$SCR is currently trading around 0.076, showing steady activity with a +1.33% move over the last 24 hours. Price has been moving in a tight range between 0.074 – 0.076, signaling strong consolidation after the recent push up. On the 1H timeframe, repeated bullish candles and defended lows suggest accumulation and pressure building for a directional move.
This kind of sideways compression near the highs often precedes volatility. A clean break with volume can unlock the next leg.
Trade Setup
• Entry Zone: 0.075 – 0.076
• Target 1 🎯: 0.078
• Target 2 🎯: 0.081
• Target 3 🎯: 0.085
• Stop Loss: 0.073
If 0.076 is flipped into support with solid volume, SCR can accelerate into a stronger rally. Failure to hold 0.074 would invalidate the setup, so risk management is key.
#TrumpCancelsEUTariffThreat #USIranMarketImpact
{spot}(SCRUSDT)
$ARPA is trading at 0.01457, up +6.20% in the last 24 hours. After a sharp impulse move toward 0.01625, price has pulled back and is now consolidating above prior support. This kind of pause after expansion often sets the stage for the next leg. On the 1H structure, selling pressure is weakening and buyers are defending the mid-range, hinting at momentum rebuilding rather than distribution.
Trade Setup
• Entry Zone: 0.01430 – 0.01460
• Target 1 🎯: 0.01530 (range reclaim)
• Target 2 🎯: 0.01625 (recent high / breakout test)
• Target 3 🎯: 0.01750 (extension if volume expands)
• Stop Loss: 0.01390 (below structure support)
If ARPA reclaims 0.01530 with solid volume, continuation toward the highs becomes likely. A clean break above 0.01625 can open a stronger trend move, shifting the market from consolidation back into expansion.
#TrumpCancelsEUTariffThreat #GrayscaleBNBETFFiling
{spot}(ARPAUSDT)
$ERA /USDT after a big momentum pop and thinking long. Let’s break it down cleanly, based only on what you shared 👇
What the chart is saying 📈
Momentum
+35% on the day is strong trend acceleration, not a random wick.
24h high ≈ 0.2899, price sitting just under it → classic pressure under resistance.
Volume
ERA vol ≈ 33.6M vs USDT vol ≈ 8.1M
That’s real participation, not thin liquidity — good sign for continuation if structure holds.
Structure (from levels shown)
Clear stair-step up from 0.23 → 0.25 → 0.27 → 0.28
Current zone (~0.289) = decision area, not a free ride.
Long thesis (when it makes sense
#Plasma runs a bug bounty program to identify and address potential security issuess in its own blockchain with a clear emphasis on components tied to its core design:
zero-fee USDT transfers fast finality through BFT consensus and custom gas handling.
The program focuses most closely on areas where vulnerabilities could lead to loss of funds, disrupt liveliness or breaks finality.
This includes the Plasma BFT consensus engine (its Rust-based Fast HotStuff implementation), validator networking and communication, quorum certificate processing, slashing and reward logic, the native paymaster for gas sponsorship, bridge implementations, and any custom changes to the Reeth execution client.@Plasma
Lower-priority but still in scope are elements like RPC endpoints, indexers, account abstraction mechanics, and denial-of-service issues that might reduce performance or throughput without directly compromising user funds.
Rewards scale according to severity. Critical bugs those that could break consensus safety, violate finality, enable paymaster drains, or allow direct fund theft qualify for the highest payouts. Plasma sets these top rewards at competitive levels compared to similar payment oriented layer 1 chains though specific amounts can change over time and are not fixed publicly in detail.
The approach integrates the bounty with other security practices including third-party audits and formal verification efforts. This layered strategy supports ongoing testing by external researchers as part of maintaining reliable stablecoin operations on the chain.$XPL
I see the risk of speculation in any token with a deflationary narrative, and WAL is not immune. If holders treat WAL purely as a scarce asset to hoard, storage usage could become more expensive or unpredictable.
That would weaken its role as a payment token... What balances this is that WAL has recurring demand tied to real consumption. Storage, availability proofs, and node rewards all require continuous flows, not one-time purchases.
In my view, WAL only works long term if it circulates. Hoarding may happen at the margins, but utility demand anchors the system in actual usage rather than belief alone.
@WalrusProtocol $WAL #Walrus
I won’t recommend trading $BTC right now. Weekend market usually slows down, liquidity dries up, and price just chops without clean direction. As you can see, BTC is stuck between key levels and momentum is weak — not the best environment for quality setups.
Instead of forcing trades on Bitcoin, it’s smarter to shift focus to $SOMI and $NOM . These pairs are showing better structure, cleaner moves, and more opportunities compared to BTC’s sideways behavior.
Sometimes the best trade is simply choosing the right market. Patience beats overtrading especially on weekends.
{future}(NOMUSDT)
{future}(SOMIUSDT)
{future}(BTCUSDT)
🚨 GOLD, SILVER, AND METALS LOOK SET TO OPEN HIGHER MONDAY
Former U.S. President Donald Trump made a strong statement on global influence, declaring that China will not control Canada, emphasizing geopolitical tensions that are increasingly shaping markets.
Key takeaway:
• Geopolitical rhetoric is intensifying, creating upward pressure on precious and rare metals.
• Markets are reacting to the clarity and firmness of political signals, which often drive safe-haven demand.
Actionable Insight:
Investors may consider globally listed stocks tied to gold, silver, and rare metals. Watch for potential momentum at the start of the week.
$XAU $XAG $ENSO #GOLD #BREAKING #Write2Earn #TRUMP
{future}(XAUUSDT)
{future}(XAGUSDT)
{spot}(ENSOUSDT)
@Dusk_Foundation There’s a quiet shift happening around Dusk Network, and it has less to do with announcements and more to do with posture. Founded in 2018, Dusk wasn’t built for the noise-heavy phase of crypto. It was built for the moment when blockchain would need to operate inside real financial routines, the kind shaped by meetings, approvals, and long-term accountability.
What makes Dusk stand out now is how deliberately unremarkable it feels. In a board meeting setting, with employees from legal, compliance, product, and engineering around the table, the system doesn’t demand special treatment. Privacy works the way finance expects privacy to work. Sensitive data stays protected, yet proof exists when oversight is required. Auditability doesn’t feel like a concession, it feels like part of the operating environment. That balance is exactly what tokenized real-world assets and compliant DeFi need to move from experiments into dependable tools.
This approach comes with obvious trade-offs. Growth is slower. Design freedom is narrower. There’s less room for improvisation. But in return, Dusk offers something rare in crypto: infrastructure that assumes it will be used repeatedly, reviewed critically, and still expected to hold up years later.
The open questions are no longer about vision, but about follow-through. Will institutions move from cautious pilots into real reliance? Can developers build compelling products inside stricter boundaries? And as regulation continues to evolve unevenly across regions, does DUSK become a durable backbone or a carefully scoped solution?
Dusk isn’t trying to feel exciting. It’s trying to feel dependable. In regulated finance, that shift might matter more than anything else.
#dusk $DUSK