failure to push through proves that neither sellers nor buyers have created structural dominance.
Besides, RSI also adds clarity to the recent price action. After topping out near 70, it turned lower as Bitcoin price slipped back under the $90,000 mark, dragging RSI down to 39. That drop matched price settling deeper into its range, not breaking away from it.
Since then, the RSI has stabilized and is gradually rising again, currently hovering around 44. This rebound keeps the long-term BTC price forecast firmly in range mode, indicating that it is regaining equilibrium rather than preparing for a new trend.
BTC/USD 1D Chart (Source: TradingView)
Summary 
Bitcoin price remains governed by structure, not sentiment, as regulatory delays extend uncertainty. The prevailing result is the furtherance of range behavior as long as the policymakers are passive. From a technical perspective, BTC price stability depends on holding established demand zones, which hence preserve consolidation. 
A breakdown below support would nullify this bias and put control in the hands of sellers. Until then, Bitcoin price reflects disciplined balance but not directional intent. This situation keeps the  BTC price outlook neutral and structurally driven.